scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN NASABAH DEBITUR TERHADAP PERJANJIAN BAKU YANG MENGANDUNG KLAUSULA EKSONERASI PADA BANK UMUM DI BANDARLAMPUNG

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Jahri

Legal protection for debtor as a consumer in banking becomes important which the position of the some parts of credit contract is not balanced. Bank prefer to have a strong bargaining position, so the bank based on the reason of efficiency makes standard contract contain exoneration clause that incriminating debitors. The Government’s Determination Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection has been set up the opposition to banning the use of the standard contract. Similarly, the Financial Services Authority (FSA)/ Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) carried out a function of supervising the financial institution has issued POJK No. 1/POJK.07/2013 on Consumer Protection of Financial Services Sector. The regulations issued to protect consumers especially financial services sector. The result showed that credit contract of the commercial bank in Bandar Lampung still contains exoneration clause that prohibited on The Government’s Determination Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection and OJK Regulation No.1/POJK.07/2013 on Consumer Protection of Financial Services Sector. There is a clause that requires the debtors to submit all bank’s guidance and regulations, either already exist or will be set later. The legal consequence of the implementation of exoneration clause in credit contract is the contract can be canceled by law as mentioned in Article 18 paragraph (3) The Government’s Determination Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. The legal protection of debtor as a consumer of banking service has been arranged by the regulations, but the implementation has not effective because still there are abuses by the bank. Therefore, the active role of Financial Services Authority to conduct monitoring and providing strict sanctions to banks that violate the rule. Furthermore, need education for community and have to make a format of standard contract that compatible with rules which formulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA)/ Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). Keywords: Exoneration, Clause, Customer Protection, Standard Contract

GANEC SWARA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
ALINE FEBRIANY LOILEWEN ◽  
TITIN TITAWATI

  This study aims to examine and analyze how the legal protection and supervision of the banking world for customers using internet banking facilities.  This study uses a form of normative legal research, namely research that is based on written rules and legislation and various literature related to the problems that will be discussed in this study.   Some forms of legal protection for customers using internet banking facilities are the existence of the Financial Services Authority Regulation No.38 / POJK.03 / 2016 concerning Application of Risk Management in the Use of Information Technology by Commercial Banks (POJK IT Risk Management). The existence of Article 1 number 12 of Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions (UU ITE), electronic signatures are signatures consisting of electronic information that is attached, associated or related to other electronic information used as a verification and authentication tool . Another thing that can be done by customers who use internet banking facilities is to conduct customer complaints. Customer complaints are a manifestation of the protection of rights owned by customers, namely the right to be heard. This right is regulated in Article 4 letter d of Law 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection of the PK Law). Whereas in the financial services sector, there is Article 32 of the Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 1 / POJK.07 / 2013 concerning Consumer Protection in the Financial Services Sector (POJK PK) which stipulates that financial service sector business operators must have and carry out customer service and settlement complaints.  The supervision policy carried out by Bank Indonesia towards banks aims to protect the interests of the community and to maintain the continuity of the bank's business as a trust and as an intermediary institution, the supervision is carried out either directly or indirectly


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Dauri Dauri ◽  
Nadya Waliyyatunnisa ◽  
Retias Dewi Jayanti

This study aims to examine the legal protection of creditors against standard savingsbookkeeping agreements at the Bank. With the enactment of Law Number 8 of 1999concerning Consumer Protection, the customer or customer gets legal protection. To bea customer at a bank, the community must first be bound in a legal relationship with thebank. The legal relationship between the customer and the bank occurs after bothparties sign an account opening form as proof that the customer has agreed and iswilling to fulfill the terms and conditions proposed by the bank. Customers who deposittheir money in the bank expect profit, security and convenience, therefore there must beprotection provided by the bank to depositors. The problem that will be discussed in thisresearch is how the form of legal protection for creditors against the standardagreement to open a savings account at a bank. The method used in this study is a typeof normative juridical research or literature review or documents related to theproblem. Based on the results of the study the authors found that the form of legalprotection for deposit customers against the exoneration clause in the form of opening a savings account at a commercial bank is one of the government's efforts to protect consumers against businesses in the financial services sector. Financial ServicesAuthority Regulation Number:1/POJK.07/2013 concerning Consumer Protection TheFinancial Services Sector is able to put the position of consumers of financial servicesin balance with financial service players, but in practice banks still apply theexoneration clause.


