scholarly journals KELEMAHAN YURIDIS FORMAL PELAKSANAAN PERSIDANGAN PIDANA MELALUI TELECONFERENCE SAAT PANDEMI COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-214
Author(s):  
I Made Wirya Darma
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Quick Response ◽  
Social Distancing ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Positive Sense ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
The Republic

AbstractThe implementation of virtual trials through teleconference is seen as in line with social distancing and physical distancing policies, in order to reduce the pace of development of the Covid-19 Pandemic. As a quick response to the Supreme Court in ensuring the protection of judicial officials, justice seekers, court users including defendants who are dealing with the law, the Supreme Court has issued Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) Number 1 of 2020 concerning Guidelines for Implementing Tasks During the Prevention Period of the Spread of Covid-19 in The environment of the Supreme Court and the Judiciary Bodies that are under it. Within the prosecutor's office, the trial using this teleconference facility refers to the Instruction of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 2020 concerning Policies for Implementing Tasks and Handling Cases During the Prevention Period for the Spread of COVID-19 in the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia on March 27, 2020. Referring to the judicial system criminal law in Indonesia, online court proceedings are a legal breakthrough (rules breaking) in a positive sense. However, in practice the implementation of online trials still encounters obstacles or obstacles.Keywords: online trial; teleconference criminal hearing; virtual courtAbstrakPelaksanaan persidangan virtual melalui sarana teleconference dipandang seiring dengan kebijakan social distancing dan phisyical distancing, guna menekan laju perkembangan Pandemi Covid-19. Sebagai respons cepat Mahkamah Agung dalam menjamin terlindunginya aparatur peradilan, pencari keadilan, pengguna pengadilan termasuk terdakwa yang sedang berhadapan dengan hukum, maka MA telah mengeluarkan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Selama Masa Pencegahan Penyebaran Covid-19 di Lingkungan Mahkamah Agung dan Badan Peradilan yang Berada Di Bawahnya. Di lingkungan kejaksaan, persidangan dengan menggunakan sarana teleconference ini merujuk pada Instruksi Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2020 tentang Kebijakan Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Penanganan Perkara Selama Masa Pencegahan Penyebaran COVID-19 di Lingkungan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia pada tanggal 27 Maret 2020. Merujuk kepada sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia, pelaksanaan sidang secara online merupakan terobosan hukum (rules breaking) dalam makna yang positif. Namun, dalam praktiknya pelaksanaan persidangan online masih menemui kendala atau hambatan.

scholarly journals The Internet as a public place and a place of committing a prohibited act: Comments regarding the judgment of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland, case ref. no. IV KK 296/17

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 183-199
Author(s):  
Jan Kluza ◽  
Konrad Sączek
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Public Space ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Public Place ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Way

The paper concerns the analysis of the possibility for classifying the Internet as a public place, which is of extraordinary legal significance with regard to the fulfilment of the criteria of many prohibited acts. Such a statement was presented by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland in its judgment of 17 April 2018, case ref. no. IV KK 296/17. This paper attempts to assess the standpoint of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland and the way it is reflected in various factual situations. To determine whether the Internet can constitute a public space in the sense of criminal law, several factors must be indicated, including, first of all, the application of an appropriate interpretation of the norms of criminal law. Internet jako miejsce publiczne popełnienia przestępstwa — uwagi na tle wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 17 kwietnia 2018 roku, sygn. akt IV KK 296/17Artykuł zawiera analizę możliwości zakwalifikowania Internetu jako miejsca publicznego, co ma swoje doniosłe znaczenie prawne dla spełnienia znamion wielu typów czynów zabronionych. Taką tezę zaprezentował Sąd Najwyższy w wyroku z dnia 17 kwietnia 2018 roku sygn. IV KK 296/17. Niniejszy tekst to próba oceny stanowiska Sądu Najwyższego oraz jego przełożenia na różnorakie stany faktyczne. W kwestii tego, czy Internet może stanowić miejsce publiczne w rozumieniu prawa karnego, trzeba wskazać na kilka okoliczności, przede wszystkim na zastosowanie właściwego sposobu wykładni norm prawa karnego.

