scholarly journals Instrumen Penilaian Skripsi Jurusan Sejarah Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Padang

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aisiah Aisiah
Keyword(s):  
History Education ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Assessment Scores ◽  
Valid Instrument ◽  
History Department ◽  
Assessment Format

This paper examines the development of script assessment instruments in history department. So far, the assessment instrument has not been valid as a measurement so that the development is needed to be done. The aim is to develop the components and indicators of scripts' assessment as a basis for a valid instrument and describe the characteristics and forms of the instrument. The development is done through R & D. Subjects of the research were assessment instruments itself used by the rater (examiner) to assess the script. Rater consists of 10 persons. The research data is in the form of rater assessment scores at the time of the exam. Data analysis was performed by testing the validity and reliability of the instrument through expert judgment in the FGD and inter-rater reliability. R & D results indicate that the instrument in the form of assessment format history script consists of four components and 20 indicators/assessment items. While the assessment format of history education script consists of six components and 19 indicators/assessment items. The characteristic of the resulting instrument has been qualified as a good instrument in the term of validity and reliability. The analysis showed that the level of inter-rater reliability was significant to be said to be reliable (the assessment instruments of history script r between 0, 9751 and 0.9949, while the assessment instruments of history education r between 0, 9947 and 0.9990).

PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN ASESMEN KINERJA DASAR TATA RIAS

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Gede Sudirtha
Keyword(s):  
Performance Test ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Development Research ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Test Instrument ◽  
Scoring Rubrics ◽  
Data Collection Instrument ◽  
Empirical Tests

This study aims to develop a performance assessment instrument for Make up Training Subject in Beauty Education Program by appropriate validity and reliability procedure in thedevelopment of the assessment instrument as the assessment process and products. Thisresearch is a development research (R&D). The research focuses on the development ofassessment instrument for Makeup Training Subject. The aspects of research, data sources, techniques and instruments/data collection instrument, and validation and reliability of theinstrument used in the study conducted by interview, observation, and literature and documents.The data of this study is quantitative data, which was statistically analyzed due to relevant empirical testing (validation of instruments) that includes testing and content validity andinternal validity. Descriptive analyzes were undertaken to describe the research data. The results showed: 1) The design of the instrument Makeup Training Subject are developed through theneeds analysis. It is done through literature review and study of the course competencies byengaging a team of researchers. This study resulted in the instrument guidelines and assessment instrument completed with its scoring rubrics. The instrument comprising: a step of validityassessment is done through the stages: experts judgment, empirical tests to prove the validityand reliability of the instruments assessment. All the performance test instrument developed is

Scoring Second Signed Language Assessment

2021 ◽  
pp. 315-328
Author(s):  
Tobias Haug ◽  
Eveline Boers-Visker ◽  
Wolfgang Mann ◽  
Geoffrey Poor ◽  
Beppie Van den Bogaerde
Keyword(s):  
Language Production ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Language Assessment ◽  
Rating System ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Signed Language ◽  
Assessment Research

There exists a scarcity in signed language assessment research, especially on scoring issues and interrater reliability. This chapter describes two related assessment instruments, the SLPI and the NFA, which offer scoring criteria. Raters are provided with scales for evaluating the different components of the language production of the candidate. Through its use, the rating system has been proved successful; there is, however, hardly any data on interrater reliability. In this chapter, the authors describe reliability issues with attention to raters’ training and score resolution techniques and discuss how to identify and increase rater reliability. The dearth of knowledge on signed language assessment, and in particular its validity and reliability, indicates an urgent need for more research in this area.

Quality of Instruments Used to Assess Competencies in Athletic Training

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 187-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim F. Schilling
Keyword(s):  
Athletic Training ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Summative Assessment ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Professional Programs ◽  
Assessment Of Competencies

Context: An emphasis on knowledge and skill competency acquisition continues to gain importance in allied health professions. Accuracy and fairness in the summative assessment of competencies are essential to ensure student competence. A positive demonstration of validity, reliability, and authentic quality criteria are needed to achieve evidence-based practice considerations in the assessment of competencies. Objective: To present a variety of instruments used in the assessment of competencies established in the fifth edition of the athletic training competencies document and judge them based on validity, reliability, and authenticity criteria. Data Sources: Literature reviewed for this article included published articles pertaining to the assessment of competencies used in health care professional programs. Data Synthesis: Self, written, and observation assessment methods with specific types of instruments for each category are used in the summative assessment of competencies. Quality of the assessment instruments are considered to ensure score authenticity, validity, and reliability of measures. The type of assessment instrument and its content was recommended depending on the level of competence, which was categorized according to the depth of understanding and complexity of skill in the competencies. Conclusions: There was no one-size-fits-all assessment method determined. Certain instruments demonstrated greater quality than others and were used depending on assessment goals and resources.

