scholarly journals Problems of defining the concept of "public" in present jurisprudence

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 294-304
Author(s):  
Oleksandr Khrystov
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Social Institution ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The Public ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Legal Concepts ◽  
High Level ◽  
Legal Understanding

The article deals with problems of defining the concept of "public" in present jurisprudence. The the article’s objective was to clarify the problems of defining the concept of "public" in present jurisprudence and to provide an understanding of this term. The author notes that today there is inconsistency of legal regulation, as well as arbitrariness, ine-quality and substitution of concepts in the application of this term both in different and within one branch of jurisprudence. The preparation of most legal acts on the participation of "public" in legal relations takes place without proper legal understanding of this term, the concept of which is not defined at all in the current national legislation. The conceptual and categorical apparatus of legal sciences due to the lack of definition of "public" in the legislation is based on arbitrary representation and does not reflect the unity of the aggregate features of this category. Its understanding by scholars through the prism of related (generic) legal concepts do not give an accurate meaningful reflection. Selective, and sometimes chaotic and unsystematic reference of legal scholars to philosophical, sociological, political, psychological and other sources of scientific knowledge about the essential characteristics of "public" in research on its place and role in legal relations indicate the lack of established conceptual approaches in today’s jurisprudence. Scientific inferences of legal scholars about this social institution are often reduced to the definition of the concept by identifying selective characteristics (features) without a comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon. The author has concluded that the “public” in jurisprudence should be understood as both individual citizens and their associations, which have a high level of legal consciousness and legal culture, as well as the basis of beliefs and ideology which are the building of the legal state and civil society. The author suggests to abandon in the theory of operational-search activities from the use of the concept of "public" as a category of operational-search activities forces, because: first, "public" is an abstract concept in contrast to other categories of operational-search activities forces, including law enforcement agencies operational units, secret full-time and part-time agents who have legal status; secondly, the public takes part in various branches of society, which are not characterized by the focus on assisting operational units in combating crime.

scholarly journals PUBLIC SERVICE OF JUDGES IN UKRAINE: ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGULATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 77-83
Author(s):  
Roman Holobutovskyi ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Social Institution ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Public Servants ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Status ◽  
Definition Of

The article examines the problems of administrative and legal regulation of the service of judges in Ukraine. The legislation on public service in the judiciary has been studied. It is determined that public service in the judicial bodies of Ukraine is a complex state-legal and social institution, which covers the formation of administrative, procedural and socio-psychological foundations of employees in the courts; construction and legal description of the hierarchy of positions; identification, selection, training, development, promotion, evaluation, promotion and responsibility of public servants. That is, this service exists in order to exercise the powers of an employee in court in a constructive and effective methods. Based on the analysis of the main provisions of regulations governing the organizational and legal framework of the civil service, the content of administrative and legal regulation of the public service of judges in Ukraine is clarified. It is determined that despite the legislative consolidation of the order of service in the judiciary, today remains unresolved a number of problematic issues, which include the following: features of public service in court, special requirements for skills and qualifications of court staff compared to other employees, and there is also no list of positions of the court staff that must be attributed to the public service. The author's definition of the term «administrative and legal regulation of judicial activity» is formulated. It is proposed to understand the activity of the state, which consists in the implementation of state-authoritative, normative-organizational, purposeful influence of funds on public relations, arising during the performance of courts assigned to them, which are implemented through a set of administrative law. Conclusions on the current state of administrative and legal regulation of the public service of judges in Ukraine have been formed. It is determined that the conduct of public service by judges is associated with the implementation of a specific in its meaning and content function - the administration of justice. Administrative and legal regulation of the public service reflects the objective principles and normative enshrinement of rules and administrative procedures that ensure the procedure for selection, appointment, passage and termination of public service by judges. Further scientific investigations require the status of judges' implementation of administrative and legal status.

PECULIARITIES OF THE PROCEDURAL STATUS OF SUBJECTS WHICH HAVE THE OBLIGATION OF PROOF DURING THE PRE-TRIAL INVESTIGATION OF CRIMINAL OFFENSES

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrii Vorobey ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Judicial Investigation ◽  
Definition Of