scholarly journals Disparitas Penuntutan Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-78
Author(s):  
Benny Leonard Saragih ◽  
Ediwarman Ediwarman ◽  
Muaz Zul
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Internal Factors ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Substantive Law

Difference in punishment or sentencing disparity is basically a natural thing because it can be said almost no case that is really the same. Disparity becomes a problem when the range of the sentence imposed differences between similar cases so large, giving rise to injustice and can give rise to suspicions in the community. Disparities in the Criminal (disparity of sentencing) is not the same as the application of criminal offenses against the same (same offense) or the criminal acts that are dangerous to be compared (offenses of comparable seriousness) without clear justification. Based on Law No. 16 of 2004 which replaced Law No. 5 of 1991 About the Prosecutor of the Republic of Indonesia is an institution in the field of prosecution of the main authority of the public prosecutor act prosecution about what is meant by the prosecution as well as the reference to the provisions of Article 1 point 7 and Article 137 Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Law of Criminal Procedure Code (Criminal Code). Research Methods in writing this thesis carried out by the method of normative law, namely analyzing and searching for answers to the problems raised by the substantive law / legal norms contained in the rules of law, the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA), the Supreme Court Circular, and etc. Factors that cause the disparity criminal offense namely Legislation Provisions factors, internal factors and external factors.

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Undermining Parliamentary Sovereignty and Federalism

Federalism-E ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-65
Author(s):  
Joshua Nahmias
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Political Environment ◽  
Supreme Court Of Canada ◽  
Canadian Charter ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Purse ◽  
Parliamentary Sovereignty ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Core Concepts

This article explores the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and its role in altering two core concepts of Canadian democracy: parliamentary sovereignty and federalism. The author argues that the Charter has undermined these concepts through the empowerment of Canada's judiciary, namely the Supreme Court of Canada. The article explores ways in which the powers of parliament have been superseded by the courts, specifically through the establishment of "charter proofing," parliament's loss of power over the "public purse," and the erosion of the provinces' policy autonomy. Ultimately, the article seeks to demonstrate that the Charter has "legalized" Canadian politics to the extent that the judiciary unwieldy an unacceptable amount of power in Canada's political environment. Cases explored in the essay include Morgentaler v. the Queen (1988), Schachter v. Canada (1992), and Attorney-General of Québec v. Association of Québec Protestant School Boards (1984).

scholarly journals Ajaran Turut Serta Tindak Pidana Korupsi

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-52
Author(s):  
Harry Arfhan ◽  
Mohd. Din ◽  
Sulaiman Sulaiman
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Banda Aceh

Penyertaan pada dasarnya diatur dalam pasal 55 dan 56 KUHP yang berarti bahwa ada dua orang atau lebih yang melakukan suatu tindak pidana atau dengan perkataan ada dua orangatau lebih mengambil bahagian untuk mewujudkan suatu tindak pidana. Penyertaan di dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tahun 2001 disebut sebagai pembantuan.Dalam putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor : 1769 K/PID.SUS/2015 menyatakan bahwa Terdakwa I Indra Gunawan Bin Alm. Saleh tersebut tidak terbukti secara sah dan menyakinkan bersalah melakukan perbuatan sebagaimana yang didakwakan dalam semua dakwaan Penuntut Umum dan Menyatakan Terdakwa II Irfan Bin Husen telah terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan bersalah melakukan tindak pidana “Turut Serta Melakukan Korupsi”. Majelis Hakim Judex Factie Pengadilan Tinggi/Tipikor Banda Aceh dalam memeriksa dan mengadili perkara Aquo telah salah dalam menerapkan hukum atau suatu peraturan hukum tidak diterapkan atau diterapkan tidak sebagaimana mestinya, yaitu mengenai penerapan hukum pembuktian sehingga harus dibatalkan oleh Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.The participation is basically regulated in articles 55 and 56 of the Criminal Code, which means that there are two or more people who commit a crime or say that there are two or more people taking part to realize a crime. The participation in the Law on the Eradication of Corruption Crime namely Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 is referred to as assistance. In the decision of the Supreme Court Cassation Number: 1769 K / PID.SUS / 2015 stated that Defendant I Indra Gunawan Bin Alm. Saleh is not proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing an act as charged in all charges of the Public Prosecutor and Stating Defendant II Irfan Bin Husen has been proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing a criminal offense "Also Participating in Corruption". Judex Factie Judge of the High Court / Corruption Court in Banda Aceh in examining and adjudicating the case of Aquo has been wrong in applying the law or a legal regulation was not applied or applied improperly, namely regarding the application of verification law so that it must be canceled by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia.