Author(s):  
Marwah Marwah

Abstract                Under the provisions of Article 22 paragraph (1) of the Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 1/POJK.07/2013 on Consumer Protection of the Financial Services Sector, whereas in the case of Business Service Actors using standard agreements, such standard agreements shall be prepared in accordance with the laws and regulations . However, based on the results of the research, in the current banking practice, the agreement format has been prepared unilaterally by the bank in the form of standard conditions set forth in the printed form, and then presented to applicant debtor for approval. This study aimed to find out about the role of the Financial Services Authority as a facilitator in providing accurate information and provide facilities for the settlement of consumer complaints. This research was an empirical research conducted in Makassar city. The results indicated that the Financial Services Authority as a facilitator, not optimal in protecting the mortgage debtor.Key Word : Role of the Financial Services Authority, Debtor Protection Abstrak             Berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 22 ayat (1) Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 1/POJK.07/2013 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan, bahwa dalam hal Pelaku Usaha Jasa Keuangan menggunakan perjanjian baku, maka perjanjian baku tersebut wajib disusun sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan. Namun, berdasarkan hasil penelitian, dalam praktik perbankan saat ini, format perjanjian telah disiapkan secara sepihak oleh pihak bank berupa syarat-syarat baku yang dituangkan dalam formulir yang sudah dicetak, dan kemudian disodorkan kepada calon nasabah debitor untuk disetujui. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mengenai peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan sebagai fasilitator dalam menyediakan informasi yang akurat serta memberikan fasilitas penyelesaian pengaduan konsumen. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian empiris yang dilaksanakan di kota Makassar. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Otoritas Jasa Keuangan sebagai fasilitator, belum optimal dalam melindungi debitor Kredit Pemilikan Rumah.Kata Kunci : Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, Perlindungan Debitor   


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-61
Author(s):  
Rahmadi Indra Tektona ◽  
Mardi Handono ◽  
Regina Yurisprastita Jufri

Writing aims to find out the effort to resolve disputes for Tap Cash BNI card users who have failed to top up, which results in losses to consumers. The focus of the problem is how to resolve disputes between the banks as Tap Cash card issuers and consumers of electronic money users. This research begins by reviewing various laws and regulations which form the basis of legal protection for card users, for this reason, it is used normative juridical research, by reviewing the applicable laws and regulations. the author also uses the concept of the rule of law which is obliged to provide legal guarantees. In the matter of efforts to resolve disputes for consumers using the BNI Tap Cash card, the concept of legal protection also applies based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Financial Services Authority Regulation Number: 1 / POJK.07 / 2013 concerning Consumer Protection of the Financial Services Sector. Analysis of legal materials used is the analysis of legal materials with a deductive method which is a research method based on general concepts to provide concrete explanations of specific legal issues, data is collected through seminars, articles, and interviews and analyzed qualitatively. Based on the results of research conducted on the problem, it was found several forms of settlement efforts provided by the BNI bank namely the resolution of disputes outside the court and the resolution of disputes through the court.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mellisa Rahmaini Lubis

Consumers loses have occurred in the practice of Fintech-based loans by non-bank financial institutions. The reports of losses arising from Fintech transactions has increased. This is because many Fintech organizers have not received permission from the OJK but are still able to conduct business activities in Indonesia. The problem in this study is: How is the supervision by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) of non-bank financial institutions providing fintech-based venture capital lenders for MSMEs? And how is the legal consequences of fintech-based business capital loan services for MSME entrepreneurs. The study used normative legal approach and the data analyzed by descriptive qualitative.          The results of this study indicate that supervision by the OJK of non-bank financial institutions providing fintech-based venture capital lenders for SMEs as a form of legal protection to consumers. It is carried out in the form of preventive and repressive protection. Preventive protection is implemented by enacting OJK Regulation Number 77 / POJK.01 / 2016, OJK Circular Letter Number 18 / SEOJK.02 / 2017 and OJK Regulation Number 1 / POJK.07 / 2013 concerning Consumer Protection in the Financial Services Sector. Repressive protection is by applying sanctions against fintech organizers who commit violations in the form of written warnings and fines; restrictions on business activities; and revocation of permission. The legal consequences arising from fintech-based business capital loan services for SMEs to fintech providers are required to improve standards and meet consumer protection aspects. The legal consequence for MSMEs is the potential for fraud and misuse of consumer data by Fintech service providers.


Author(s):  
Desak Putu Dewi Kasih ◽  
Putu Devi Yustisia Utami

This study aims to determine the regulations regarding standard contracts in the banking sector after the existence of the authority of the Otoritas Jasa keuangan, to find out the legal consequences of violations of the provisions of standard contracts carried out by banking financial services and to determine efforts to prevent violations of standard contracts by banking financial services. This is normative legal research with with statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results show that the regulation regarding the standard contract after the existence of the OJK as a financial service consumer protection agency is regulated through the Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) No.1/POJK.07/2013 concerning Consumer Protection in the Financial Services Sector and in the Financial Services Authority Circular Letter (SEOJK) No. 13 /SEOJK.07 / 2014 regarding the Standard contract. The legal consequences of violating the provisions of the standard contract are not regulated in the POJK and the SEOJK. When it compared with the provisions of article 18 paragraph (3) of the Consumer Protection Law which explicitly states that violations of article 18 paragraphs (1) and (2) result in standard clauses being null and void, POJK and SEOJK only require financial service actors to make action plan, hence it is deemed to have no clear legal consequences. One of the efforts that must be made by banking financial service actors to prevent violations of the provisions of the standard contract is by making standard contract regulations independently and elaborating them in the internal banking regulations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 216
Author(s):  
Laras Ayu Sahita ◽  
Hudi Asrori