The article considers the peculiarities of the procedural status of the subjects who are obliged to prove criminal offenses during the pre-trial investigation, taking into account the latest changes in the current criminal procedure legislation made in connection with the adoption of the Law of Ukraine n Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Concerning Simplification of Pre-trial Investigation of Certain Categories of Criminal Offenses". The author notes that this issue is little studied in the scientific literature and relevant from a practical point of view. The peculiarities of the procedural status of the head of the inquiry body are studied, a number of problematic issues of legal regulation of the powers of the specified subject of evidence are indicated and it is proposed to amend the current version of Article 391 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine to eliminate contradictions. The procedural status of the interrogator and the person authorized to carry out pre- trial investigation of criminal offenses is analyzed, offers on modification of item 401 of the Criminal procedure code of Ukraine are presented. It is also proposed that the bylaws of the relevant law enforcement agencies provide for qualification requirements for persons authorized to investigate criminal offenses in the form of higher legal education in the specialty "Law", as the lack of qualification requirements may adversely affect the quality of pre-trial investigation of criminal offenses. The content of Articles 84, 92 and 94 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine is analyzed, proposals are made to supplement these legal norms after the word "investigator" with the word "interrogator". The specific circle of subjects on which the duty of proof during the pre-judicial investigation in the form of inquiry is assigned is defined. According to the author of the article, further areas of research of certain problematic issues are a comprehensive doctrinal study of the legal status of such subjects of evidence as the interrogator and head of the inquiry body, determination of legal guarantees of their activities and procedural independence, definition of functions and tasks assigned to these subjects.

State service of the Russian Federation in the sphere of law enforcement: problems of theory and practice of administrative and legal regulation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Роман Нагорных ◽  
Roman Nagornyh
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Russian Federation

The monograph presents the characteristics of modern theoretical and methodological approaches to the understanding of the problems of administrative and legal regulation of the public service of the Russian Federation in the field of law enforcement, subjected to a detailed analysis of the current administrative legislation in the field of administrative and legal regulation and organization of public service in law enforcement agencies, justified the direction of further improvement Special attention is paid to the problems of development of the administrative law Institute of public service in law enforcement, the legal status of civil servants of law enforcement agencies in our country. The book is intended for students, postgraduates, teachers and researchers of educational institutions and research institutions, as well as for all those interested in the problems of modern administrative law.

scholarly journals FORMS AND PROCEDURES FOR PERSONNEL PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICE IN THE LAW ENFORCEMENT SPHERE

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4(106)) ◽  
pp. 86-101
Author(s):  
П. О. Комірчий
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Regulatory Requirements ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The Public ◽  
Real Increase ◽  
The Law ◽  
Definition Of

The article notes that in modern conditions, the place of staffing of the public service in the law enforcement sphere is of fundamental importance, which is studied through the prism of recent changes in the administrative legislation of Ukraine as a new stage in the reform of the law enforcement system of our state. It has been substantiated that the organization of public service in modern conditions presupposes a significant number of interrelated forms and procedures of staffing. The appropriate forms include: the definition of a strategy for organizational and staff work; educational and preparatory work; selection and selection of personnel; appointment and replacement of posts, placement of personnel; ensuring the passage of service. It has been established that the forms of staffing determine the boundaries of the corresponding staffing procedures. The specifics of staffing procedures implemented within the framework of the specified forms of staffing (for example, within the framework of strategic organizational and staff work, procedures for calculating the staffing of the public service, positive incentives for this service, etc.) are established and characterized. It has been theoretically proved that the correct combination of available forms and procedures for staffing contributes to a real increase in the efficiency of the functioning of law enforcement agencies based on the qualitative use of the potential of employees without increasing the time and resources spent on their maintenance. It was determined that the staffing of the public service in the law enforcement sphere of Ukraine is an element of personnel management of public service bodies in the field of order protection, which is a normatively ordered system of interrelated elements that are in stable administrative and legal relations with each other in relation to staffing, within which their functioning as a whole. It is concluded that the forms and procedures for staffing the public service in the law enforcement sphere of Ukraine, in fact, like any other complex social and legal phenomenon in the plane of the functioning of public administration entities, is subject to careful administrative and legal regulation, within which legislators determine special legal requirements for the implementation of staffing of the public service in the relevant field. That is, a large number of requirements are put forward for the existence of staffing in the public service in the law enforcement sphere in a static and dynamic form at the normative level, aimed at properly staffing the subject of public administration with high-quality personnel, making effective and rational staffing management and increasing the level of uniqueness of this phenomenon. A special place among these regulatory requirements is occupied by the regulatory requirements for the organizational structure of the staffing of the public service in the law enforcement sphere.

scholarly journals Prospects for developing the legal regulation of digital platforms

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Anatolyevna Kirillova ◽  
Teymur El'darovich Zulfugarzade ◽  
Oleg Evgenyevich Blinkov ◽  
Olga Aleksandrovna Serova ◽  
Irina Aleksandrovna Mikhaylova
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Business And Society ◽  
Legal Regime ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Digital Platforms ◽  
The Public ◽  
The One ◽  
Definition Of