Evaluating Fairness of Algorithmic Risk Assessment Instruments: The Problem With Forcing Dichotomies

2021 ◽  
pp. 009385482110405
Author(s):  
Samantha A. Zottola ◽  
Sarah L. Desmarais ◽  
Evan M. Lowder ◽  
Sarah E. Duhart Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
False Positive ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Assessment Scores ◽  
Risk Assessment Instrument ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Future Work

Researchers and stakeholders have developed many definitions to evaluate whether algorithmic pretrial risk assessment instruments are fair in terms of their error and accuracy. Error and accuracy are often operationalized using three sets of indicators: false-positive and false-negative percentages, false-positive and false-negative rates, and positive and negative predictive value. To calculate these indicators, a threshold must be set, and continuous risk scores must be dichotomized. We provide a data-driven examination of these three sets of indicators using data from three studies on the most widely used algorithmic pretrial risk assessment instruments: the Public Safety Assessment, the Virginia Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument, and the Federal Pretrial Risk Assessment. Overall, our findings highlight how conclusions regarding fairness are affected by the limitations of these indicators. Future work should move toward examining whether there are biases in how the risk assessment scores are used to inform decision-making.

scholarly journals PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN KETERAMPILAN SOSIAL MAHASISWA PADA MATA KULIAH MIKRO TEACHING PAI

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 055
Author(s):  
Amaliyah Amaliyah ◽  
Ahmad Hakam ◽  
Suci Nur Pratiwi ◽  
Sari Wulandari
Keyword(s):  
Social Skills ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Teacher Candidates ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Skills Assessment ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Social Skills Assessment ◽  
The Social ◽  
Intraclass Correlations

The PAI micro teaching course contains competencies that enable students to empower and implement teacher competencies, including personal, social, pedagogical and professional competencies. This research focuses on developing social skills assessment instruments because: first, the values ​​of social skills are one of the main assets for Islamic Education teacher candidates to interact with the social environment, the second teacher is someone who gives empathy and cares for students. This research aims to describe the steps for developing a social skills assessment instrument and testing the content validity. The research method used the Borg and Gall development model. The process of content validity qualitatively uses peer assessments from PAI lecturers. The process of content validity quantitatively uses the Aikens Index, and  the reliability between raters uses the intraclass correlations coefficient. The results of the research describe: first the process and results of content validity qualitatively include suggestions from validators, the second is content validity quantitatively, include the validity and reliability scores.The results of the research are expected: social skills instruments are one of the tools to empower and develop social skills of PAI teacher candidates in learning activities and daily life.

scholarly journals The Validity and Reliability of The Instrument Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skill on The Biological Scope Materials

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-158
Author(s):  
Ganda Hijrah Selaras ◽  
Yuni Ahda ◽  
Heffi Alberida ◽  
Tri Putri Wahyuni
Keyword(s):  
Higher Order Thinking ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Thinking Skill ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
High Level ◽  
High Order Thinking

High Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) requires students to connect, analyze, and also transform their knowledges and experiences. To determine students' high-level thinking skills, we can use assessment instruments. A good instrument should be valid and reliable so it is feasible to measure and assess what it wants to be measured and assessed. Therefore it is necessary to know the level of validity and reliability of the higher order thinking assessment instruments. The instrument used in this study in the scope of biology material. This type of research is descriptive research. The subjects of this study were students of grade X MIPA 5 SMA 5 Padang. Based on the results of data analysis, the assessment instrument of high order thinking skill on biological scope material is logically valid, empirical valid and reliable.

51. Structured assessment format for evaluating operative reports (SAFE-OR) in general surgery

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
A. Vergis ◽  
L. Gillman ◽  
M. Taylor ◽  
S. Minor ◽  
J. Park
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Sigmoid Colectomy ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Assessment Format

This study determined the construct validity, inter-rater reliability and internal consistency of a “Structured Assessment Format for Evaluating Operative Reports” (SAFE-OR) in general surgery. The assessment instrument was developed using consensus criteria set forth by the Canadian Association of General Surgeons. It includes a structured assessment and a global quality rating scale. Residents divided into novice and experienced groups viewed and dictated a video-taped laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. Transcriptions were then graded by blinded, independent faculty evaluators using SAFE-OR. Twenty-one residents participated in the study. Mean structured assessment scores (out of 44) were significantly lower for novice versus experienced residents (23.3 ± 5.2 vs 34.1 ± 6.0, t=0.001). Mean global quality scores (out of 45) were similarly lower for novice residents (25.6 ± 4.7 vs 35.9 ± 7.6, t=0.006). Inter-class correlation coefficients were 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.99) for structured assessment and 0.93 (95% CI 0.83-0.97) for global quality scales. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for internal consistency were 0.85 for structured assessment and 0.96 for global quality assessment scales. SAFE-OR demonstrates significant construct validity, excellent inter-rater reliability and high internal consistency. This tool will allow educators to objectively evaluate the quality of trainee operative reports and ultimately provide a mechanism for implementing, monitoring, and refining curriculum for operative dictation communication skills. Moore R. The dictated operative note: important but is it being taught? Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2000; 190(5):639-40. Novitsky Y, Sing R, et al. Prospective, blinded evaluation of accuracy of operative reports dictated by surgical residents. The American Surgeon 2005; 71(8):627-31. Wanzel K, Ward R, et al. Teaching the surgical craft: From selection to certification. Current Problems in Surgery 2002; 39(6):573-659.

