Epistemic Contextualism: An Idle Hypothesis
Keyword(s):
Epistemic contextualism is one of the most hotly debated topics in contemporary epistemology. Contextualists claim that ‘know’ is a context-sensitive verb associated with different evidential standards in different contexts. Contextualists motivate their view based on a set of behavioural claims. In this paper, I show that several of these behavioural claims are false. I also show that contextualist test cases suffer from a critical confound, which derives from people's tendency to defer to speakers’ statements about their own mental states. My evidence consists in results from several behavioural experiments. I conclude that contextualism is an idle hypothesis and I propose some general methodological lessons.
2015 ◽
Vol 20
(3)
◽
pp. 185-198
◽
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
2006 ◽
Vol 16
(05)
◽
pp. 677-703
◽
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
1994 ◽
Vol 144
◽
pp. 503-505