scholarly journals Akibat Hukum Terhadap Peralihan Hak Milik Atas Tanah Yang Belum Lunas Pembayarannya

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
M. Adib Luthfi ◽  
Akhmad Khisni

ABSTRAKHasil penelitian menyimpulkan, bahewa akibat hukum dari peralihan hak milik atas tanah yang belum lunas pembayarannya adalah sah secara jual beli, akan tetapi apabila pembayaran harga tanahnya tersebut belum dilunasi terlebih dahulu maka peralihan hak nya dapat ditangguhkan (sesuai perjanjian pengikatan jual beli lunas). Setelah pembayaran harganya dilunasi baru proses peralihan haknya dilanjutkan (pembuatan Akta Jual Beli dan proses sertifikat). PPAT membuatkan Akta Jual Beli selanjutnya akta tersebut dijadikan alat bukti autentik yang menerangkan telah terjadi peralihan hak atas tanah melalui jual beli selanjutnya untuk didaftarkan. Sedangkan jual beli tanah yang menganut hukum adat bersifat konkret, kontan, nyata dan riil. Artinya peran PPAT dalam melaksanakan amanat Undang-Undang tersebut harus benar-benar terlaksana dan kaitannya dengan peralihan hak milik atas tanah yang belum lunas pembayarannya, PPAT harus menentukan sikap tegas untuk tidak membuatkan Akta Jual Beli tersebut sebelum seluruh pembayaran harganya lunas meskipun cara pembayarannya secara bertahap. Solusinya apabila ada permasalahan seperti itu maka PPAT harus membuatkan perjanjian pengikatan jual beli lunas sebelum dibuatkan Akta Jual Belinya. Hal tersebut dilakukan supaya terwujud rasa keadilan dan meminimalisir wanprestasi antara penjual dan pembeli dalam kaitannya dengan jual beli tanah.Kata Kunci : Akibat Hukum, Jual Beli Tanah, Belum Lunas. ABSTRACT The result of this study concludes that the legal effect of the transfer of ownership of land that has not paid off is valid for the sale and purchase, but if the payment of the land price has not been paid in advance then the transfer of its rights can be suspended (in accordance with the agreement of sale and purchase settlement paid). After payment of the price is paid a new process of transfer of rights continue (making Deed of Sale and Purchase certificate process). PPAT makes the Deed of Sale and then the deed is used as authentic proof that there has been a transfer of land rights through subsequent sale and sale to be registered. While the sale and purchase of land that adheres to customary law is concrete, cash, real and real. This means that the role of PPAT in carrying out the mandate of the Act must be fully implemented and related to the transfer of ownership rights to land that has not paid off, PPAT must determine the firm stance to not make the Deed and Sell before all payment of the price paid in full even though the payment method gradually . The solution if there are problems like that then PPAT must make a binding agreement to buy and sell paid before the Deed of Sale. This is done in order to realize the sense of justice and minimize the default between the seller and the buyer in relation to the sale and purchase of land.Keywords: Legal Effect, Sale and Purchase Land, Not Filled.

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-146
Author(s):  
Cornelia Junita Welerubun

Unalienated land dispute resolution in a way that is custom done by indigenous chiefs to resolve the dispute relating to customs. To resolve the disputes of indigenous chiefs hold a customary or sitting often known as judicial customs. The judicial nature of the Customs mediation, there is King as a mediator in it. The important role of indigenous chiefs of in dispute resolution is needed, this is because Community law is very respectful of indigenous chiefs. Legal protection must be viewed stages namely legal protection was born from a provision of the law and the rule of law given by a society that basically is the community's agreement to regulate the relationship between the behavior members of the society and between the individuals with the Government deemed to represent the interests of the community. Legal protection is not a true picture of the work function of the law itself that its purpose is not to provide other guarantees of fairness, expediency and also legal certainty. Legal protection will be more evident in the ownership of land rights is supported by the presence of certificate of land rights, as a means of proof of land ownership rights.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Yanto Sufriadi

This study focuses on the concept of land ownership rights based on Indonesian customary law and Islamic law. This study is a normative legal research with the approach of statutory law, customary law and Islamic law. Data obtained through library research. Based on this study, it is concluded that both Indonesian Customary Law and Islamic Law recognize individual ownership of land, but that ownership has a social function, namely that land rights must provide benefits for welfare, both the welfare of the owner and the welfare of the community. Both Indonesian Customary Law and Islamic Law prohibit land ownership that is detrimental to the welfare of others. This concept is expected to become a reference in formulating the ownership of material rights in Indonesian National Law.