scholarly journals Re-Evaluasi Proses Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-69
Author(s):  
Muhammad Arief
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
The Political ◽  
Human Rights Violations ◽  
University Campus ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Security Forces ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

Tujuan Penelitian menganalisis proses penyelesaian pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) berat pada Persitiwa Trisaksi oelh Kejaksanaan Agung Republik Indonesia. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum. Normative dengan pendekatan kualitatif yang diuraikan secara deskriptif. Hasil peneltian menunjukan bahwa pelanggaran HAM berat pada peristiwa penanganan demonstrasi di Kampus Universitas Trisakti pada tahun 1998, oleh aparat keamanan; sehingga menyebabkan tewasnya empat orang mahasiswa dan ratusan lainnya luka. Komnas HAM telah melakukan (investigasi) penyelidikan terhadap peristiwa tersebut, dan laporan Komnas HAM menyimpulkan telah terjadi pelanggaran HAM berat atas insiden tersebut. Hasil penyelidikan tersebut telah dilaporankn Komnas HAM, dan berkas laporan tersebut telah diserahkan kepada Jaksa Agung; tetapi sampai saat ini (±18 tahun) Jaksa Agung belum memproses ke tingkat peneyidikan dan penuntutan. Alasan Jaksa Agung, berkaitan dengan hal-hal teknis yuridis, yang oleh publik dianggap tidak relevan dengan substansi kasus/masalah. Tetapi intinya aspek politis dan non yudisial lebih mengitari kasus-kasus tersebut. The purpose of this research is to analyze the process of resolving gross violations of human rights (HAM) at the Trisaksi event by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The research method used is legal research methods. Normative with a qualitative approach described descriptively. The research results show that gross human rights violations during the handling of demonstrations at the Trisakti University Campus in 1998, by security forces; causing the death of four students and hundreds of others injured. Komnas HAM has conducted (investigated) investigations into the incident, and the Komnas HAM report concludes that gross human rights violations have occurred in the incident. The results of the investigation have been reported by Komnas HAM, and the report files have been submitted to the Attorney General; but until now (± 18 years) the Attorney General has not yet proceeded to the level of investigation and prosecution. The Attorney General's reasons relate to juridical technical matters which the public deems irrelevant to the substance of the case / problem. But in essence, the political and non-judicial aspects surround these cases.

scholarly journals THE NORMATIVE RESOLUTION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN “ON THE PRACTICE OF THE COURTS APPLYING THE CRIMINAL LAW IN CASES OF CRIMES RELATED TO VIOLATION OF THE RULES OF THE ROAD AND THE OPERATION OF VEHICLES” DATED JUNE 29, 2011, AND THE CRIMINAL LAW

2020 ◽  
pp. 69-75
Author(s):  
K.A. Bakishev
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Offence ◽  
The Road ◽  
Regulatory Decision ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Sufficient Degree ◽  
The Republic

