scholarly journals PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH DENGAN PENDEKATAN INVESTIGASI DAN PENDEKATAN KONVENSIONAL PADA POKOK BAHASAN TEOREMA PHYTAGORAS DI KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 9 PEMATANGSIANTAR

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-208
Author(s):  
Theresia Monika Siahaan

Abstract. This study aims to determine whether there are differences in mathematical problem solving abilities of students who are taught through an investigative approach and with conventional approaches in class VIII SMP 9 of Pematangsiantar. This type of research is experimental research. The population in this study were all eighth grade students of SMP 9 of Pematangsiantar as many as 8 classes. The problem solving abilities of students taught with an investigative approach to the average pretest of 57.73 and post-test of 85.42, the level of change in problem solving abilities was 27.69. Higher than the problem solving abilities of students who are taught with conventional learning the average pretest is 56.67 and posttest is 72.67. Hypothesis testing, from the calculation of student pretest data obtained at dk = 64 and the real level α = 0.05 and 𝑡(1−12∝)=𝑡0,975 obtained ttable = 1.669 and tcount = 1.172. Because tcount < ttable = (1.172 <1.669) it can be concluded that the initial ability of students is the same. While based on the calculation of student posttest data obtained at dk = 64 and the real level α = 0.05 obtained ttable = 1.669 and t count = 4.212. Because tcount> ttable (4.212 > 1.669) then Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. Then it was concluded that there were significant differences between problem solving abilities taught by an investigative approach and conventional approaches.Keywords: Problem Solving Ability, Investigative Approach, Conventional Approach.

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-77
Author(s):  
Mustika Helma ◽  
Gigin Saipul Rahma

The study began with observations at VIII Rengat Barat Middle School students of class VIII. This study aims to determine students' mathematical problem solving abilities using the Learnig Starts With A Question model. This type of research is experimental research (experimental research) with a quasi-experimental design research design. The research design used was The Randomized posttest-only control design. The sampling technique uses Simple Random Sampling. In this study the instrument used was a test of students' mathematical problem solving abilities. Data obtained on the problem-solving ability test were analyzed using the Independent Samples T-Test based on the results of the hypothesis test, the value of tcount = 2.014 and ttable = -1.999 with (df) n-2 and significance <0.05 (0.048 <0.05). As for the Independent Samples T-Test testing criteria, reject H0 if t> t table. Based on that, H0 is rejected because tcount = 2,014> ttable = -1,999. So it can be concluded that the students 'mathematical problem solving ability using the Learning Starts With A Question learning model is better than the students' mathematical problem solving ability using the conventional model in class VIII of SMP Negeri 4 Rengat Barat. Keywords: Problem Solving, Learnig Starts With A Question


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-199
Author(s):  
Muksin Muksin ◽  
Tataq Yuli Eko Siswono ◽  
Rooselyna Ekawati

The students' problem solving ability is low. One effort that can be done is to implement the pair checks type of cooperative learning. This study aims to determine the effect of the pair checks type of cooperative learning based on the task of problem posing on students' mathematical problem solving abilities. This research is a quasi experimental research. The population of this study were students of grade 8. The sample consisted of two classes selected by random sampling. The instruments used in this study were test and questionnaire. The data were obtained from the results of the post test after implement the pair check type of cooperative learning. Data were analyzed using t-test. The results showed that there was a significant effect of the pair checks type of cooperative learning based on the task of problem posing on students' mathematical problem solving abilitie. In addition, there was a difference in the increase indicated by the N-gain value in the experimental clas. Therefore, the pair checks type of cooperative learning based on the task of problem posingan effect on improving students' problem-solving abilities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-458
Author(s):  
Geni Sri Elita ◽  
Mhmd Habibi ◽  
Aan Putra ◽  
Nelpita Ulandari

