scholarly journals Measuring the conformity level of the evaluation instruments in the BSE for indonesian language subject with the 2013 curriculum

BAHASTRA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Imam Safi'i ◽  
Ismi Salamah
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Instruments

Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Anton Hermawan ◽  
Anggita Kristiasari ◽  
Fransiska N. Bhiju ◽  
Dona Manik
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Performance Appraisal ◽  
Performance Standards ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Evaluation Instrument ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Professional Perspective ◽  
Evaluation Instruments ◽  
The Right ◽  
Good Organization

Introduction. Performance evaluation is the process of evaluating the implementation of the tasks of organizational members, including libraries, in accordance with the performance standards using particular way including instruments. Instruments are needed to document the evaluation carried out by the organization. Therefore, libraries need to pay attention to developa performance evaluation instrument to plan their human resources. This research explains an overview of stages in developing performance evaluation instruments in an organization, particularly libraries. Research methods. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach by involving the existing  performance evaluation dimensions. After that, the performance evaluation indicators were developed. Data analysis. The measurement of validity and reliability was valid when the correlation between items was >0.3 and when Cronbach alpha was > 0.6. The measurement of validity and reliability help to support the development of performance evaluation instruments. Results and Discussion. Of the 36 statements, only 27 items were valid and used in performance appraisal instruments. The items are arranged in a model of development of the performance evaluation instruments. Conclusion and recommendations. A good organization needs to pay attention to the right indicators in an assessment instrument. In its application, it is effective to use the 360 ​​degree method, where employees are evaluated by other staff to ensure the balance professional perspective.

Evaluation instruments for executive functions in children and adolescents: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Anna Berardi ◽  
Francescaroberta Panuccio ◽  
Luisa Pilli ◽  
Marco Tofani ◽  
Donatella Valente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Executive Functions ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Evaluation Instruments

A Review of Currently Published Evaluation Instruments for Human Patient Simulation

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e25-e35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzie Kardong-Edgren ◽  
Katie Anne Adamson ◽  
Cynthia Fitzgerald
Keyword(s):  
Patient Simulation ◽  
Human Patient Simulation ◽  
Human Patient ◽  
Evaluation Instruments

scholarly journals Teacher Hiring Instruments and Teacher Value Added: Evidence from Peru

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleonora Bertoni ◽  
Gregory Elacqua ◽  
Carolina Méndez ◽  
Humberto Santos
Keyword(s):  
Classroom Observation ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Teacher Characteristics ◽  
Teacher Hiring ◽  
School Teachers ◽  
Primary School Teachers ◽  
Female Teachers ◽  
Hiring Process ◽  
Evaluation Instruments ◽  
Public Primary School

In this article, we explore whether the evaluation instruments used to recruit teachers in the national teacher hiring process in Peru are good predictors of teacher effectiveness. To this end, we estimate teacher value-added (TVA) measures for public primary school teachers in 2018 and test for their correlation with the results of the 2015 and 2017 national evaluations. Our findings indicate that among the three sub-tests that comprise the first, centralized stage of the process, the curricular and pedagogical knowledge component has the strongest (and significant) correlation with the TVA measure, while the weakest correlation is found with the reading comprehension component. At the second, decentralized stage, we find no significant correlation with our measures of TVA for math, as well as non-robust correlations for the professional experience and classroom observation evaluation instruments. A positive and significant correlation is found between the classroom observation component and TVA for reading. Moreover, we find correlations between our measure of TVA and several teacher characteristics: TVA is higher for female teachers and for those at higher salary levels while it is lower for teachers with temporary contracts (compared to those with permanent positions).

scholarly journals Evaluation Instrument Development for Scientific Writing Instruction with A Constructivism Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 345-363
Author(s):  
Supriyadi Supriyadi
Keyword(s):  
Writing Instruction ◽  
Statistical Technique ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Scientific Writing ◽  
Evaluation Instrument ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Evaluation Instruments ◽  
Scientific Papers ◽  
Combined Models ◽  
Evaluation Of Learning

