scholarly journals Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Sistem Peradilan Anak Berdasarkan Asas Keadilan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasaan Oleh Anak (Studi Kota Medan)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-122
Author(s):  
Antonius Alexander Pilliang ◽  
Mahmud Muliadi ◽  
Marlina Marlina
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Violent Crime ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Police Department ◽  
Secondary Data Source ◽  
Data Source

In this research, the problem is whether the Child Criminal Justice System has given Justice to children as perpetrators of violent crime? How law enforcement efforts for children as perpetrators of violence by the Medan Municipal Police Department? How the application of justice principles for children as perpetrators of action Violence especially in Medan? The research method used is the normative juridical method, with the leper approach (library reseacrh) that collects the data source from literature literature. In this research used secondary data source that is by using primary, secondary and tertiary law materials. This research is discussed with qualitative approach that is finding problem which then analyzed with inductive system by using legal theories used. The results of this study indicate that the juvenile justice system contained in law number 11 of 2012 has provided justice for children as perpetrators of criminal acts, only in certain circumstances, the application of the criminal justice system does not provide legal certainty for the victims and the community. Law enforcement efforts for children as perpetrators of violent crime are by applying formal and material criminal law in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations. The application of the principle of justice for children as perpetrators is adjusted to the position of cases that have been done by applying the criminal justice system of children, even in certain circumstances, the application of diversion in cases of violence perpetrated by the child may be enforced.

scholarly journals PRIMUM REMEDIUM ACTION SANCTIONS AGAINST CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW

Cepalo ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-120
Author(s):  
Mashuril Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
State Budget ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law

Criminal sanctions are more popular than action sanctions at the application level. Action sanctions formulation is regulated in Articles 82 and 83 of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law, while criminal sanctions are the last resort. However, criminal sanctions are still the "prima donna" in law enforcement practices against children in conflict. This condition raises various problems such as the overcapacity of correctional institutions, burdens the state budget, and creates a stigma against children in conflict with the law. Because the purpose of implementing the juvenile criminal justice system is in the child's best interests, action sanctions should be prioritised, even though criminal sanctions are needed in law enforcement against children in conflict with the law. Therefore, an idea emerged to restore criminal sanctions as ultimum remedium and strengthen action sanctions as primum remedium. The problem discussed in this study is how to implement primum remedium action sanctions against children in conflict with the law? And how to strengthen primum remedium action sanctions against children in conflict with the law? This study uses a normative juridical, an empirical juridical, and a comparative methods. The data in this article are sourced from primary and secondary data processed through description, prescription, and system. The results indicate that criminal sanctions still dominate judges' decisions in children in conflict with the law, and action sanctions are complementary sanctions because it is rarely applied.

scholarly journals KAJIAN NORMATIF KEDUDUKAN ANAK SAKSI DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 144
Author(s):  
Muhammad Iftar Aryaputra ◽  
Dharu Triasih ◽  
Endah Pujiastuti ◽  
Ester Romauli Panggabean ◽  
Reny Puspita Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
Complete Set ◽  
Data Source ◽  
The Law

<p>Anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum dibagi menjadi tiga katagori, yaitu anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum, anak korban, dan anak saksi. Selama ini, perhatian yang diberikan lebih banyak tertuju pada anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum dan anak korban.  Kedudukan anak saksi kurang untuk dikaji.  Penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk mengkaji lebih dalam kedudukan anak saksi dalam peradilan pidana anak. Permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini yakni<em> </em>terkait pengaturan anak saksi dalam hukum positif dan bentuk perlindungan terhadap anak saksi dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam penelitian hukum normatif. Dengan demikian, sumber data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder, terutama yang berasal dari bahan hukum primer berupa perundnag-undangan terkait. Dari data yang diperoleh, selanjutnya akan dianalisis secara kualitatif, sehingga akan menghasilkan suatu penelitian yang bersifat deskriptif analisis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, didapatkan hasil bahwa undang-undang yang mengatur paling lengkap tentang anak saksi dalam sisitem peradilan pidana anak adalah UU No. 11 Tahun 2012. Pengaturan mengenai anak saksi cenderung tidak sistematis dalam suatu undang-undang. Ketentuan mengenai anak saksi tersebar dalam berbagai ketentuan perundang-undangan seperti UU No. 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana, UU Perlindungan Anak, UU Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, dan UU Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Patut disayangkan, belum diatur tentang jaminan keselamatan bagi anak saksi dan pemulihan mental bagi anak saksi.</p><p><em>Children who are dealing with the law are divided into three categories, children in conflict with the law, children of victim, and children of witness. So far, more attention has been paid to children in conflict with the law and children of victims. The position of children of witness is less to be studied. This study is intended to examine more deeply the position of witnesses in the juvenile criminal justice system. The problem raised in this study is related to the arrangement of children of witnesses in positive law and the form of protection of witness children in the criminal justice system of children. This research is included in normative legal research. Thus, the data source used is secondary data, especially those derived from primary legal materials in the form of related regulations. From the data obtained, then it will be analyzed qualitatively, so that it will produce a descriptive analytical study. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the law that regulates the most complete set of witness children in the criminal justice system is Law No. 11 of 2012. Arrangements regarding witness children tend not to be systematic in a law. Provisions regarding witness children are spread in various legislative provisions such as Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law, Child Protection Act, Child Criminal Justice System Law, and Witness and Victim Protection Act. Unfortunately, it has not been regulated about the guarantee of safety for witness children and mental recovery for witness children.</em><em></em></p>