The study considers the prospects for the legal regulation of public and private digital platforms. Digital platforms have replaced linear businesses and changed economic principles. The transition to digital technologies in the economy, business, and society substantiates the need for their legal regulation. The study aims at considering the legal status of public and private digital platforms, developing a new conceptual framework, determining the key features of digital platforms, and analyzing the prospects for developing legal regulation in this area. The paper compared management contexts in the public and commercial sectors. With the help of the generalization method, criteria for a new classification of digital platforms were proposed. The article used such methods as analysis, synthesis, deduction, and induction. The study represents a new definition of digital platforms, classifies them, and concludes that the introduction of special regulation of public and private digital platforms might require preliminary approbation, for example, in the form of an experimental legal regime. To ensure the comprehensive regulation of the activities of digital platforms, it is necessary to adopt international concepts that would allow creating uniform terms and principles. At the same time, regulation should consider the specifics of the existing regulation. On the one hand, it will be based on the dispositive method; on the other hand, it will be built over the imperative method.

Typologization of security regulation

2020 ◽  
pp. 20-27
Author(s):  
Denis Tikhomirov
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Procedural Understanding ◽  
Limited Ability ◽  
Methodological Basis ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Legal Understanding

The purpose of the article is to typologize terminological definitions of security, to find out the general, to identify the originality of their interpretations depending on the subject of legal regulation. The methodological basis of the study is the methods that made it possible to obtain valid conclusions, in particular, the method of comparison, through which it became possible to correlate different interpretations of the term "security"; method of hermeneutics, which allowed to elaborate texts of normative legal acts of Ukraine, method of typologization, which made it possible to create typologization groups of variants of understanding of the term "security". Scientific novelty. The article analyzes the understanding of the term "security" in various regulatory acts in force in Ukraine. Typological groups were understood to understand the term "security". Conclusions. The analysis of the legal material makes it possible to confirm that the issues of security are within the scope of both legislative regulation and various specialized by-laws. However, today there is no single conception on how to interpret security terminology. This is due both to the wide range of social relations that are the subject of legal regulation and to the relativity of the notion of security itself and the lack of coherence of views on its definition in legal acts and in the scientific literature. The multiplicity of definitions is explained by combinations of material and procedural understanding, static - dynamic, and conditioned by the peculiarities of a particular branch of legal regulation, limited ability to use methods of one or another branch, the inter-branch nature of some variations of security, etc. Separation, common and different in the definition of "security" can be used to further standardize, in fact, the regulatory legal understanding of security to more effectively implement the legal regulation of the security direction.

The Noise Abatement Campaign in Industrializing Japan, 1923–37

Resonance ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-327
Author(s):  
Shuhei Hosokawa
Keyword(s):  
Public Opinion ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Public Realm ◽  
Political Responsibility ◽  
Noise Abatement ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
The Public ◽  
Causal Responsibility ◽  
Kanto Earthquake ◽  
Definition Of

Drawing on Karin Bijsterveld’s triple definition of noise as ownership, political responsibility, and causal responsibility, this article traces how modern Japan problematized noise, and how noise represented both the aspirational discourse of Western civilization and the experiential nuisance accompanying rapid changes in living conditions in 1920s Japan. Primarily based on newspaper archives, the analysis will approach the problematic of noise as it was manifested in different ways in the public and private realms. In the public realm, the mid-1920s marked a turning point due to the reconstruction work after the Great Kantô Earthquake (1923) and the spread of the use of radios, phonographs, and loudspeakers. Within a few years, public opinion against noise had been formed by a coalition of journalists, police, the judiciary, engineers, academics, and municipal officials. This section will also address the legal regulation of noise and its failure; because public opinion was “owned” by middle-class (sub)urbanites, factory noises in downtown areas were hardly included in noise abatement discourse. Around 1930, the sounds of radios became a social problem, but the police and the courts hesitated to intervene in a “private” conflict, partly because they valued radio as a tool for encouraging nationalist mobilization and transmitting announcements from above. In sum, this article investigates the diverse contexts in which noise was perceived and interpreted as such, as noise became an integral part of modern life in early 20th-century Japan.

