scholarly journals The Registration Of “Ulayat”’ Land In West Sumatra: Between The Legal Certainty And The Social Justice

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 585
Author(s):  
A. Yoma Amanda Putri ◽  
Djauhari Djauhari
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Social ◽  
West Sumatra ◽  
Customary Rights ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
The Right

Ulayat land House of communal rights is a member of the House, as a fellowship of customary law. The purpose of the arrangement of Ulayat Land is to protect the customary land and take the benefits for survival in some generations and uninterrupted between the members of the House with its territory. Conceptually, this is related to a social justice. While the purpose of the registration of land, according to the article 19 BAL is to guarantee the legal certainty over land. The implementation of Customary Land or Ulayat Land Registration was preceded by the creation of the base rights. The making of the pedestal of this right in the form of a waiver of physical mastery of plots of land (Sporadic). Before the creation of the pedestal of this right was preceded by the creation of Ranji by Ninik Mamak, which was passed by the House. The writing Empirical Juridical approach, was supported by empirical juridical approach. Empirical juridical approach was done by collecting all the materials and data obtained from the field-related to the problems are examined. Registration of the customary (Ulayat) rights of the House is done by applying to the Head Office of land district/city. The filing listed on behalf of or Mamak Head Heirs using a waiver of physical mastery of parcels of the land that are signed by the Mamak Head Chiefs as Heir. The statement must be approved by the head of the tribe or Tribal King and Chairman of custom Density Nagari and known by Lurah/village chief concerned by attaching a document containing the names of the members of the House of at least three generations created by Mamak Chief Heir and known by the ruler of the tribe and the leader of the RIGHT. The registration of Customary House was expected to guarantee legal certainty for members of the House as a fellowship of customary law, because it is aimed at maintaining Customary Rights for indigenous Justice. Therefore, the customary land register of House in conceptional in touch with the land registry purposes, i.e. to guarantee legal certainty while also embodying a sense of Justice for indigenous citizens (members of the House). Keywords: Social Justice; Legal Certainty; The Registration of Ulayat Land.

scholarly journals PERANAN PENGHULU TERHADAP HAK ULAYAT DI MINANGKABAU

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
Eviandi Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Application Of Law ◽  
Customary Rights ◽  
Conducting Research ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
The Right ◽  
Day By Day

Sumatra in general and Banuhampu District in particular the existence of customary rights is decreasing day by day both in terms of quantity and quality. The reduced existence of customary rights is because the customary rights have been traded by the legal community, in the case that Minangkabau customary law prohibits the sale and purchase of customary rights, this is stated in the customary kato "Jua indak eaten by bali, pawning indak eaten sando" means that ulayat rights can not be traded and transferred ownership to parties outside the legal community fellowship. Based on the above, the authors are interested in conducting research with the following problems: How are customary rights in Banuhampu District? What is the role of the leader / Pangatuo of the tribe / clan or the head of the inheritance of the ulayat rights in Banuhampu? What is the solution taken to defend the existence of customary rights in Banuhampu District? This research is juridical-social, because the researcher will examine how the application of law, namely customary law, in the development of the existence of customary rights among the Banuhampu community. Based on the discussion that the author puts forward, the following conclusions can be drawn: Whereas Customary Land (Ulayat) Currently its existence in Banuhampum can still be maintained. Even though it's been much less. This can be proven that until now the Legal Alliance in the Customary Law Community, namely Nagari, Tribe, Kaum, are still alive and existent, and each Legal Alliance still has customary rights although both in terms of quantity and quality have decreased. Whereas Ninik mamak / Penghulu / Pangatuo Suku / Kaum is a person who plays a very big role in the midst of his community / association, because ninik mamak has the right and obligation to take care of his children and nephews along with their communal customary rights, and has the obligation to preserve their customary rights. Whereas the customary rights must be maintained, because the ulayat rights are the identity of the association and the ulayat rights are not property rights, therefore the ulayat rights are prohibited from being transferred or sold.

scholarly journals Analisis Hukum Surat Pelepasan Hak Atas Tanah Adat (Dati) Di Kota Ambon

SASI ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Desy Kosita Hallauw ◽  
Jenny Kristiana Matuankotta ◽  
Novyta Uktolseja
Keyword(s):  
State Government ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Customary Rights ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Binding Power ◽  
Ownership Rights

