scholarly journals TANGGUNG JAWAB PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH (PPAT) DALAM PENANDATANGANAN AKTA JUAL BELI YANG DIDASARI ATAS BLANGKO KOSONG (CONTOH KASUS: PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1201/K/PDT/2016)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 375
Author(s):  
Arlene . ◽  
Hanafi Tanawijaya
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Abuse Of Power ◽  
The Law ◽  
Ministerial Decree ◽  
Legal Consequences

PPAT or The Land Deed Official is a Public Official who is granted part of the authorities by the State in the implementation of land registration and the making of an authentic deed. The certificate that is made by PPAT must be made based on the deeds of the law by the parties. The authentic certificate can be used as evidence in case of dispute based on the ordinance. According to Article 22 Regulation Number 37 of 1998, the certificate must be read by The Land Deed Official in front of the parties along with two witnesses. However, in this case, The Land Deed Official asked one party to sign on the blank certificate, as a result the certificate wasn’t being read in front of the parties. This deed is accused of maladministration that includes unlawful procedures, abuse of power, malfunction and unfairness or incompetence. The author examines the problem using normative legal research methods which supported by some interviews with the ones who are experts in the field of the land and maladministration. This deed resulted in the existence of legal consequences. The sanctions awarded againts to the Land Deed Official who did this deed contained in Ministerial Decree of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial/Head of National Land Authority Number 1 year of 2006 Article 28 paragraph (1) includes firing from The Land Deed Official membership.

scholarly journals PERBUATAN MALADMINISTRASI DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA JUAL BELI OLEH PPAT DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA MENURUT PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 24 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PERATURAN JABATAN PPAT Jo. PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 37 TAHUN 1998 TENTANG PERATURAN JABATAN PPAT (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA SELATAN NOMOR: 129/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel.)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1378
Author(s):  
Cecyllia Tamara B. Schouten ◽  
Hanafi Tanawijaya
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Abuse Of Power ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ministerial Decree ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Poor Management

The Land Deed Official (the PPAT) is a Public Official who is granted part of the authorities by the State in the implementation of land registration and the making of an authentic deed. The certificate must be made based on the deeds of the law by the parties. The deeds of the law based on Article 2 of the Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998, a sale and purchase, swap, gift, inbreng, granting right of building/right of use based on the land property rights, and granting of land mortgage. Based on the ordinance, the authentic deed can be used as evidence in case of dispute. In this case is usually a lot of the contempt of court. This act is called the Maladministration. Maladministration is poor management or regulation, especially in an offical capacity. Maladministration is bias, neglect, inattention, delay, incompetence, ineptitude, arbitrariness and so on and would be long and interesting list. Including abuse of power, unlawful procedures, unfairness and malfunction or incompetence. The author examines the problem using normative legal research methods supported by some interviews with some who are experts in the field of the land and maladministration. This act resulted in the existence of legal consequences. Due to the law could by law or may be cancelled. The sanctions awarded againts to the Land Deed Official who did this deed contained in Ministerial Decree of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial/Head of National Land Authority Number 112/Kep-4.1/iv/2017 Article 6 paragraph (1) include reprimand, warning, skorzing, onzetting even fired from The Land Deed Official membership.

scholarly journals SANKSI YANG DITERIMA OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTE TANAH DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA AUTENTIK YANG CACAT HUKUM (STUDI PUTUSAN: PN JAKSEL NO. 124/PDT.G/2017/PN.JKT.SEL)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 314
Author(s):  
Andi Pratono ◽  
Tjempaka Tjempaka
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Community People ◽  
Is Theory ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Made In