scholarly journals Presumption of Innocence Against Criminal Offenders in the Police: A Critical Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Oktavia Wulandari ◽  
Ali Imron ◽  
Briliyan Ernawati ◽  
Nazar Nurdin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Police Department ◽  
Fundamental Principle ◽  
Critical Study ◽  
Presumption Of Innocence ◽  
Criminal Offenders ◽  
Police Level

<p>The purpose of this paper is to conduct a critical study of the application of the presumption of innocence to the perpetrators of criminal acts (suspects) investigated by the police. Implementation of the principle is important to study because the suspect must not be considered guilty before the criminal act is proven. A review of this case was carried out at the Kendal Police Department in mid-2019-2020. Writing texts are written with a normative-empirical approach. The non-doctrinal approach was chosen because it can clearly examine the application of the principle of presumption of innocence in more depth. Therefore, the author considers it necessary to carefully examine the application of these principles in the process of law enforcement at the police level. The results showed that the application of the principle of presumption of innocence in the Kendal Police Department was not optimal, because some of its applications were colored by threats and acts of violence. The suboptimal application of this principle is influenced by various factors, including the lack of legal knowledge of suspects and threats and acts of violence that are not reported. As we know the presumption of innocence is a fundamental principle in the criminal justice system, where a person must be positioned innocent before his guilt is proven in an honest and open trial.</p>

scholarly journals MODEL OF CRIMINAL CASE RESOLUTION OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS CAUSING DEATH

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismunarno ◽  
Rofikah ◽  
Sabar Slamet
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Traffic Accident ◽  
Traffic Accidents ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Police Department ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
National Police

<p align="center"><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p><p>         The present research seeks to find out a model of criminal case resolution of traffic accidents causing death in Traffic Directorate of Yogyakarta (DIY) Police Department through either criminal justice system or mediation. Socio-legal research or non-doctrinal research has been used for this research. The research location is located in the Traffic Directorate of Yogyakarta Police Department. The research data use primary and secondary data. The results of this research indicate that in Traffic Directorate of DIY Police Department criminal case of traffic accidents causing death is resolved through criminal justice system with a record of ordinary examination. It is in accordance with the Decree of Indonesian National Police Number 15 of 2013 regarding Procedures for Handling Traffic Accident. Meanwhile, mediation is never used to resolve such case since there exists no legal framework. The article, therefore, suggests that revision of the Decree should be made. The criminal case resolution of traffic accidents causing death should fall into two forms, namely willful misconduct and negligence. A case with willful misconduct should be resolved through criminal justice system, while  that negligence is resolved through mediation.</p><p><strong>Keywords: accident, death, criminal justice system, mediation</strong></p>

scholarly journals PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK DAN PEDOMAN PERILAKU HAKIM

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Imran Imran
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research

ABSTRAKDalam sistem peradilan pidana penanganan suatu kasus dimulai sejak kasus itu muncul, kemudian ditangani oleh polisi, hingga proses akhir dari penegakan hukum terletak pada putusan hakim. Putusan hakim dapat berupa menjatuhkan hukuman ataupun membebaskan seorang terdakwa. Dalam putusan hakim akan terlihat kemampuan hakim dalam mengonstruksi kasus sejak dakwaan dibacakan hingga pledoi diucapkan. Semua konstruksi hakim tersebut akan tergambar dalam pertimbangan-pertimbangan. Dalam pertimbangan tersebut akan terlihat apakah suatu putusan tersebut melanggar kode etik atau tidak. Apa yang terlihat dalam dua putusan hakim yang dikeluarkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Tobelo, mencerminkan adanya persoalan ketika seorang terdakwa dua kali dihukum oleh majelis hakim yang sama untuk perbuatan yang sama pula. Hal inilah yang kemudian menjadi rumusan masalah, apakah putusan tersebut melanggar Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim atau tidak? Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang memfokuskan kajian pada data sekunder, maka akan terlihat bagaimana sesungguhnya dua putusan tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan telah terjadi pelanggaran Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim yang dilakukan oleh majelis hakim.Kata kunci: kode etik dan pedoman perilaku hakim; sistem peradilan pidana; profesionalisme.  ABSTRACT In the criminal justice system, the handling of a case starts since the claim arises, then is handled by the police, until the final process of law enforcement, which lies in the judge's decision. Judges' decisions can be in the form of sentencing or acquitting a defendant. The ability of a judge to construct a case will appear in the decision from the time the indictment is read until the plea is pronounced. In these considerations, it will be seen whether the judge's decision violates the code of ethics or not. Two judges' decisions issued by the Tobelo District Court reflect the problem in which a defendant was twice sentenced by the same panel of judges for violating the same law. This is what then becomes the formula of the problem, whether the decision violates the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges or not. By using normative legal research method focusing on secondary data construing, it will expose the fact of these two decisions. The results of this analysis indicate that there are violations of the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges been committed by the panel of judges examining the case. Keywords: code of ethics and code of conduct of judges; criminal justice system; professionalism. 

