scholarly journals EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PENEMUAN TERBIMBING DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN TUGAS SUPERITEM TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA MAHASISWA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (October) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
Novi Mayasari ◽  
Anis Umi Khoirotunnisa

This study aims to find out "the effectiveness of guided discovery models by using super-task tasks on the development of students' mathematical problem solving abilities". This research is designed by using posttest only control which the research subject is first year students of 2018/2019 academic year. This research uses saturated sampling technique because all members of the population are used as samples. Data collection techniques in this study only use test instruments. Data analysis technique was done by using t-test. The results of the data analysis obtained that hypothesis testing in the experimental and control class obtained t calculation  = 3.41 with t table = 1.67. Because t calculation > t table then H0 is rejected so that it can be concluded that the guided discovery learning model by using superchemical tasks is more effective than the direct learning model on mathematical problem-solving abilities of first-level students in school mathematics II even semester at IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui “efektivitas  model penemuan terbimbing dengan menggunakan tugas superitem terhadap pengembangan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika mahasiswa”. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian dengan desain yang digunakan adalah posttest only control  dimana subyek penelitiannya adalah mahasiswa tingkat I tahun ajaran 2018/2019. Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik sampling jenuh karena semua anggota populasi dijadikan sebagai sampel. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini hanya menggunakan instrument tes. Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji–t. Hasil dari analisis data diperoleh uji hipotesis pada kelas eksperimen dan kontrol diperoleh thitung= 3,41 dengan ttabel = 1,67. Karena   thitung > ttabel maka H0 ditolak sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran penemuan terbimbing dengan menggunakan tugas superitem lebih efektif  dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran langsung terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika mahasiswa tingkat I pada mata kuliah matematika sekolah II semester genap di IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro.  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-98
Author(s):  
Intan Rachmawati ◽  
Baidowi Baidowi ◽  
Nurul Hikmah ◽  
Laila Hayati

This study aims to determine the effect of Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS) learning model on mathematical problem solving abilities in the form of algebra material. This type of research is a quasi experiment with the posttest only design with a nonequivalent group. The population in this study were 7th grade students of SMPN 1 Mataram in the academic year of 2019/2020. Sample determination using purposive sampling technique, where the sample of this study is students of class VII-I as an experimental class and students of class VII-H as a control class. In the experimental class applied the TAPPS learning model and control class applied the direct learning model. The instrument used in this study was a test of mathematical problem-solving abilities (posttest) on algebra form material. Quantitative data analysis was performed using t-test. The results of the data analysis showed that there are significant differences in students' mathematical problem solving abilities between the classes that get the TAPPS learning and direct learning. This suggests that learning with the Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS) model affects the ability to solve mathematical problems in the form of algebra material.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-371
Author(s):  
Ahmad Kausar Raya ◽  
Sofyan M Soleh ◽  
Heny Wulandari

This study aims to determine the effect of the use of the super-scaled model of scaffolding on students' mathematical problem solving abilities. The sampling technique used was cluster random sampling with 3 classes namely experimental class 1 (the class was treated with scaffolding assisted superememe learning model), experimental class 2 (superitem learning only) and control class (the conventional treatment class). Hypothesis testing used is anava 1 cell path is not the same. The results of the study found that there were differences in students' mathematical problem solving abilities by using learning models of scaffolding assisted supermarkets. Furthermore, the mathematical problem solving ability of students with the super-intensive learning model assisted by scaffholding is the same as the mathematical problem-solving ability of students using superemit learning models. The mathematical problem solving ability of students with superficial learning models assisted by scaffholding is better than the students' mathematical problem-solving abilities using conventional learning models. Furthermore, the mathematical problem solving ability of students with superemit learning models is the same as the mathematical problem solving ability of students using conventional learning models.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-113
Author(s):  
Muh. Aripin Nurmantoro

This purpose of this study are to find out to determine the mathematical problem solving abilities of students using the Team Asissted Individualization learning models; mathematical problem solving abilities of students who use the Direct Instruction learning models; and to find out the better mathematical problem solving abilities of students who use the Team Asissted Individualization learning models with Direct Instruction. This research was conducted by experimental method, using cluster random sampling technique, and after drawing, Class VIII B and Class VIII D were selected as samples. Class VIII D was used as the experimental class I, where the learning used the Learning Team Team Individualization model and class VIII D was used as the experimental class II, where the learning used the Direct Instruction learning model. While the data analysis technique used in this study is the t-test. Based on the results of data analysis that has been done, it can be concluded that the mathematical problem solving abilities of students who use The Team Asissted Individualization learning models are better than Direct Instruction Model.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-21
Author(s):  
Dianti Yahya ◽  
Yulia Yulia

