The binding of fork head proteins to DNA is partly determined by cooperation of bases

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 594-608
Author(s):  
Václav Mach
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
In Silico ◽  
Dna Recognition ◽  
Simple Algorithm ◽  
Fork Head ◽  
Statistical Algorithm ◽  
On Line ◽  
Negative Base

AbstractOur previous study revealed that DNA recognition by the insect Fork head transcription factors depends on specific combinations of neighboring bases, a phenomenon called the base cooperation effect. This study presents a simple algorithm designed for in silico investigation of the base cooperation effect. The algorithm measures and evaluates observed and expected frequencies of various base combinations within a set of aligned binding sites. Consequently, statistically significant differences between the observed and expected frequencies are interpreted as evidence of either positive or negative base cooperation effect. Our current results suggest that the base cooperation affects DNA binding of the vertebrate members of the Fork head family, similarly to their insect homologies.The statistical algorithm used in this study is available on line (http://blast.entu.cas.cz/bias/index.htm).

scholarly journals Overproduction of a truncated hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 protein inhibits expression of liver-specific genes in hepatoma cells.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 5453-5460 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Vallet ◽  
B Antoine ◽  
P Chafey ◽  
A Vandewalle ◽  
A Kahn
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase ◽  
Hepatoma Cells ◽  
Nuclear Factor ◽  
Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor ◽  
Regulatory Regions ◽  
Truncated Protein ◽  
Fork Head

Transcription of hepatocyte-specific genes requires the interaction of their regulatory regions with several nuclear factors. Among them is the hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 (HNF3) family, composed of the HNF3 alpha, HNF3 beta, and HNF3 gamma proteins, which are expressed in the liver and have very similar fork head DNA binding domains. The regulatory regions of numerous hepatocyte-specific genes contain HNF3 binding sites. We examined the role of HNF3 proteins in the liver-specific phenotype by turning off the HNF3 activity in well-differentiated mhAT3F hepatoma cells. Cells were stably transfected with a vector allowing the synthesis of an HNF3 beta fragment consisting of the fork head DNA binding domain without the transactivating amino- and carboxy-terminal domains. The truncated protein was located in the nuclei of cultured hepatoma cells and competed with endogenous HNF3 proteins for binding to cognate DNA sites. Overproduction of this truncated protein, lacking any transactivating activity, induced a dramatic decrease in the expression of liver-specific genes, including those for albumin, transthyretin, transferrin, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, and aldolase B, whereas the expression of the L-type pyruvate kinase gene, containing no HNF3 binding sites, was unaltered. Neither were the concentrations of various liver-specific transcription factors (HNF3, HNF1, HNF4, and C/EBP alpha) affected. In partial revertants, with a lower ratio of truncated to full-length endogenous HNF3 proteins, previously extinguished genes were re-expressed. Thus, the transactivating domains of HNF3 proteins are needed for the proper expression of a set of liver-specific genes but not for expression of the genes encoding transcription factors found in differentiated hepatocytes.

scholarly journals Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1405-1421 ◽  
Author(s):  
C C Adams ◽  
J L Workman
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Nf Kappa B ◽  
Nucleosomal Dna ◽  
Nucleosome Binding

