scholarly journals PRIMUM REMEDIUM ACTION SANCTIONS AGAINST CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW

Cepalo ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-120
Author(s):  
Mashuril Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
State Budget ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law

Criminal sanctions are more popular than action sanctions at the application level. Action sanctions formulation is regulated in Articles 82 and 83 of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law, while criminal sanctions are the last resort. However, criminal sanctions are still the "prima donna" in law enforcement practices against children in conflict. This condition raises various problems such as the overcapacity of correctional institutions, burdens the state budget, and creates a stigma against children in conflict with the law. Because the purpose of implementing the juvenile criminal justice system is in the child's best interests, action sanctions should be prioritised, even though criminal sanctions are needed in law enforcement against children in conflict with the law. Therefore, an idea emerged to restore criminal sanctions as ultimum remedium and strengthen action sanctions as primum remedium. The problem discussed in this study is how to implement primum remedium action sanctions against children in conflict with the law? And how to strengthen primum remedium action sanctions against children in conflict with the law? This study uses a normative juridical, an empirical juridical, and a comparative methods. The data in this article are sourced from primary and secondary data processed through description, prescription, and system. The results indicate that criminal sanctions still dominate judges' decisions in children in conflict with the law, and action sanctions are complementary sanctions because it is rarely applied.

scholarly journals Legality Letter of Statement of Khilaf in Indonesia Criminal Justice System

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Rugun Romaida Hutabarat
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Primary Source ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Criminal Matters

In criminal law, a person charged with a criminal offense may be punished if it meets two matters, namely his act is unlawful, and the perpetrator of a crime may be liable for the indicated action (the offender's error) or the act may be dismissed to the perpetrator, and there is no excuse. The reasons may result in the death or the removal of the implied penalty. But it becomes a matter of how if the Letter of Statement Khilaf is the answer to solve the legal problems. The person who refuses or does not do what has been stated in the letters is often called "wanprestasi" because the statement is categorized as an agreement. The statement includes an agreement which is the domain of civil law or criminal law, so its application in the judicial system can be determined. This should be reviewed in the application of the law, are there any rules governing wrong statements in the criminal justice system. By using a declaration of khilaf as a way out of criminal matters, then the statement should be known in juridical rules. This study uses normative juridical methods, by conceptualizing the law as a norm rule which is a benchmark of human behavior, with emphasis on secondary data sources collected from the primary source of the legislation. The result of this research is that the statement of khilaf has legality, it is based on Jurisprudence No. 3901 K / Pdt / 1985 jo Article 189 Paragraph (1) of Indonesian criminal procedure law. However, this oversight letter needs to be verified in front of the court to be valid evidence, but this letter of error is not a deletion of a criminal offense, because the culpability of the defendant has justified the crime he committed. Such recognition, cannot make it free from the crime that has been committed.Keywords: Legality, Letter of Statement, Criminal Justice System

scholarly journals Analysis and Review of The Implementation of Law Enforcement Operations Juridical Capture Corruption in The Criminal Justice System

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 843
Author(s):  
Hulman Siregar ◽  
Rakhmat Bowo Suharto
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
National Development ◽  
State Budget ◽  
State Institutions

Corruption has occurred in all sectors of activity in State Institutions has even been categorized as an extraordinary crime. This condition has a negative impact on the implementation of sustainable national development to improve the welfare of the community. Because the state budget funds both central and regional that can be used to build infrastructure facilities for public services such as health services, education, social assistance in the form of food and clothing. Become reduced due to corruption. The mindset and pattern of action in dealing with corruption crime requires a leap of change so that the implementation of law enforcement in combating corruption through hand-catching operations can run effectively in accordance with the laws and regulations.Keywords: Planned; Accurate; Accountable; Responsible.

scholarly journals CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDREN UNDER 12 YEARS OF AGE IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW IN THE CHILD CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 252-260
Author(s):  
Eko Iswahyudi ◽  
◽  
I. Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Nurini Aprilianda ◽  
Bambang Sugiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Community Service ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Obligations ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

