scholarly journals PERBUATAN MALADMINISTRASI DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA JUAL BELI OLEH PPAT DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA MENURUT PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 24 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PERATURAN JABATAN PPAT Jo. PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 37 TAHUN 1998 TENTANG PERATURAN JABATAN PPAT (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA SELATAN NOMOR: 129/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel.)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1378
Author(s):  
Cecyllia Tamara B. Schouten ◽  
Hanafi Tanawijaya
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Abuse Of Power ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ministerial Decree ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Poor Management

The Land Deed Official (the PPAT) is a Public Official who is granted part of the authorities by the State in the implementation of land registration and the making of an authentic deed. The certificate must be made based on the deeds of the law by the parties. The deeds of the law based on Article 2 of the Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998, a sale and purchase, swap, gift, inbreng, granting right of building/right of use based on the land property rights, and granting of land mortgage. Based on the ordinance, the authentic deed can be used as evidence in case of dispute. In this case is usually a lot of the contempt of court. This act is called the Maladministration. Maladministration is poor management or regulation, especially in an offical capacity. Maladministration is bias, neglect, inattention, delay, incompetence, ineptitude, arbitrariness and so on and would be long and interesting list. Including abuse of power, unlawful procedures, unfairness and malfunction or incompetence. The author examines the problem using normative legal research methods supported by some interviews with some who are experts in the field of the land and maladministration. This act resulted in the existence of legal consequences. Due to the law could by law or may be cancelled. The sanctions awarded againts to the Land Deed Official who did this deed contained in Ministerial Decree of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial/Head of National Land Authority Number 112/Kep-4.1/iv/2017 Article 6 paragraph (1) include reprimand, warning, skorzing, onzetting even fired from The Land Deed Official membership.

scholarly journals TANGGUNG JAWAB PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH (PPAT) DALAM PENANDATANGANAN AKTA JUAL BELI YANG DIDASARI ATAS BLANGKO KOSONG (CONTOH KASUS: PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1201/K/PDT/2016)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 375
Author(s):  
Arlene . ◽  
Hanafi Tanawijaya
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Abuse Of Power ◽  
The Law ◽  
Ministerial Decree ◽  
Legal Consequences

PPAT or The Land Deed Official is a Public Official who is granted part of the authorities by the State in the implementation of land registration and the making of an authentic deed. The certificate that is made by PPAT must be made based on the deeds of the law by the parties. The authentic certificate can be used as evidence in case of dispute based on the ordinance. According to Article 22 Regulation Number 37 of 1998, the certificate must be read by The Land Deed Official in front of the parties along with two witnesses. However, in this case, The Land Deed Official asked one party to sign on the blank certificate, as a result the certificate wasn’t being read in front of the parties. This deed is accused of maladministration that includes unlawful procedures, abuse of power, malfunction and unfairness or incompetence. The author examines the problem using normative legal research methods which supported by some interviews with the ones who are experts in the field of the land and maladministration. This deed resulted in the existence of legal consequences. The sanctions awarded againts to the Land Deed Official who did this deed contained in Ministerial Decree of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial/Head of National Land Authority Number 1 year of 2006 Article 28 paragraph (1) includes firing from The Land Deed Official membership.

scholarly journals SANKSI YANG DITERIMA OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTE TANAH DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA AUTENTIK YANG CACAT HUKUM (STUDI PUTUSAN: PN JAKSEL NO. 124/PDT.G/2017/PN.JKT.SEL)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 314
Author(s):  
Andi Pratono ◽  
Tjempaka Tjempaka
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Community People ◽  
Is Theory ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Made In

Indonesia is the law of state or law state, as a law state country, Indonesia must have 3(three) important element such as legal certainty, justice, and expediency. Those main elements represent all the law state. In community, people everyday acts always relate to legal act, such as contract, buying or selling object that promised. To ensure those legal act have the ability perfect proof power, those legal act poured in the form of deed. In buying and selling land, a deed of sale and purchase must be made in front authorized official like land deed officer. However land deed officer as public official do make mistake on duty, with the result that party at a disadvantage. Party that loss because of mistake land deed officer, do ask for responsibility by suing the land deed officer to compensate the losses. Land deed officer in carrying out their duties must apply the precautionary principle so as to minimize any mistakes in making the deed. Author is using normative legal research methods, supported by a data which is theory and interviews some expert in land deed officer and Code of Ethics. The legal consequences to the land deed officer due the legal acts are against the law, which is a sanction will be given. The sanction will divided in three types such as sanction according to the Civil Law, Criminal Law and Code of Ethics or Government Regulation about land deed officer.

