scholarly journals SUBJECTIVE ATTITUDE OF A PERSON TO A CRIME AND PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LAW

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Presumption Of Innocence ◽  
Social Content ◽  
Dialectical Method ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Heuristic Appraisal

The publication is focused on the attempt of theoretical grounding of the place obtained by the requirement of obligatory consideration of the subjective attitude of a person to the features of committed crime within the system of principles of criminal law of Ukraine. To achieve this objective, the author has applied the dialectical method, the dogmatic (formal and legal) method, as well as analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction. The established approaches to determining the range of principles of criminal law of Ukraine have been studied. Particular attention has been paid to the prevalence of the existence of such a principle as the “principle of guilt” in interpretations of various specialists. This principle is also known as the “principle of guilty liability”. The correlation between the criminal principle of guilt and the criminal procedural presumption of innocence has been critically analyzed.It has been established that the principle of guilt in criminal law is complex. It includes such elements as the legislative definition of guilt (the Art. 23 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), the differentiation of guilt into forms and types (intent and its types, negligence and its types), the possibility to blame a person for only those socially dangerous consequences (the main and qualifying characteristics of corpus delicti of the committed crime), which were within a certain subjective attitude defined by law (intent or negligence), determining the severity of a particular crime depending on the content and degree of guilt, exclusion of criminal liability of a person for damage that was not covered (and could not be covered) by its subjective attitude. This principle also implies a compulsory presence of understanding (awareness as a result of heuristic, appraisal activity) of certain circumstances (nature and social content of the action or omission, properties of the object, specific features of the victim, awareness of certain norms or rules, etc.) by the subject before and during the commission of a crime.

scholarly journals THE “CRIMINAL LAW OF VICTIM” AS A CRIMINAL LAW MODEL

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
Irina Aleksandrovna Tretyak
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Theoretical Models ◽  
Legal Personality ◽  
Basic Model ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Impact

The subject. The article is devoted to analysis of the basic models of criminal law and the impact of victim’s legal status on the criminal legal theory.The purpose of the paper is to substantiate the existence and the importance of “criminal law of victim” as basic model of criminal legal theory.The methodological basis of the research includes general-scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, system-structural approach) as well as academic methods (formal-legal method, method of interpretation of legal texts).Results and scope of application. The definition of the role of the victim, the importance of his legitimate interests in the implementation of criminal liability is complicated by the fact that the basic models of criminal law developed by science – “criminal law of the offender” and “criminal law of the crime” – do not consider the victim as a subject of criminal legal relations.The theoretical models of criminal law are embodied in the criminal law, specific legal rela-tions, law enforcement acts, etc., in connection with which there are specific indicators – the parameters by which it is possible to determine which model of criminal law is implemented.If the question of the criminal legal personality of the victim is controversial, in my opinion, there is no doubt that the victim is a party to the criminal law conflict, which often begins to unfold long before the crime.Conclusions. Recognizing the victim as a subject of criminal legal relations, as well as a par-ticipant in the criminal law conflict, it is possible to talk about the formation of a new model of criminal law – “the criminal law of victim”.

The Subject of a Crime Under Part 1 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
E. G. Bykova ◽  
◽  
A. A. Kazakov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Code

The change in the disposition of Part 1 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation led to questions from law enforcement officers about from what moment a person is considered to be held administratively liable and what to mean by the commission of a similar act. The article carries out a systematic legal analysis of the provisions of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in order to formulate proposals for solving the indicated problems. The fundamental method was dialectical. The formal legal method was used in the study of regulations governing certain aspects of the legal assessment of unlawful acts that take into account administrative precedence. Using a comparative legal method, a distinction was made between situations where a person was ordered to be held administratively liable and an administrative penalty was imposed. Scientific publications on the subject were analyzed. It was concluded that the current version of Part 1 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, containing a formally indefinite legal category, raises the problem of calculating the one-year period during which a person can be prosecuted under this norm if there is an administrative precedence. In addition, it is justified that a «similar act» should be understood only as an administrative offense, responsibility for which is provided for in Art. 20.3.1 Administrative Code of the Russian Federation. The use of criminal law by analogy is unacceptable, therefore, it is proposed to amend the disposition of Part 1 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code to eliminate the identified gap. The problem identified could be the basis for further scientific research. The practical significance is due to the fact that the positions formulated by the authors can be taken into account in the process of improving criminal law, when amending the relevant explanations of the highest court in this category of cases in order to form a unified practice of applying criminal law.

