scholarly journals Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis : Dampak Model Pembelajaran Superitem Berbantuan Scaffholding

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-371
Author(s):  
Ahmad Kausar Raya ◽  
Sofyan M Soleh ◽  
Heny Wulandari

This study aims to determine the effect of the use of the super-scaled model of scaffolding on students' mathematical problem solving abilities. The sampling technique used was cluster random sampling with 3 classes namely experimental class 1 (the class was treated with scaffolding assisted superememe learning model), experimental class 2 (superitem learning only) and control class (the conventional treatment class). Hypothesis testing used is anava 1 cell path is not the same. The results of the study found that there were differences in students' mathematical problem solving abilities by using learning models of scaffolding assisted supermarkets. Furthermore, the mathematical problem solving ability of students with the super-intensive learning model assisted by scaffholding is the same as the mathematical problem-solving ability of students using superemit learning models. The mathematical problem solving ability of students with superficial learning models assisted by scaffholding is better than the students' mathematical problem-solving abilities using conventional learning models. Furthermore, the mathematical problem solving ability of students with superemit learning models is the same as the mathematical problem solving ability of students using conventional learning models.

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-446
Author(s):  
Nur Asih ◽  
Sendi Ramdhani

AbstrakTujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui apakah peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA) lebih baik dari pada konvensional, untuk mengetahui sikap kemandirian belajar siswa terhadap pembelajaran matematika menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA), dan untuk mengetahui hambatan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Metode penelitiannya adalah eksperimen kuasi dan desain penelitiannya Nonequivalent control group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI SMA PASUNDAN CIKALONGKULON dengan sampel sebanyak dua kelas. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Kelas XI MIPA-3 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas XI MIPA-1 sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen berupa tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis, angket dan wawancara. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA) lebih baik dari konvensional. Hasil angket siswa kelas XI MIPA-3 memperoleh hasil hampir seluruhnya positif respon siswa terhadap model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA).Kata Kunci: Kemandirian, MEA, Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Increased Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Student Learning Independence Using the Means-End Analysis Learning Model AbstractThe purpose of this research is to find out whether the improvement of students 'mathematical problem-solving abilities using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model is better than conventional learning, to determine the attitudes of students' learning independence towards mathematics learning using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model, and to find out the obstacles of students in solving problems mathematical problem solving abilities. The research method is a quasi-experiment and the research design is Nonequivalent control group design. The population in this study were all students of class XI SMA PASUNDAN CIKALONGKULON with a sample of two classes. The sampling technique uses a purposive sampling technique. Class XI MIPA-3 as an experimental class and class XI MIPA-1 as a control class. The instruments were in the form of tests of mathematical problem-solving abilities, questionnaires, and interviews. Based on the results of data analysis, the improvement of students' mathematical problem-solving abilities using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model is better than conventional. The results of the XI MIPA-3 class questionnaire obtained almost entirely positive student responses to the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model.Keywords: Independence, MEA, Mathematical Problem Solving.


Author(s):  
Leonard Leonard ◽  
Kurnia Khaerul Nisa

Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika merupakan salah satu tujuan pendidikan nasional di Indonesia, tetapi pencapaiannya masih tergolong rendah. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kuasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian posstest-only. Pengambilan sampel pada penelitian ini menggunakan teknik purpose sampling. Sampel penelitian sebanyak 60 peserta didik yang terbagi dalam dua kelas (30 kelas eksperimen dan 30 kelas kontrol). Penelitian ini dilakukan di sekolah SMP N 10 Bekasi dan SMP N 26 Bekasi. Kelas eksperimen menggunakan model pembelajaran teamdengan strategi pembelajaran tugas dan paksa, sedangkan kelas kontrol menggunakan pembelajaran . Data yang terkumpul kemudian dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji beda rata-rata sampel bebas. Hasil analisis data menunjukan bahwa rata-rata nilai peserta didik yang pembelajarannya menggunakan model pembelajaran team assisted individualization dengan strategi tugas dan paksa lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan rata-rata nilai peserta didik yang pembelajarannya menggunakan model pembelajaran langsung. Kata kunci: Model pembelajaran team assisted individualization, Strategi pembelajaran tugas dan paksa, kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika   ABSTRACT This research was conducted to determine the effect of team assisted individualization learning models with task learning strategies and forced to the ability to solve mathematical problems. Mathematical problem solving ability is an ability that belongs to the national education goals, but its achievement is still relatively low. The method used in this study is a quasi-experimental method with a poststest-only research design. Sampling in this study uses purpose sampling technique. The study sample consisted of 60 students divided into two classes (30 experimental classes and 30 control classes). This research was conducted in the school of SMP N 10 Bekasi and SMP N 26 Bekasi. The experimental class uses team individualization learning models with task and forced learning strategies, while the control class uses direct learning. The collected data is then analyzed using independent sample t-test. The results of data analysis showed that the average value of students who learned using the team assisted individualization learning model with higher task and forced strategies compared to the average value of students who learned using direct learning models. Keywords: Team assisted individualization learning model, task and forced learning strategies, mathematical problem solving skills                