Eksistensi Lembaga Pengumuman Terhadap Legalitas Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah (Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematik Lengkap)

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-183
Author(s):  
Mitta Ramadany Wael ◽  
Sarjita Sarjita ◽  
Mujiati Mujiati
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Government ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Legal Consequences

Abstract: The implementation of the announcement agency in land registration to apply the principle of publicity, but in its implementation according to PP 24 of 1997 and the PTSL regulation there is a difference in both the number of days of implementation and the status of registered parcels. This research used legal research methods is a normative law research methods and empirical juridical law that aims to determine the existence of the announcement agency in the implementation of PTSL and find out the legal consequences of the announcement agency on the legality of the Land Rights Certificate. The result of this research is the existence of the announcement agency in PP No. 24 of 1997 is different from the implementation of PTSL. Explicitly in PP No. 24 of 1997 the announcement was only carried out for customary land for 30 days and the announcement of state land was not implemented while the existence of the announcement agency in PTSL did not differentiate the status of the land, either state land or customary land, the announcement was still held for 14 calendar days. In accordance with the hierarchy of state the Government Regulation has a higher position than the Ministerial Regulation, this causes the making of the regulations below must refer to the regulations above so as not to collide/counter-productive. This rule collision will cause a legal gap if there is a lawsuit in the Administrative Court, so the product can be legally flawed and canceled. Kata Kunci : existence, announcement agency and PTSL Intisari: Pelaksanaan lembaga pengumuman sesuai PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 dan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematik Lengkap (PTSL) terdapat perbedaan baik dalam jumlah hari pelaksanaan maupun status bidang tanah yang didaftarkan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dan hukum yuridis empiris yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui eksistensi lembaga pengumuman dalam pelaksanaan PTSL dan mengetahui konsekuensinya terhadap legalitas sertipikat hak atas tanah. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah eksistensi lembaga pengumuman dalam PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 berbeda dengan pelaksanaan dalam PTSL. Secara tegas dalam PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 pengumuman hanya dilaksanakan untuk tanah adat selama 30 hari dan untuk tanah tanah negara tidak dilaksanakan pengumuman, sedangkan eksistensi lembaga pengumuman dalam PTSL tidak membedakan status tanah, baik itu tanah negara maupun tanah adat tetap dilakukan pengumuman selama 14 hari kalender. Sesuai dengan hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan, peraturan pemerintah memiliki kedudukan lebih tinggi dari peraturan menteri, hal ini menyebabkan pembuatan peraturan yang di bawah harus merujuk kepada peraturan yang ada di atasnya supaya tidak bertabrakan/kontra produktif. Tabrakan aturan ini akan menimbulkan celah hukum apabila terjadinya suatu gugatan di PTUN, sehingga produk yang dihasilkan bisa jadi cacat hukum dan dibatalkan. Kata Kunci : eksistensi, lembaga pengumuman dan PTSL

scholarly journals Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) Terhadap Pendaftaran Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Yang Menjadi Objek Sengketa

Acta Comitas ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Wulan Rismayanthi
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Title Deed ◽  
Legal Consequence ◽  
Card System ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Consequences

The Land Deed Official (the PPAT) is a public official who is granted part of the authorities by the State in the implementation of land registration, by making the land certificate as the basis for land registration. The Agrarian Office may turn down the registration of the land rights in the event of any recording in the land registry books of the land rights which become the object of dispute. Based on Article 45 of the Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 that there is a legal ambiguity on the return of the files in the form of certificate, title deed and other related documents. According to Article 55 of the Head of National Land Agency number 1 of 2006, the PPAT is personally responsible for the execution of the task and his/her authority, in every act making. There is no clear arrangement regarding the responsibility of PPAT on the registration of the conveyance of the land which becomes the object of dispute. Such provisions result in legal issues about the legal consequences and the responsibility of PPAT on the registration of the conveyance of the land which becomes the object of dispute The type of research used in this thesis is a normative legal research as the result of the presence of the ambiguity and the vacuum of norms. The legal materials were collected by the techniques of library research and the card system. The descriptive, interpretative and argumentative theories as well as associated with laws that relevant to the issues were used to analyze the legal materials. The results showed that the Agrarian Office turns down and returns the documents to the PPAT as the legal consequence of the conveyance of land which becomes the object of dispute. The legal consequences of the deed made ??before the PPAT remains authentic during a blocking of certificate. The responsibility of the PPAT is in accordance with his/her position, in keeping the deed, certificate along with the relevant documents at the time of the restitution by the Agrarian Office. PPAT shall be mandatory as an intermediary to keep the documents that are being returned at the time of confiscation by a court or at the revocation of blocking by the applicant.

