scholarly journals Effects The Constitutional Court Decision Allowing Marriage Agreement After Marriage (Constitutional Court Decision No. 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015)

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 271
Author(s):  
Kevin Hanif Hakim ◽  
Akhmad Khisni
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Marriage Contract ◽  
The Status ◽  
Thesis Writing ◽  
Legal Mechanism ◽  
Legal Consequences

At first the marriage law stipulated in the Civil Law Act (Civil Code) and subsequent regulations related to marriage and even then dealt with separately by Act No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage. On October 27 2016 the Constitutional Court (MK) through its Decision No. 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 gives constitutional interpretation of Article 29 of Act No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage which basically says that the marriage contract can be carried out during the marriage bond. Therefore, the object of the author's thesis writing is a result of the law of the Constitutional Court decision that allows marriage after marriage. And the formulation of the problem in this paper are the implications of the procedure / mechanism of making the marriage contract and the legal consequences of the status of the property as well as third parties who feel aggrieved over the agreement. Methods used by the authors te is normative research method. So as to obtain results that due to the Constitutional Court's decision that allows the marriage contract after marriage alter the legal mechanism of making the marriage contract that can now be created during the marriage bond takes place by the Notary without preceded by the determination of the competent court and the legal consequences of making the marriage contract after the wedding on the status of property together with the inherent (closely related) to the time of entry into force of the agreement and binding on third parties.Keywords: Notary; Marriage Agreement; the Constitutional Court Decision

scholarly journals Praperadilan Terhadap Penetapan Status Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-103
Author(s):  
Claudia Permata Dinda ◽  
Usman Usman ◽  
Tri Imam Munandar
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Status ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights

ABSTRAK Praperadilan yang diatur dalam KUHAP menjamin perlindungan HAM dan aparat penegak hukum dalam menjalankan tugas dan kewenangannya secara konsekwen. Lembaga praperadilan telah menciptakan mekanisme kontrol sebagai lembaga yang berwenang melakukan pengawasan terhadap kinerja aparat penegak hukum dalam menjalankan tugasnya guna tercipta proses peradilan pidana yang baik. Terkait dengan penegakan hukum dan pemberantasan korupsi, Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi merupakan lembaga yang diamanatkan oleh undang-undang dengan wewenangnya untuk menetapkan status tersangka guna proses penyelidikan dan penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui akibat dari perluasan objek praperadilan atas penetapan status tersangka terhadap KUHAP dan mengetahui akibat dari perluasan objek praperadilan terhadap penetapan status tersangka tindak pidana korupsi oleh KPK. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Sebelumnya, sah atau tidaknya penetapan status tersangka oleh KPK bukan merupakan objek praperadilan, namun melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 praperadilan telah berwenang memeriksa sah atau tidaknya penetapan status tersangka. Hal ini menjadi sebuah pembaharuan dalam Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia. ABSTRACT Pretrial regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code guarantees the protection of human rights and law enforcement officers in carrying out their duties and authorities consistently. The pretrial institution has created a control mechanism as an institution authorized to supervise the performance of law enforcement officers in carrying out their duties in order to create a good criminal justice process.This study aims to determine the effects of the expansion of pretrial objects over the determination of the status of suspects against the Criminal Procedure Code and to determine the consequences of expanding pretrial objects to determine the status of suspected criminal acts of corruption by the KPK. The research method used in writing this thesis is a normative juridical research method through the conceptual approach, the statutory approach and the case approach. Previously, the KPK was not a pretrial object or not, but through the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 the pretrial had the authority to examine whether or not the status of the suspect was determined. This has become a renewal in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code.

scholarly journals MARRIAGE AGREEMENT FOR THE JOINT ASSETS IN MIXED COUPLE MARRIAGE ACCORDING IN INDONESIA BOOK OF CIVIL LAW NUMBER 1 OF 1974 POST DECISION OF THE COURT OF CONSTITUTION NUMBER 69/PUU-XIII/2015

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 290-301
Author(s):  
Titik Triwulan Tutik
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Mixed Marriage ◽  
Equal Rights ◽  
The Status ◽  
Joint Property ◽  
Husband And Wife