Features of the legal status of subjects of Civil Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-188
Author(s):  
Iryna I. Banasevych ◽  
Ruslana M. Heints ◽  
Mariia V. Lohvinova ◽  
Oksana S. Oliinyk
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Historical Analysis ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Roman Law ◽  
Historical Method ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Legal Entities

Theoretical and applied research of the features of the legal status of the subjects of civil law remains debatable today. Doctrinal and legislative analysis of this subject points to unresolved issues in this area. In particular, the provision on defining the state as a party to civil law remains controversial. There is no consensus on the definition of individuals and legal entities as subjects of civil law among scholars. Furthermore, the legal regulation of certain types of entities is somewhat unsystematic and chaotic. This is largely due to the insufficient development of theoretical issues related to the subjects of civil law. The above issues determine the relevance of the study of the features of the legal status of subjects of civil law. The purpose of the study is to investigate the features of the legal status of subjects of civil law based on doctrinal and legislative analysis. The study is based on a systematic approach, which lies in studying a complex system of relationships between subjects of civil law. Furthermore, the study is based on the laws and principles of dialectics, which contribute to the study of the legal status of the subjects of civil law. Systemic and structural-functional analysis was used to comprehensively describe the legal status of subjects of civil law. The historical method contributed to the study of the evolution of research on the subjects of civil law. The formal legal method helped identify the special features of the provisions of regulations concerning the subjects of civil law. With the help of the comparative legal method, the study analysed the provisions of the Civil Code of Ukraine in terms of regulation of subjects of civil law and such regulation was compared with other countries. The study defined the concepts and types of subjects of civil law and considered the features of the legal status of individuals, legal entities, as well as the state as a special participant of civil law. Special attention was paid to the historical analysis of the development of approaches to the definition of subjects of law, starting with Roman law

PATENT PROTECTION OF SCIENTIFIC RESULTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGES

2020 ◽  
pp. 36-43
Author(s):  
Daria Ponomareva ◽  
◽  
Alexander Barabashev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Patent Protection ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Foreign Law ◽  
Scientific Results ◽  
Will Force ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Artificial Intelligence Systems

This article is devoted to the legal problems associated with the provision of patent protection for the results of scientific activities created by artificial intelligence systems. The authors explore the approaches formulated by doctrine and practice in relation to objects created by robotic systems, computer technology and AI. The problem of the relationship between patent protection of the results of scientific (scientific and technical) activities and artificial intelligence systems is becoming more and more urgent. Modern AI systems are quite capable of creating inventions that are the result of the application (use) of the cognitive (thinking) abilities of a person, that is, such inventions can be patentable. There is no doubt that the increasingly active introduction of AI systems will force national legislators to reconsider the definition of the term “inventor.” In Russian legislation, the issue of patent protection of inventions created by AI is currently not resolved. The review of the state of legal regulation of patent protection of the results of scientific activity (first of all, inventions) created by AI systems, presented in the article, indicates the absence of clear rules both in Russian and foreign law (using the example of individual jurisdictions) regarding the determination of the legal status of this kind. objects and the person who has exclusive rights in relation to them. The use of already existing legal constructions by analogy, as well as the borrowing of foreign experience, can only temporarily solve the issue of patent protection of the results of scientific activity created with the help of AI.

UNITY AND DIFFERENTIATION OF LEGAL REGULATION OF LABOR RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES OF THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonid Mohilevskyi ◽  
◽  
Olha Sіevidova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Labor Relations ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Labor Rights ◽  
Work Activity ◽  
Theoretical Approaches ◽  
Labor Legislation ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Definition Of

The Public Prosecutor's Office in Ukraine plays a major role in the protection of human rights and freedom, of general interests of the society and the country, and in the strengthening of law and order, thus facilitating the establishment and development of the democratic constitutional state. The effectiveness of performing the duties put onto the prosecution of Ukraine is directly dependent on the prosecutor's offices' employees that are empowered to fulfill their professional responsibilities. The legal status of an employee of a prosecutor's office is specified in the Law of Ukraine “On Public Prosecutor’s Office”. Although, some aspects of these employees' work activity are normalised in the general labor law. This expresses the principle of unity and differentiation of the legal regulation of prosecutor's office's employee's labor relations. This article researches theoretical approaches to the definition of the concepts "unity" and "differentiation". The unity of the legal regulation of labor relations is manifested in the legally established equality of all employees. Differentiation is not opposed to the principle of unity, but takes into account the characteristics of different categories of workers and working conditions to ensure equality. The relationship between the general labor law and the special law on the prosecutor's office regarding the adjustment of the labor rights of the employees of Ukraine's prosecutor's offices had been analysed. The key to effective legal regulation of labor rights of employees of the prosecutor's office of Ukraine is compliance with unity and differentiation. It had been determined that the differentiation of the legal regulation of prosecutor's office's employee's labor rights determines the mandatory and priority application of the special legislation norms. In turn, the unity of the legal regulation of prosecutor's office's employee's labor rights determines the subsidiary usage of labor legislation norms in cases of an employee's individual labor rights not being determined in the special law on Public Prosecutor's Office. Unification of labor law norms governing the labor activity of this category of workers will make it possible to achieve an optimal balance of unity and differentiation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document