Indonesia is the law of state or law state, as a law state country, Indonesia must have 3(three) important element such as legal certainty, justice, and expediency. Those main elements represent all the law state. In community, people everyday acts always relate to legal act, such as contract, buying or selling object that promised. To ensure those legal act have the ability perfect proof power, those legal act poured in the form of deed. In buying and selling land, a deed of sale and purchase must be made in front authorized official like land deed officer. However land deed officer as public official do make mistake on duty, with the result that party at a disadvantage. Party that loss because of mistake land deed officer, do ask for responsibility by suing the land deed officer to compensate the losses. Land deed officer in carrying out their duties must apply the precautionary principle so as to minimize any mistakes in making the deed. Author is using normative legal research methods, supported by a data which is theory and interviews some expert in land deed officer and Code of Ethics. The legal consequences to the land deed officer due the legal acts are against the law, which is a sanction will be given. The sanction will divided in three types such as sanction according to the Civil Law, Criminal Law and Code of Ethics or Government Regulation about land deed officer.

scholarly journals PENCATATAN PERKAWINAN TINJAUAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1974 TENTANG PERKAWINAN DAN HUKUM ISLAM

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Basri Basri
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
The State ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Religious Law ◽  
Secondary Data Sources ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences

AbstractThe main problem in this research is, the marriage registration linked to the validity of a marriage according to Law No. 1 of 1974 and the Law of Islam as well as the legal consequences of marriage were not recorded according to Law No. 1 of 1974 and the Law of Islam.This research is penelitianYuridis Normative namely legal research using secondary data sources in the form of literature votes. research that emphasizes the science of law, tried to examine the legal principles that apply in the community and as supporting research carried Normative method.Marriage has been done according to the law of each religion and his belief that (a valid marriage according to religious law) must be registered in order to obtain legal protection. However, registration of marriage it does not specify when the validity of the marriage because of the validity of marriage is at the time held Munurut law of each religion and belief. Registration of marriages serves to record the occurrence of law concerning marriage, as well as the listing on the birth.The legal consequences of marriage were not recorded, although the religion or belief was valid, but the marriage conducted without the knowledge and supervision of employees marriage registrar does not have the force of law is certain. By law, it would be difficult demanding livelihood and legacy of the husband if the husband dies. Additionally wife is not entitled to the property (Gono-gini) in case of separation. The next legal consequences are children from the marriage that can not be listed deemed illegitimate children unless there is recognition of a father or a court decision.Although the validity of marriage is returned to the law of each religion and belief but the registration of marriages should be made legal by the state so that protection can be implemented to the maximum. And registration of marriages should be made at the same time with the implementation of the marriage. Keywords: Registration, Marriage, Validity

scholarly journals Practice of License to Open State Land in Balikpapan

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deasy Ratna Sari
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
The State ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
License Holder

This study aims to find out why the License to Open State Land can be the basis for land registration and to know the legal consequences on the sale and purchase of land objects based on the License to Open State Land. This research is done empirically juridically, that is by collecting data by researching and examining facts that exist in line with the observation in the field. Land issues in Indonesia are the responsibility of all parties involved, including the responsibilities of the central and local governments. The Local Government of Balikpapan City stipulates the IMTN regulation. The result of this research is the regional regulation aims to prevent and reduce the existence of land disputes by the orderly administration of land affairs. Land Acquisition License Can Become the Foundation for Land Land Registration because it is legally determined that the license holder can apply for a right to land within 3 years since the IMTN is issued. As a result of the Law on Sale and Purchase of Land Objects Based on the License to Open the Land of the State ie the agreement becomes null and void and the sale and purchase agreement is considered never existed.

scholarly journals Legalitas Peresmian Akta Notaris Berbasis Cyber Notary Melalui Media Konferensi Zoom

Acta Comitas ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 185
Author(s):  
I Dewa Gede Cahaya Dita Darmaangga ◽  
I Dewa Ayu Dwi Mayasari
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The World ◽  
Result Show ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Legal Concepts ◽  
Legal Consequences