scholarly journals Implementasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Perspektif Integrasi

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Achmad Budi Waskito
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Functional Differentiation ◽  
Enforcement Policy ◽  
Research Show ◽  
Function Difference

AbstractCriminal justice system as a tool of law enforcemen didn�t work optimally, in fact criminal justice system in Indonesia be acquainted whith principle of function difference impact on law enforcemennt performance so it will be difficult to achieve its function, as a crime prevention effort. This research purpose to set system concept and ideal approaches the organization of a unified criminal justice system so as to achieve an optimal performance of the criminal justice system (CJS) in criminal law enforcement, by approachng the system and re-structural, substantial and cultural reorientation of the criminal justice system.the main object of research is againt criminal law enforcement policy, the approach used is a normative juridical and sosiological approach complemented by a historical aproach/contextual and global/comparative, by prioritizing secondary data whit qualitative analysis. The result of the research show the sub system in the criminal justice system (such as investigation, prosecution, adjudicate and execution) funcionally and institutionally has not yet shown the existence of an integrated criminal justice system when viewed partially, the components of the support component seem to separate from one another, and tend to be centric institutions. Understanding of the integrated criminal justice system is inseparable from an understanding that includes substantial meaning, but also a philosophical aspect about the meaning justice and be nefit integrated. Therefore the legal culture is an integral part. ����Keyword: implementation of the criminal justice system, functional differentiation, integrated approach.Abstrak Sistem peradilan pidana sebagai sistem penegakan hukum dengan menggunakan hukum pidana, tidak berjalan secara optimal bahkan sistem peradilan pidana di indonesia dikenal asas �differensiasi fiungsional� berdampak pada kinerja penegakkan hukum sehingga akan sulit untuk mencapai fungsinya, sebagai upaya penanggulangan kejahatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan konsep sistem dan pendekatan yang ideal penyelenggaraan sistem peradilan pidana yang integral sehingga terwujud suatu kinerja Sistem peradilan pidana (SPP) yang optimal dalam penegakan hukum pidana, dengan melakukan pendekatan sistem dan reorientasi struktural, substansial dan kultural terhadap sistem peradilan pidana. Objek utama penelitian ialah terhadap kebijakan penegakan hukum pidana, pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan analisis yuridis normatif dan sosiologis dilengkapi dengan pendekatan historis/kontekstual dan global/komparatif, dengan mengutamakan data sekunder dengan analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan sub-sistem dalam sistem peradilan pidana (sub-sistem penyidikan, penuntutan, mengadili dan pelakasana pidana) secara fungsional dan kelembagaan belum menujukkan adanya perihal sistem peradilan pidana terpadu (SPPT) apabila dilihat secara parsial, komponen-komponen pendukung terkesan terpisah antara satu dengan yang lainnya, serta cenderung bersifat �instansi sentris�. Pemahaman mengenai sistem perdilan pidana terpadu tidak terlepas dari pemahaman yang mencakup makna substansial, tapi juga menyentuh aspek filosofis mengenai makna keadilan dan kemanfaatan secara terintegrasi. Oleh karena itu budaya hukum merupakan bagian yang tidak terpisahkan.Kata kunci: Pelaksanaan Sistem Peradilan Pidana, differensiasi fungsional, Pendekatan terpadu

scholarly journals EFEKTIVITAS PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA PENJARA TERHADAP ANAK YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurika Latiff Hikmawati
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Cultural Factors ◽  
District Court ◽  
Community Factors ◽  
Inhibiting Factors ◽  
Child Friendly