This study aims to analyze the position of the Marriage Agreement for Joint Treasures in Mixed Marriage from three sides of the law, namely Civil Law, Law Number 1 of 1974, and Constitutional Court Decree Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015. Hypothesis: Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 in line with Islamic law that prioritizes equal rights and obligations between husband and wife in terms of ownership of assets in marriage. The method: used is normative (dogmatic) legal research, which is intended to find and formulate legal arguments, through analysis of the subject matter. While the approach used in this study there are 4 (four) types, namely: the statutory approach, comparative approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results: of the study show that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 has provided a practical solution in overcoming the problems of a Marriage Agreement on Joint Assets: First, a marriage agreement can be made before, during and after the marriage is implemented. Second, ratification of a marriage agreement may be by a notary public, and effective from the date of the marriage agreement, and may be revoked. Third, marriage agreements are binding on third parties, especially related to the position of joint property in the marriage. This means that, Indonesian citizens have the right to joint property in a mixed marriage as long as the marriage agreement states that. The ruling is in line with Islamic law that prioritizes equal rights and obligations between husband and wife in terms of ownership of assets in a marriage. Conclusion: The legal consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 on the status of joint property made a marriage agreement after marriage which began since the marriage took place followed by the status of shared property becomes separate if both parties wish in the agreement, as well as assets to be obtained in the future remain the property of each party, without having to obtain a court decision regarding the separation of assets. This ruling is in accordance with Islamic law which prioritizes equal rights and obligations between husband and wife in terms of ownership of assets in marriage.

scholarly journals Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Kawin terhadap Pihak Ketiga dalam Perspektif Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-211
Author(s):  
Putu Trisna Witariyani ◽  
I Nyoman Sujana ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Third Party ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Husband And Wife

Property problems in marriage often occur. With this, the couple can make a marriage agreement for those who want to separate their marital assets. One of the marriage agreement arrangements, which is mentioned in paragraph (1), namely in Article 29 of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage states that a marriage agreement can be made before the marriage takes place and binds a third party as long as the third party is involved. However, after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 the arrangement of the agreement in marriage has changed. This study aims to determine the arrangement of the marriage agreement after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 and knowing the legal consequences for third parties with the existence of a marriage agreement after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015. The research method used is the Normative research method where the assessment is based on legal materials from the existing literature. The results of the analysis show that the marriage agreement arrangements have changed since the Constitutional Court Decision, where the amendment is that the marriage agreement can be made before or after marriage, applies after marriage unless the parties determine otherwise, and also the marriage agreement can be changed and revoked according to the agreement of the husband and wife. . If the agreement in marriage is registered, the agreement will be enforced for the third party. Couples who want to make a marriage agreement should follow the existing rules so that the marriage agreement is valid and does not harm third parties.

scholarly journals DETERMINATION OF THE LEGAL STATUS FOR DISASTER EMERGENCY IN INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 ((S2)) ◽  
pp. 23-42
Author(s):  
Teuku Ahmad Dadek ◽  
Husni Husni ◽  
Mahdi Syahbandir ◽  
M. Ya’kub Aiyub Kadir ◽  
Yanis Rinaldi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
The Status ◽  
Property Loss ◽  
Legal Mechanism

Article 7 paragraph (2) of the Law Number 24 Year 2007 concerning Disaster Management (UUPB) stipulates that the establishment of a disaster emergency status must contain indicators that include the number of victims, property loss, the damage of the infrastructure and facilities, the extent to which an area is affected by the disaster and the socio-economic impacts that arise. Paragraph (3) of the article states that further provisions regarding the establishment of the status and the level of the disaster are regulated through a Presidential Regulation. However, the Presidential Regulation has not yet been issued while the Letter of Decision on the Disaster Emergency Status continues to be published, which causes legal uncertainty in its implementation. Hence this article investigates the legal mechanism in determining a disaster emergency status that guarantees legal certainty, its legal implications, and steps the (central) Government and the Regional Government should take in dealing with such legal implications. The research method employed in this study is the juridical normative research. Research on disaster legislation, especially in determining disaster emergency status, has not yet demonstrated legal certainty. This is due to the absence of legal mechanisms and positive legal formalities that are built from legal facts that lead to multiple interpretations and to legal disputes. The absence of the Presidential Regulation (Perpres) as a UUPB manifestation for determining the emergency status of a disaster as stipulated by autonomous provinces/districts (Decree) has contributed to the potential arbitrary use of state funds. Therefore, the Presidential regulation is urgently required.

scholarly journals Implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision Regarding the Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees and Inclusion of Default Clauses in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 33-38
Author(s):  
Siti Malikhatun Badriyah ◽  
◽  
R. Suharto ◽  
Marjo Marjo ◽  
Retno Saraswati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Regulations ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Legal Principles

