scholarly journals Sharia Principles in the Financial Services Authority Regulation on Dispute Settlement Alternatives

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Ro'fah Setyowati ◽  
Bagya Agung Prabowo
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Service Industry ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
Finance Industry ◽  
Banking Institutions ◽  
The Right

There is a legal disharmony with the Sharia Banking Law in the regulation on alternative dispute resolution institutions. This problem arises because the regulation does not pay attention to sharia principles, as mandated by Article 55, Paragraph 3 of the Sharia Banking Law. Meanwhile, the application of sharia principles is a spiritual right of consumers which also requires legal protection. This research is intended to assess alternative dispute resolution institutions' regulations, particularly Financial Services Authority Regulation from a consumer protection perspective, particularly spiritual rights. This research is categorized as an empirical normative study, using a philosophical, historical approach and a content analysis of the Financial Services Authority Regulation. The results of this study indicate that the Financial Services Authority Regulation on Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions has not accommodated spiritual rights in dispute resolution for the Islamic banking industry. A weak understanding of spiritual rights causes it in the context of dispute resolution. It also creates another problem in the form of a lack of attention and policies that support the protection of spiritual rights, both in regulatory and banking institutions. In the context of dispute resolution, there are general consumer rights, such as the right to get advocacy, while the application of sharia principles is a special right. Based on these findings, it is recommended that regulatory institutions, particularly the Financial Services Authority, pay adequate attention to the entire financial service industry under their respective characteristics. It is an important matter because the protection of spiritual rights supports the development of the Islamic finance industry both in Indonesia and globally.

scholarly journals Kewenangan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Asuransi Pasca Keluarnya Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Nomor 1/POJK.07/2014

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
Wisnu Kumala ◽  
Yaswirman Yaswirman ◽  
Ulfanora Ulfanora
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Consumer Protection Act ◽  
Legal Effect ◽  
Legal Consequences

There is a tug of authority in resolving insurance disputes outside the court between the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) based on Law Nomor 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection with Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions (LAPS) based on Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2014. This encourages the author to conduct legal research in order to determine the authority of BPSK in resolving insurance disputes as well as the legal consequences of the decision after the issuance of the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2014 using the statutory approach. This legal research results in the finding that BPSK is still authorized to settle insurance disputes following the issuance of the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2014, this is based on the provisions of the Lex superior derogat legi inferiori principle. Then there is no legal effect on the BPSK decision after the issuance of the Financial Services Authority Regulation. This is because BPSK's decision has been based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, whose position is higher than the Regulation of the Financial Services Authority. So there is no need for BPSK to follow the provisions of the regulations whose hierarchy of legislation is lower than the Consumer Protection Act. Therefore BPSK's decision is "final and binding" as explained in Article 54 paragraph 3 of the Consumer Protection Act.

Article 23—Common Provisions

2021 ◽  
pp. 408-408
Author(s):  
Eleonora Rosati
Keyword(s):  
Computer Program ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Computer Programs ◽  
Member States ◽  
Adjustment Mechanism ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Right

This chapter covers the common provisions in Article 23 of the copyright order in Europe, Directive 2019/790. It refers to Member States that are required to ensure that any contractual provision that prevents compliance with the transparency obligation and contract adjustment mechanism will be unenforceable in relation to authors and performers. It also looks at the legislation that causes non-compliance with the alternative dispute resolution procedure. The chapter points out that the provisions on the right of revocation do not apply to authors of a computer program within the meaning of Article 2 of Directive 2009/24/EC on the legal protection of computer programs. It emphasizes that the principle of appropriate and proportionate remuneration in Article 18 of Directive 2019/790 do not affect individuals involved in computer programs.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Perkara Pelanggaran Hak atas Merek

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-71
Author(s):  
I Gede Mahendra Juliana Adiputra ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Mutual Agreement