scholarly journals Criminal liability for illegal implementation of medical and pharmaceutical activity: comparative analysis of legislation of the post-Soviet states

2021 ◽  
pp. 35-45
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Dmitrievna Sungurova
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Pharmaceutical Activity ◽  
The Russian Federation

The goal of this research consists in comparison of the normative legal acts that regulate the questions of criminal liability for illegal implementation of medical and pharmaceutical activity in Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, and the Russian Federation. The article employs the general scientific methods of cognition: analysis, synthesis, generalization. For identification of differences in the content of the corresponding legal norms, the author applies the comparative legal method, which consists in comparative analysis of the normative legal acts of the post-Soviet states. The research materials contain the norms of criminal law, as well as normative legal acts in the sphere of licensing. The novelty of this work consists in the fact that pursuit of ways to improve the national criminal law, the author assesses the possibilities of reception of certain provisions of the foreign legislation. The article explores the approaches towards systematization of crimes for illegal conduct of medical and pharmaceutical activity in the Criminal Code. The conclusion is made on the three approaches of the legislators towards establishment of origin of the object of crime. Analysis is performed on the current state of the practice of constructing criminal law sanctions of the norms on liability for illegal implementation of medical and pharmaceutical activity. The common feature of the Russian, Belarusian, Armenian, Kazakh, Azerbaijani, and Kyrgyz law consists in imposition of a fine as the basic punishment. The size of penalties are compared. It is proposed to expand the sanction of the Article 235 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with an additional penalty in form of revocation of right to hold a certain post or conduct a particular activity for a certain period of time.

scholarly journals Subject Of A Crime Under French Criminal Legislation

2021 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 63-68
Author(s):  
Khurshida Mirziyatovna Abzalova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
Legal Entities

This article deals with the issues of criminal liability of persons (the subject of the crime) for committing crimes under the Criminal Code of France. It is noted that the French criminal law does not contain any special chapter devoted to the subject of the crime, but provides for important provisions on the responsibility of individuals and legal entities. Based on the analysis, it was concluded that it is necessary to apply the experience of France in terms of liberalizing the responsibility of minors and introducing the responsibility of legal entities.

scholarly journals THE PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION OF THE ABETTING IN THE COMISSION OF THE OFFENCES INVOLVING THREATS TO PUBLIC HEALTH (PART 1 OF ARTICLE 9 OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTION ON THE COUNTERFEITING OF MEDICAL PRODUCTS AND SIMILAR CRIMES INVOLVING THREATS TO PUBLIC HEALTH)

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (11) ◽  
pp. 2912-2915
Author(s):  
Pavlo S. Berzin ◽  
Ivan S. Demchenko ◽  
Anzhela B. Berzina
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Structural Method ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Adequate Understanding ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The aim: based on the features of the notion of “abetting the commission of crimes established in accordance with the Convention” provided for in Part 1 of Art. 9 of the Medicrime Convention, it is necessary to offer an adequate understanding of the notion of “abetting” and define the types of criminal offenses (crimes) that are the “subject” of such abetting. Materials and methods: the research is based on an analysis of the provisions of the Medicrime Convention and the criminal law of Ukraine. The following methods were used: dialectical method; hermeneutic method; systemic-and-structural method; and comparative-legal method. Results: at the legislative level, there is a problem of designating the relevant socio-legal phenomena with adequate concepts and interpretations of these concepts. In the current criminal legislation of Ukraine, there is no definition of the concept of “abetting”, which is used in Part 1 of Art. 9 of the Medicrime Convention. Therefore, in the implementation of the requirements provided for in Part 1 of Art. 9 of the Medicrime Convention, each Party takes the necessary legislative and other measures to recognize abetting in committing any crimes, established under this Convention, as a crime, therefore we should take into account the existence of two alternative ways to explain the meaning of “abetting”: 1) to recognize at the legislative level that “abetting” and “incitement” are synonyms, and therefore the meaning of the term “abetting” can be explained by using the term “inclination”; 2) to recognize at the legislative level that the concept of “abetting” has a meaning different from the concept of “incitement”, and covers not only “inclination”, but also “coercion”, “motivation” and “encouragement”. Conclusions: the main disadvantage of using the concept of “abetting” in the text of the Ukrainian translation of the Medicrime Convention is that without an independent explanation of this concept at the legislative level, its content should be determined depending on the meaning of the term “inciter” under Part 4 of Art. 27 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), and means inciting a person to commit any of the crimes specified in the Medicrime Convention.