scholarly journals The Authority of Notary as Public Official in The Making of Land Deed and Auction Minutes Deed According to The Law Number 30 of 2004 on Notary

Rechtsidee ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Mochammad Tanzil Multazam
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Competent Authority ◽  
Public Official ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Impact

Birth of Law No. 30 of 2004 on Notary, regarded as the beginning of reforms in the field of notary. A notary who previously carried out its duties based on the Dutch heritage regulations Reglement op Het Notaris Ambt in Indonesie (Stb. 1860:3) was started feels aware of its existence by the government. However, one of the impact of these laws is the extension of the authority of the notary to make the auctions minutes deed and the land deed, but as it is known in advance, making auctions minutes deed is the authority of the auction official, and make the land deed is the land deed official authority (known as PPAT ). Based on Vendu Reglement (VR), only authorized officials that can make auctions minutes deed, and if the notary push him to make it, then the power of the deed will degrade into privately made deed because it is not made by the competent authority. As with the land deed, authorized officials to make the land deed is PPAT, but the authority specified in Article 2 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation No. 37 of 1998 on Land Deed Official. Therefore, the Notary can make land deed, on condition not including the deed contained in that Article 2 paragraph (2). How To Cite: Multazam, M. (2014). The Authority of Notary as Public Official in The Making of Land Deed and Auction Minutes Deed According to The Law Number 30 of 2004 on Notary. Rechtsidee, 1(2), 147-162. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v1i2.94

scholarly journals Peranan PPAT Dalam Pensertifikatan Tanah Akibat Jual Beli

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 241
Author(s):  
Ratih Mega Puspa Sari ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Property Right ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

ABSTRACTDalam Pasal 1 Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Pemerintah nomor 37 tahun 1998 tentang Peraturan Jabatan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah ini yang dimaksud dengan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah, selanjutnya disebut PPAT, adalah pejabat umum yang diberi kewenangan untuk membuat akta-akta otentik mengenai perbuatan hukum tertentu mengenai hak atas tanah atau Hak Milik atas Satuan Rumah Susun. Dan sejak berlakunya Pemerintah Peraturan Nomor 10 Tahun 1961 sebagaimana telah diperbaharui dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah, jual beli atas tanah dilakukan oleh para pihak di hadapan PPAT yang bertugas membuat aktanya. Akta jual beli yang ditandatangani para pihak membuktikan telah terjadi pemindahan hak dari penjual kepada pembelinya dengan disertai pembayaran harganya, telah memenuhi syarat tunai dan menunjukkan secara nyata atau riil perbuatan hukum jual beli yang bersangkutan telah dilaksanakan. Akta tersebut membuktikan bahwa benar telah dilakukan perbuatan hukum pemindahan hak untuk selama-lamanya dan pembayaran harganya.Karena perbuatan hukum yang dilakukan merupakan perbuatan hukum pemindahan hak, maka akta tersebut membuktikan bahwa penerima hak (pembeli) sudah menjadi pemegang haknya yang baru .Kata kunci : Pejabat pembuat akta tanah, Akta Jual Beli Tanah ABSTRACTIn Article 1 of the Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 24 of 2016 on Amendment to Government Regulation No. 37 of 1998 on the Regulation of the Official of the Author of the Land Deed as meant by the Land Deed Authority Officer, hereinafter referred to as PPAT, is a public official authorized to make the deed- authentic deeds concerning certain legal acts concerning the right to land or the Property Right of the Flats Unit. And since the enactment of Government Regulation Number 10 Year 1961 as has been updated with Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration, the sale and purchase of land carried out by the parties in the presence of PPAT in charge of making the act. The sale and purchase deed signed by the parties proves that there has been a transfer of rights from the seller to the purchaser, accompanied by the payment of the price, has met the cash requirements and shows the real or real deed of the sale and purchase law concerned has been executed. The deed proves that the right to have done the legal act of transfer of rights for ever and the payment of the price. Because the legal act is done is a legal act of transfer of rights, then the deed proves that the recipient of the right (buyer) has become the new rights holder.Keyword : Land Deed Official ,The Deed Of Sale And Purchase Of Land

scholarly journals Pelaksanaan Wewenang Kantor Pertanahan Dalam Pendaftaran Tanah (Studi di Kecamatan Kuta Baro Kabupaten Aceh Besar)

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 150-163
Author(s):  
Fery Irwanda
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Subject ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