Author(s):  
Saim Aksnudin

In the national development the role of land for the fulfillment of various purposes will increase, either as a place to live or for business activities. In relation to that will also increase the need for support in the form of guarantee of legal certainty in the field of land. The result of the research is the conception of the state of Indonesia is a state law, which contains the meaning in the administration of government and the state based on the law, the protection of the law is a universal concept of the rule of law. The legal certainty on land rights as intended by the UUPA encompasses three things, namely the certainty of the object of land rights, certainty on the subject of land rights and certainty about the status of landrights. Legal conception of land title certificate is a proof that issued by authorized legal institution, containing juridical data and physical data which isused as evidence of ownership of land rights in order to provide assurance of legal certainty and certainty of rights to a plot of land owned or possessed by a person or legal entity. With the certificate of rights, it is expected that the juridical can guarantee the legal certainty and the right by the state for the holder of the right to the land. This country's guarantee is granted to the owner or the holder of the certificate may be granted because the land is already registered in the state land administration system.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 829
Author(s):  
Riyanto Riyanto ◽  
Arief Cholil

Abstract. The bride and groom's candidate before the marriage takes place, can make a "Marriage Agreement" to provide legal certainty related to property and for legal protection against third parties. Primarily for mixed marriages, the bride and groom are subject to two different legal systems according to their nationality. , the agreement made by the Marriage Agreement has been amended by the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 dated October 27, 2016. The positive implication for the intermarriage is that it can have land rights in the form of Ownership Rights (HM) and Right to Build (HGB) without having to divorce first. Then, this research intends to discuss the practice of the Implementation of Mixed Marriage Agreements based on Act No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015. The purpose of this study was to describe the role of the notary in the deed Mating Agreement and its implementation after the decision of the Court in question, and to know the legal implications of the couples in mixed marriages. The method in this research is juridical empirical research methods.Keywords: Mating Agreement; Marriage Commingling; Deed; Decision of the Constitutional Court; Marriage Act.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Fatimiah Azzahra

This article aims to discuss the conflict of tenure rights between Perhutani and the community and the status of land held by the community after the entry into force of Presidential Regulation No. 86 of 2018 concerning Agraria Reform. The study uses a sociological juridical method. The location of the study is in the forest area of   Perhutani Public Corporation, Malang Regency. Data collection techniques using observation, interviews, and documentation. The results of the study show that conflicts over ownership of land rights between Perhutani and the community have been going on for a long time. Physically the land has been controlled by the community since the Dutch colonial era and passed down from generation to generation. The granting of permission to manage the land and payment of land tax strengthened the community’s argument about land ownership. The land status which is the object of the dispute is based on Presidential Regulation No. 86 of 2018 concerning Agrarian Reform became the authority of Perhutani Public Corporation. Communities can get ownership rights or get land compensation if the Ministry of Forestry releases the land.