scholarly journals Problems of criminal liability for illegal amber mining in Ukraine

2021 ◽  
pp. 113-117
Author(s):  
R.O Movchan ◽  
A.A Vozniuk ◽  
D.V Kamensky ◽  
O.O Dudorov ◽  
A.V Andrushko
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Main Type ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Illegal Mining ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Subject

Purpose. Critical analysis of the criminal law provision on illegal mining of amber, identification of its shortcomings, development of proposals for their elimination. Methodology. The system of philosophical, general scientific and specific scientific methods and approaches, which have provided objective analysis of the subject under consideration, in particular, the method of systemic and structural analysis, specific sociological, statistical, comparative, formal-logical methods. Findings. Shortcomings of the criminal law provision on illegal mining, sale, acquisition, storage, transfer, shipment, transportation and processing of amber, in particular, unjustified expansion of the criminal law prohibition under consideration, unsuccessful design of the main and qualified components of the criminal offense under review, as well as unjustified sanctions. Originality. The authors have been among the first researchers in the domestic criminal law doctrine to provide a comprehensive critical understanding of the provision dedicated to the regulation of criminal liability for illegal amber mining, which has made it possible to develop scientifically based recommendations for improving domestic criminal law. Practical value. Based on the research results, specific proposals addressed to domestic parliamentarians have been developed, which can be taken into account in the process of further lawmaking in terms of updating relevant provisions of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. It is argued that the improved Art. 240-1 should only cover illegal mining of amber. The main structure of the researched criminal offense is proposed to be designed as material. It has been proven, including through references to specific law enforcement materials, that sanctions of Part1 of Art. 240-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine should provide for a fine as the only non-alternative main type of punishment, while referenced to alternative punishments in the form of a fine and imprisonment should be included in Parts 2 and 3.

PENALIZATION OF ILLEGAL INTERFERENCE IN THE OPERATION OF THE AUTOMATED COURT DOCUMENT SYSTEM IN UKRAINE

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-160
Author(s):  
Yehor Nazymko ◽  
◽  
Artem Shcherbina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Management System ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Mirror Image ◽  
Document Management ◽  
Document Management System ◽  
Criminal Offender ◽  
Unlawful Interference ◽  
Definition Of

In the article the authors consider the institute of penalization in general and penalization of illegal interference in the work of the automated document management system of the court in Ukraine in particular. It is indicated that the study of sanctions of criminal law, and in particular Art. 376-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which provides for criminal liability for unlawful interference in the automated document management system of the court, allows us to conclude that the legislator does not always correctly correlate the public danger of an illegal act, its consequences for the state and society. According to the author, the concept of penalization is somewhat narrower than penalization. This can be explained by the fact that criminal law, despite all its humanity, is an instrument, first of all, punitive, and only then educational influence. In most cases, correction is achieved through punishment in its purest form. That is why the measures and means of alternative work with a criminal offender, which consists in release from punishment are very limited. Therefore, depenalization is a mirror image of penalization, in its narrower sense. The author's definition of penalization is offered, which should be understood as a component of criminal law policy, which is a set of mutually agreed principles, laid down in the content of punishment and implemented in the form of sanctions of the Special Part of criminal law. It is concluded that currently the types of penalties provided for illegal interference in the work of the automated document management system of the court are not fully effective and do not correspond to the level of public danger of the act. An important way of development for the legislator is to change the approach to the subjects of such an offense and to establish the features of its commission, all the necessary components of the subjective side of the criminal offense. Currently, one of the effective ways to solve this situation is to differentiate criminal liability depending on the type of subject (general or special).