<table width="605" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="406"><p><em>Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System is expected to be a model of a criminal justice system that is more child-friendly in Indonesia. But until now the implementation of the juvenile justice system in Indonesia is still found many problems, especially in Purwokerto. The problems examined in this study are: first, how the effectiveness of the application of imprisonment sanctions against children who commit crimes; Second, what factors hinder the application of sanctions imprisonment of children in the jurisdiction of the Purwokerto District Court. This research uses sociological juridical methods. The approach used is a case approach. The results showed that the application of imprisonment sanctions against children who commit crimes in the jurisdiction of the Purwokerto District Court was not effective. The inhibiting factors are legal factors, law enforcement factors, supporting facilities or factors, community factors and cultural factors. The effectiveness of the application of sanctions imprisonment against children can be implemented well when the law is upheld and the morality of law enforcement and the community that supports in that direction.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords:</em></strong></p><p><em>Effectiveness, Criminal Prison, Children</em></p></td></tr></tbody></table>

Criminal Justice: Overview

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolph Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
State Legislatures ◽  
The United States ◽  
System P ◽  
Essential Components ◽  
Ancient Times

The criminal justice system traces its roots to ancient times. When the 13 original colonies were formed, they brought many of the laws and legal processes from England. Traditionally, the criminal justice system is viewed as including law enforcement, judiciary, and corrections. However, state legislatures and Congress must be viewed as essential components of the criminal justice system because they pass laws that influence the other three components. A number of controversial practices and policies exist within the criminal justice system. Social work, which has had a long involvement in the criminal justice system, including spearheading the creation of the juvenile justice system in the United States, is involved in all phases of the criminal justice system.

scholarly journals The Implementation of Diversion by the Investigator of Bandung Police Department Towards Narcotics Cases Conducted by Children

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 156
Author(s):  
Herdiansyah Akhmadi ◽  
Ijud Tajudin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Police Department ◽  
Criminal Court ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Court System ◽  
Justice Process ◽  
Criminal Justice Process

Narcotics crime is not only done by someone who has entered adulthood. In fact, the involvement of children in the vicious circle of narcotic crime has often been encountered. In response, the Government issued Law No. 11 Year 2012 on the Criminal Justice System for Children to accommodate children with legal problems. In the Criminal Justice System Law for Children found a concept that is not encountered in another law that is diversion. Diversion is the transfer of the settlement of child cases from criminal justice process to process outside of criminal justice process. The requirement for a child to be made a diversion effort is a criminal threat against the child is not more than 7 (seven) years and not the repetition of criminal offense. Drug Division of Bandung City Police Department in the period of investigation 2015 - 2017 has handled 7 (seven) narcotics cases done by the child. The success rate of diversion in the BCPD is more than 50%, although not a few factors can hamper the enforcement of diversion itself. This study aims to find out how the process of diversion conducted by BCPD Drug Division and whatever obstacles they face. This research was conducted using normative juridical approach method and empirical juridical research specification, that is by examining secondary data consisting of primary law material, secondary law material, and field research in the form of a third party related interview. It can be argued that the application of diversion is not easy but does not make the process of applying diversion of children stalled. In addition to the necessary reforms in the aspect of a legislative establishment, it is also necessary to develop the infrastructure and capacity building of the law enforcement in the implementation of the diversion process, so that the implementation of diversion system can be done optimally. Thus, Indonesia as a just state of law can provide complete protection and justice for children from the conventional criminal justice systems Keywords: Child Criminal Court System, Diversion, Law Enforcement

scholarly journals Analisis terhadap Penghentian Penyidikan pada Laporan Polisi Nomor: B.210/VIII/2018/JAMBI/SPKT”C” Tentang Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan Anak

Wajah Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 341
Author(s):  
M Rudi Hartono ◽  
Lilis Winantri
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Police Officers ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Police Department ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Search And Seizure ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
The Republic

Law enforcement efforts by Law Enforcement Officers include a series of actions taken by police officers, Prosecutors, Judges, and Correctional Institutions. However, the spearhead in the handling of criminal cases that occur in the community is basically handled and carried out directly by police officers. In carrying out its duties, the Police have a basic duty as mandated in Article 13 of Law No. 2 of 2002 on the Police of the Republic of Indonesia, namely the Police have the task of maintaining security and public order, enforcing the law, and providing protection, protection, and service to the community. The task of law enforcement relates to the Criminal Justice System where the Police Department is one of its parts in addition to judges and prosecutors, which in the criminal justice system have the authority to make coercive efforts, which include the activities of arrest, detention, search and seizure. In carrying out the task of investigating the perpetrators of crimes or criminal cases, from the beginning of the investigation the case always coordinates with the Public Prosecutor, to avoid going back and forth on a recurring basis. In the police report Number: B.210/VIII/2018/Jambi/SPKT"C", there is a process of termination of investigation where the case of rape of a child is not continued to the stage of further law enforcement, namely the impeachment of the Prosecutor for prosecution, but in this case it is discontinued only to the level of investigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document