The Joy of SOI: As Viewed from a Backside FIB Perspective

Author(s):  
Steven Herschbein ◽  
Chad Rue ◽  
Carmelo Scrudato

Abstract For most advanced semiconductor products, the preferred methodology for achieving Focused Ion Beam (FIB) circuit modification and node access is through the backside of the chip. The high density of interconnect wiring and the presence of C4 solder bumping has made complex edits virtually impossible with conventional frontside techniques. IBM has developed a set of procedures for performing backside edit on circuits built using the Silicon-On-Insulator (SOI) process. While the basic approach and techniques parallel many of the established practices developed for handling transistors built in conventional bulk silicon, there are a number of key and critical differences. In this paper, we will address the basic instruction set developed for successful FIB work on SOI product. This will include backside silicon surface preparation, charge control, endpointing during high volume silicon removal, global and local coordinate lock techniques, floor voltage contrast phenomena, floor preparation and preservation, fill pattern issues and advantages, and finally the target structure alignment, access, connection and/or removal. Post process bake and handling will also be discussed.

Author(s):  
Z. G. Song ◽  
S. K. Loh ◽  
X. H. Zheng ◽  
S.P. Neo ◽  
C. K. Oh

Abstract This article presents two cases to demonstrate the application of focused ion beam (FIB) circuit edit in analysis of memory failure of silicon on insulator (SOI) devices using XTEM and EDX analyses. The first case was a single bit failure of SRAM units manufactured with 90 nm technology in SOI wafer. The second case was the whole column failure with a single bit pass for a SRAM unit. From the results, it was concluded that FIB circuit edit and electrical characterization is a good methodology for further narrowing down the defective location of memory failure, especially for SOI technology, where contact-level passive voltage contrast is not suitable.


Author(s):  
Julien Goxe ◽  
Béatrice Vanhuffel ◽  
Marie Castignolles ◽  
Thomas Zirilli

Abstract Passive Voltage Contrast (PVC) in a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) or a Focused Ion Beam (FIB) is a key Failure Analysis (FA) technique to highlight a leaky gate. The introduction of Silicon On Insulator (SOI) substrate in our recent automotive analog mixed-signal technology highlighted a new challenge: the Bottom Oxide (BOX) layer, by isolating the Silicon Active Area from the bulk made PVC technique less effective in finding leaky MOSFET gates. A solution involving sample preparation performed with standard FA toolset is proposed to enhance PVC on SOI substrate.


1998 ◽  
Vol 523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry Rice ◽  
Wei Chen

AbstractAs ULSI device critical dimensions continue to shrink to submicron sizes, electron microscopy techniques such as electron beam induced current (EBIC) and voltage contrast are finding more applications towards pinpointing failure sites for subsequent cross sectioning or deprocessing. In addition to the traditional use of EBIC for junction delineation, EBIC has been applied to locate leakage sites in capacitor structures and silicon-on-insulator (SOI) devices as well. Similarly, voltage contrast has been applied to identify single or multiple opens in via chains which consist of thousands of vias. In addition to a brief revisit of the basic principles of EBIC and voltage contrast, focus will be placed on the application of EBIC and voltage contrast in failure analysis of semiconductor devices. Examples of using voltage contrast combined with precision cross section focused ion beam (XFIB) for identifying the failure mechanism of 0.8μm vias will be presented. Also, the use of EBIC for identifying leakage sites in SOI and bipolar devices and subsequent FIB/scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis will be presented.


Author(s):  
Natsuko Asano ◽  
Shunsuke Asahina ◽  
Natasha Erdman

Abstract Voltage contrast (VC) observation using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) or a focused ion beam (FIB) is a common failure analysis technique for semiconductor devices.[1] The VC information allows understanding of failure localization issues. In general, VC images are acquired using secondary electrons (SEs) from a sample surface at an acceleration voltage of 0.8–2.0 kV in SEM. In this study, we aimed to find an optimized electron energy range for VC acquisition using Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) for quantitative understanding.


Author(s):  
H. Lorenz ◽  
C. Engel

Abstract Due to the continuously decreasing cell size of DRAMs and concomitantly diminishing thickness of some insulating layers new failure mechanisms appear which until now had no significance for the cell function. For example high resistance leakage paths between closely spaced conductors can lead to retention problems. These are hard to detect by electrical characterization in a memory tester because the involved currents are in the range of pA. To analyze these failures we exploit the very sensitive passive voltage contrast of the Focused Ion Beam Microscope (FIB). The voltage contrast can further be enhanced by in-situ FIB preparations to obtain detailed information about the failure mechanism. The first part of this paper describes a method to detect a leakage path between a borderless contact on n-diffusion and an adjacent floating gate by passive voltage contrast achieved after FIB circuit modification. In the second part we will demonstrate the localization of a DRAM trench dielectric breakdown. In this case the FIB passive voltage contrast technique is not limited to the localization of the failing trench. We can also obtain the depth of the leakage path by selective insitu etching with XeF2 stopped immediately after a voltage contrast change.


Author(s):  
X. Yang ◽  
X. Song

Abstract Novel Focused Ion Beam (FIB) voltage-contrast technique combined with TEM has been used in this study to identify a certain subtle defect mechanism that caused reliability stress failures of a new product. The suspected defect was first isolated to a unique via along the row through electrical testing and layout analysis. Static voltage contrast of FIB cross-section was used to confirm the suspected open defect at the via. Precision Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) was then used to reveal the detail of the defect. Based on the result, proper process changes were implemented. The failure mode was successfully eliminated and the reliability of the product was greatly improved.


Author(s):  
P. Perdu ◽  
G. Perez ◽  
M. Dupire ◽  
B. Benteo

Abstract To debug ASIC we likely use accurate tools such as an electron beam tester (Ebeam tester) and a Focused Ion Beam (FIB). Interactions between ions or electrons and the target device build charge up on its upper glassivation layer. This charge up could trigger several problems. With Ebeam testing, it sharply decreases voltage contrast during Image Fault Analysis and hide static voltage contrast. During ASIC reconfiguration with FIB, it could induce damages in the glassivation layer. Sample preparation is getting a key issue and we show how we can deal with it by optimizing carbon coating of the devices. Coating is done by an evaporator. For focused ion beam reconfiguration, we need a very thick coating. Otherwise the coating could be sputtered away due to imaging. This coating is use either to avoid charge-up on glassivated devices or as a sacrificial layer to avoid short circuits on unglassivated devices. For electron beam Testing, we need a very thin coating, we are now using an electrical characterization method with an insitu control system to obtain the right thin thickness. Carbon coating is a very cheap and useful method for sample preparation. It needs to be tuned according to the tool used.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1692-1693
Author(s):  
Daniel Morrall ◽  
Chad Parish

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document