scholarly journals REKONTRUKSI PASAL 7 AYAT (1), UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK, BERBASIS PRINSIP-PRINSIP INDIVIDUALISASI PIDANA DALAM HUKUM ISLAM

Yustitia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-93
Author(s):  
Maemunah Maemunah
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
District Court ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
The Law ◽  
Special Protection

Children are a trust and gift from God who has dignity and dignity as a whole human being. In order to safeguard his dignity, the child is entitled to special protection, especially legal protection in the justice system. In realizing the maximum child protection, requires a policy that supports the realization of maximum protection, with the issuance of Law Number 11 Year 2012, concerning the Juvenile Justice System. This is done because Indonesia as a State Party in the Convection of children's rights governing the principle of legal protection against children have an obligation to provide special protection for children in conflict with the law. In Article 7 Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Law on the Juvenile Justice System, article 7 (1) At the level of investigation, prosecution and examination of cases of children in the district court must be endeavored Diversion, (2) Diversion as meant in paragraph (1) is carried out in the case of acts crimes committed: (a) are threatened with imprisonment of less than 7 (seven) years and (b) do not constitute repeat offenses. This study intended to examine and analyze the form of legal construction of the Juvenile Justice System specifically implementing diversion for victims with demands of less than 7 years. The research method uses a statutory approach, a case approach, and a comparative approach to the number of cases by reviewing and analyzing legislation, journals, cases, data and direct interviews. According to the results of the study, it is found that the implementation of legal penal system of the Juvenile Justice System (1) child cases is increasing, (2) diversion is carried out since the investigation up to the court, and there are still many that are done at a higher level, (3) have an understanding, that diversion must be sought, has a meaning that can be done at various levels so that diversion occurs at several levels, and often occurs at the Court level.

scholarly journals Criminal Justice System Toward Children With Legal Conflict Seen In Justice Restorative Presfective

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-26
Author(s):  
Brian Septiadi Daud ◽  
Irma Cahyaningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Whole Process ◽  
The Law ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The criminal justice system of children is very important in the effort to settle cases. Children are gifts of God that are entrusted to be cared for, guarded, and guided for a good future. In article 1 number 1 of Law no. 11 of 2012 states that what is meant by the juvenile justice system is the whole process of resolving cases of children dealing with the law from the investigation stage to the guidance stage after undergoing the crime. The aims of the study were to find out and analyze the juvenile justice system (SPPA) in conflict with the law and to examine the implementation of legal protection against children in conflict with the law based on Law Number 11 of 2012. The research method used to see the arrangement of this arrangement is juridical-normative legal research, this research is research that is attempted with the system reviewing applicable laws and regulations or applied to a particular legal case and concept. The method of collecting legal material with the document method is to collect library research contained in secondary legal materials, then analyzed deductively. The results of this study are to look at the process of the juvenile justice system based on subsystems, components, the process of achieving justice for restorative justice and the process of implementing child protection based on the applicable laws and regulations.  

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Perantara Narkotika (Study Putusan No.14/Pid.Sus Anak.2015/PN.Dps)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-199
Author(s):  
Rezky Ayu Saraswati ◽  
I Nyoman Sujana ◽  
Diah Gayatri Sudibya
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
District Court ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Moment

The rise of drug trafficking involving children as narcotics couriers is a problem that needs serious attention from both the government, law enforcement and the community. Children who commit crimes must continue to obtain legal protection in the best interests of the child. Child protection is contained in Law number 11 of 2012 concerning the juvenile justice system, where at the moment children can become narcotics abuse even as narcotics brokers with the rampant abuse of narcotics for all circles both in Indonesia and in the international world. The formulation of the problem raised is how is the basis for judges' consideration in imposing criminal sanctions on children as intermediaries for narcotics? And what is the legal protection of children as an intermediary for narcotics? The problems to be discussed will be examined based on normative perspectives and the legislative approach to the decisions of the Denpasar District Court No. 14 / Pid.Sus Anak / 2015 / PN. Dps, that the judge considers that the accused child has committed narcotics crimes by being charged Law number 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics, which can be sentenced to a minimum of 5 years and a maximum of 20 years and can be subject to fines. Legal protection for children is carried out by judges by imposing criminal training on employment in a generation of Indonesian foundations, solely so that children can carry out their activities as usual when they return to the community and do not disturb their psychic rights and can increase their skills in children. The child does not return to committing a crime.

KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA PERLINDUNGAN ANAK DALAM PEMBARUAN SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK DI INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 358
Author(s):  
Candra Hayatul Iman
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Court ◽  
Special Treatment ◽  
System Reform ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Cultural Paradigm ◽  
The Law

Juvenile Delinquency is an anti-social behavior can be disturbing public society, but it is recognized as a common phenomenon that must be accepted as a social fact. Children based on their physical, mental and social have a weak position compared with adults, so that children who committed needs to be special treatment. Therefore, the treatment of juvenile delinquents should be different with the treatment of adults. Child Protection in fact there are still many who have not accommodate the principles of international instruments. In the juvenile court still found violations of children's rights in the implementation of the handling of children in conflict with the law. Research it can be concluded that the formulation of policies for the protection of children in conflict with the law in the juvenile justice system in Indonesia is regulated in Law No. 3 Year l997 on Juvenile Court has not accommodated the principle of the best interest of the child in the juvenile justice system, so it is normative in the formulation did not reflect the level of the basic idea of the protection of children. Thus, the level of normative formulation does not reflect the basic idea of the child protection law. Formulation studies to the protection of children in conflict with the law in the juvenile justice system in accordance with Law No. 11 Year 2012 has been to accommodate the principle of the best interest of the child with the diversion. Yet undiscovered principles of availability of legal aid in the context of the principle of diversion and diversion control authority. Formulation studies to the protection of children in conflict with the law in the juvenile justice system in accordance with Law No. 11 Year 2012 has been to accommodate the principle of the best interest of the child, among others, by focusing on the handling of children in conflict with the law through diversion measures to promote restorative justice approach. Application policy to the protection of children in conflict with the law in the juvenile justice system involves substantial problems, structural and cultural. Paradigm of retributive justice system is still an idea in Act No. 3 of 1997. Keywords: Criminal Law Policy; child protection, juvenile justice system reform.

scholarly journals Implementasi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Melalui Diversi Oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 228-243
Author(s):  
Ramlah Ramlah ◽  
A Muin Fahmal ◽  
Muhammad Syarief Nuh
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Case File ◽  
The Public

Penelitian bertujuan menganalisis implementasi perlindungan hukum terhadap anak melalui diversi oleh jaksa penuntut umum. Tipe penelitian ini adalah yuridis empiris, data yang diperoleh penulis dari studi dokumen maupun wawancara dengan pihak yang berkepentingan dalam hal ini pihak Kejaksaan Negeri Makassar, kemudian dilakukan analisis deskriptif kuantitatif. Hasil Penelitian implementasi upaya diversi yang dilakukan oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum terhadap perkara tindak pidana anak di Kejaksaan Negeri Makassar telah terlaksana dengan baik dari segi prosedural. Pelaksanaan yang dilakukan oleh aparat penegak telah sesuai dengan undang-undang sistem peradilan anak serta Peraturan Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia. Namun kenyataannya pada pelaksanaan diversi di Kejaksaan Negeri Makassar seringkali dijumpai anak yang mengulangi tindak pidana sehingga Jaksa Penuntut Umum tidak mengupayakan diversi melainkan melimpahkan berkas perkara pada Pengadilan Negeri Makassar, yang mana telah sesuai dengan unsur-unsur pelaksanaan diversi itu sendiri sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Pasal 7 Ayat 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Anak. Faktor yang menghambat terhadap implementasi perlindungan hukum terhadap anak melalui diversi oleh jaksa penuntut umum antara lain: substansi hukum, struktur hukum dan budaya hukum. This study aims to analyze the implementation of legal protection against children through diversion by the public prosecutor. This type of research is juridical empirical, the data obtained by the author from document studies and interviews with interested parties, in this case the Makassar District Attorney, then carried out a quantitative descriptive analysis. The results of the research on the implementation of diversion efforts carried out by the public prosecutor on child criminal cases at the Makassar District Prosecutor's Office have been carried out well from a procedural perspective. Implementation carried out by the enforcement apparatus is in accordance with the law on the juvenile justice system and the Attorney General's Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia. However, in reality in the implementation of diversion at the Makassar District Prosecutor's Office, there are often children who repeat the crime so that the Public Prosecutor does not seek diversion but instead delegates the case file to the Makassar District Court, which is in accordance with the elements of the diversion implementation itself as regulated in Article 7. Paragraph 2 of Law Number 11 Year 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System. Factors that hinder the implementation of legal protection against children through diversion by the public prosecutor include: legal substance, legal structure and legal culture.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Anak Melalui Diversi sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Bagi Anak

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 079-084
Author(s):  
Nurmalawaty Nurmalawaty
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Justice Process ◽  
The Law