Learning model chosen by educators teacher has not been able to accommodate the mathematics problems of students. For that, the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) model was applied. The purpose of research is to collation the mathematical problem solving abilities of students who are using Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) learning model and using the ordinary learning model (scientific approach). This type of research is a quasy experiment with randomized control group only design. The population of this study were all students of class VII SMPN 1 Danau Kembar. For to get sample class with random sampling technique. As for the research instrument used in the study is a test of mathematical problem solving students abilities. Based on the results of this avarage mathematical problem solving students abilities experiment class and control class is 80,30 and 73,16. Than the hypothesis testing using the t-test. From calculation result obtained t_count > t_table 2,21 > 1,64) with alpha=0,05 with 95% confidence interval so H0 rejected and accepted H1.Keywords : Mathematical problem solving abilities, Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL)


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-261
Author(s):  
Kusairi Kusairi ◽  
Syaiful Syaiful ◽  
Haryanto Haryanto

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of Generative learning model on mathematical problem-solving and mathematical creative thinking skills. The method used in this research is Quasi-Experiment method with post-test only design. The sample in this study was 75 fifth grade students at SDIT Al-Azhar Jambi taken by random sampling technique. Data collection techniques using essay tests of mathematical problem-solving and mathematical creative thinking skills. Data analysis was done by normality test, homogeneity and hypothesis testing using one-way ANOVA by SPSS software 25.0. The results of data analysis show that there is an effect of Generative learning model on mathematical problem solving and mathematical creative thinking skills, and the application of Generative learning model with student worksheet are better than just Generative learning model or conventional learning model.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-446
Author(s):  
Nur Asih ◽  
Sendi Ramdhani

AbstrakTujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui apakah peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA) lebih baik dari pada konvensional, untuk mengetahui sikap kemandirian belajar siswa terhadap pembelajaran matematika menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA), dan untuk mengetahui hambatan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Metode penelitiannya adalah eksperimen kuasi dan desain penelitiannya Nonequivalent control group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI SMA PASUNDAN CIKALONGKULON dengan sampel sebanyak dua kelas. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Kelas XI MIPA-3 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas XI MIPA-1 sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen berupa tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis, angket dan wawancara. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA) lebih baik dari konvensional. Hasil angket siswa kelas XI MIPA-3 memperoleh hasil hampir seluruhnya positif respon siswa terhadap model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA).Kata Kunci: Kemandirian, MEA, Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Increased Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Student Learning Independence Using the Means-End Analysis Learning Model AbstractThe purpose of this research is to find out whether the improvement of students 'mathematical problem-solving abilities using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model is better than conventional learning, to determine the attitudes of students' learning independence towards mathematics learning using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model, and to find out the obstacles of students in solving problems mathematical problem solving abilities. The research method is a quasi-experiment and the research design is Nonequivalent control group design. The population in this study were all students of class XI SMA PASUNDAN CIKALONGKULON with a sample of two classes. The sampling technique uses a purposive sampling technique. Class XI MIPA-3 as an experimental class and class XI MIPA-1 as a control class. The instruments were in the form of tests of mathematical problem-solving abilities, questionnaires, and interviews. Based on the results of data analysis, the improvement of students' mathematical problem-solving abilities using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model is better than conventional. The results of the XI MIPA-3 class questionnaire obtained almost entirely positive student responses to the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model.Keywords: Independence, MEA, Mathematical Problem Solving.


Author(s):  
Leonard Leonard ◽  
Kurnia Khaerul Nisa

Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika merupakan salah satu tujuan pendidikan nasional di Indonesia, tetapi pencapaiannya masih tergolong rendah. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kuasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian posstest-only. Pengambilan sampel pada penelitian ini menggunakan teknik purpose sampling. Sampel penelitian sebanyak 60 peserta didik yang terbagi dalam dua kelas (30 kelas eksperimen dan 30 kelas kontrol). Penelitian ini dilakukan di sekolah SMP N 10 Bekasi dan SMP N 26 Bekasi. Kelas eksperimen menggunakan model pembelajaran teamdengan strategi pembelajaran tugas dan paksa, sedangkan kelas kontrol menggunakan pembelajaran . Data yang terkumpul kemudian dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji beda rata-rata sampel bebas. Hasil analisis data menunjukan bahwa rata-rata nilai peserta didik yang pembelajarannya menggunakan model pembelajaran team assisted individualization dengan strategi tugas dan paksa lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan rata-rata nilai peserta didik yang pembelajarannya menggunakan model pembelajaran langsung. Kata kunci: Model pembelajaran team assisted individualization, Strategi pembelajaran tugas dan paksa, kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika   ABSTRACT This research was conducted to determine the effect of team assisted individualization learning models with task learning strategies and forced to the ability to solve mathematical problems. Mathematical problem solving ability is an ability that belongs to the national education goals, but its achievement is still relatively low. The method used in this study is a quasi-experimental method with a poststest-only research design. Sampling in this study uses purpose sampling technique. The study sample consisted of 60 students divided into two classes (30 experimental classes and 30 control classes). This research was conducted in the school of SMP N 10 Bekasi and SMP N 26 Bekasi. The experimental class uses team individualization learning models with task and forced learning strategies, while the control class uses direct learning. The collected data is then analyzed using independent sample t-test. The results of data analysis showed that the average value of students who learned using the team assisted individualization learning model with higher task and forced strategies compared to the average value of students who learned using direct learning models. Keywords: Team assisted individualization learning model, task and forced learning strategies, mathematical problem solving skills                