In the Act No. 11 of 2012 about the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, it explains the age limit for juvenile criminal responsibility for those who commit criminal acts, as regulated in Article 1 point 3. The children between 12 (twelve) years old and 18 (eighteen) years old are suspected of committing a crime. The purpose of this study was to analyze the construction of the regulation of children under the age of 12 in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2021 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. This type of normative legal research uses a statute approach and a case approach through a literature study. The results of the research on the Construction of Regulations for Children under the Age of 12 in Act Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System as Children in Conflict with the Law. There is a need for additional rules or amendments to the provisions of criminal sanctions for children, where criminal sanctions will be given to children aged at least 10 years, where these rules consist of basic criminal sanctions, such as community service or supervision, job training, coaching in institutions. This sanction is carried out by considering the rights of children as perpetrators, children as victims and children as witnesses who are underage, without eliminating the implementation of applicable legal obligations.

scholarly journals KAJIAN NORMATIF KEDUDUKAN ANAK SAKSI DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 144
Author(s):  
Muhammad Iftar Aryaputra ◽  
Dharu Triasih ◽  
Endah Pujiastuti ◽  
Ester Romauli Panggabean ◽  
Reny Puspita Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
Complete Set ◽  
Data Source ◽  
The Law

<p>Anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum dibagi menjadi tiga katagori, yaitu anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum, anak korban, dan anak saksi. Selama ini, perhatian yang diberikan lebih banyak tertuju pada anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum dan anak korban.  Kedudukan anak saksi kurang untuk dikaji.  Penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk mengkaji lebih dalam kedudukan anak saksi dalam peradilan pidana anak. Permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini yakni<em> </em>terkait pengaturan anak saksi dalam hukum positif dan bentuk perlindungan terhadap anak saksi dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam penelitian hukum normatif. Dengan demikian, sumber data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder, terutama yang berasal dari bahan hukum primer berupa perundnag-undangan terkait. Dari data yang diperoleh, selanjutnya akan dianalisis secara kualitatif, sehingga akan menghasilkan suatu penelitian yang bersifat deskriptif analisis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, didapatkan hasil bahwa undang-undang yang mengatur paling lengkap tentang anak saksi dalam sisitem peradilan pidana anak adalah UU No. 11 Tahun 2012. Pengaturan mengenai anak saksi cenderung tidak sistematis dalam suatu undang-undang. Ketentuan mengenai anak saksi tersebar dalam berbagai ketentuan perundang-undangan seperti UU No. 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana, UU Perlindungan Anak, UU Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, dan UU Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Patut disayangkan, belum diatur tentang jaminan keselamatan bagi anak saksi dan pemulihan mental bagi anak saksi.</p><p><em>Children who are dealing with the law are divided into three categories, children in conflict with the law, children of victim, and children of witness. So far, more attention has been paid to children in conflict with the law and children of victims. The position of children of witness is less to be studied. This study is intended to examine more deeply the position of witnesses in the juvenile criminal justice system. The problem raised in this study is related to the arrangement of children of witnesses in positive law and the form of protection of witness children in the criminal justice system of children. This research is included in normative legal research. Thus, the data source used is secondary data, especially those derived from primary legal materials in the form of related regulations. From the data obtained, then it will be analyzed qualitatively, so that it will produce a descriptive analytical study. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the law that regulates the most complete set of witness children in the criminal justice system is Law No. 11 of 2012. Arrangements regarding witness children tend not to be systematic in a law. Provisions regarding witness children are spread in various legislative provisions such as Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law, Child Protection Act, Child Criminal Justice System Law, and Witness and Victim Protection Act. Unfortunately, it has not been regulated about the guarantee of safety for witness children and mental recovery for witness children.</em><em></em></p>

scholarly journals DIVERSI TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
I Made Wiharsa
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Criminal Punishment ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Research Type