Notaire ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
Nailu Vina Amalia

The deed of the purchase and sale agreement (PPJB). The deed of the sale and purchase agreement is a preliminary agreement prior to the sale and purchase of land. PPJB is used only once. If what is agreed in the PPJB has been fulfilled then the signing of the sale and purchase deed can be carried out, by signing the sale and purchase deed, the ownership of land rights has been transferred. There are still many people who think that when the PPJB is signed, there will be a transfer of land rights, even though the PPJB is not an evidence of a transfer of land rights. This thesis discusses graded PPJB or recurring PPJB made by a Notary on a plot of land based on ownership rights over land use rights of former customary land based on the quotation of the Decree of the Governor of East Java Region Serial Number I/Agr/117 XI/HM/01.G/1970 issued November 4, 1970, or uncertified land. Whether it contradicts the concept of buying and selling in agrarian law and the legal consequences of the PPAT who made the sale and purchase deed based on the graded PPJB.Keywords: Graded PPJB; Recurring PPJB: Proof of Prior Rights.Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (akta PPJB). Akta PPJB merupakan perjanjian pendahuluan sebelum diadakannya jual beli tanah. Akta PPJB digunakan untuk sekali saja, namun prakteknya masih ditemukan Akta PPJB bertingkat. Masih banyak masyarakat yang menganggap apabila sudah ada akta PPJB sudah ada peralihan hak atas tanah, padahal akta PPJB bukan bukti adanya peralihan hak atas tanah. Akta Jual Beli (AJB) yang merupakan bukti adanya peralihan hak atas tanah. AJB dibuat apabila syarat-syarat yang ada dalam akta PPJB sudah terpenuhi. Dalam tesis ini membahas tentang akta PPJB bertingkat atau akta PPJB berulang yang dibuat oleh Notaris atas sebidang tanah berdasarkan Hak Milik atas tanah Hak Pakai bekas Gogolan tidak tetap berdasarkan Kutipan Surat Keputusan Gubernur Kepala Daerah Tingkat I Jawa Timur Nomor I/Agr/117/XI/HM/01.G/1970 tertanggal 4 Nopember tahun 1970 atau tanah yang belum bersertipikat apakah akta PPJB bertingkat tersebut bertentangan dengan konsep jual beli dalam hukum tanah dan akibat hukum dari Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) membuat AJB berdasarkan akta PPJB bertingkat.Kata Kunci: PPJB Bertingkat; PPJB Berulang; Bukti Hak Lama.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-119
Author(s):  
Happy Trizna Wijaya

Since September 24, 1960 Law No. 5/1960 was stipulated regarding Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles or often referred to as the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), adopting legal unification and based on customary law. Customary land law is original law, has a unique characteristic, where individual rights to land are personal rights but in it contain togetherness. Land controlled by customary law communities is known as ulayat rights. Although customary law is the basis of the LoGA, problems with ownership rights to customary land often occur due to unclear land boundaries and customary land tenure by the government without any release of land. The results of this study revealed that the procedure for controlling customary land by the local government through the mechanism of land acquisition as stipulated in Permendagri No. 15 of 1975 provides more opportunities for the Government to control land rights, while the owner / holder of land rights has a very weak position because many rights to land are neglected so that it violates the human rights of land rights holders. With the issuance of Presidential Decree No. 55 of 1993 concerning Land Procurement for the Implementation of Development for the Public Interest in lieu of Permendagri No. 15 of 1975, which provides a protection to holders of land rights to be able to defend their rights. This is also the case with Perpres No. 36 of 2005 Jo Perpres No. 65 of 2006 issued as a substitute for Presidential Decree No. 55 of 1993, far more provide protection to the community to defend their rights, while the government is increasingly limited in obtaining land. So Perpres No. 65 of 2006 provides a guarantee of legal certainty to holders of land rights to be able to defend their rights.Sejak 24 September 1960 ditetapkan Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-pokok Agraria atau sering disebut Undang-undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA), menganut unifikasi hukum dan berdasarkan hukum adat. Hukum tanah adat merupakan hukum asli, mempunyai sifat yang khas, dimana hak-hak perorangan atas tanah merupakan hak pribadi akan tetapi didalamnya mengandung unsur kebersamaan. Tanah-tanah yang dikuasai oleh masyarakat hukum adat dikenal dengan sebutan hak ulayat. Walaupun hukum adat merupakan dasar dari UUPA tetapi permasalahan terhadap hak kepemilikan atas tanah adat seringkali terjadi karena penentuan batas tanah hak ulayat yang tidak jelas, maupun karena penguasaan hak atas tanah adat oleh pemerintah tanpa ada pelepasan tanah. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa Prosedur penguasaan tanah ulayat oleh Pemda melalui mekanisme pembebasan tanah yang tertuang dalam Permendagri No. 15 Tahun 1975 lebih memberikan kesempatan kepada pihak Pemerintah untuk menguasai hak atas tanah, sedangkan pemilik/pemegang hak atas tanah mempunyai kedudukan yang sangat lemah karena banyak hak atas tanah yang diabaikan sehingga sangat melanggar hak asasi pemegang hak atas tanah. Dengan diterbitkannya Kepres No. 55 Tahun 1993 mengenai Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum sebagai pengganti Permendagri No. 15 Tahun 1975, yang memberikan suatu perlindungan kepada pemegang hak atas tanah untuk dapat mempertahankan haknya. Begitu juga halnya dengan Perpres No. 36 Tahun 2005 Jo Perpres No. 65 Tahun 2006 yang dikeluarkan sebagai pengganti Kepres No. 55 Tahun 1993, jauh lebih memberikan perlindungan kepada pihak masyarakat untuk membela haknya, sedangkan pihak pemerintah semakin terbatas dalam memperoleh tanah. Sehingga Perpres No. 65 Tahun 2006 memberikan suatu jaminan kepastian hukum kepada pemegang hak atas tanah untuk dapat mempertahankan haknya.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 705
Author(s):  
Rini Setyowati Abadi ◽  
Achmad Sulchan

