scholarly journals Increasing the Publication of Scientific Articles to Support Key Performance Indicators by Providing Publication Space Facilities in the Petroleum Engineering Department

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 572-579
Author(s):  
Boni Swadesi ◽  
Nur Suhascaryo ◽  
Indah Widiyaningsih ◽  
Wahyuni A. ◽  
Yuan Cahyo Guntoro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Petroleum Engineering ◽  
Quality Of Education ◽  
Student Work ◽  
Engineering Faculty ◽  
National Journal ◽  
Engineering Department

This study was used to identify and increase the interest of students of the Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Mineral Technology, UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta in publishing scientific articles. the publication of scientific articles has an effect on improving the quality of majors in a university so that it is necessary to support the increase in the publication of scientific articles. The method used in this research is quantitative in the form of socialization, questionnaires, and holding competitions to explore potential interests and talents, as well as awarding student work appreciation. The results obtained from this study are in the form of increasing the quality of publications from competitions conducted with 3 scientific articles with national journal standards and 4 standard posters. From this progress, it is hoped that interest in writing standardized scientific articles will continue to increase, thus the quality of education and achievement of scientific work indicators of a university is achieved.

scholarly journals ВНЕДРЕНИЕ ЭЛЕКТРОННОГО МЕНЕДЖМЕНТА В ПРАКТИКУ ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ

2019 ◽  
pp. 34-37
Author(s):  
Худайназар Х. Курбанов ◽  
Феруза М. Рашидова
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Academic Performance ◽  
Performance Assessment ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Professional Competence ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Quality Of Education

The article discusses the actual problems of education - digitalization and the development of electronic management in educational institutions; an information system for collecting data on graduates and their occupation; automation of conducting profiles of teachers and the development of their professional competence; monitoring the academic performance assessment; ensuring transparency and improving the quality of education; implementation of a key performance indicators (KPI).

Computable metrics of personal performance in software development teams

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andriy Lishchytovych ◽  
Volodymyr Pavlenko
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Software Development ◽  
Product Quality ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Project Manager ◽  
Development Life Cycle ◽  
Software Product ◽  
Software Development Life Cycle

The present article describes setup, configuration and usage of the key performance indicators (KPIs) of members of project teams involved into the software development life cycle. Key performance indicators are described for the full software development life cycle and imply the deep integration with both task tracking systems and project code management systems, as well as a software product quality testing system. To illustrate, we used the extremely popular products - Atlassian Jira (tracking development tasks and bugs tracking system) and git (code management system). The calculation of key performance indicators is given for a team of three developers, two testing engineers responsible for product quality, one designer, one system administrator, one product manager (responsible for setting business requirements) and one project manager. For the key members of the team, it is suggested to use one integral key performance indicator per the role / team member, which reflects the quality of the fulfillment of the corresponding role of the tasks. The model of performance indicators is inverse positive - the initial value of each of the indicators is zero and increases in the case of certain deviations from the standard performance of official duties inherent in a particular role. The calculation of the proposed key performance indicators can be fully automated (in particular, using Atlassian Jira and Atlassian Bitbucket (git) or any other systems, like Redmine, GitLab or TestLink), which eliminates the human factor and, after the automation, does not require any additional effort to calculate. Using such a tool as the key performance indicators allows project managers to completely eliminate bias, reduce the emotional component and provide objective data for the project manager. The described key performance indicators can be used to reduce the time required to resolve conflicts in the team, increase productivity and improve the quality of the software product.

scholarly journals Designing key performance indicators for higher education programs in engineering and technology

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (Q3) ◽  
pp. 44-50
Author(s):  
Lam Ngoc Quynh Le ◽  
Dung The Vu ◽  
Hien Ngoc Do ◽  
Thoai Tuong Lam ◽  
Trang Thi Thuy Vuu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Global Integration ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Quality Of Higher Education ◽  
Statistical Measures ◽  
Engineering And Technology

Higher education plays a crucial role in the economic and social development. In order to fulfill its role, mission, and vision, as well as enhance competitive advantages in the global integration context, universities have to put quality as the top priority. Recently, many universities nationwide have been developing quality assurance system, conducting self assessment, and pursuing accreditation in both program and institutional levels. This process aims at developing suitable action plan for quality improvement based on determined strengths and weaknesses. However, this process requires a huge effort to collect and analyze data. In order to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency, the key performance indicators (KPIs) are proposed to evaluate the quality of higher education programs in many aspects. Those KPIs can be considered as a set of statistical measures of how higher education programs are performing. This paper, therefore, provides some general definitions and proposes some KPIs in order to measure the quality of higher education programs in engineering and technology. However, findings of this study can be used as references for other programs.