Relinquishment of land rights is the relinquishment of legal relations between the holders of land rights and the land under their control by providing compensation on the basis of deliberation. Letter of Waiver of rights is evidence that is made with the aim of releasing land rights. A letter of release of customary land rights (dati) is applied in the same way as the release of land rights in general, as enforced in accordance with Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. The process of registering customary land rights (dati) is based on the release of customary rights (dati) issued by the customary land owner (dati) as the basis for rights. So based on the release of land rights, it can be registered at the Ambon City Land Office to obtain proof of land ownership or certificates. The letter of release of customary land rights (dati) issued by the customary State Government in Ambon City is binding as long as it is carried out based on applicable customary law and can be proven the basis of ownership rights to customary land (dati) from the customary land owner (dati) that issues the release letter the land rights. However, as long as it cannot be proven valid, the letter of release of land rights does not have binding power, thus the release of the customary land rights (dati) becomes invalid and the certificate can be canceled.

scholarly journals PROCUREMENT OF ULAYAT LAND FOR SUBSIDED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN HARAU DISTRICT LIMA PULUH KOTA REGENCY

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Inggir Deviandari ◽  
Kurnia Warman ◽  
Zefrizal Nurdin
Keyword(s):  
Limited Liability ◽  
Subsidized Housing ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Communal Land ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
The Right

Ulayat rights are the rights that owned by a legal alliance, where the citizens of the community have the right to control the land. The Regional Regulation of West Sumatra Province, Article 2 paragraph (1) Number 6 of 2008 concerning Communal Land and Its Utilization states that the main principle of customary land is permanent based on the Minangkabau traditional philosophy “jua ndak makan bali, gadai ndak makan sando” (shall not bargaining; may not be pawned). The provisions of the regulation state that ulayat land may not be traded and may not be pawned, its ownership status may not change, except for importunate situation and condition, namely maik tabujua dalam rumah (for the death of family member), gadih gadang ndak balaki (wedding), rumah gadang katirisan (misfortune), mambangkik Batang tarandam (efforts to enforce). Land acquisition for the construction of subsidized housing is not a land acquisition according to Law Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Procurement for Public Interest. The formulation of the problems discussed are first, the process of acquiring communal land for the construction of subsidized housing in Harau District, Lima Puluh Kota Regency, secondly the land registration process after the acquisition of customary land occurs, thirdly the legal consequences of acquiring customary land used for the construction of subsidized housing in Harau District, Lima Regency. Dozens of Cities againts customary law communities. This study uses an empirical juridical approach with the aim of finding out whether the law in the book is in accordance with the law in action. The results of the research study indicate that the process of acquiring communal land for the construction of subsidized housing is carried out by buying and selling. The construction of subsidized housing is managed by a legal entity in the form of a Limited Liability Company. The status of land ownership is just as the user of the facility that called with Hak Guna Bangunan

JUAL BELI TANAH YANG DILAKUKAN TANPA AKTA PPAT

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-107
Author(s):  
Cheri Bayuni Budjang
Keyword(s):  
Everyday Life ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Right ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Buying and selling is a way to transfer land rights according to the provisions in Article 37 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration which must include the deed of the Land Deed Making Official to register the right of land rights (behind the name) to the Land Office to create legal certainty and minimize the risks that occur in the future. However, in everyday life there is still a lot of buying and selling land that is not based on the laws and regulations that apply, namely only by using receipts and trust in each other. This is certainly very detrimental to both parties in the transfer of rights (behind the name), especially if the other party is not known to exist like the Case in Decision Number 42 / Pdt.G / 2010 / PN.Mtp

scholarly journals RIGHTS OWNERSHIP TO CERTIFIED LAND CONFRONTED WITH THE CUSTOMARY LAW IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saim Aksnudin
Keyword(s):  
National Development ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Status ◽  
Need For Support ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ownership Of Land

In the national development the role of land for the fulfillment of various purposes will increase, either as a place to live or for business activities. In relation to that will also increase the need for support in the form of guarantee of legal certainty in the field of land. The result of the research is the conception of the state of Indonesia is a state law, which contains the meaning in the administration of government and the state based on the law, the protection of the law is a universal concept of the rule of law. The legal certainty on land rights as intended by the UUPA encompasses three things, namely the certainty of the object of land rights, certainty on the subject of land rights and certainty about the status of landrights. Legal conception of land title certificate is a proof that issued by authorized legal institution, containing juridical data and physical data which isused as evidence of ownership of land rights in order to provide assurance of legal certainty and certainty of rights to a plot of land owned or possessed by a person or legal entity. With the certificate of rights, it is expected that the juridical can guarantee the legal certainty and the right by the state for the holder of the right to the land. This country's guarantee is granted to the owner or the holder of the certificate may be granted because the land is already registered in the state land administration system.