This study aims to find out about the legality of the inauguration of cyber-based notary deeds through the Zoom Conference media and the legal consequences of notarial deeds inaugurating the Zoom Conference media. The research method used is normative legal research methods that use a statutory approach and analysis of legal concepts based on primary and secondary legal materials. The study result show that according to Article 1868 of the Civil Code stipulates that the making of an authentic deeds is made is the presence of an authorized public official. Homeever, when referring to the explanation of Article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public, there is no clarity regarding the explanation regarding electronic certification (cyber notary) whether tappers must remain physically present in front of a notary or may not ignore it virtually. Regarding the inauguration of deeds through the Zoom Conference media, its is necessary to have clearer regulations regarding the concept of cyber notary in the world of notary so that notaries can carry out their duties without violating laws and regulations. The concept of cyber notary, in the inauguration of the deed, it is felt that there is a need for regulations that clearly regulate how the terms or conditions in the inauguration of authentic deeds/notaries are carried out using the concept of cyber notary, one of which is the Zoom Cenference media.   Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mengenai legalitas peresmian akta Notaris berbasis cyber notary melalui media Konferensi Zoom dan akibat hukum peresmian akta otaris dilakukan dengan media Konferensi Zoom. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan serta analisis konsep hukum dengan bersumber pada bahan-bahan hukum primer maupun sekunder. Hasil studi menunjukan bahwa menurut Pasal 1868 KUHPerdata menentukan mengenai pembuatan akta otentik tersebut dibuat dihadapan pejabat umum yang berwenang. Tetapi apabila merujuk terhadap penjelasan Pasal 15 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris tidak ada kejelasan mengenai penjelasan mengenai sertifikasi elektronik (cyber notary) apakah para penghadap harus tetap hadir secara fisik dihadapan notaris ataukah boleh tidak melaikan secara virtual. Terkait dengan peresmian akta melalui media Konferensi Zoom maka diperlukan adanya pengaturan lebih jelas mengenai konsep cyber notary dalam dunia kenotariatan agar notaris dapat menjalankan tugas jabatannya tanpa menyalahi undang-undang dan peraturan perundang-undangan. Konsep cyber notary ini dalam peresmian akta dirasa perlunya ada pengaturan yang mengatur dengan jelas bagaimana ketentuan atau syarat dalam peresmian akta autentik/notaris yang dilakukan dengan menggunakan konsep cyber notary salah satunya adalah media Konferensi Zoom.

scholarly journals Pertanggungjawaban terhadap Tindak Pidana Penyelundupan Sepeda Motor Harley oleh Direktur PT. Garuda Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 500-504
Author(s):  
I Dewa Gede Pramana adhi ◽  
I Nnyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Developing Country ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The People ◽  
The Law ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

Indonesia is a developing country where each region has its own natural wealth. This advantage cannot be used because there are many people who send out of the region without permission and vice versa, goods from outside countries are smuggled into Indonesia only to avoid the applicable taxes. This study aims to examine the regulation of smuggling in criminal law in Indonesia and reveal the responsibility of the director of PT. Garuda Indonesia, which carried out the act of smuggling luxury motorcycles. This research is a type of normative legal research conducted with research methods based on legal materials, while the problem approach used is a legislative and conceptual approach. Sources of data used are primary and secondary legal materials. Another bad example is shown by one of the people who has a big name in Indonesia, the smuggling case by the president of Garuda Indonesia is an illustration of how weak the law in Indonesia is and this incident has resulted in criminal and administrative sanctions. The results of the study indicate that the regulation of smuggling crimes in Indonesia is contained in Law Number 17 of 2006 concerning Customs. Handling of violations of customs provisions is more focused on the fiscal settlement, namely in the form of payment of a sum of money to the State in the form of a fine. The criminal liability of smugglers is regulated in Law No. 17 of 2006 the president director of PT. Garuda Indonesia is threatened with criminal and administrative sanctions

scholarly journals Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah Di Bidang Konstruksi

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russel Butarbutar
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
The State ◽  
Abuse Of Power ◽  
Goods And Services ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Force

<p align="justify">Offenses of corruption and crime that often occurs in the procurement of goods/services that are common construction in accordance with Act No. 31 of 1999 such is: a crime against the state financial harm to the law or abuse of power, bribery offense group, group evasion offense in the post, extortion offense in office, deeds offense, offense relating to an interest in the procurement, and gratification. That the Corporation could be required for Corporate Responsibilities when the corruption in the procurement of goods and services in the field of construction that we can see at verdict No. 04/Pid. Sus/2011/PT. BJM which have permanent legal force (inkrachtvan gewische). The above findings generated through normative research methods to approach the analysis of legal materials, either primary, ie Act No. 31 of 1999 jo . Act No. 20 of 2001 on Eradication of Corruption, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials.</p>

scholarly journals Kedudukan Hukum Saksi Instrumentair Terkait Keautentikan Akta Notaris

Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 511
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Anggelina
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Issue ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences

The legal status of a Notary employee in his capacity is a witness of the Instrumentair to support the validity of an authentic deed which is inseparable and has legal consequences for the deed of the Notary. Notary deed that raises the law causes the Notary employee to work as a witness instrument in the deed to be the party responsible and responsible for the law that appears. The legal issue in this journal is the Responsibility for the accountability of instruments in the deed of a Notary? And how to place the legal position in the instrumentation in terms of supporting the Notary deed related to the Notary's responsibility to keep the confidentiality of the deed which is made by him based on Article 16 Paragraph (1) Letter F and Article 40 of the UUJN Amendment?, This article is analyzed by normative legal research methods with a study of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter f UUJN Changes that still involve obscurity of legal norms. The purpose of this study is to examine the accountability of the instrumentair in the deed of the Notary and also provide understanding in terms of the legal position of the instrumentair selection related to the authenticity of the Notary deed. The results of the study through the journal can prove the lawsuits related to the substance of the deed whose signing involved him, remembering his capacity only employees who are functioned by a Notary to prepare the deed. The legal position of viewing related to the occupation of the Notary keeps the confidentiality of the deed whose production is made based on Article 16 paragraph (1) letter f and Article 40 of the UUJN. Therefore the instrumentair witness cannot apply Article 322 of the Criminal Code because his capacity as an election is not bound by professional ownership. Witness instructors who do not support the confidentiality of Notary documents. Status hukum pegawai Notaris dalam kapasitasnya menjadi saksi Instrumentair guna mendukung sahnya suatu akta autentik merupakan hal yang tak terpisahkan dan memiliki konsekwensi hukum terhadap akta Notaris. Akta Notaris yang menimbulkan persoalan hukum menyebabkan pegawai Notaris yang berfungsi sebagai saksi instrumentair dalam akta menjadi pihak yang dianggap tahu dan bertanggung jawab atas persoalan hukum yang muncul. Isu hukum dalam jurnal ini adalah Bagaimanakah tanggungjawab saksi instrumentair dalam akta Notaris? Dan bagaimanakah kedudukan hukum saksi instrumentair dalam hal mendukung keautentikan akta Notaris terkait adanya kewajiban Notaris menyimpan kerahasiaan akta yang pembuatannya dilakukan olehnya berdasarkan Pasal 16 Ayat (1) Huruf F dan Pasal 40 UUJN Perubahan ?, Artikel ini dianalisis dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan kajian terhadap Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf f UUJN Perubahan yang masih terdapat kekaburan norma hukum. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengkaji secara mendalam tanggungjawab saksi instrumentair dalam akta Notaris serta memberikan pemahaman dalam hal kedudukan hukum saksi instrumentair terkait dengan keautentikan akta Notaris. Hasil kajian melaui jurnal ini diketahui bahwa saksi instrumentair tidak bisa dituntut secara hukum terkait substansi akta yang penandatanganannya melibatkan dirinya, megingat kapasitasnya hanya pegawai yang difungsikan oleh Notaris untuk mempersiapkan akta. Kedudukan hukum saksi instrumentair terkait adanya kewajiban Notaris menyimpan kerahasiaan akta yang pembuatannya dilakukan olehnya berdasarkan Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf f dan Pasal 40 UUJN Perubahan tidak diwajibkan secara pasti harus menjaga kerahasiaan subtansi akta. Oleh sebab itu terhadap saksi instrumentair tidak bisa diterapkan Pasal 322 KUHP karena kapasitasnya sebagai saksi tidak melekat jabatan profesi. Saksi instrumentair yang tidak menjaga kerahasiaan dokumen Notaris perbuatannya diklasifikasikan perbuatan melawan hukum.

