scholarly journals Restorative Justice Bagi Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan dalam Perspektif Pidana Islam

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Hasuri Hasuri
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Negative Behavior ◽  
Criminal Cases

The settlement of criminal cases by using the punishment method for the perpetrators (retributive) is not effective enaough and it is not become deterrent for the perpetrators but they more expert in doing criminal acts, moreover the perpetrators are children under the age that they are unstable in psychiatric and very easy to imitate the negative behavior gained in jail. Many methods of punishment offered by experts to change conventional punishment methods one of them is using the Restorative Justice, the  concept of punishment is by involving the victim's family efforts not only focus on giving suffering to the perpetrator but also healing the injuries suffered by the victim and the victim's family. This study focuses on the concept of Restorative Justice for children involved in criminal acts of murder in Islamic criminal studies, and find the differences in the application of Restorative Justice in the provision of a positive legal system in Indonesia with Islamic criminal law.

The English Legal System

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Vikram Sachdeva ◽  
Victoria Butler-Cole ◽  
Annabel Lee
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
General Structure ◽  
Primary Sources ◽  
Legal Rights ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Medical Practitioners ◽  
System P ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Basic Features

The practical application of the law can be broadly divided into civil and criminal law. Criminal law is imposed and enforced by the state in contrast to civil law, which aims to enforce civil legal rights and obligations between individuals. There are two primary sources of law in our domestic legal system—namely, statutes and common law. The court structure in England and Wales is labyrinthine in complexity, but has some basic features which are simple. Criminal cases are normally heard in the Magistrates’ Court or Crown Court while civil cases generally start in the County Court (for low-value cases) or the High Court (for high-value cases). Within this general structure, there are a number of specialist courts, which medical practitioners may encounter from time to time. Sanctions for criminal cases include imprisonment, a fine, or community service, but civil cases are usually awarded damages, i.e. financial compensation.

scholarly journals MENS REA AS THE BASIS OF DIVERSION IN THE CHILD CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM BASED ON RESTORATIVE JUSTICE

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (04) ◽  
pp. 62-67
Author(s):  
Nur Chasanah ◽  
◽  
Arief Darmawan SU ◽  
Otto Yudianto ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Mens Rea ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
Criminal Penalty ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law

Restorative justice or more precisely keadilan restoratif in the Indonesian context is based on the principle of building joint participation between perpetrators, victims, and community groups in resolving a criminal act. The problem has been that in the formulation of the laws and government regulations diversion (diversi) is carried out if a criminal act is committed by a child who is punishable by imprisonment under seven years other than that if criminal acts that were committed by a child is not a repetition of criminal acts (recidive). A research using a normative legal research method found that through legal findings or rechtsvinding (penemuan hukum), judges can formulate criminal law policies through their decisions based on mens rea. Tt is a must for judges to settle criminal cases with a child of 12-years-old age perpetrator and/or the delinguent actor is a recidive via diversion. The provisions of Indonesian criminal procedure law dicates that judges are also obliged to seek diversion towards the settlement of all criminal cases whose actions were committed by children, both those with a criminal penalty over seven years and/or recidive or those who does not included in the two categories.

scholarly journals Effectivity Of Restorative Justice Meets The Just Nature Of Indonesia Society

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramdani Abd. Hafizh ◽  
Ahmad Ramdani Chairi ◽  
Dirasid Dirasid ◽  
Raka Febrian Krisnaputra ◽  
Irvan Ali
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Law System ◽  
Kinship System ◽  
Traffic Violations ◽  
Main Factor ◽  
Adat Law

Restorative justice is a form of cases settlement beyond the court which engaged perpetrator, victim and society as condition restore after the crime. This form started to be developed in Indonesia, especially in regions which implement “adat” law consistently and have close kinship system. Restorative justice is urgently needed today, in order to reduce the number of cases and prison over capacity. The significant number of criminal cases which had been judged in the court is the main factor of prison over capacity. The prison full of criminal which had variety of crimes. The negative impact is, prison is not a shoch-therapy for the criminals, instead of after they fulfill their sentence period and become alumni of prison, they tend to re-do their crimes even worse than the previous one. This condition was the causing factor of restorative justice in the criminal law system for example, children criminals, traffic violations which had narrow impacts and can be solved by “adat” institution, with the exception for major cases or extraordinary crimes for instance drugs, planned murder, terrorism and genocide

scholarly journals The Process Of Settlement Of Criminal Actions With Children Through Approach Restorative Justice

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-156
Author(s):  
Rismanto Rismanto
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Criminal Behavior ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Negative Behavior ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Keywords Children

Abstract                                                                              Children are the mission and gift of God Almighty, and we must always protect them, because children are a nature that is attached to human dignity and rights and must be protected. Child protection is any activity that guarantees and protects children and their rights so that they can live, grow and participate as best as possible according to human dignity and receive protection from violence and discrimination. For children who have violated the law, it is strongly influenced by factors other than children, because children's criminal behavior is usually a process of imitating or being influenced by or influenced by the negative behavior of adults or people around them. Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System includes a concept in the settlement of underage criminal cases, namely the concept of restorative justice. In solving criminal acts, this concept is realized by involving the perpetrator, victim, perpetrator / victim's family, and other related parties to find a fair solution that prioritizes restitution rather than revenge. Keywords: Children, Restorative Justice, Child Crimes

KONSEP RESTORATIVE JUSTICE MELALUI MEDIASI PENAL DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA BERMOTIF RINGAN PADA MASYARAKAT ADAT KAMPUNG KUALA GASIB DI KECAMATAN KOTO GASIB KABUPATEN SIAK

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
ELMA YANTI
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Direct Participation ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Differences Of Opinion ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials

The settlement of criminal offenses with mild motives can be carried out by reasoning penal mediation called the restorative justice approach, which focuses on the direct participation of perpetrators, victims and the community. The research that use in this study is sociological legal research (social legal research). The concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of a mildly criminal case for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak, was carried out with the intermediary of the headman. Headman as customary village heads and as government administrators have an important role in creating peace efforts in resolving disputes that occur in the community, one of which is through the settlement of criminal cases by reasoning penal mediation with the concept of restorative justice. The constraints of the concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of mildly criminal cases for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak are: a) The absence of a special law mediation of regulation, b) Lack of facilities and infrastructure in mediating, c) Lack of mediator skills for village head to reconcile the parties to the dispute, d) There are differences of opinion among law enforcement officials about the concept of restorative justice through penal mediation

Errors in the Application of the Criminal Law on Certain Corruption Crimes in Practice of Appeal and Cassation Courts

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 72-80
Author(s):  
A. V. Galahova ◽  
Y. I. Antonov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Retroactive Effect

The article is devoted to systematization of generalized appeal and cassation practice on errors in criminal cases of corruption crimes in 2017–2018. Errors are systematized in such areas as the unfairness of the sentence; the absence of a crime in the act; inconsistency of the conclusions of the court set out in the sentence, the actual circumstances of the criminal case; incorrect application of the provisions of the criminal law in time and its retroactive effect.

Theft and Fraud Committed Using Electronic Payment Systems (Regional Judicial and Investigative Practice)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 66-79
Author(s):  
S. L. Morozov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Payment Systems ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Electronic Payments ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation

The advent of the electronic currency and the effecting of electronic payments has caused new forms of thefts and types of acquisitive crimes. The judicial investigative practice of criminal cases of embezzlement committed using bank cards and other types of electronic payments has encountered problems with the qualification of such acts. The author identifies the most common enforcement problemsand their causesby a retrospective study of judicial practice, the changing norms of the criminal law. At the same time, a ten-year period of work of the judicial investigating authorities was studied. On the basis of traditional general scientific methods of cognition, as a result of a system-legal analysis of the considered set of specific situations, the author gives an author's view of the complex of causes that cause a lack of uniformity in judicial investigative practice. Using the hermeneutic approach, the author paid special attention to the application by the courts of the interpretation of the criminal law by the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in different years. In conclusion, ways of resolving contentious issues of qualification of thefts and fraud in the field of electronic means of payment are proposed. It has been ascertained that high-quality and uniform law enforcement can provide additional clarification on the delimitation of related and competing theft from the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. It is concluded that in general, the current concept of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation does not contain contradictions with the novels of the criminal law, but can be improved. The rationale and edition of possible additions to the relevant decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation are given.

Recklessness: the House of Lords and the criminal law

Legal Studies ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-286
Author(s):  
Jenny McEwan ◽  
St. John Robilliard
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Court ◽  
Mens Rea ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
House Of Lords

‘The House of Lords has a dismal record in criminal cases. All too often their lordships’ decisions have to be reversed by legislation…the present decision could well be another'.In two recent criminal appeals of major importance on the meaning of mens rea, Caldwell and Lawrence, the House of Lords has departed so far from the academically accepted deffition of ‘recklessness’, that Professor Smith is driven to ask, ‘Can we really afford the House of Lords as an appellate criminal court?’. Such desperation surely indicates that their Lordships have got things badly wrong and it is our purpose in this article to examine whether this is indeed the case.

scholarly journals Takzir sebagai Hukuman dalam Hukum Pidana Islam

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-272
Author(s):  
Usammah Usammah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
National Level ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Community Life ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Sharia Law ◽  
Interesting Part ◽  
Western Law

Memformalisasikan syariat Islam baik dalam ranah kehidupan bermasyarakat dan sosial, dalam bernegara dan berbangsa tidak jarang terjadi perdebatan, baik perdebatan sosial-politik maupun keagamaan. Perdebatan itu di samping menyangkut memahami ajaran agama dan hubungannya dengan negara-bangsa, juga dalam memahami sistem hukum yang ada dalam negera, lebih-lebih bahwa negera menganut sistem hukum positif yang lebih banyak dipengaruhi oleh hukum barat. Gagasan pemberlakuan hukum pidana Islam tidak serta merta dapat dijalankan dengan baik tanpa adanya legislasi dan pembentukan hukum pidana Islam materil sebagai hukum positif yang berlaku. Juga bahwa hukum pidana Islam adalah hukum publik yang membutuhkan kekuasaan negara baik dalam pembentukannya maupun dalam penegakannya. Dalam hubungannya dengan legislasi dan pembentukan hukum (qanun syariat Islam), maka hal yang sangat menarik adalah bagaimana menentukan bentuk jarimah dan uqubatnya baik yang termasuk dalam kategori hudud, qisas, dan takzir sebagai bagian dari sistem penegakan hukum syariat Islam. Takzir as a Punishment in Islamic Criminal Law The formalizing of Islamic Sharia Law both in the realm of social and community life and also in the state and national level. This issue is frequently debatable, both in socio-political as well as in religious matter. The debate is not only about understanding religious teachings and their relationship with the nation, but also about understanding the legal system applicable in the country, especially the country which apply a positive legal system that influenced by western law. The idea of enforcing Islamic Criminal Law cannot be carried out properly without the existence of legislation and the establishment of Islamic Criminal Law as a positive law that enforced. In addition, Islamic Criminal Law is a public law that requires state power both in its formation and in its enforcement. In relation to legislation and the formation of law (Qanun Sharia), the very interesting part is how to determine the form of rahmah and uqubat both are included in the hudud, qisas and takzir categories as part of the Islamic Sharia law enforcement system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document