The Concept of the legal policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the period from 2010 to 2020emphasizes that the criminal law must meet the requirements of legal accuracy and predictability ofconsequences, that is, its norms must be formulated with a sufficient degree of clarity and based on clearcriteria that exclude the possibility of arbitrary interpretation provisions of the law. Meanwhile, an analysisof the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan shows that some articles on liability for road transportoffences are designed poorly. For example, Art. 346 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan ischaracterized by a combination of formal and qualified corpus delicti, as well as two forms of guilt — intentand negligence; in Art. 351 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the circle of subjects of thecriminal offence was significantly reduced due to the unjustified exclusion of drivers of non-mechanicalvehicles. As a result, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the regulatory decree «On thepractice of the courts applying the criminal law in cases of crimes related to violation of the rules of theroad and the operation of vehicles’ of June 29, 2011 made a number of errors and contradictions that led todifficulties in qualifying the criminal offence and the appointment criminal punishment. Taking into accountthe law-enforcement and legislative experience of Kazakhstan and other countries in the field of ensuringtraffic safety, the author proposes amendments and additions to the named regulatory decision of theSupreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan to improve its quality and improve law enforcement practice.

scholarly journals Pembatasan Kasasi Perkara Pidana Oleh Mahkamah Agung Ditinjau Dari Hak Rakyat Untuk Memperoleh Keadilan

ADALAH ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurelia Verina Withania ◽  
Ahmad Mahyani
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Basic Purpose ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Prescriptive Analysis

The existence of rules limiting the cassation becomes an obstacle for the public to obtain justice and is not in accordance with the principles of the state of Indonesia as a state of law which is stated in the provisions of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in Article 28D. Problem: Is the limitation of cassation in Article 45A of the Supreme Court Law in accordance with the provisions of the 1945 Constitution and the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is a normative research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach as well as prescriptive analysis techniques. The cassation legal effort should return to its basic purpose, namely maintaining legal uniformity and unity and providing justice for the community.

scholarly journals Soolise võrdõiguslikkuse küsimus Eesti Vabariigi põhiseadustes ja riigikohtu praktikas 1920–1940 [Abstract: Gender equality in constitutions and Supreme Court cases in the Republic of Estonia in 1920–1940]

2018 ◽  
pp. 341
Author(s):  
Marelle Leppik
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Gender Equality ◽  
Women's Rights ◽  
Private Sphere ◽  
Women’S Rights ◽  
Court Cases ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

The purpose of the article is to analyse the principle of gender equality laid down in the interwar Estonian constitutions and to study the relevant court cases at the highest level of appeal in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Estonia (1920–40). When Estonia granted equality rights with the constitution of 1920 and all citizens, men and women alike, were declared to be equal before the law, it placed Estonia among the vanguard of nations in Europe in support of gender equality. The amendment of the constitution in 1933 left the equality principle unchanged. In the new constitution, which went into effect in 1938, gender equality was extended to relations in marriage as well. In the twentieth century, the focus was not on the equality of genders as such, but rather on women’s equality compared to men, and the main question was how to improve women’s rights to gain the equality promised in the constitution. On 1 September 1924, the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court made a judgment which could be considered the first important court case about women’s rights in Estonia. The Supreme Court issued a complaint submitted by a female lawyer, who challenged a lower court judgement that she – as a woman – was not suitable to be appointed to the position of judge candidate. According to the Supreme Court, the only constitutionally uniform solution that would support gender equality was that all persons – men and women – on the same grounds had the right to become a judge candidate and enter the judiciary in Estonia. However, the court system of the interwar independent Republic of Estonia remained traditionally masculine without any female judiciary, which is in turn indicative not so much of legal, but rather of pragmatic questions about social attitudes. The exploration of tensions in society engendered by the ambition to bring women into positions of authority and to grant women rights in the private family sphere as well, leads to two main conclusions. First, despite the formal equality that was granted by both constitutions of the Republic of Estonia adopted in 1920 and 1937, women’s efforts, e.g. opening the judiciary to women, were met with a degree of ironical resistance, and general emphasis on women’s rights even drew attention to presumable positive discrimination as well. Estonia’s foreign minister Ants Piip wrote an article in the magazine Constitutional Review about the first constitution of the Republic of Estonia in 1925: “It is interesting to note that despite this provision, many laws exist which protect women in industry, thereby discriminating favourably against men.” Since both the 1920 and the 1937 constitution granted gender equality in public, not in the private sphere, the traditional gap between women’s legal position and that of men generally remained unchanged in private family law. Thus, the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Estonia confirmed in 1937 that it was in accordance with the principle of gender equality to restrict the possibilities for married women compared to men to make a testament without any mandatory advisor. According to the court’s reasoning, the regulation was constitutional because the law of succession and the right to make a testament belonged not to the public but to the private sphere. Thereafter, female lawyers drew attention to the fact that a married woman could legally become a judge or a minister – at least it was not prohibited or excluded – and decide the fate of a nation, since this right belonged to the public sphere. And still at the same time, a married woman’s competence to transact in the private sphere was limited compared to men. However, the constitution that went into effect in 1937 brought some changes, since equality in marriage was additionally granted, for instance. Unfortunately, the implementation period of the new constitution was limited to about two years, thus there is no case law to confirm that the constitution brought specific changes in practice.