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-166
Author(s):  
Syahfitri Purnama ◽  
Muawanah Muawanah ◽  
Tista Maya Surati ◽  
Rika Septianingsih

A learning can run well supported by an appropriate learning model. In this study the Search Solve Create Share (SSCS) and Think Pair Share (TPS) learning models are used. This research is a quantitative study using t test. The purpose of this study is to study whether there are differences between the SSCS learning model and the TPS learning model on students' mathematical problem solving abilities. This research is a quantitative study with a research design. Random Design Group Pretest-Posttest Group. The results of this study obtained a P-value smaller than the significance level. Hypothesis testing from this study provides conclusions about the TPS learning model better than the SSCS learning model in improving students' mathematical problem solving abilities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-21
Author(s):  
Dianti Yahya ◽  
Yulia Yulia

Learning model chosen by educators teacher has not been able to accommodate the mathematics problems of students. For that, the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) model was applied. The purpose of research is to collation the mathematical problem solving abilities of students who are using Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) learning model and using the ordinary learning model (scientific approach). This type of research is a quasy experiment with randomized control group only design. The population of this study were all students of class VII SMPN 1 Danau Kembar. For to get sample class with random sampling technique. As for the research instrument used in the study is a test of mathematical problem solving students abilities. Based on the results of this avarage mathematical problem solving students abilities experiment class and control class is 80,30 and 73,16. Than the hypothesis testing using the t-test. From calculation result obtained t_count > t_table 2,21 > 1,64) with alpha=0,05 with 95% confidence interval so H0 rejected and accepted H1.Keywords : Mathematical problem solving abilities, Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL)


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-380
Author(s):  
Jamroni Wibi Darmani ◽  
Achi Renaldi

Students' mathematical problem solving ability is very important. But the results of the observation and supported by several studies of students' mathematical problem solving abilities are still very low. It is suspected that reciprocal teaching learning model with the help of tripships can improve students' mathematical problem solving abilities. This study aims to determine the effect of using reciprocal teaching models with fieldtrips on students' mathematical problem solving abilities. The sampling technique used was cluster random sampling with 2 classes, namely experimental class (the class was treated with reciprocal teaching learning model with fieldtrip), and the control class (the class was treated by conventional models). The hypothesis test used is the t-test. The results of the study found that there were differences in students 'mathematical problem solving abilities using reciprocal eaching learning models with fieldtrips on students' mathematical problem solving abilities. Furthermore, the mathematical problem solving ability of students with reciprocal teaching learning model is better than the students' mathematical problem solving abilities using conventional learning models. The conclusion of this study is that there is influence in improving students' mathematical problem solving ability by using reciprocal teaching learning model with fieldtrip to.


Author(s):  
Sutrisno Sutrisno ◽  
Nita Zuliyawati ◽  
Rina Dwi Setyawati

Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi dengan pentingnya kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui efektivitas model Problem Based Learning dan model Cooperative Learning tipe Think Pair Share berbantuan geogebra. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian eksperimen. Metode pengumpulan data terdiri dari dokumentasi, tes, dan observasi. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini digunakan analisis variansi, regresi, dan uji proporsi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa siswa yang mendapat model PBL berbantuan geogebra memiliki kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis sama dengan siswa yang mendapat model TPS berbantuan geogebra, dan kedua model pembelajaran tersebut menghasilkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran konvensional. Hasil penelitian juga menunjukkan bahwa pada model PBL dan TPS berbantuan geogebra, terdapat pengaruh keaktifan belajar siswa dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematisnya. Model PBL dan TPS berbantuan geogebra juga menghasilkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah yang memenuhi ketuntasan klasikal. Kata kunci: Problem Based Learning, Think Pair Share, kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis.   ABSTRACT This research is motivated by the importance of students' mathematical problem solving abilities. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the Problem Based Learning model and the Cooperative Learning model Think Pair Share type assisted by geogebra. The type of research used is experimental research. Data collection methods consist of documentation, testing, and observation. Data analysis in this study used analysis of variance, regression, and proportion test. The results of this study indicate that students who get geogebra-assisted PBL models have the same mathematical problem solving abilities as students who get geogebra-assisted TPS models, and both of these learning models produce students' mathematical problem-solving abilities better than conventional learning models. The results also showed that in the PBL and TPS models assisted by geogebra, there was an influence on students' learning activeness with their mathematical problem solving abilities. The geogebra-assisted PBL and TPS models also produce problem-solving abilities that meet classical completeness. Keywords: Problem Based Learning, Think Pair Share, mathematical problem solving abilities.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (October) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
Novi Mayasari ◽  
Anis Umi Khoirotunnisa