scholarly journals Kepastian Hukum Dalam Pembuatan Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan

Acta Comitas ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (02) ◽  
pp. 275
Author(s):  
Ketut Nurcahya Gita ◽  
I Made Udiana
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

Abstract   The purpose of this writing is to find out about legal certainty and comparison of power of attorney to impose mortgage rights stipulated in the Notary Position Law No.2 of 2014 with the form stipulated by the Head of Land Agency Regulation No.8 of 2012. This research uses normative legal research methods. The results of this study show that the comparison of authentic deeds according to the Law of Notary Position No.2 of 2014 and the Regulation of the Head of the Land Agency No.8 of 2012 regarding the creation of a power of attorney to impose mortgage rights made before a notary there are differences in the head and end of the deed. The form of power of attorney imposes a security right issued by the State Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia which is different and not in accordance with the provisions stipulated in the Law of Notary Position No.2 of 2014. Second, the legal certainty of the power of attorney imposes a security right made by a Notary by following format of the Head of the Land Agency Regulation No.8 of 2012, the deed cannot provide legal certainty. The deed will be degraded into a letter under the hand, so that it cannot be used as a basis in making the deed of mortgage imposition, however, the Notary is given the right to add deficiencies to the blank so that it remains an authentic deed.   Abstrak   Tujuan penulisan ini untuk mengetahui mengenai kepastian hukum serta perbandingan surat kuasa membebankan hak tanggungan yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris No.2 Tahun 2014 dengan Blanko yang ditentukan Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan No.8 Tahun 2012. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan perbandingan akta autentik menurut Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris No.2 Tahun 2014 dan Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan No.8 Tahun 2012 dalam mengenai pembuatan surat kuasa membebankan hak tanggungan yang dibuat dihadapan Notaris terdapat perbedaan pada kepala dan akhir akta. Blanko surat kuasa membebankan hak tanggungan yang diterbitkan Badan Pertanahan Negara-Republik Indonesia berbeda dan tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan yang telah ditetapkan dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris No.2 Tahun 2014. Kedua, kepastian hukum surat kuasa membebankan hak tanggungan yang dibuat oleh Notaris dengan mengikuti format Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan No.8 Tahun 2012 maka akta tersebut tidak dapat memberikan kepastian hukum. Akta tersebut akan terdegradasi menjadi surat dibawahtangan, sehingga tidak bisa dijadikan dasar dalam pembuatan akta pembebanan hak tanggungan, akan tetapi Notaris diberikan hak untuk menambahkan kekurangan pada blangko tersebut agar tetap menjadi akta autentik.  

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pencipta atas Pencatatan Suatu Ciptaan yang Sama

Lentera Hukum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riko Sulung Raharjo ◽  
M. Khoidin ◽  
Ermanto Fahamsyah
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Similar Work ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences

Copyright recognizes a declarative system in which the state automatically protects a creation after it was born without having to be preceded by registration. Article 64 of Copyrights Act Number 28 of 2014 (Copyright Act) states the registration even though it is not a necessity for the creator. This study aims to examine and analyze the legal consequences, forms of legal protection, as well as the future conception of regulations relating to the recording of a work in common by using legal research as its method. The results of the study indicate that the legal consequences on the similar work to the registration, inter alia, the abolition of the power of law for the registration of works, compensation for the creator, and criminal threats. Based on the theory of legal certainty, a provision is a form of legal certainty provided by the Copyright Law. There is a form of legal protection against the creator of the registration of the similar creation, inter alia, the abolition of the power of the law for registration the work by the court, the creator has the right to compensation, and the creator has the right to sue criminal. Based on the theory of legal protection, a provision is a form of protection provided by the Copyright Law. The future conception of the regulation of registration of creation so that it can provide legal protection against the creator through the renewal related to the addition of authority and procedures in conducting checks for ministers in the case of the registration of creation since it was first realized and announced. Based on the theory of legal certainty and the benefits of law, change and renewal can provide legal certainty and legal benefit for the creator and his creation. Keywords: Creator, Recording of Creations, Same Creations

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document