The existence of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, made problems in society related to the implementation of the fiduciary guarantee execution. This study aims to determine and analyze the implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. The research method used is normative juridical by conducting document studies of legal principles, legal regulations and legal norms in Indonesia and interviews with civil law experts. The results showed that the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, caused disagreements in its implementation. Prior to the Constitutional Court Decision, the execution of the Fiduciary Guarantee was based on the Fiduciary Guarantee Law, if the debtor in default, the Fiduciary Recipient can execute on the basis of the fiduciary recipient's own power to sell the object of fiduciary security, but with a Constitutional Court Decision it must go through a court. This creates confusion for creditors and is against the principle of material security. This is detrimental to creditors, because creditors cannot immediately sell their own fiduciary collateral objects if the debtor defaults. This phenomenon can lead to a lack of legal certainty and legal protection for fiduciary recipients and contradicts the nature of fiduciary guarantees which should have strong guarantee rights and are easy to implement.

scholarly journals Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai Tata Konstitusional Abnormal dan Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Titon Slamet Kurnia
Keyword(s):  
Classical Model ◽  
Chief Executive ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Theory ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constitutional Order ◽  
The Status

Artikel ini mencerminkan pendapat penulis yang tidak setuju dengan keberadaan KPK dan Teori Konstitusi yang mendasarinya. Artikel ini didasarkan pada teori trias politica klasik dan mengajukan pendapat bahwa keberadaan badan-badan yang bersifat eksekutif harus sesuai dengan preskripsi teori unitary executive. Sesuai dengan teori unitary executive, presiden harus diberikan kewenangan to appoint and remove setiap pejabat eksekutif secara eksklusif. Kaidah ini didasarkan pada status presiden sebagai Chief Executive. Berdasar pengertian ini, KPK, sebagai badan independen, inkonstitusional. Seturut dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 36/PUU-XV/2017 yang mengkualifikasikan KPK sebagai eksekutif, tata konstitusional kita yang abnormal, dengan keberadaan KPK, harus dinormalkan sesuai dengan teori unitary executive. This article expresses the author’s view to disagree with the existence of the KPK and its supporting Constitutional Theory. This article is based on classical model of the trias politica theory and suggests that the existence of executive bodies should conform with the prescription of unitary executive theory. According to the unitary executive theory, the president should have the power to appoint and remove any executive official exclusively. This norm is based on the status of the president as the Chief Executive. According to this notion, the KPK, as independent agency, is unconstitutional. In line with the Constitutional Court Decision No. 36/PUU-XV/2017, qualifying the KPK as executive, our abnormal constitutional order, with the existence of the KPK, should be normalized in accordance with the unitary executive theory.

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS HAK EIGENDOM VERPONDING SEBAGAI JAMINAN KEBENDAAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-55
Author(s):  
Irman Widi Kurniawan ◽  
Etty Mulyati ◽  
Betty Rubiati
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Status Quo ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Legal Force

ABSTRAKDi dalam bagian kedua UUPA mengatur tentang pelaksanaan konversi hak atas tanah menjadi wujud kepastian hukum sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 33 ayat (3) UUD 1945. Namun kepastian hukum terhadap konversi Hak atas tanah barat terutama sertifikat Hak Eigendom Verponding masih menjadi problematika tersendiri bagi masyarakat yang memiliki bukti kepemilikan hak atas tanah barat tersebut apabila dijadikan sebuah jaminan guna memperoleh fasilitas kredit. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah yuridis normatif dengan kajian bahan hukum primer, sekunder serta tersier. Berdasarkan pembahasan tersebut bahwa Kepastian Hukum terkait konversi hak Eigendom Verponding telah memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat dengan ketentuan diperlukan konversi sehingga dapat dijadikan objek jaminan namun dalam prakteknya masih terdapat objek jaminan dengan tidak memperhatikan asal mula objek jaminan tersebut serta akibat hukum terhadap konversi hak atas tanah tersebut adalah pemberlakuan UUPA menjadi dasar bahwasanya prinsip status quo hak atas tanah terdahulu memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dengan ketentuan hak-hak lama menjadi tidak diakui keberadaannya. Kata Kunci: hak atas tanah; hak barat; kepastian hukum jaminan; konversi ABSTRACTIn the second section of the UUPA regulates the conversion of land rights into a form of legal certainty as stipulated in Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution. But the legal certainty of the conversion of the Right to western land, especially the Eigendom Verponding Rights certificate, remains a problem for people who have proof of ownership of the western land if it is used as a guarantee to obtain credit facilities. The research method used is normative juridical with the study of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the discussion that legal certainty related to the conversion of rights Eigendom Verponding has had a binding legal force with the necessary provisions of conversion so that it can be used as an object of guarantee but in practice there is still an object of guarantee by not taking into account the origin of the object of the guarantee and the legal consequences of the conversion of the right to land is the enactment of the UUPA being the basis that the principle of the status quo of the former land rights provides a guarantee of legal certainty with the provisions of old rights to be unclaimed civility. Keywords: conversion; guarantee legal certainty; land rights; western rights

scholarly journals KONSEKUENSI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 TERHADAP KEDUDUKAN ANAK ASTRA DALAM HUKUM ADAT BALI