AbstrakSiswa mengalami kesulitan dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita, mengajukan pertanyaan, membuat langkah-langkah penyelesaian, serta menyelesaikan permasalahan yang diberikan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh model problem based learning dengan pendekatan metakognisi terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian eksperimen dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitafif. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes uraian. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII MTs Negeri Semerah Kerinci dengan jumlah 84 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan secara simple random sampling. Kelas VIII D dan VIII A masing-masing terpilih sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Analisis data kemampuan pemecahan masalah dilakukan menggunakan uji-t. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh model pembelajaran problem based learning dengan pendekatan metakognisi terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa.Kata Kunci: Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis, Pendekatan Metakognisi, Problem Based Learning. The Effect of Problem Based Learning with Metacognition Approaches on Mathematical Problem Solving SkillAbstractStudents have difficulty in solving story problems, asking questions, taking steps to solve, and solving the problems given. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of problem-based learning models with metacognitive approaches to students' mathematical problem-solving abilities. This type of research is an experimental study using a quantitative approach. The instrument used was a description test. The population in this study was eighth-grade students of MTs Semerah Kerinci with a total of 84 people. Sampling is done by simple random sampling. Class VIII D and VIII A were respectively chosen as the experimental class and the control class. Data analysis of problem-solving ability is done using the t-test. The results showed that there was an influence of the problem-based learning model of learning with a metacognition approach to students' mathematical problem-solving abilities.Keywords: Mathematical Problem Solving Ability, Metacognition Approach, Problem Based Learning.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Novia Fadilah ◽  
Edy Surya

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah kemampuan pemecahan masalahmatematis siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran MEAs lebihtinggi daripada kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang belajar denganmenggunakan model pembelajaran PBL di SMP Negeri 38 Medan. Jenis penelitian iniadalah penelitian eksperimen. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelasVIII SMP Negeri 38 Medan semester genap, yang terdiri dari 5 kelas. Sampel dalampenelitian ini adalah dua kelas yang dipilih berdasarkan kelas-kelas atau kelompok yangsudah ada, dimana kelas VIII-4 sebagai kelas eksperimen MEAs dengan jumlah sampel38 orang dan kelas VIII-5 sebagai kelas eksperimen PBL dengan jumlah sampel 39orang. Penelitian ini menggunakan dua jenis instrument yaitu pre-test dan post-testdalam bentuk uraian. Dari hasil penelitian yang diberikan, diperoleh nilai rata-rataposttest kelas eksperimen MEAS 79,6842 dan kelas eksperimen PBL memperoleh nilairata-rata 71,9487. Dari hasil uji hipotesis post-test diperoleh hitung t (1,9044) > tabel t(1,6675) dengan demikian diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa kemampuan pemecahanmasalah matematis siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran MEAslebih tinggi daripada kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang belajardengan menggunakan model pembelajaran PBL di SMP Negeri 38 Medan T.A2016/2017Kata kunci: Pemecahan Masalah Matematis, MEAs, PBLABSTRACTThis research aims to find out whether a mathematical problem solving abilities studentslearning by using learning model MEAs is higher than the ability of mathematicalproblem solving of students who learn by using the learning model PBL in SMP Negeri38 Medan. This type of research is research experiments. The population in this researchis the whole grade VIII SMP Negeri Medan 38 semester even, consisting of 5 classes. Thesample in this study were selected based on two classes of classes or groups that alreadyexist, where the class VIII-4 experimental MEAs as a class with the number of samples of38 people and class VIII-experimental class 5 as PBL with a number of samples of 39 people. This study uses two types of instrument, namely pre-test and post-test in the form of descriptions. Of research results are given, obtained average value of experimentalclass posttest MEAS 79,6842 experimental class and PBL gained an average rating of 71,9487. Hypothesis test results from post-test is obtained (1.9044) > (1.6675) thus obtained conclusions that the ability of mathematical problem solving of students learning by using learning model of the MEAs is higher than the ability of mathematical problem solving of students who learn by using the learning model PBL in SMP Negeri 38 Medan 2016/2017.Keywords: Mathematical problem solving, MEAs, PBL


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 410-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Parker

A computer application promotes programming knowledge and allows students to create their own worlds through mathematical problem solving.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubaitun Rubaitun

This study aims to determine whether the improvement of students' mathematical problem solving skills that get the learning of Model-Eliciting Activities is better than students who get regular learning. Method in this research is experiment and research design pretest and postest in experiment and control class. The population in this study were all students of MTs Kota Cimahi. School samples were taken at random, and obtained by MTs Negeri Kota Cimahi. Then the sample is selected two class VIII at random class. The experimental class uses Model-Eliciting Activities, while the control class uses ordinary learning. The hypothesis in this research is the improvement of student solving abilities of MTs students in Cimahi whose learning using Model-Eliciting Activities is better than using ordinary learning. Research data obtained through the instrument of posttest mathematical problem solving ability. The posttest data is processed by normality test, homogeneity test, and two average difference test using SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solution) software version 16.0 for Windows. The results showed that the improvement of problem solving ability of MTs students in Cimahi whose learning using Model-Eliciting Activities was better than those using ordinary learning.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Trisnawati Trisnawati ◽  
Wanda Nugroho Yanuarto