Social justice and administrative justice

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackie Gulland
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Health Education ◽  
Life Expectancy ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Material Wealth ◽  
Community Activists ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Administrative Justice

Social justice is a popular concept, used by academic theorists, international bodies such as the United Nations, politicians on both the left and the right and by community activists. This chapter considers how the term ‘social justice’ may or may not be useful in the context of ‘administrative justice’ by looking at the relationship between administrative justice and structural inequalities. Administrative justice scholars usually focus on procedures. By contrast, social justice scholars are more concerned with substantive outcomes. They draw attention to the major rifts in society which lead to huge inequalities of outcome in terms of material wealth, health, education and life expectancy. Administrative justice, with its emphasis on rule following and fair procedures, can often seem divorced from these inequalities. This is where the concept of social justice can help administrative justice scholars. Administrative justice scholars, often dismiss outcomes as being beyond the reach of law, as being about politics. The emphasis on the ‘social’ in social justice compels us to look at this broader context and to show us how the great schisms in society create and enforce inequality.

Strategi Penyelesaian Pendaftaran Tanah Hak Komunal Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-69
Author(s):  
Ardi Saputra Sinaga ◽  
Julius Sembiring ◽  
Sukayadi Sukayadi
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Communal Land ◽  
Community Strategy ◽  
Land Control

Abstract: Environment and Forestry Ministry established the reserve incense forest of the Pan-dumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community as a customary forest. But in reality, it has not been guaranteed legal certainty regarding the existence and recognition of the rights of the Pan-dumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community. The objective of this research is to know the le-gal status of Indigenous Peoples forest in Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law at this time, strategy of the land registration of communal right settlement, and constraint and effort done in the land registration of communal right settlement of Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community. This research uses qualitative research method with empirical juridical research form. Based on the results of the study showed that the legal status of the Indigenous Forests of Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Society is currently reserved as customary forest of Pan-dumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community. Strategy for resolving communal rights land registration in the incense forest of the Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community through four stages. First, recognition of the existence of the Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community. Secondly, the establishment of customary forests of the Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community by Environment and Forestry Ministry. Third, the Settlement of Land Control in Forest Areas is carried out in accordance with Presidential Regulation Number 88 of 2017 by issuing customary forests of the Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community from forest areas. Fourth, registration of communal land rights of Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Custom-ary Law Community.Keywords: strategy, communal rights, customary forestsIntisari: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (KLHK) menetapkan pencadangan hutan kemenyan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta sebagai hutan adat. Tetapi kenyataannya, keadaan tersebut hingga saat ini dinilai belum menjamin kepastian hukum akan keberadaan dan pengakuan hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menjelaskan bagaimana strategi penyelesaian pendaftaran tanah hak komunal hutan kemenyan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa status hukum hutan kemenyan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta saat ini dicadangkan sebagai hutan adat. Strategi penyelesaian pendaftaran tanah hak komunal hutan kemenyan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta melalui empat tahapan. Pertama, pengakuan keberadaan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta. Kedua, penetapan hutan adat Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta oleh KLHK. Ketiga, dilakukan Penyelesaian Penguasaan Tanah dalam Kawasan Hutan sesuai dengan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 88 Tahun 2017dengan cara mengeluarkan hutan adat Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta dari kawasan hutan. Keempat, pendaftaran tanah hak komunal Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta.Kata Kunci : strategi, hak komunal, hutan adat

The Thinking behind the Creation of a Basic Law for Social Organizations

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-80
Author(s):  
Liu Peifeng ◽  
Shui Bing ◽  
Deng Guosheng ◽  
Wang Ming ◽  
Ma Jianyin
Keyword(s):  
Legislative Process ◽  
Editorial Office ◽  
Current Form ◽  
Social Organizations ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Legal Forms ◽  
The Right ◽  
Civil Laws