Pasal 3 PP 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah menyebutkan pendaftaran tanah bertujuan untuk memberikan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang hak atas suatu bidang tanah. Terbitnya  sertifikat Hak Milik atas tanah Jailani Yusuf cs yang merupakan objek sengketa, telah diputus berdasarkan Putusan Kasasi No.633 K/Pdt/2006. Permohonan pendaftaran hak yang diajukan oleh Abdullah Ibrahim dan Cut Ben Ibrahim ke Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Aceh Besar tanpa memberitahukan adanya Putusan Kasasi, sehingga melahirkan sertifikat yang subjek hukumnya tidak sesuai dengan Putusan Kasasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan, mengetahui pelaksanaan pendaftaran tanah yang melahirkan Sertifikat hak atas tanah yang subjek hukumnya tidak sesuai dengan Putusan Kasasi dan tanggung jawab Kantor Pertanahan atas  penerbitan sertifikat untuk atas pihak yang tidak berhak berdasarkan putusan pengadilan. Jenis Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis empiris dengan meneliti keberlakuan hukum itu dalam kenyataan atau dalam masyarakat. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa dalam pelaksanaan Pendaftaran tanah yang melahirkan Sertifikat No.11, 12 dan 21, 22, 23/2015 terdapat cacat hukum administratif yang disebabkan kesalahan subyek dan/atau obyek hak, karena di atas tanah yang diterbitkan sertifikat telah ada Putusan Kasasi. Akibatnya pihak yang mendaftarkan tanah bertanggung jawab secara hukum dan Kantor Pertanahan bertanggung jawab secara administratif.Article 3 of the Government Regulation Number 24, 1997 on Land Registration states that a land registration aiming to provide law certainty and law protection on land right holder over the land. The issuance on of the land certificate of Jailani Yusuf et.al is a dispute object; it has been decided based on Judicial Review Number 633 K/Pdt/2006. The application on the right registration that is proposed by Abdullah Ibrahim and Cut Ben Ibrahim to Land Authority Office of Aceh Besar without providing the review, hence it results in certificate issuance that the law subject is not based on the decision. This research aims to know the implementation of land registration in the making process of certificate that its legal subject is not based on the court decision, responsibility of land office of the change of certificate issuance for party that is no having right based on the court decision. This is juridical empirical research by exploring the law application into society. The research shows that in the implementation of land registration in making process of Certificates Numbers: 11, 12 and 21, 22, 23/2015 has administrative law lack caused by subject fault and/or object of right, as on the land certificate issued has been reviewed by the Supreme Court. The impact on parties registering their land is legally responsible and the Land Authority Office is administrative legally responsible.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Regulation Changes on Environment and Forestry in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Helmi Helmi ◽  
Fauzi Syam ◽  
Nopyandri Nopyandri ◽  
Akbar Kurnia Putra
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Enforcement ◽  
The People ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Article 5 ◽  
Regulation Changes

This article aims to examine the correlation between the concept of proper enforcement of the law as stipulated in Article 5 (2) of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia and the establishment and implementation of government regulation on environment and forestry. This article is a normative legal research with statute, historical, and conceptual approaches. The result shows that proper legal enforcement means two things, namely, establishment and enactment of government regulation by the President and the content of the regulation that does not contradict the law. Failure to comply with the law means the President does not establish or enforce a government regulation as mandated or the content of the regulation is not in line with the law.  If the President does form or enforce the implementation of government regulation, this means that the President violates his oath and promise to uphold the Constitution and to serve the nation. If the content of the regulation contradicts with the law, it can be canceled. In this situation, the government needs to realign the content of existing regulations. The ministry involved in legal drafting is called to oversee the content and follow through with revisions. All party involves in the making of law and regulation, such as the People Representatives, the President, or the Minister, is reminded to carefully formulate a government regulation.

scholarly journals STATUS HUKUM HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH YANG TERKENA ABRASI

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-107
Author(s):  
Dwi Susiati ◽  
Sri Setiadji
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