The existence of competition causes the original brand owner to feel disadvantaged because the sales result has decreased. It is permissible for someone to use another party's mark as long as they ask permission from the trademark owner first. The owner can give trademark rights to other people as agreed in an agreement. The formulation of the problem in this research is as follows: how is the legal protection of trademark rights and how to resolve violations of trademark rights. The research method used in this research is normative legal research. The results of the discussion in this study are as follows: Legal protection of the right to a trademark has been regulated by Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, in the provisions of the Law it is expressly stated that if it has been registered in the law that the right to a trademark has been protected. The sanction imposed on the perpetrator of the crime of trademark rights is a fine of Rp. 20,000,000, - (twenty million rupiah) on condition that if the fine is not paid, he will be subject to imprisonment for 6 (six) months. Settlement of trademark cases can be carried out through institutions that can be used to resolve trademark disputes, including: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration and Courts. Alternative dispute resolution wants the disputing parties to resolve their own dispute with the aim of obtaining a mutual agreement, if the agreement fails, can take arbitration, namely the disputing parties to be able to resolve the dispute to the arbitration institution based on the agreement, furthermore, if the arbitration is successful the last action is through the court, namely the commercial court which has the authority to adjudicate trademark disputes.

scholarly journals ASAS KESEIMBANGAN DALAM ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL DI LUAR PENGADILAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Usak .
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Labor Disputes ◽  
Balance Principle ◽  
Industrial Labor ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

Industrial labor disputes between workers or workers and employers often occur as a result of mismatches of opinion and / or actions of both. Both disputes are usually preceded by violations of law and may occur not for violation of the law. For the right institution to resolve industrial relations disputes, if based on the principle of balance thinking is a deliberation to seek dispute resolution, the right institution is a non-litigation institution outside the court, without having to be brought to the Industrial Relations Court. To further ensure the creation of a balance principle for the parties in disputes in industrial relations disputes, according to Law no. 2 of 2004 on Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement, dispute settlement takes priority through negotiation to seek deliberation outside the consensus of the courts, this will create a balance principle for the position of the parties while providing legal protection for workers/laborers. In accordance with the legal matter, the purpose of this study is to examine alternative forms of realization of industrial relations dispute settlement outside the court as a reflection of the principle of equilibrium.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI NASABAH PERUSAHAAN PERGADAIAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Dispute Resolution Mechanism

Preventive legal protection for customers of pawnshop company has been adequately regulated in the Financial Services Authority Regulations, namely regarding the requirements for legal entity forms, ownership and capital. In addition, there are restrictions that must be obeyed by pawnshop company as a form of protection for customers. Whereas repressive protection is a dispute resolution mechanism through the settlement of complaints made by the pawnshop company and dispute resolution through a court or an outside judicial institution, namely through an alternative dispute resolution institution.Keywords: Protection, customers, pawnshop company 

scholarly journals Analisis Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbatasan Laut Antara Indonesia Vietnam Di Perairan Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-188
Author(s):  
Rizza Ayu S ◽  
Ramlan Ramlan ◽  
Rahayu Repindowaty
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Exclusive Economic Zone ◽  
International Peace ◽  
Legal Regime ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
Peace And Security ◽  
Economic Zone

The sea border between Indonesia and Vietnam is a maritime border located in the South China Sea. Until now, there have been several problems that have occurred especially in the exclusive economic zone between Indonesia and Vietnam, which have not been completely resolved. The exclusive economic zone is an area outside and adjacent to the territorial sea which is subject to a special legal regime for international maritime law. Based on the principles of international peace and security, there are several attempts shown to create good relations between countries in resolving disputes that occur. The principle referred to in resolving international disputes is to provide a way for parties to a dispute to resolve their disputes based on international law. There are two methods of settlement known in international law, that is peacefully and in war (military). Dispute settlement procedures for countries that are interconnected with maritime territories between countries can be seen in Article 287 UNCLOS 1982 which regulates alternatives and dispute resolution procedures. This research is a normative study that examines sources related to the issues discussed. The results of this study conclude that in resolving disputes between Indonesia and Vietnam regarding maritime boundaries in the waters of the Exclusive Economic Zone, it can be resolved with various alternative dispute resolution alternatives as described in the 1982 UNCLOS framework, that is a) peaceful dispute resolution, b) dispute resolution with mandatory procedures. Each country is given the freedom to choose an alternative that will be used in resolving the dispute that is being faced what both parties want both take the litigation route (court route)as well as non-litigation channels (out of court) as regulated in Article 280 UNCLOS 1982.