“THE CHOICE IS CRUEL”: ASSISTED SUICIDE AND CHARTER RIGHTS IN CANADA

2015 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Palmer
Keyword(s):  
British Columbia ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Assisted Suicide ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Supreme Court Of Canada ◽  
The Supreme Court

IN a groundbreaking decision, the Supreme Court of Canada in Carter v Canada (Attorney General) 2015 SCC 5 has declared the criminal law measures prohibiting the provision of assistance in dying unconstitutional. In doing so, the Supreme Court unanimously overruled its previous decision (Rodriguez v British Columbia (Attorney-General) [1993] 3 S.C.R. 519) upholding the blanket prohibition on assisted suicide.

scholarly journals SINKRONISASI PENANGANAN PERKARA PIDANA YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH SUBJEK HUKUM KORPORASI

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-89
Author(s):  
Wahyu Priyanka Nata Permana
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Secondary Data Sources ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Subjects

Korporasi dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia telah ditempatkan sebagai subjek hukum tindak pidana yang dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana. Dalam praktek penanganan perkara pidana yang melibatkan korporasi sebagai subjek hukum masih menemui kendala dalam prosedur dan tata cara pemeriksaan korporasi sebagai pelaku tindak pidana, oleh karena itu Mahkamah Agung RI dan Jaksa Agung RI mengeluarkan pedoman penanganan perkara tindak pidana oleh korporasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat sinkronisai antara Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI dengan Peraturan Jaksa Agung RI. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif serta sumber data primer dan sekunder. Adapun hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya keseragaman dalam sebagian besar penangangan perkara pidana dalam Peraturan Jaksa Agung dengan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung, tetapi dalam pelaksanaan putusan pidana terhadap korporasi terdapat perbedaan ketika korporasi tidak membayar pidana denda dan harta korporasi tidak mencukupi untuk membayar denda tersebut. Terhadap hal-hal yang tidak diatur oleh Peraturan Jaksa Agung, berkenaan pemeriksaan terhadap korporasi dalam hal terjadi peleburan, penggabungan, pemisahan dan proses pembubaran korporasi telah termuat dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung.Corporations in the Indonesian legislation have been placed as criminal liability subject. In practice the handling of criminal cases involving corporations as legal subjects still encounters obstacles in the procedures and procedures of corporation examination as perpetrators of criminal acts, Therefore the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia and the Attorney General of Indonesia issued guidelines for handling criminal cases by corporations. This study aims to see the synchronization between the Regulation of the Supreme Court and the Attorney General's Regulation. The research method used is normative juridical with qualitative approach as well as primary and secondary data sources. The results of the study indicate the existence of uniformity in the majority of criminal case handling in the Attorney General's Regulation with the Supreme Court Regulation, but in the execution of criminal verdict against the corporation there is a difference when the corporation does not pay the fine, and the corporation's property is not sufficient to pay the fine. In respect of matters not governed by the Attorney General's Regulation, concerning the examination of the corporation in the event of a merger, merger, separation and dissolution process of the corporation has been contained in the Supreme Court Regulation

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document