This study aims to find out "the effectiveness of guided discovery models by using super-task tasks on the development of students' mathematical problem solving abilities". This research is designed by using posttest only control which the research subject is first year students of 2018/2019 academic year. This research uses saturated sampling technique because all members of the population are used as samples. Data collection techniques in this study only use test instruments. Data analysis technique was done by using t-test. The results of the data analysis obtained that hypothesis testing in the experimental and control class obtained t calculation  = 3.41 with t table = 1.67. Because t calculation > t table then H0 is rejected so that it can be concluded that the guided discovery learning model by using superchemical tasks is more effective than the direct learning model on mathematical problem-solving abilities of first-level students in school mathematics II even semester at IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui “efektivitas  model penemuan terbimbing dengan menggunakan tugas superitem terhadap pengembangan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika mahasiswa”. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian dengan desain yang digunakan adalah posttest only control  dimana subyek penelitiannya adalah mahasiswa tingkat I tahun ajaran 2018/2019. Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik sampling jenuh karena semua anggota populasi dijadikan sebagai sampel. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini hanya menggunakan instrument tes. Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji–t. Hasil dari analisis data diperoleh uji hipotesis pada kelas eksperimen dan kontrol diperoleh thitung= 3,41 dengan ttabel = 1,67. Karena   thitung > ttabel maka H0 ditolak sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran penemuan terbimbing dengan menggunakan tugas superitem lebih efektif  dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran langsung terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika mahasiswa tingkat I pada mata kuliah matematika sekolah II semester genap di IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro.  


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (02) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
Muhammad Jainuri ◽  
Edumatica FKIP

The purpose of this study to describe the problem solving and self-efficacy mathematical students with prior knowledge of high, medium, low, and overall use sinektik learning better than conventional learning, interaction between learning model with early ability in influencing the mathematical problem solving ability and self-efficacy. mathematical  Experimental quantitative approach to design treatment by block (2x3). The sample is determined by simple random sampling technique. The instrument uses the questions and statements. Hypothesis testing using indepenpedent sample t-test,test Mann Whitney and two-way ANOVA. The findings of this study indicate: the ability of solving mathematical students use learning model sinektik overall and the ability of high start better than conventional learning, problem-solving ability mathematical students with prior knowledge medium and low using model sinektik no better than conventional learning, there is no interaction among early learning model with the ability to affect the ability of mathematical problem solving, self-efficacy of students' mathematical overall, high and low initial capability using sinektik learning model is no better than conventional learning, self-efficacy mathematical students with prior knowledge currently using sinektik learning model is better than conventional learning, and there is interaction between learning model with early ability in influencing self-efficacy. students' mathematical


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-129
Author(s):  
Evi Dwi Murti ◽  
Nasir Nasir ◽  
Hasan Sastra Negara

This writing aims to see the effect of using the SAVI learning model on students' problem solving abilities. The type of writing is quantitative writing. The sampling technique used was randomized class. The data collection technique used is the essay test technique. The data analysis technique used is the two jaur anava test. Based on the hypothesis test obtained, the results show that there are influences of students with treatment using the SAVI learning model to improve mathematical problem solving skills in algebraic factorization material better than students with the treatment of learning using conventional learning both in general and in each category. the independence of students' mathematical learning. There is interaction between mathematical problem solving abilities of students who have high mathematical learning independence better than students who have moderate and low mathematical learning independence. While students who have mathematical learning independence are better than students who have low mathematical learning independence. In addition, there is no interaction between the treatment of learning and the category of self-reliance on students 'mathematical learning towards improving students' mathematical problem solving abilities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-98
Author(s):  
Intan Rachmawati ◽  
Baidowi Baidowi ◽  
Nurul Hikmah ◽  
Laila Hayati

This study aims to determine the effect of Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS) learning model on mathematical problem solving abilities in the form of algebra material. This type of research is a quasi experiment with the posttest only design with a nonequivalent group. The population in this study were 7th grade students of SMPN 1 Mataram in the academic year of 2019/2020. Sample determination using purposive sampling technique, where the sample of this study is students of class VII-I as an experimental class and students of class VII-H as a control class. In the experimental class applied the TAPPS learning model and control class applied the direct learning model. The instrument used in this study was a test of mathematical problem-solving abilities (posttest) on algebra form material. Quantitative data analysis was performed using t-test. The results of the data analysis showed that there are significant differences in students' mathematical problem solving abilities between the classes that get the TAPPS learning and direct learning. This suggests that learning with the Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS) model affects the ability to solve mathematical problems in the form of algebra material.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document