scholarly journals Rubrik Nursing Clinical Exercise: Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kompetensi Klinis Pada Pendidikan Klinik Keperawatan

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 194
Author(s):  
Retno Sumiyarrini ◽  
Gandes Retno Rahayu ◽  
Yoyo Suhoyo
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Education ◽  
Interpersonal Relationships ◽  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Subjective Data ◽  
Nursing Clinical

Background: Clinical Skills is a fundamental ability that must be mastered by the newly graduated nurses. Therefore, assessment of clinical competence is essential to be considered by educators and education managers. It needs a valid assessment instrument, which is reliable and impactful on learning the process by giving a structured feedback so that qualified graduates can be produced. Some assessment instruments in the clinical nursing education have less evidence of validity and reliability and less feasible, so it requires a development of clinical assessment instruments. This study aims to develop a clinical assessment instrument in the nursing clinic and to test the content validity. Method: This study used a qualitative research design that includes drafting through literature review and expert review by the expert panel.Results: The process of drafting and reviewing produces a rubric named Nursing Clinical Exercise (NCEx) made of six domains consisting the assessment of subjective data, physical examination, diagnosis formulation, treatment planning formulation, communication and interpersonal relationships, and professionalism. The value of content validity is good (CVR of the entire domain = 1)Conclusion: The NCEx Rubric consists of six domains and has good content validity.

scholarly journals Penerapan Model Kooperatif Tipe Team Games Tournament dalam Volley Ball Like Games

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13
Author(s):  
Refky Sudrajat Ramadhan
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Performance Assessment ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Class Action ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Play Skills ◽  
Cooperative Model ◽  
Team Games ◽  
Assessment Format

This study aims to find out if the TGT (Team Games Tournament) cooperative model through volley ball like Games can improve your volleyball mini play skills. Research using class action research method, with participants is VB class student SDN 178 Gegerkalong KPAD Bandung City, which amounted to 30 students (16 male; 13 female). The research Data is taken using the Games Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI) assessment format. The results showed an increase in the average pre-test that the student received was 69, and on the average final cycle of the student's value of 78. Thus, the results can be concluded that the implementation of TGT type cooperative model through volley-like games can improve the playing skills of Minivolleyball in grade V students at SDN Gegerkalong KPAD in Bandung. AbstrakStudi ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah model kooperatif tipe TGT (Team Games Tournament) melalui volley ball like games dapat meningkatkan keterampilan bermain mini voli. Penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian tindakan kelas, dengan partisipan adalah siswa kelas VB SDN 178 Gegerkalong KPAD Kota Bandung, Yang berjumlah 30 siswa (16 laki-laki; 13 perempuan). Data penelitian diambil dengan menggunakan format penilaian Games Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan adanya peningkatan, rata-rata nilai pada pre-test yang diperoleh siswa sebesar 69, dan pada siklus akhir rata-rata nilai siswa sebesar 78. Dengan begitu dari hasil dapat disimpulkan bahwa penerapan model kooperatif tipe TGT melalui volley-like games dapat meningkatkan keterampilan bermain minivoli pada siswa kelas V SDN Gegerkalong KPAD Kota Bandung. 

scholarly journals Development of Performance Assessment Instruments Through Practical Learning to Improve Science Process Skills

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (SpecialIssue) ◽  
pp. 96-103
Author(s):  
Elfrida Elfrida ◽  
Nursamsu Nursamsu ◽  
Raja Novi Ariska
Keyword(s):  
Performance Assessment ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Teacher Response ◽  
Science Process Skills ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Valid Instrument ◽  
Basic Biology ◽  
Academic Year

Basic Biology subjects are integrated between theory and practicum. Practical learning is an essential way that teachers can take to improve students' science process skills, so a valid instrument is needed to measure it. The objective of this study is to produce a valid performance assessment instrument in practical learning; a student worksheet in practical learning; the improvement of science process skills; and teacher response. The type of research is referring to model of 4-D. The subject of research is composed of the students in the odd semester academic year 2021-2022 at SMA Muhammadiyah Langsa. Instruments of research consist of validation sheet, student worksheet, observation sheet, questionnaire. The findings show validity score is 84% (good category); student worksheet in practical learning is 43% (very good category); there is the improvement of students science process skills before and after the practical learning, which shows by N-gain value of 0.64% (high category); and teacher response to developed performance assessment instrument is 83% (very practical category).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document