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Gede Pasek Pramana
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Law

This research aims to analyze about the significance of the Constitutional Court Decision No.46/PUU-VIII/2010 the position of anak astra in Bali customary law. The research method used is a normative study by selecting the type of statue approach and the conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials that were examined in this study consisted of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials and techniques were analyzed with the description, systematic, evaluation and argumentation. Based on the perspective ( review ) Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010, anak astra have a civil relationship with her biological father and his family along can be proved by science and technology and / or other evidence according to the law. The juridical consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 to the norms of Bali customary law about anak astra Bali is must conform to the directions of law in the Decision of the Constitutional Court.

scholarly journals KAJIAN KRITIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 013-022/PUU-IV/2006 TENTANG PEMBATALAN PASAL PENGHINAAN TERHADAP PRESIDEN

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-114
Author(s):  
Adhya Satya Bangsawan
Keyword(s):  
Legal Reasoning ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Freedom Of Speech ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Ordinary People ◽  
Head Of State ◽  
The Status ◽  
Legal Consequences

This article discusses the legal reasoning used by the Indonesian Constitutional Court in its Decision No. 013-022/PUU-IV/2006. The object of the constitutionality review is Article 134, 136 bis, and 137 of the Indonesian Criminal Code which contained the ban of insult action toward the president/vice president. Those norms have been declared null and void based on the argument that those norms were not criminal acts. Hence, this article stresses that the annulment of those norms may give negative legal consequences toward the protection of president/vice president’s dignity. Freedom of speech is categorized as a right of expression in which its performance is undertaken restrictively. This article argues that the ban of insult action toward the president/vice president is a constitutional limitation to the freedom of speech. The status of president/vice president shall not be considered as equal with ordinary people since the president/vice president is the head of state and also the symbol of the state.

scholarly journals AKSES KEADILAN BAGI KORBAN PELANGGARAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA BERAT PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 006/PUU-IV/2006

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 177
Author(s):  
R. Herlambang P. Wiratraman
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Political Legitimacy ◽  
Truth And Reconciliation Commission ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Difficult Situation ◽  
Truth And Reconciliation ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Legal Mechanism

Penyelesaian hukum untuk mengakhiri pelanggaran hak asasi manusia di Indonesia tampaknya menghadapi cara yang kian rumit, terutama setelah pembatalan Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2004 tentang Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi di tahun 2006. Pembatalan tersebut diyakini oleh korban sebagai hilangnya legitimasi hukum-politik untuk membangun mekanisme yang adil dan jelas bagi upaya akses keadilan. Dengan pendekatan sosio-legal, penelitian ini membahas tiga pertanyaan kunci, apa mekanisme hukum yang mungkin digunakan untuk mengatasi pelanggaran pelanggaran hak asasi manusia berat masa lalu, apakah dimungkinkan menyelesaikan kasus-kasus pelanggaran hak asasi manusia tersebut melalui mekanisme peradilan, dan bagaimana dampak putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, khususnya untuk mengakhiri impunitas dan pelanggaran hak asasi manusia di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian ini berpendapat bahwa putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi telah membawa situasi yang sangat serius, berpengaruh dan lebih sulit untuk mendapatkan keadilan, terutama untuk korban- korban yang telah berjuang selama bertahun-tahun atas hak-hak mereka.<p>The legal solution for ending gross violation of human rights in Indonesia seems facing a more difficult way, especially after the annulment of Act No. 27 of 2004 on Truth and Reconciliation Commission in 2006. Such annulment is believed by the victim as the lose of legal-political legitimacy to build a just and clear mechanism for bringing justice. This article discusses three key questions, what possible legal mechanism is used to solve gros violation of human rights in the past, whether possible or not to solve such cases into judicial mechanism, and how are impacts fo Constitutional Court decision, especially to end impunity and human rights violation in Indonesia, by socio-legal method. Article argues such Constitutional Court decision has brought a very serious, influential and more difficult situation to access to justice, especially to those victims who had been struggling their rights for years.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document