Methodicial Bases or HR-Strategy Formation: From Strategic Alternatives to Key Performance Indicators

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 112-120
Author(s):  
Svitlana Dovbnya ◽  
Oleksandra Pysmenna
Keyword(s):  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Corporate Culture ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Strategy Formation ◽  
Operational Strategies ◽  
Personnel Expenses ◽  
Strategic Goals ◽  
Hr Strategy

The purpose of this work was to systematize basic stages of strategic HR management. The main difference between traditional strategic management and personnel one is in strategic alternatives forming. According to development of human capital concept and escalating сorporate social responsibility three components of HR strategy were suggested: “quality of personnel-expenses”, “employees' interaction, vector of corporate culture and social responsibility”, “personnel development”. The combination of these types allows to form valid strategic alternatives of HR strategy. The condition for the effective implementation of the strategy is its decomposition to the level of key performance indicators. Purpose KPIs is the ability to assess the implementation of operational strategies and achieve strategic goals.

scholarly journals Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) as a Tool to Improve Product Quality

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 347-354
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Midor ◽  
Erika Sujová ◽  
Helena Cierna ◽  
Danuta Zarebinska ◽  
Wojciech Kaniak
Keyword(s):  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Improve Product Quality ◽  
Process Measures ◽  
Organizational Unit ◽  
Manufactured Products ◽  
Management Method ◽  
A Company ◽  
Financial Process

AbstractThe literature includes a wide selection and distribution of performance indicators to be used in different areas of the company. The paper highlights the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) as those that are the most universal and allow the control of intended targets in different areas of the enterprise. KPIs are financial and non-financial process measures used to assess the degree of achievement with regard to strategic and operational objectives in a company. They are also used to measure the effectiveness of all activities undertaken in an organizational unit. The paper presents the possibility of using KPIs to improve the quality of manufactured products, by analyzing the trend of selected indicators. This analysis gave an impulse to undertake improvement actions in the company consisting in the use of quality management method – in this case 5 WHY leading to the initiation of preventive and corrective actions in the occurrence of defective products.

Do key performance indicators matter on public procurement rules 2008? An empirical study on local government engineering department, bangladesh

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-257
Author(s):  
Mahfuzar Rahman ◽  
Amrita Kumar Das ◽  
Zohurul Islam
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Empirical Study ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Questionnaire Survey ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Survey Method ◽  
Key Informant ◽  
Engineering Department ◽  
Senior Officers

This study focuses on the importance of transparency and accountability of Local Government Engineering Department (LGED)'s procurement performance based on 45 predetermined Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). The main objectives of this study are to find the extent of compliance of PPR 2008 by LGED and to identify gaps in compliance and scope of improvement for implementation. For this study, a questionnaire survey method collected data from different stakeholders related to procurement activities of LGED. Key informant interviews were also conducted with senior officers of LGED and IMED. The study result shows a clear adherence to the rules of PPR 2008 by LGED in operating its procurement functions except when paying interest for delayed payment. This study was confined to compliance issues covering 11 KPIs set by the Central Procurement Technical Unit (CPTU).

scholarly journals Transforming Building Criteria to Evidence Index

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (13) ◽  
pp. 5894
Author(s):  
Géza Fischl ◽  
Peter Johansson
Keyword(s):  
Construction Industry ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Social Needs ◽  
Scientific Databases ◽  
Building Process ◽  
Construction Products ◽  
Construction Product