To investigate mechanisms by which multiple transcription factors access complex promoters and enhancers within cellular chromatin, we have analyzed the binding of disparate factors to nucleosome cores. We used a purified in vitro system to analyze binding of four activator proteins, two GAL4 derivatives, USF, and NF-kappa B (KBF1), to reconstituted nucleosome cores containing different combinations of binding sites. Here we show that binding of any two or all three of these factors to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative. Thus, the binuclear Zn clusters of GAL4, the helix-loop-helix/basic domains of USF, and the rel domain of NF-kappa B all participated in cooperative nucleosome binding, illustrating that this effect is not restricted to a particular DNA-binding domain. Simultaneous binding by two factors increased the affinity of individual factors for nucleosomal DNA by up to 2 orders of magnitude. Importantly, cooperative binding resulted in efficient nucleosome binding by factors (USF and NF-kappa B) which independently possess little nucleosome-binding ability. The participation of GAL4 derivatives in cooperative nucleosome binding required only DNA-binding and dimerization domains, indicating that disruption of histone-DNA contacts by factor binding was responsible for the increased affinity of additional factors. Cooperative nucleosome binding required sequence-specific binding of all transcription factors, appeared to have spatial constraints, and was independent of the orientation of the binding sites on the nucleosome. These results indicate that cooperative nucleosome binding is a general mechanism that may play a significant role in loading complex enhancer and promoter elements with multiple diverse factors in chromatin and contribute to the generation of threshold responses and transcriptional synergy by multiple activator sites in vivo.

scholarly journals The Proneural Proteins Atonal and Scute Regulate Neural Target Genes through Different E-Box Binding Sites

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (21) ◽  
pp. 9517-9526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn M. Powell ◽  
Petra I. zur Lage ◽  
David R. A. Prentice ◽  
Biruntha Senthinathan ◽  
Andrew P. Jarman
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Tandem Repeats ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Sense Organ ◽  
Ample Evidence ◽  
E Box ◽  
Bhlh Transcription Factors

ABSTRACT For a particular functional family of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors, there is ample evidence that different factors regulate different target genes but little idea of how these different target genes are distinguished. We investigated the contribution of DNA binding site differences to the specificities of two functionally related proneural bHLH transcription factors required for the genesis of Drosophila sense organ precursors (Atonal and Scute). We show that the proneural target gene, Bearded, is regulated by both Scute and Atonal via distinct E-box consensus binding sites. By comparing with other Ato-dependent enhancer sequences, we define an Ato-specific binding consensus that differs from the previously defined Scute-specific E-box consensus, thereby defining distinct EAto and ESc sites. These E-box variants are crucial for function. First, tandem repeats of 20-bp sequences containing EAto and ESc sites are sufficient to confer Atonal- and Scute-specific expression patterns, respectively, on a reporter gene in vivo. Second, interchanging EAto and ESc sites within enhancers almost abolishes enhancer activity. While the latter finding shows that enhancer context is also important in defining how proneural proteins interact with these sites, it is clear that differential utilization of DNA binding sites underlies proneural protein specificity.

scholarly journals Analysis of Activator and Repressor Functions Reveals the Requirements for Transcriptional Control by LuxR, the Master Regulator of Quorum Sensing in Vibrio harveyi

mBio ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia C. van Kessel ◽  
Luke E. Ulrich ◽  
Igor B. Zhulin ◽  
Bonnie L. Bassler
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Quorum Sensing ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Vibrio Harveyi ◽  
Communication Process ◽  
Nucleotide Sequencing ◽  
Collective Behaviors

ABSTRACT LuxR-type transcription factors are the master regulators of quorum sensing in vibrios. LuxR proteins are unique members of the TetR superfamily of transcription factors because they activate and repress large regulons of genes. Here, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation and nucleotide sequencing (ChIP-seq) to identify LuxR binding sites in the Vibrio harveyi genome. Bioinformatics analyses showed that the LuxR consensus binding site at repressed promoters is a symmetric palindrome, whereas at activated promoters it is asymmetric and contains only half of the palindrome. Using a genetic screen, we isolated LuxR mutants that separated activation and repression functions at representative promoters. These LuxR mutants exhibit sequence-specific DNA binding defects that restrict activation or repression activity to subsets of target promoters. Altering the LuxR DNA binding site sequence to one more closely resembling the ideal LuxR consensus motif can restore in vivo function to a LuxR mutant. This study provides a mechanistic understanding of how a single protein can recognize a variety of binding sites to differentially regulate gene expression. IMPORTANCE Bacteria use the cell-cell communication process called quorum sensing to regulate collective behaviors. In vibrios, LuxR-type transcription factors control the quorum-sensing gene expression cascade. LuxR-type proteins are structural homologs of TetR-type transcription factors. LuxR proteins were assumed to function analogously to TetR proteins, which typically bind to a single conserved binding site to repress transcription of one or two genes. We find here that unlike TetR proteins, LuxR acts a global regulator, directly binding upstream of and controlling more than 100 genes. Again unlike TetR, LuxR functions as both an activator and a repressor, and these two activities can be separated by mutagenesis. Finally, the consensus binding motifs driving LuxR-activated and -repressed genes are distinct. This work shows that LuxR, although structurally similar to TetR, has evolved unique features enabling it to differentially control a large regulon of genes in response to quorum-sensing cues.