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-152
Author(s):  
Hermawati Hermawati ◽  
Jumroh Jumroh ◽  
Eka Fitri Puspa Sari

AbstrakKemampuan pemecahan masalah tidak lepas dari kegiatan belajar mengajar pada umumnya karena keberhasilan seseorang terhadap sesuatu yang dihadapi tidak lepas dari matematika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis peserta didik kelas IX di SMP Negeri 15 Palembang. Sampel pada penelitian ini di ambil secara acak yaitu peserta didik kelas IX.1 berjumlah 31 peserta didik yang dilakukan di SMP Negeri 15 Palembang tahun Pelajaran 2019/2020. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan soal tes berbentuk uraian materi bangun ruang (kubus dan balok). Teknik analisis data dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kuantitatif. Dari hasil analisis data dan pembahasan maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis peserta didik dikategorikan rendah.  Analysis of Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability on Cubes and Blocks in Junior High SchoolAbstractThe ability to solve problems cannot be separated from teaching and learning activities in general because one's success in something that is faced cannot be separated from mathematics. This study aims to determine the mathematical Problem-solving abilities of grade IX students at SMP Negeri 15 Palembang. The sample in this study was taken randomly. namely students of class IX.1, totaling 31 students which were conducted at SMP Negeri 15 Palembang for the 2019/2020 academic year. The data collection technique used test questions in the form of a description of the material (cubes and cuboids). The data analysis technique in this research is descriptive quantitative. From the results of data analysis and discussion, it can be concluded that the students' mathematical Problem-solving ability is categorized as low.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
Rosita Rosita ◽  
Rika Valianti ◽  
Nurhasanah Nasution ◽  
Sri Hariani Manurung

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa yang memperoleh  pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD lebih tinggi daripada kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran secara langsung. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu (quasi experiment). Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa MTs Negeri di kabupaten Labuhanbatu yang berakreditasi A dan B. Sampel penelitian ini adalah MTs Negeri 1 Labuhanbatu dan MTs Negeri 2 berjumlah117 siswa. Validitas instrument angket dilakukan dengan analisis butir menggunakan rumus korelasi Product Moment dan uji reliabilitas menggunakan rumus Alpha Cronbach. Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji normalitas dengan uji Chi Kuadrat dan untuk menghitung peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah  matematika setelah pembelajaran dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan pembelajaran langsung, maka digunakan uji gain ternormalisasi (g). Siswa yang mendapat model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD memperoleh rata-rata peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis sebesar 0,63 dan siswa yang mendapat model pembelajaran langsung dengan rata-rata peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis sebesar 0,36. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data penelitian diperoleh hasil bahwa ada peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran koopertiftipe STAD lebih tinggi dari pada siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran langsung.This study aims to determine the increase in the problem-solving ability of students who get cooperative learning type STAD is higher than the mathematical problem solving abilities of students who receive direct learning.This research is a quasi experiment research. The population in this study were all State MTs students in Labuhanbatu district who were accredited A andB. The sample of this research is MTs Negeri 1 Labuhanbatu and MTs Negeri 2 totaling 117 students.The validity of the questionnaire instrument was carried out by analyzing items using the Product Moment correlation formula and reliability testing using the Cronbach Alpha formula. The data analysis technique used the normality test with the Chi Squared test and to calculate the increase in mathematical problem solving skills after learning with STAD cooperative learning and direct learning, the normalized gain test (g) was used. Students who received the STAD cooperative learning model obtained an average increase in mathematical problem solving abilities of 0.63 and students who received a direct learning model with an average increase in mathematical problem solving abilities of 0.36. Based on the results of the research data analysis, it was found that there was an increase in the problem solving ability of students who took STAD type coopertive learning higher than students who took direct learning. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Akhmad Badrul Lubis ◽  
Yelvema Miaz ◽  
Indah Eka Putri

Difficulties of primary school students in solving mathematical problems that require problem solving or reasoning abilities indicate the existence of problems in the process of learning mathematics, because one of the purposes of learning mathematics in primary school is to develop the students’ mathematical problem-solving skills. As a solution to overcome the problems, this research aims at understanding how the implementation of the guided discovery learning model influences mathematical problem-solving skills. This research employs a quasi-experimental design by involving all fifth-grade students at one of primary schools in Tebo Regency, Jambi. The simple random sample was conducted to obtain class VB as experimental class, and class VA as control class. Based on the results of the final score, experiential class obtained an average score of 86.00, and control class obtained an average score of 76.93.  The results of hypothesis test using t-test obtained tcount = 2,203 > ttable = 2,020, which indicated that H0 was rejected, and H1 was accepted. Therefore, the guided discovery learning model influenced the fifth-grade students’ mathematical problem-solving skills, thus it is recommended for teachers to be able to use the guided discovery learning model in the mathematics learning process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document