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to determine about legal protection for consumers of securities companies that purchase shares of public listed company that committed acts of corruption. This article using a normative prespective<br />legal research with statue approach. Legal materials that used include primary and secondary legal material obtained by data collection techniques based on literature study with analysis techniques with deductive logic, explain a general thing then drawing it into more specific conclusions. The result of this study explains that there is a legal protection in the form of efforts that can be done by the investors as explained in the Chapter VI Article 28 through Article 30 of Law Number 21 of 2011 on Financial Services Authority (FSA) and also through the predetermined Internal Dispute (IDR) mechanism by FSA. If the mechanism unsuccessfully, then they can do an alternative dispute resolution through an Alternative Dispute Settlement Institution in the Financial Services Sector as regulated in POJK Number 1 / POJK.07 / 2013. As a customer, it is expected to find out more about their rights and obligations in the capital market sector before deciding to invest their funds through a securities company. FSA also needs to provide more education regarding the rights and obligations of financial service businesses and financial service consumers. In addition, it is expected that the FSA can have a greater role related to the protection of consumers and society.<br />Keywords: Protaction; Securities Companies; Consumers of Securities Companies.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Penulisan artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tentang perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen perusahaan efek yang melakukan pembelian saham korporasi terbuka yang dinyatakan melakukan tindak pidana korupsi. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat prespektif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach). Jenis data yang digunakan berupa data primer dan sekunder yang diperoleh dengan teknik pengumpulan data berdasarkan studi kepustakaan dengan teknik analisis data dengan logika deduktif, yaitu  menjelaskan suatu hal yang bersifat umum kemudian menariknya menjadi kesimpulan yang lebih khusus. Hasil dari kajian ini adalah adanya perlindungan hukum berupa upaya yang dapat dilakukan oleh konsumen sebagaimana dijelaskan pada Bab VI Pasal 28 sampai dengan Pasal 30 Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dan juga melalui mekanisme Standar Internal Dispute (IDR) yang telah ditentukan oleh OJK. Jika melalui mekanisme tersebut belum menemui titik terang maka dapat melakukan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Sektor Jasa Keuangan sebagaimana diatur dalam POJK Nomor 1/ POJK.07/2013. Sebagai nasabah diharapkan untuk lebih mencari tahu kembali terkait hak-hak dan kewajibannya selaku nasabah di sektor pasar modal sebelum memutuskan untuk menginvestasikan dananya melalui perusahaan efek. OJK juga perlu memberikan edukasi lebih terkait hak dan kewajiban baik pelaku usaha jasa keuangan dan konsumen jasa keuangan, selain itu OJK diharapkan dapat memiliki peranan yang lebih besar lagi terkait dengan perlindungan konsumen dan masyarakat.<br />Kata kunci: Perlindungan; Perusahaan Efek; Konsumen Perusahaan Efek.</p>


2012 ◽  
Vol 51 (4II) ◽  
pp. 399-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syeda Rabab Mudakkar ◽  
Jamshed Y. Uppal

Financial services sector has become a major driver of economic growth in the developing countries through innovation in response to the forces of globalisation and technology. Sound risk management practices by financial institution are critical to the stability of the institutions and to the sustainability of economic growth. Therefore, measurement of market risk is important to all market participants for devising risk management strategies. Value-at-Risk (VaR) is the most widely used measure of market risk, which is defined as the maximum possible loss to the value of financial assets with a given probability over a certain time horizon. However, the task of implementing the VaR approach still remains a challenge as the empirical return distributions are found to be fat tailed and skewed in contrast to the normal distribution as assumed in the theoretical models. An extensive literature in finance (e.g., Nassim Taleb’s The Black Swan) underscores the importance of rare events in asset pricing and portfolio choice. These rare events may materialise in the shape of a large positive or negative investment returns, a stock market crash, major defaults, or the collapse of risky asset prices.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Lastuti Abubakar ◽  
Tri Handayani

<em>This study examines and analyzes the legal implications of strengthening the integrated Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions in the Financial Services Sector regulations. This study applies a normative juridical approach with descriptive-analytical research specifications. The data are analyzed using qualitative juridical analysis. Results show that: an Integrated Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions in the Financial Services Sector is a dispute resolution institution that is in accordance with the characteristics of the financial services sector as an agent of trust and prioritizes consumer protection. It is expected that consumer dispute resolution is faster, cheaper, and fairer for both Business Actors and the consumers; strengthening of regulations on integrated ADR Institutions in the Financial Services Sector aims to create independent, fair, effective, and efficient dispute resolution capable of anticipating developments in the financial services sector that are increasingly complex from a legal perspective, the use of financial technology, and products/services across financial services sectors</em>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document