There is increasing pressure from developers toward architects and engineers to deliver scientifically sound proposals for often complex and cost-intensive construction products. An increase in digitalization within the construction industry and the availability of intelligently built assets and overall sustainability make it possible to customize a construction product. This servitization of construction products is assumed to perform much preferably in satisfying stakeholders’ physical, psychological, and social needs. The degree to which these products are performing can be evaluated through an evidence index. This article aims to introduce a conceptual model of an evidence index and test it in the programming stage of a case study. The investigation follows the evidence-based design approach and renders evidence through key performance indicators in the programming stage of the building process. For testing the concept, a case study investigation was performed by simulating a novice research assistant, and the amount of evidence was collected and appraised for evidence index. The case study showed that key performance indicators of a servitized project could be evaluated on a four-point scale. The quality of the evidence index generation depended on the level of expertise the evaluator has in research and the skilful use of scientific databases.

scholarly journals Key Performance Indicators Related to the Quality of Life in Patients with Celiac Disease: A Descriptive-Analytical Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Farnaz Jahhantigh ◽  
Fateme Behmaneshpour ◽  
Fatemaeh Gharebaghi
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Celiac Disease ◽  
Family History ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Analytical Study ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
History Of

Background: Celiac disease (CD) is a chronic, systemic immune disorder that can affect one’s quality of life. Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the key performance indicators (KPIs) related to the quality of life of patients with CD admitted to the Celiac Association of Bouali Hospital in Zahedan. Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was performed on 60 patients with CD who referred to the Celiac Association of Bouali Hospital in Zahedan in 2018. Data collection tools included a demographic questionnaire (age, gender, marital status, duration of illness, education, ethnicity, economic status, occupation, breastfeeding history, family history of CD, as well as vitamin D and iron supplementation) and the Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients with CD. Data were analyzed in SPSS 21 using descriptive statistics. All values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Sixty participants completed the study, 66.7% of whom were female, 76.7% were married, and 85.3% reported a family history of CD. The total score of patients’ quality of life was 81.66 ± 18.33, and the lowest score of quality of life was associated with patients’ concerns (51.81 ± 3.85). The findings also showed that, among various KPIs, vitamin D had a particularly significant relationship with patients’ quality of life. Conclusions: There was a significant relationship between the quality of life and vitamin D supplementation in the participants. Besides, considering the effect of physical health on improving the quality of life and the chronic nature of CD, it is necessary to enhance the quality of life of these individuals by raising their awareness about micronutrient intakes while respecting their dietary restrictions.

scholarly journals Key performance indicators (KPIs)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Sanz ◽  
P. Alonso ◽  
B. Haidar ◽  
H. Ghaemi ◽  
L. García
Keyword(s):  
Social Network ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Education Students ◽  
Online Tool ◽  
Entrepreneurial Skills ◽  
Entrepreneurial Activities ◽  
Different Sources

The project “Social network tools and procedures for developing entrepreneurial skills in PhD programmes” (prodPhD) aims to implement innovative social network-based methodologies for teaching and learning entrepreneurship in PhD programmes. The multidisciplinary teaching and learning methodologies to be developed will enable entrepreneurship education to be introduced into any PhD programme, providing students with the knowledge, skills, and motivation to engage in entrepreneurial activities. However, the use of the output of the project will depend on the nature and profile of the research or scientific field. In this context, key performance indicators (KPIs) form the base on which the quality and scope of the methodologies developed in the project will be quantified and benchmarked. The project’s final product will be an online tool that higher education students can use to learn entrepreneurship from a social network perspective. Performance measurement is one of the first steps of any project and involves the choice and use of indicators to measure the effectiveness and success of the project’s methods and results. All the KPIs have been selected according to criteria of relevance, measurability, reliability, and adequacy, and they cover the process, dissemination methods, and overall quality of the project. In this document, each KPI is defined together with the units and instruments for measuring it. In the case of qualitative KPIs, five-level Likert scales are defined to improve indicator measurability and reliability. The KPIs for prodPhD are divided into three main dimensions, depending on the stage of the project they evaluate. The three main dimensions are performance and development (which are highly related to the project’s process), dissemination and impact (which are more closely correlated with the project’s output), and overall project quality. Different sources (i.e., European projects and papers) have been drawn upon to define a set of 51 KPIs classified into six categories, according to the project phase they aim to evaluate. An Excel tool has been developed that collects all the KPIs analysed in the production of this document. This tool is shared in the Scipedia repository.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document