Diversion of narcotic crime in the criminal justice system for the children. Children in conflict with the law, especially in narcotic cases not specifically regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 on the Narcotics. During this time the children in conflict with the law that is drafted in the Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Criminal Justice System for The Children. Criminal punishment against with a certain person started because that person has committed a crime. Children in the case of a criminal act of narcotics criminal sanctions will have a negative impact on a child's future. Referring to the criminal justice system for the children are known to attempt a diversion to divert the child's completion of the criminal case of the trial into a non-judicial process. This research with the normative methods research type, which aims to determine the impact of the imposition of criminal sanctions and diversion efforts for children in narcotic crime. Diversi tindak pidana narkotika dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak. Anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum khususnya dalam tindak pidana narkotika belum diatur secara khusus dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. Selama ini terhadap anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum mengacu pada Undang-Undang Nomor. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.  Penjatuhan pidana terhadap seseorang bermula karena seseorang tersebut telah melakukan suatu tindak pidana. Anak dalam hal melakukan tindak pidana narkotika yang dijatuhi sanksi pidana akan berdampak buruk pada masa depan anak. Mengacu pada sistem peradilan pidana anak yang dikenal upaya diversi untuk mengalihkan penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana anak dari proses peradilan ke proses non peradilan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metoda penelitian hukum normatif, yang bertujuan untuk dapat mengetahui dampak penjatuhan sanksi pidana dan upaya diversi bagi anak dalam tindak pidana narkotika.

scholarly journals Pendekatan dalam Penanganan Sengketa Pilkada Menunjang Kinerja Kepolisian dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Sebagai Pelindung, Pengayom dan Pelayan Masyarakat

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
husain kasim
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Police Officers ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Mass Violence ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
The Law

This study aims to: 1) knowing the basic law enforcement restorative justice approach in handling criminal acts riots, 2) to know how to implement a restorative justice approach and the factors that influenceThe experiment was conducted at the Police Resort Ternate, North Maluku province, with a population of security officers who work directly handling and protection against acts of mass violence with less sampling as many as 50 people through random sampling techniques. Data were collected by questionnaire and interview techniques. Data analysis was performed using qualitative descriptive analysis and interpretation.The results showed that: 1) The perpetrator of criminal acts of rioting should be avoided from the formal criminal justice system. The best solution that must be done is through the act of diversion (transfer) the completion of its case outside the criminal justice system, but there is no definite legal basis for implementing diversion measures in addition to referring to the Law 2 of 2002, which only specifies that police officers have the authority of police discretion. 2) Treatment of the criminal action in a dispute over the election unrest in North Maluku, which was held on Sat. Criminal Police Ternate is through mediation. This means that the principle of restorative justice has been implemented on Sat. Criminal Police Ternate, however, efforts to address criminal acts there are influences from the substance of the law, law enforcement officers, legal culture of society and their own community.

scholarly journals Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Sistem Peradilan Anak Berdasarkan Asas Keadilan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasaan Oleh Anak (Studi Kota Medan)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-122
Author(s):  
Antonius Alexander Pilliang ◽  
Mahmud Muliadi ◽  
Marlina Marlina
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Violent Crime ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Police Department ◽  
Secondary Data Source ◽  
Data Source

In this research, the problem is whether the Child Criminal Justice System has given Justice to children as perpetrators of violent crime? How law enforcement efforts for children as perpetrators of violence by the Medan Municipal Police Department? How the application of justice principles for children as perpetrators of action Violence especially in Medan? The research method used is the normative juridical method, with the leper approach (library reseacrh) that collects the data source from literature literature. In this research used secondary data source that is by using primary, secondary and tertiary law materials. This research is discussed with qualitative approach that is finding problem which then analyzed with inductive system by using legal theories used. The results of this study indicate that the juvenile justice system contained in law number 11 of 2012 has provided justice for children as perpetrators of criminal acts, only in certain circumstances, the application of the criminal justice system does not provide legal certainty for the victims and the community. Law enforcement efforts for children as perpetrators of violent crime are by applying formal and material criminal law in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations. The application of the principle of justice for children as perpetrators is adjusted to the position of cases that have been done by applying the criminal justice system of children, even in certain circumstances, the application of diversion in cases of violence perpetrated by the child may be enforced.

scholarly journals RECONSTRUCTION OF CHILD CRIMINAL SANCTIONS IN PERSPECTIVE OF LAW NUMBER 11 THE YEAR 2012 CONCERNING JUSTICE CHILD CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM BASED ON JUSTICE VALUES