Abstract This paper is the second from the “Salon Series on the Creation of Legislation on the Right of Association and Social Organizations”. This was a series of salons jointly hosted by Tsinghua University’s ngo Research Center, the Philanthropy and ngo Support Center, and the editorial office of the China Nonprofit Review. The formulation of a basic law on social organizations is an important issue for China’s social sector, and particularly for the social organization sector. It is also one of the conditions necessary for a transformation in the way social organizations are managed, from the current form of governance, which is achieved through administrative regulations, to management by ‘rule of law’ in the truest sense. Recently, in academic circles, many different lines of thought have developed about the formulation of a basic law for social organizations, including the argument for ‘governance through administrative law’, which adopts a public law perspective; the argument for ‘special civil laws’, which approaches the question from the perspective of private law; and the argument for a ‘combination of legal forms’. This paper explores the content of a basic law, as well as the objectives, nature of and skills involved in formulating such a law. It examines the necessity and feasibility of creating such legislation, and the key ideas that need to be transformed during the legislative process. At the same time, the paper considers the differences between this and the thinking behind other legislation such as the charity law.

Negotiated or Negated? The Rhetoric and Reality of Customary Tenure in an Ashanti Village in Ghana

Africa ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine M. Ubink
Keyword(s):  
Land Tenure ◽  
Social Inequalities ◽  
Playing Field ◽  
Political Relationships ◽  
The Social ◽  
Central Elements ◽  
Local Actors ◽  
Customary Rights ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Property Regimes

Customary land tenure is seen as a field in which social and political relationships are diverse, overlapping and competing. Property regimes are, therefore, often analysed in terms of processes of negotiation, with people's social and political identities as central elements. This article studies the negotiability of customary tenure in peri-urban Ghana where land is at the centre of intense and unequal competition and closely tied up with struggles over authority. It focuses on one village to provide a grassroots view of processes of contestation of customary rights to land. The analysis of how and to what extent local actors in this village deal with, negotiate and struggle for rights to land confirms that contestants for land never operate on a level playing field. Postulating the social inequalities of local communities, the article analyses whether it is useful to place all local land dealings under the term ‘negotiations’, or whether such a characterization stretches the boundaries of the term too far and risks undermining the significance of local stratification and ignoring the winners and losers in a contest with uncertain rules.

scholarly journals Eksistensi Hak Ulayat Pasca Berlakunya Peraturan Menteri Agraria Nomor 18 Tahun 2019

Notaire ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 489
Author(s):  
Wimba Roofi Hutama
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Management Control ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Customary Rights ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Binding Power ◽  
Land Community

The Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia recently issued Ministerial Regulation of ATR No. 18 of 2019 concerning Procedures for Administration of Customary Land Community Units of Customary Law. However, the reality is that until now there are still ulayat lands of customary law community units whose management, control and use are based on local customary law provisions and are recognized by the members of the customary law community unit concerned. The research uses normative research, namely normative juridical research, namely research based on applicable laws and legal norms and has binding power to answer the legal issues faced. The results obtained are that the characteristics of customary rights of customary law communities, that customary rights to land are controlled by customary law communities, namely people who live in groups, hereditary based on ties of origin/ancestor or similarity of residence, have the same culture, live in a certain area, have customary property that is jointly owned, have customary institutions containing sanctions, as long as they are still alive according to developments and do not conflict with national law.Keywords: Existence; Customary Rights; Minister of Agrarian Regulation.Menteri Agraria Dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia baru-baru ini menerbitkan Permen ATR No. 18 Tahun 2019 Tentang Tata Cara Penatausahaan Tanah Ulayat Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Namun kenyataannya hingga kini masih terdapat tanah ulayat kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat yang pengurusan, penguasaan dan penggunaannya didasarkan pada ketentuan hukum adat setempat dan diakui oleh para warga kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat yang bersangkutan”. Penelitian dengan menggunakan penelitian normatif, yaitu penelitian yuridis normatif, yaitu penelitian didasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan atau norma-norma hukum yang berlaku dan mempunyai kekuatan mengikat guna manjawab isu hukum yang dihadapi. Diperoleh hasil bahwa Karakteristik hak ulayat masyarakat hukum adat, bahwa hak ulayat atas tanah tersebut dikuasai oleh masyarakat hukum adat, yakni masyarakat yang hidup berkelompok, turun menurun berdasarkan ikatan asal usul/leluhur atau kesamaan tempat tinggal, berbudaya sama, hidup dalam satu wilayah tertentu, memiliki harta benda adat milik bersama, mempunyai pranata adat mengandung sanksi, sepanjang masih hidup sesuai perkembangan dan tidak bertentangan dengan hukum nasional.Kata Kunci: Eksistensi; Hak Ulayat; Peraturan Menteri Agraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document