The transition of land rights for the grant must be conducted through the procedures in accordance with the provisions occured for the transition of land rights for the grant must be registered at the land office to obtain legal certainty in the form of a certificate, so that the land status would be clear. In practice, in the district Wonossalam-Demak are still many people who do grant without going through legal procedures that have been set and raises difficulties on many fronts for legal certainty on the grant agreement. This study aims to determine and analyze the role of notaries in the implementation of transitional registration of land rights because the grant. Notary entitled to be responsible if something happens on the issue of the agreement for him, the responsibility it be liable in peridana, civil, code of conduct, and administration.Keywords: Registration, Transfer of Rights To Land, Customary Law.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 511
Author(s):  
Riska Fauziana ◽  
Anis Mashdurohatun

The study entitled "Implementation of the Sale and Purchase Agreement and the Status of Ownership of Land Rights at Apartment in Payon Amartha View of Semarang" aims to: 1) Understand the process of buying and selling apartments. 2) To know about the status of ownership of land rights of the apartment.Theresearch method in this journal uses a sociological Juridical approach with the specification of the data collection method to Obtain the data that will be used as the thesis of material through an interview with the manager and the marketing of apartment in Payon Amartha View of Semarang, or by observation in the form of roomates surveillance systematically Involved in Obtaining data. Afterwards will be conducted analysis of the data Obtained from various sources.The results of the research indicate that: 1) The process of buying and selling apartments begins with payment of the Booking Fee Followed by the signing of the Temporary Deed of Sale and Purchase (TDSP) as a legitimate and strong evidence that it has made a sale and purchase. 2) The ownership status of the buyer of the apartment is the Strata Title Certificate.Keywords: Sale And Purchase; Ownership Rights To The Apartment.


Author(s):  
Alpi Sahari

Land problems almost occur throughout Indonesia, without exception in Medan, North Sumatra Province. In Medan there is PTPN II land which, due to community needs, the government chose not to extend the HGU (Hak Guna Usaha) for the benefit of the community. The government considers that the people need this land more in order to meet the needs of life and the welfare of the entire community. The method used in this paper is juridical normative by adopting a legal synchronization approach, both vertically and horizontally, on land tenure conflicts after the expiration of the Legal Entity for Plantation Companies in Indonesia. Data obtained through literature search. The results show that the provisions regarding land tenure have been regulated in Law number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles or often referred to as UUPA. In article 16 paragraph 1 of Law Number 5 of 1960 UUPA, it is stated that land rights include ownership rights, land use rights, building use rights, usage rights, lease rights, land opening rights, rights to collect forest products, other rights that are not included in the rights mentioned above which will be stipulated by law as well as rights which are temporary as mentioned in Article 53 of Law Number 5 concerning UUPA. The existence of land rights that have been regulated in law often creates confusion and overlaps in the control of the land object. There is still a lack of and low understanding of the law by the majority of the community, are often used by irresponsible individuals with the intention of obtaining benefits in the form of land rights through control of the land. Then the role of the government has not run optimally in protecting the rights of land controlled by the community. The government has not been able to collect data and make complete registrations of land tenure in Indonesia. This is the cause of the frequent occurrence of land tenure conflicts so that the participation of all levels of society as well as the government is urgently needed..  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document