scholarly journals Electrostatic repulsion causes anticooperative DNA binding between tumor suppressor ETS transcription factors and JUN-FOS at composite DNA sites

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bethany J. Madison ◽  
Kathleen A. Clark ◽  
Niraja Bhachech ◽  
Peter C. Hollenhorst ◽  
Barbara J. Graves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Epithelial Cell Line ◽  
Electrostatic Repulsion ◽  
Ets Transcription Factors ◽  
Positively Charged

AbstractMany transcription factors regulate gene expression in a combinatorial fashion often by binding in close proximity on composite cis-regulatory DNA elements. Here we investigate the molecular basis by which ETS transcription factors bind with AP1 transcription factors JUN-FOS at composite DNA-binding sites. The ability to bind to DNA with JUN-FOS correlates with the phenotype of these proteins in prostate cancer: the oncogenic ERG and ETV1/4/5 subfamilies co-occupy ETS-AP1 sites with JUN-FOS in vitro, whereas JUN-FOS robustly inhibits DNA binding by the tumor suppressors EHF and SPDEF. EHF binds to ETS-AP1 DNA with tighter affinity than ERG in the absence of JUN-FOS, which may enable EHF to compete with ERG and JUN-FOS for binding to ETS-AP1 sites. Genome-wide mapping of EHF and ERG binding sites in a prostate epithelial cell line reveal that EHF is preferentially excluded from closely spaced ETS-AP1 DNA sequences. Structural modeling and mutational analyses indicate that adjacent positively-charged surfaces from EHF and JUN-FOS disfavor simultaneous DNA binding due to electrostatic repulsion. The conservation of positively charged residues on the JUN-FOS interface identified ELF1 as an additional ETS factor that exhibits anticooperative DNA binding, and we present evidence that ELF1 is frequently downregulated in prostate cancer. In summary, the divergence of electrostatic features of ETS factors at their JUN-FOS interface enables distinct binding events at ETS-AP1 DNA sequences. We propose that this mechanism can drive unique targeting of ETS transcription factors, thereby facilitating distinct transcriptional programs.

DNA recognition by nuclear receptors

2004 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 59-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Claessens ◽  
Daniel T Gewirth
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Dna Recognition ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Core Motif ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Sequence Recognition

The nuclear receptors constitute a large family of ligand-inducible transcription factors. The control of many genetic pathways requires the assembly of these nuclear receptors in defined transcription-activating complexes within control regions of ligand-responsive genes. An essential step is the interaction of the receptors with specific DNA sequences, called hormone-response elements (HREs). These response elements position the receptors, and the complexes recruited by them, close to the genes of which transcription is affected. HREs are bipartite elements that are composed of two hexameric core half-site motifs. The identity of the response elements resides in three features: the nucleotide sequence of the two core motif half-sites, the number of base pairs separating them and the relative orientation of the motifs. The DNA-binding domains of nuclear receptors consist of two zinc-nucleated modules and a C-terminal extension. Residues in the first module determine the specificity of the DNA recognition, while residues in the second module are involved in dimerization. Indeed, nuclear receptors bind to their HREs as either homodimers or heterodimers. Depending on the type of receptor, the C-terminal extension plays a role in sequence recognition, dimerization, or both. The DNA-binding domain is furthermore involved in several other functions including nuclear localization, and interaction with transcription factors and co-activators. It is also the target of post-translational modifications. The DNA-binding domain therefore plays a central role, not only in the correct binding of the receptors to the target genes, but also in the control of other steps of the action mechanism of nuclear receptors.