This study was conducted to develop evaluation instruments for scientific writing instruction with a constructivism approach. The development of evaluation instruments is important to provide valid and reliable measurement to measure the success rate of scientific writing instruction with a constructivism approach. In order to achieve these objectives, the combined models of development, i.e. 4D and RDR were used. The implementation of the development consisted of four stages, namely the preliminary study, define, design, and product development. The research data were in the form of quantitative and qualitative data and the data sources were the students, lecturers, practitioners, and experts in relevant fields of study. Data analysis technique was the domain technique and t test statistical technique for related samples. Based on the results, the obtained development product in the form of the evaluation of the instruction of writing scientific papers were valid and reliable. The development product consisted of four types of evaluation devices, the assessment rubrics, portfolios, observation sheets, and learning journal. Based on the results of the four development products, the effectiveness test was valid and reliable so that it can be used to conduct evaluation of learning to write scientific papers with constructivism approach, both for the evaluation of the process and the evaluation of the learning outcomes.

scholarly journals Evaluation Instruments and Good Practices in Online Education

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally Baldwin ◽  
Jesus H. Trespalacios
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Online Education ◽  
Undergraduate Education ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Seven Principles ◽  
Evaluation Instruments ◽  
Type Of Institution ◽  
Principles Of Good Practice

Chickering and Gamson’s (1987) Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education offers extensively researched and validated tenets for best practices in higher education. After a review of the literature, twenty-eight evaluation instruments currently used to design and review online courses in higher education institutions were collected and divided into categories, based on geographical reach and the type of institution for which they were developed. This study investigates how evaluation instruments used in higher education assess the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education, and what other items are addressed in the evaluation of courses. Findings show that national and statewide evaluation instruments were less institute specific and more closely aligned to the principles of good practice, and that evaluation instruments often measure extraneous items (e.g., student services, navigation, resources, or institutional support). Additional findings and conclusions based on the analysis of the instruments are discussed.

scholarly journals The Correlation between Teaching Evaluation and Lecturers’ Performances

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-37
Author(s):  
Nooradelena Mohd Ruslim ◽  
Ng Loo Ee ◽  
Norhusna Saharun ◽  
Nurhusna Baharuddin ◽  
Nurul Ain Abu Bakar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
Teaching Evaluation ◽  
External Factors ◽  
Final Examination ◽  
Inferential Statistics ◽  
Online System ◽  
Evaluation Scores ◽  
Evaluation Instruments ◽  
The Relationship

The purpose of the study is to explore the relationship between teaching evaluation and lecturers’ performances. To achieve this purpose, the study analysed the correlations between teaching evaluation scores by student and evaluation on lecturers’ performances by dean, and between teaching evaluation scores by student and students’ final examination results. Census study was applied to collect all data, which involved 124 lecturers and eight deans. The study used data from the online system, which involved evaluation made for 246 courses by all active students in semester June – November 2018. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied in this study and analysed using SPSS version 21.0. The result showed that there is no significant relationship between teaching evaluation scores by student and evaluation on lecturers’ performances by dean. This study also found that there is no significant relationship between teaching evaluation scores by student and students’ final examination results. Based on the findings, the study inferred there is bias in the evaluation instruments and there are external factors contributed to the outcome of insignificant correlations in both analyses, thus the effect or impact of the evaluation system to academic division is not significant

scholarly journals Development of Personal Information Privacy Concerns Evaluation

2018 ◽  
pp. 4862-4871
Author(s):  
Anna Rohunen ◽  
Jouni Markkula
Keyword(s):  
Service Providers ◽  
Personal Information ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Privacy Concerns ◽  
The Public ◽  
Data Intensive ◽  
Information Privacy Concerns ◽  
Evaluation Instruments ◽  
Information And Communication

Personal data is increasingly collected with the support of rapidly advancing information and communication technology, which raises privacy concerns among data subjects. In order to address these concerns and offer the full benefits of personal data intensive services to the public, service providers need to understand how to evaluate privacy concerns in evolving service contexts. By analyzing the earlier used privacy concerns evaluation instruments, we can learn how to adapt them to new contexts. In this article, the historical development of the most widely used privacy concerns evaluation instruments is presented and analyzed regarding privacy concerns' dimensions. Privacy concerns' core dimensions, and the types of context dependent dimensions, to be incorporated into evaluation instruments are identified. Following this, recommendations on how to utilize the existing evaluation instruments are given, as well as suggestions for future research dealing with validation and standardization of the instruments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document