This study was employed to enhance learning motivation and mathematical problem-solving abilities of class VIII A students of SMP Negeri 7 Purwokerto through SFAE learning with problem-solving strategies. The subjects of this study were 31 students of class VIII A SMP Negeri 7 Purwokerto. This study is a Classroom Action Research (CAR), which was conducted collaboratively and participative. The action research was carried out in 3 cycles, with each cycle consisting of 2 meetings. Students were given a questionnaire to measure learning motivation and a test to measure their mathematical problem-solving abilities at the end of each cycle. Data collection techniques in this study include observation, questionnaires, tests, and documentation. Data analysis was carried out by descriptive qualitative and quantitative. The finding showed that implementing of SFAE learning with problem-solving strategies could increase students’ learning motivation and mathematical problem-solving abilities. The study found that (1) The average percentage of the overall learning motivation questionnaire is steadily increased from 61.71% in cycle one to 68.10% in cycle two and 76.03% in cycle three. (2) The average percentage of student tests for problem-solving abilities in cycle one also significantly increases from 35.21% to 53.20% in cycle two and 79.61% in cycle three. The average student test rate for each indicator of problem-solving ability has met the study’s success criteria.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 112
Author(s):  
Alman Alman

This study is a quasi-experimental research using factorial design. This study aimed at finding the facts that had been resulted from the different influence caused by the use of Open-Ended method and that of STAD method on the students’ mathematical problem-solving skills in terms of learning achievement. The learning achievement was categorized into two types namely the high achievement and the low achievement. The population in this study was Grade V students from SD Negeri Serayu. The data were analyzed by ANAVA univariate test. The results of the study were as follows. First, there have been differences in the mathematical problem-solving skills of the students who had been taught using Open-Ended method and those who had been taught using the STAD method. Second, there were also differences on the students’ score. For the students who had been taught using the Open-Ended method, the highest posttest average score of their learning achievement was 95.71 while the lowest post-test average score of their learning achievement was 63.92. These students’ total average score of learning achievement was 81.04. On the other hand, for the students who had been taught using STAD the highest posttest average score of their learning achievement was 95.50 while the lowest posttest average score of their learning achievement was 70.00. These students’ total average score of learning achievement was 89.13. Third, there has not been any differences between the Open-Ended method and the STAD method.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-130
Author(s):  
Mulia Suryani ◽  
Lucky Heriyanti Jufri ◽  
Tika Artia Putri

AbstrakRendahnya kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa menyebabkan siswa kurang mampu menyelesaikan soal yang bersifat non rutin dan siswa masih kurang mengembangkan ide dan kemampuan yang dimilikinya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa melalui model Problem Based Learning berdasarkan Kemampuan Awal Matematika (KAM) siswa. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa melalui model Problem Based Learning menjadi lebih baik. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII-7 SMP Negeri 12 Padang yang terdiri dari 32 orang. Siswa yang awalnya berkemampuan rendah meningkat menjadi siswa berkemampuan sedang dengan peningkatan sebesar 75 %. Siswa yang awalnya tergolong berkemampuan sedang meningkat menjadi siswa berkemampuan tinggi sebesar 26 %. Siswa sudah mampu 1) memahami masalah, 2) menyusun rencana penyelesaian, 3) melaksanakan penyelesaian, dan 4) mengecek kembali jawaban. Analysis of Students' Problem Solving Abilities Based on Early Mathematical Ability AbstractThe lack of students' mathematical problem-solving skills causes students to be less able to solve problems that are non-routine and students are still lacking in developing their ideas and abilities. This study aims to determine students 'mathematical problem-solving abilities through the Problem Based Learning model based on students' Early Mathematical Ability (KAM). The research method used is qualitative. The results of this study indicate that students' mathematical problem-solving abilities through the Problem Based Learning model are better. The sample in this study were students of class VIII-7 Middle School 12 Padang consisting of 32 people. Students who were initially low-skilled increased to moderate-capable students with an increase of 75%. Students who were initially classified as capable were increasing to high-ability students by 26%. Students can 1) understand the problem, 2) draw up a settlement plan, 3) carry out the solution, and 4) re-check the answers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document