Abrasion is a natural disaster that results in the owner of the right to land losing the right to control, use or take advantage of the land, because the land is lost in part or in whole due to erosion by water. Article 27 of the Law On Agraria determines that property rights over land are destroyed if the land is destroyed. In this study, the author will analyze the legal status of property of land affected by abrasion with the formulation of the problem What is the legal status of property rights on land affected by abrasion according to Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration and how to guarantee the protection of affected land rights abrasion. The results of this study are that the status of land rights affected by abrasion is abolished, both in the provisions of the Law On Agraria and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration because it is no longer compatible with physical data or juridical data as a strong evidence. The government has an obligation to provide guarantees and protection of rights to land affected by abrasion and those that have been affected by abrasion in part or in whole. On the basis of the state's right to control Article 2 of the Law On Agraria the state has the right to regulate land use, inventory, and maintenance to prevent and reduce the impact of abrasion on its citizens. The government can also provide compensation as contained in Article Number 24 of 2007 concerning Disaster Management which determines that the Government and regional governments are responsible for the implementation of disaster management.Abrasi merupakan bencana alam yang mengakibatkan pemilik hak atas tanah kehilangan hak untuk menguasai, menggunakan, atau mengambil manfaat atas tanah, karena tanah tersebut hilang sebagian atau seluruhnya akibat pengikisan oleh air. Pasal 27 UUPA menentukan hak milik atas tanah hapus, apabila tanahnya musnah. Pada penelitian ini, penulis akan menganalisa tentang status hukum hak milik atas tanah yang terkena abrasi dengan rumusan masalah Bagaimana status hukum hak milik atas tanah yang terkena abrasi menurut PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah  dan bagaimana jaminan perlindungan hak-hak tanah yang terdampak abrasi. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa status hak atas tanah yang terkena abrasi adalah hapus, baik dalam ketentuan UUPA maupun PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah karena tidak sesuai lagi dengan data fisik maupun data yuridis sebagai alat bukti yang kuat. Pemerintah mempunyai kewajiban untuk memberikan jaminan dan perlindungan hak-hak atas tanah yang terdampak abrasi maupun yang sudah terkena abrasi baik sebagian maupun seluruh tanahnya. Atas dasar hak menguasai oleh negara Pasal 2 UUPA negara berhak mengatur peruntukan, penggunaan, persediaan,dan pemeliharaan tanah untuk mencegah dan mengurangi dampak abrasi bagi warga negaranya. Pemerintah juga dapat memberikan ganti kerugian sebagaimana yang ada di dalam UU No. 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana yang menentukan bahwa Pemerintah dan pemerintah daerah menjadi penanggung jawab dalam penyelenggaraan penang-gulangan bencana.

Permasalahan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap untuk Tanah Negara di Kabupaten Muara Enim

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-177
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sandy Prayogo ◽  
Rakhmat Riyadi ◽  
Akur Nurasa
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Potential Impact ◽  
The Government

Abstract: The implementation of land registration acceleration for PTSL program in Muara Enim Regency is inhibited by the fact that most of the community had no land rights. The government issues various regulations, including Ministerial Regulation ATR/Ka.BPN No. 6 of 2018 as a regulation to ease acceleration in the implementation. The method in the present study was legal research method with judicial normative approach in studying the implementation of policy consistent with the regulation issued by the government. The research result was that the policy implementation by the Land Office of Muara Enim Regency was simplifying missing land rights by making SPPFBT statement as a replacement of land rights. There was no significant difference from the substance of land rights according to Government Regulation PP No. 24 of 1997 and Ministerial Regulation ATR/Ka.BPN No. 6 of 2018 so that replacement land rights in the form of SPPFBT statement could be interpreted as a simplifiedland rights replacement. The potential impacts were easiness to make SPPFBT without considering legal principles andprocess of acquisition of rights which could cause future dispute. Keywords: PTSL, SPPFBT, Policy, Potential, Impact  Intisari: Pelaksanaan kegiatan percepatan pendaftaran tanah melalui program PTSL di Kabupaten Muara Enim terkendala oleh alas hak yang tidak dimiliki oleh sebagian besar masyarakat. Pemerintah mengeluarkan berbagai regulasi salah satunya yaitu Permen ATR/Ka.BPN No. 6 Tahun 2018 untuk mempermudah percepatan dalam pelaksanaannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji penggunaan SPPFBT sebagai dasar pengganti alas hak untuk pendaftaran tanah pada program PTSL. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode hukum dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif di dalam mengkaji penerapan kebijakan yang sesuai dengan peraturan yang dibuat oleh pemerintah. Penerapan kebijakan yang dilakukan oleh Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Muara Enim yaitu menyederhanakan alas hak yang tidak ada dengan pembuatan Surat Pernyataan Penguasaan Fisik Bidang Tanah (SPPFBT) sebagai pengganti alas hak. Tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan terhadap substansi alas hak menurut PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 dan Permen ATR/Ka.BPN No. 6 Tahun 2018 sehingga alas hak pengganti berupa pernyataan SPPFBT dapat diartikan sebagai alas hak pengganti yang disederhanakan. Kemudahan dalam proses pembuatan SPPFBT yang tidak memperhatikan kaidah hukum dan cara perolehan hak dapat menyebabkan perkara sengketa di kemudian hari.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document