scholarly journals Legal Protection Carried Out by the Financial Service Authority in a Dispute between Consumers and Insurance Companies in Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61
Author(s):  
Pujiyono ◽  
Sufmi Dasco Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Analytical Techniques ◽  
Financial Service ◽  
Insurance Companies ◽  
Data Types ◽  
Financial Service Authority ◽  
Litigation Process

This study aims to find out how the form of legal protection carried out by the Financial Service Authority towards consumers who experience disputes with insurance companies in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal research that is the prescriptive approach. The data are taken from secondary data types that consist of primary and secondary legal materials. Data collection techniques used are library studies, and the analytical techniques used are deductive by syllogism method. The result of the study shows that a form of repressive protections is carried out by the Financial Service Authority after a dispute between consumers and insurance services and a legal defense that contains many weaknesses. Settlement of disputes between consumers and Insurance Companies can be done through litigation/ court and non-litigation/ out of court settlement. In the litigation process through the Commercial Court. The non-litigation process that will carried out with the institution/ internal dispute resolution step, limited facilities through mediation that facilitated by Financial Services Authority and finally through the external dispute resolution or the arbitration institution.

scholarly journals Dispute Settlement on E-Commerce Contract: A Practical Analysis of Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-486
Author(s):  
Firqotun Naziah
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Border Trade ◽  
Practical Analysis

E-commerce is a form of trade which has its own characteristics that are cross-border trade, not to meet the seller and buyer, use media internet. The birth of Law No. 11 of 2008 is about Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE Law) seems to be the solution to provide protection for consumers. In the ITE Law has set the terms validity of e-commerce transactions, establishing the rights and obligations, prohibited acts, responsibility, legal protection, remedies, and dispute resolution in e-commerce transactions. This study analyzes the dispute settlement for e-commerce dispute in Indonesia.

scholarly journals СУТНІСТЬ ТА ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ДОСУДОВОГО ВРЕГУЛЮВАННЯ АДМІНІСТРАТИВНО-ПРАВОВИХ СПОРІВ

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 5-18
Author(s):  
C. В. Ківалов
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
The Relationship

У статті проаналізовано поняття, сутність та особливості досудового урегулювання адміністративно-правових спорів. Особливу увагу приділено співвідношенню понять «спо­соби, альтернативні правосуддю» й «альтернативне вирішення спорів». Здійснено поділ до­судових способів за такими критеріями: 1) за суб'єктом, що здійснює процедуру вирішення спору: а) державні процедури врегулювання спору; б) недержавні процедури врегулювання спору; 2) за методом врегулювання спору: а) примирювальні (компромісні) процедури; б) правовїдновлювальні процедури; в) змішані процедури. Визначено, що найбільш поши­реними методами досудового вирішення спорів с переговори, посередництво, арбітраж.   The paper analyzes the concept, essence, and characteristics of pre-trial settlement of administrative legal disputes. Particular attention is paid to the relationship between the concepts "methods alternative to justice" and "alternative dispute resolution". The author carries out the classification of pre-trial methods according to the following criteria: 1) by the entity that carries out the procedure for dispute settlement: a) state dispute settlement procedures; b) non-state dispute settlement procedures; 2) by the method of settlement of the dispute: a) conciliation (compromise) procedures; b) procedures for restoration of rights; c) mixed procedures. It is determined that the most common methods of pre-trial dispute resolution are: negotiation, mediation, arbitration.

Part II The Member State Reports on Transposition of the Directive, 16 Spain

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos Francisco
Keyword(s):  
Member State ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Competition Law ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
General Overview ◽  
Full Compensation ◽  
The Right

This chapter examines the transposition of the Antitrust Damages Directive in Spain. It begins with a general overview of the transposition process, focusing on the Transposition Decree that inserts new articles in the Defence Competition Act of 2007 and in the Civil Procedure Act. It then describes the material, territorial, and temporal scope of the Transposition Decree before analysing the main issues concerning antitrust damages claims affected by the Transposition Decree or that may be relevant in future actions for damages, such as those relating to the jurisdiction of competent courts to decide damages claims based on infringements of competition law, the right to full compensation, joint and several/parental liability, passing-on of the harm and claims by indirect purchasers/suppliers, the limitation period for bringing damages claims, the use of alternative dispute resolution procedures, measures to facilitate claims, and collective claims and consumer redress.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document