Ide Diversi pada awalnya dicanangkan dalam United Nation Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice atau dikenal dengan The Beijing Rules. Diversi merupakan pemberian kewenangan kepada aparat penegak hukum untuk mengambil tindakan atau kebijaksanaan dalam menangani atau menyelesaikan masalah pelanggar anak dengan tidak mengambil jalan formal, misalnya dengan menghentikan atau tidak meneruskan/melepaskan dari proses peradilan pidana. Dengan diundangkan Undang-undang Nomor 11 tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak pada tanggal 30 Juli 2012, dan mulai berlaku 2 tahun kemudian, maka Indonesia secara sah sudah memiliki suatu peraturan yang memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum dengan salah satu metodenya adalah Diversi. Selanjutnya sebagai Peraturan Pelaksana dikeluarkannya Perma Nomor 4 tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Anak, dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 65 tahun 2015 tantang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Diversi dan Penanganan Anak yang Belum Berumur 12 tahun. Pada prinsipnya Diversi dengan pendekatan keadilan restoratif untuk memberikan jaminan perlindungan hukum terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum untuk menghindari stigmatisasi terhadap anak serta diharapkan anak dapat kembali ke dalam lingkungan social secara wajar. Keadilan Restoratif adalah suatu proses dimana semua pihak yang terlibat dalam suatu perkara pidana bersama-sama menyelesaikan masalah serta menciptakan suatu kewajaran untuk membuat segala sesuatunya menjadi lebih baik dengan melibatkan korban, anak dan masyarakat dalam upaya mencari solusi memperbaiki dan menentramkan hati dengan tidak berdasaarkan pembalasan.   The idea of Diversion was originally proclaimed in the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice, otherwise known as The Beijing Rules. Diversion is the granting of authority to law enforcement officials to take action or policy in handling or resolving problems of child offenders by not taking a formal path, for example by stopping or not continuing / releasing from the criminal justice process. With the enactment of Act No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System on 30 July 2012, and entered into force 2 years later, Indonesia has legally established a regulation that provides legal protection for children facing the law, with one of its methods called Diversion. Furthermore, as the Implementing Regulation, the issuance of Supreme Court Regualtion No. 4 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion in the Juvenile Justice System, and Government Regulation No. 65 of 2015 concerning The Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion and Handling of Children Under 12 Years Old. In principle, Diversion with a restorative justice approach is to guarantee legal protection for children facing the law to avoid stigmatization of children and it is expected that children can return to the social environment fairly. Restorative Justice is a process where all parties involved in a criminal case together solve a problem and create a fairness to make things better by involving victims, children and the community in an effort to find solutions to improve and reassure by not responding to retaliation.

scholarly journals EFEKTIFITAS KONSEP DIVERSI DALAM PROSES PERADILAN ANAK PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA MENURUT UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK (Dalam Proses Peradilan Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Di Kabupaten Malang)

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 266
Author(s):  
Komariah Komariah ◽  
Tinuk Dwi Cahyani
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
The State ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law

Enforcement of the Act No. 11 of 2012 on Juvenile Justice System provides protection of the rights of juvenile who commit criminal acts use the diversion approach to realize the concept of Restorative Justice. To figure out the implementation of the Act, it is necessary to study with the socio-legal research method in the Police District, the State Attorney and the District Court at Malang. The results of these studies found that the application of diversion has been effective although there are still some obstacles. One of the toughest obstacles to implementing a diversion to fit is the unavailability of places to educate, nurture and put the brat as stated in the law. The study also found that in Malang at least there are some organizations / institutions in applying the diversion of government supporters, among others: BAPAS and P2TP2A.

scholarly journals JURIDICAL STUDIES AGAINST DIVERSION IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Indah Setyowati ◽  
Ida Musofiana
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Relationship

The diversion provisions in the juvenile justice system law whether it has prevented children from the negative effects of the Criminal Justice System. By the way, all children who have problems with the law put the best interests of the child. The method of approach is the statutory approach and the comparative approach. Primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials obtained by the author will be analyzed using the method of systematic interpretation, namely interpretation by looking at the relationship between the rules in an interdependent law.The result, diversion is a settlement of child cases that are carried out outside formal justice with the aim of preventing children from stigmatizing children who are dealing with the law must be in accordance with the purpose of diversion in The Beijing Rules. Whereas in Indonesia, the diversion provisions in the Criminal Justice System Act of the Child are still included in the criminal justice system by giving stronger stigmatization to children who are in conflict with the law and so it is not in accordance with the purpose of diversion in The Beijing Rules. So the diversion provisions in the Child Criminal Justice System Law do not yet reflect the principle of child protection as mandated by the Child Protection Act and the Child Criminal Justice System Law. Where the diversion in the Child Criminal Justice System Law has not fully mandated the principle of the best interests of children viewed from the perspective of child protection, with a view of all issues by placing the child's position as first and foremost.

scholarly journals CRIMINAL POLICY IN CHILDREN'S CONSTRUCTION EFFORTS AS A NARCOTIC CRIMINAL ACTION PERSON

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 144
Author(s):  
Frans Simangunsong
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Electronic Media ◽  
Daily Press ◽  
Special Provision

Cases of narcotics abuse are increasing. This is evidenced by the almost<br />daily press reports from newspapers and electronic media about smuggling, illegal<br />trade, arrests and detention related to the problem of narcotics abuse. The purpose of<br />narcotics abuse is a deviant or accidental use of narcotics. So the act violates the law and<br />is threatened with criminality. Criminal policy in an effort to control children as<br />perpetrators of narcotics crimes. Threats of imprisonment that can be imposed on<br />children no later than 1/2 (one half) from the maximum threat of imprisonment for<br />adults. This means that the criminal threat for children who become narcotics couriers is<br />half of the criminal threats contained in the Narcotics Law. For children who become<br />couriers or narcotics brokers, they must be based on the mechanism stipulated in the<br />Child Protection Act and the Juvenile Justice System Law. Law enforcement for<br />perpetrators who are still under age, there is a special provision called diversion, namely<br />the transfer of settlement of child cases from criminal justice processes to processes<br />outside of criminal justice

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document