The Structure of Criminal Liability: Complicity

1996 ◽  
Vol 30 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 146-153
Author(s):  
Miriam Gur-Arye
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Mental State ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Draft Code ◽  
Actus Reus ◽  
The Law ◽  
Definition Of

The notion of “wrongdoing” is not recognized by the Draft Code. Nor does it classify the criminal law defences as either justification or excuse. Rather, the Draft Code distinguishes between “an offence” and “an act”. The term “offence” is used to cover cases where theactus reusis committed with the mental state required by the definition of the offence, by an offender who is criminally liable. An offender who has a defence, even a personal one, such as insanity, mistake, or duress, commits “an act”. The term “act” is used to indicate that defences negate the criminal nature of the act.I have elsewhere elaborated on the question whether or not a criminal code which aims to reform the criminal law should distinguish between justification and excuse. There I have both discussed and evaluated,inter alia, the proposals of the Draft Code in this context. Therefore, I shall not elaborate on this subject any further. I shall rather focus on the law of complicity and shall discuss three main issues.

Money Laundering and Tax Crimes in Spain: Doctrine and Jurisprudence

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-87
Author(s):  
Juan José Nieto-Montero
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Presumption Of Innocence ◽  
The Public ◽  
Spanish Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Tax Fraud ◽  
Illicit Activity

AbstractAs regulated in Spanish law, money laundering requires a prior illicit activity that has generated the assets that are the subject of laundering. One of the subjects that has been deeply discussed in recent years by certain doctrinal sectors, even with support in various jurisprudential rulings, has been the suitability of crimes against the Public Treasury, especially tax fraud, as the prior offence underlying money laundering. Thus, it has been debated whether the tax offender carrying out one of the activities typified in the Criminal Code (acquiring, possessing, using, converting or transmitting assets) automatically commits a type of money laundering. In that case, it would become an automatic and inevitable consequence of the tax crime itself. If, on the contrary, some other component must be required (essentially through the subjective elements of the unjust) to determine the existence of a second crime, that of money laundering, the prohibition of non-bis in idem confronts us, to a greater or lesser extent. Furthermore, doctrinal approaches and some judgements of the Spanish highest courts have generated a reinterpretation of the criminal law that fits badly with the principles of criminality. Nor is it easy to delineate the assets that are the object of the tax offence that may be subject to laundering, since, by definition, they are assets that were originally in possession of the offending subject and, besides, they are pecuniary obligations. To that extent, the presumption of innocence could, in many cases, determine the exoneration of the suspect.

scholarly journals Criminal Liability of Legal Persons in Light of the Subsidiarity of Criminal Repression

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-228
Author(s):  
Pavel Kotlán
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Theoretical Concept ◽  
Legal Person ◽  
Legal Regulations ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract This paper deals with the definition of (substantive) subsidiarity of criminal repression and the possibility of its application to the criminal liability of legal persons. After defining the liability of legal persons in the relevant legal regulations, the paper presents an interpretation of subsidiarity in Section 12(2) of the Criminal Code that is significantly different from the “official” opinion. Subsequently, the paper discusses certain criminal law situations in which the application of subsidiarity would lead to the conclusion that the legal person is not punishable (“non-criminality”). The first aim was thus to present the theoretical concept of subsidiarity of criminal repression, which would be methodologically correct, and therefore generally applicable. The second objective was directed at demonstrating that this construct can be applied to specific examples of the liability of legal persons, that is, that it can be applied to the activities of the bodies in charge of criminal proceedings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document