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (18) ◽  
pp. 68-81
Author(s):  
Akhmad Munawar ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto ◽  
Anis Mashdurohatun ◽  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Law

Children who are in conflict with the law are seen to need to be given physical and spiritual protection. Bearing in mind, the Court's decision is more likely to impose imprisonment sanctions. The United Nations in several Congresses has criticized imprisonment sanctions, besides having the potential to cause stigmatization in children, it is also ineffective and does not create a deterrent effect. This study aims to examine and to analyze the implementation of Child Criminal sanctions in the perspective of Law Number 11-year 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System, to analyze the factors that influence child criminal sanctions that are not yet fair. The research question is how the reconstruction of child-based criminal sanctions based on justice is. This research is included in non-doctrinal research (empirical). It used three theories, namely the theory of criminal purpose to analyze the first problem, the dignified justice theory to analyze the second problem and progressive legal theory to analyze the third problem. The results found that the implementation of sanctions Crime against a child in conflict with a law imposed by a prison sentence, the Judge in his consideration emphasizes juridical considerations so that the criminal sanctions imposed on the child are not in accordance with teleological theory as the purpose of punishment. Criminal sanctions against children have not brought justice, among others, because several articles in Law Number 11-year 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System still have weaknesses. Reconstruction of Articles that hinder the realization of fair criminal sanctions, namely Article 7 paragraph (2) Article 32 paragraph (2), Article 71 paragraph (1) letter e, Article 79 paragraph (1) and Article 81 paragraph (1) of the Law Number 11 the year 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System.

scholarly journals Law Enforcement against Children's Criminal Action Based On Law Number 11 of 2012 Concerning Children Criminal Justice Systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (06) ◽  
pp. 226-235
Author(s):  
Feddy Hantyo Nugroho ◽  
Rodliyah ◽  
Amiruddin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Criminal Justice Systems ◽  
Objective Interpretation ◽  
The Law

This research was conducted to analyze and find out how criminal law policy is in the effort to apply criminal sanctions against children facing the law in terms of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children and whether the concept of Diversity can be applied in the process of law enforcement against children involved in Narcotics Crimes. This research is a normative study, to analyze the legal material related to the problem under study, the author uses the Interpretation, Subjective and Objective Interpretation instruments, after that the authors process these legal materials by deductive thinking. The results obtained from the study that the drafting of Law Number 11 of 2012 is a replacement to Law Number 3 of 1997 concerning juvenile justice conducted with the aim of establishing a judiciary that truly guarantees the best protection of the interests of children facing the law as nation's next generation. The concept of Restorative Justice is one of the important things in Law Number 11 of 2012 where restoring the situation as it used to be the main goal and also no less important is the form of criminal sanctions that can be imposed on Children where criminal sanctions that are harsh and miserable are used as ultimum Remedium is not as a premium remedium especially as a maximum remedium. The concept of diversion that should be applied in Indonesia in the future, should be a combination of the concept of diversion that is applied in Australia, namely Police Diversion which is combined with the process of handling cases with the diversion prevailing in Indonesia today.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of the implementation of diversion on children who conflict with the law at the level of the state court in gorontalo province

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-69
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rizal Lampatta ◽  
Herlina Sulaiman
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
District Court ◽  
State Court ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Psychological Condition ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Remedy ◽  
The Law

Diversion is a step or legal remedy aimed specifically at children who are in conflict with the law. As perpetrators of criminal acts, children need to be treated differently from adults. This is due to the psychological condition of children who are considered unable to accept criminal sanctions. Even children who have committed criminal acts, Act No. 11 of 2012 on the Criminal Justice System Children continue to provide collateral in the form of diversion efforts so that children avoid criminal prosecution. Diversion is carried out at the police, attorney and court levels. Not all cases of child offenders who enter the PN level can be diversified because there are already rules in the SPPA Law, Perma No. 4 of 2014 and PP. 65 of 2015. Likewise in the implementation of diversion at the District Court level in Gorontalo Province, some were successful and some were not. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the implementation of diversion to child offenders at court level in Gorontalo Province. As well as to find out the obstacles in the implementation of diversion against child offenders at the District Court level in Gorontalo Province.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document