Selection of new HSF1 and HSF2 DNA-binding sites reveals difference in trimer cooperativity

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 7592-7603
Author(s):  
P E Kroeger ◽  
R I Morimoto
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Cellular Stress Response ◽  
Specific Factor ◽  
Heat Shock Element ◽  
Cooperative Interactions ◽  
Dna Binding Sites

Multiple heat shock transcription factors (HSFs) have been discovered in several higher eukaryotes, raising questions about their respective functions in the cellular stress response. Previously, we had demonstrated that the two mouse HSFs (mHSF1 and mHSF2) interacted differently with the HSP70 heat shock element (HSE). To further address the issues of cooperativity and the interaction of multiple HSFs with the HSE, we selected new mHSF1 and mHSF2 DNA-binding sites through protein binding and PCR amplification. The selected sequences, isolated from a random population, were composed primarily of alternating inverted arrays of the pentameric consensus 5'-nGAAn-3', and the nucleotides flanking the core GAA motif were nonrandom. The average number of pentamers selected in each binding site was four to five for mHSF1 and two to three for mHSF2, suggesting differences in the potential for cooperative interactions between adjacent trimers. Our comparison of mHSF1 and mHSF2 binding to selected sequences further substantiated these differences in cooperativity as mHSF1, unlike mHSF2, was able to bind to extended HSE sequences, confirming previous observations on the HSP70 HSE. Certain selected sequences that exhibited preferential binding of mHSF1 or mHSF2 were mutagenized, and these studies demonstrated that the affinity of an HSE for a particular HSF and the extent of HSF interaction could be altered by single base substitutions. The domain of mHSF1 utilized for cooperative interactions was transferable, as chimeric mHSF1/mHSF2 proteins demonstrated that sequences within or adjacent to the mHSF1 DNA-binding domain were responsible. We have demonstrated that HSEs can have a greater affinity for a specific HSF and that in mice, mHSF1 utilizes a higher degree of cooperativity in DNA binding. This suggests two ways in which cells have developed to regulate the activity of closely related transcription factors: developing the ability to fully occupy the target binding site and alteration of the target site to favor interaction with a specific factor.

An interaction between the DNA-binding domains of RelA(p65) and Sp1 mediates human immunodeficiency virus gene activation

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 6570-6583 ◽  
Author(s):  
N D Perkins ◽  
A B Agranoff ◽  
E Pascal ◽  
G J Nabel
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Nf Kappa B ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Hiv 1

Induction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gene expression in stimulated T cells has been attributed to the activation of the transcription factor NF-kappa B. The twice-repeated kappa B sites within the HIV-1 long terminal repeat are in close proximity to three binding sites for Sp1. We have previously shown that a cooperative interaction of NF-kappa B with Sp1 is required for the efficient stimulation of HIV-1 transcription. In this report, we define the domains of each protein responsible for this effect. Although the transactivation domains seemed likely to mediate this interaction, we find, surprisingly, that this interaction occurs through the putative DNA-binding domains of both proteins. Sp1 specifically interacted with the amino-terminal region of RelA(p65). Similarly, RelA bound directly to the zinc finger region of Sp1. This interaction was specific and resulted in cooperative DNA binding to the kappa B and Sp1 sites in the HIV-1 long terminal repeat. Furthermore, the amino-terminal region of RelA did not associate with several other transcription factors, including MyoD, E12, or Kox15, another zinc finger protein. These findings suggest that the juxtaposition of DNA-binding sites promotes a specific protein interaction between the DNA-binding regions of these transcription factors. This interaction is required for HIV transcriptional activation and may provide a mechanism to allow for selective activation of kappa B-regulated genes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document