scholarly journals Local wisdom Pasang ri Kajang as a political power in maintaining indigenous people's rights

2021 ◽  
pp. 265-280
Author(s):  
Gustiana Anwar Kambo
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Political Power ◽  
Indigenous Community ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Land Conflict ◽  
District Government ◽  
Customary Land

This research analyzes Pasang ri Kajang as local wisdom in Indigenous people Ammatoa Kajang becomes a social and political power. It maintains the existence of indigenous people Ammatoa Kajang in the customary land conflict with PT London Sumatra (Lonsum). Indigenous Peoples of Ammatoa Kajang, known as indigenous people who uphold the values ​​of local wisdom, was called Pasang ri Kajang; one of them is their belief that forests are the center of life. The conflict has arisen since PT Lonsum has unilaterally taken over Ammatoa Kajang's customary land in several villages. The lack of regulation of the local government that protects the rights of the Kajang community makes the position of the Ammatoa Kajang indigenous community weak in resisting. The indigenous Ammatoa Kajang community and several environmental and indigenous peoples' institutions demanded that the Bulukumba district government make and ratify the Ranperda of the Ammatoa Kajang community that could protect the rights and recognition of the Ammatoa Kajang customary community. At the end of 2015, the Bulukumba district government ratified regional regulation No. 9/2015 about the Inauguration, Recognition, and Protection of Customary Law Communities Ammatoa Kajang. Ratification of this regulation is a form of deregulation carried out by the Bulukumba district government in responding to conflicts over land and forest struggles of the indigenous people of Ammatoa Kajang and PT. Lonsum.

scholarly journals Penetapan Wilayah Adat dan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Desa Penyengat Kecamatan Sungai Apit Kabupaten Siak

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 12-28
Author(s):  
Wahyu Damon Prakoso
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Data Source ◽  
Customary Land

The problem that occurs is how the indigenous people of swamps interpret the lack of management territory, the loss of livelihood resources and organize themselves to seize opportunities for management rights. The problem of customary land and indigenous peoples above, the researchers felt the need to study more deeply on the Determination of Indigenous Areas and Customary Law Communities in Penyengat Village, Sungai Apit Subdistrict, Siak Regency, Based on the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 52 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for the Recognition and Protection of Indigenous Peoples. This type of research is sociological, so the data source used is primary data from interviews, secondary data from libraries and tertiary data from dictionaries, media, and encyclopedias. Data collection techniques are done by observation, interviews, and literature review.

scholarly journals Wewenang Kepala Adat dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Adat Berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Bombana No. 4 Tahun 2015 dan Pengaruhnya bagi Masyarakat Hukum Adat Moronene Hukaea Laea

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 105-121
Author(s):  
Sahrina Safiuddin
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous People ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Indigenous Community ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Direct Influence ◽  
Article 9 ◽  
Customary Rights

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui wewenang Kepala Adat dalam Pengelolaan hutan adat berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Bombana No. 4 tahun 2015 tentang Pengakuan, Perlindungan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Moronene Hukaea Laea dan untuk mengetahui pengaruhnya bagi masyarakat hukum adat Moronene Hukaea Laea. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Pertama, Wewenang Kepala Adat berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Bombana No. 4 tahun 2015 tentang Pengakuan, Perlindungan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Moronene Hukaea Laea diatur dalam Pasal 9 ayat (3) yang menyebutkan secara umum kewenangan dari lembaga adat.Wewenang pengelolaaan hutan adat tidak disebut secara spesifik tapi digeneralisir dalam wewenang mengelola hak-hak adat dan harta kekayaan adat. Wewenang Kepala adat dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Adat belum kuat dan penuh dikarenakan kewenangan pengelolaan hutan adat yang dimiliki oleh kepala adat hanya berlaku efektif ke dalam yaitu bagi Masyarakat Hukum adat Moronene. Kedua, Pengaruh wewenang Kepala adat dalam pengelolaan hutan adat berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Bombana No. 4 tahun 2015 bagi Masyarakat Hukum Adat Moronene Hukaea Laea sangat besar karena berpengaruh langsung terhadap keberadaan dan kelangsungan masyarakat hukum adat Moronene Hukaea Laea. Semakin kuat dan penuh kewenangan Kepala Adat berarti keberadaan dan kelangsungan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Moronene Hukaea Laea dirasakan semakin terjamin dan terlindungi. Namun wewenang kepala adat dalam hal ini kurang kuat dan penuh maka jaminan terhadap keberadaan dan kelangsungan masyarakat hukum adat Moronene Hukaea Laea juga lemah. This study aims to determine the authority of the Customary Chief in the management of customary forests based on the Regional Regulation of Bombana District No. 4 of 2015 concerning the Recognition, Protection and Empowerment of the Moronene Hukaea Laea Customary Law Community and to find out its effects on the Moronene Hukaea Laea indigenous peoples. The results showed that First, the authority of the Customary Head based on the Regional Regulation of Bombana District No. 4 of 2015 concerning Recognition, Protection and Empowerment of the Moronene Hukaea Laea Customary Law Community is regulated in Article 9 paragraph (3) which mentions the authority of customary institutions in general. The authority to manage customary forests is not specifically mentioned but generalized in the authority to manage customary rights and customary assets. The authority of the customary head in the management of customary forests is not yet strong and full because the authority to manage the customary forest owned by the customary head is only effective inward, namely for the Moronene customary law community. Second, the influence of the authority of the customary head in the management of customary forests based on the Regional Regulation of Bombana District No. 4 of 2015 for the Moronene Hukaea Laea Customary Law Community is very large because it has a direct influence on the existence and continuity of the Moronene Hukaea Laea indigenous community. The stronger and full authority of the Customary Head means that the existence and continuity of the Moronene Hukaea Laea Customary Law Community is felt to be increasingly guaranteed and protected. However, the authority of the customary head in this case is less strong and full, so the guarantee for the existence and continuity of the Moronene Hukaea Laea indigenous people is also weak.

scholarly journals EKSISTENSI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 21 TAHUN 2001 TENTANG OTONOMI KHUSUS BAGI PROVINSI PAPUA (Existence of The Act Number 21/2001 On Special Authonomy of Papua Province)

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Rooseno Rooseno
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Provincial Government ◽  
Living Standards ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Land Conflict ◽  
Papua Barat ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Corporate Social

There are 13 airports in Papua and West Papua provinces, its land was recorded in the Besluit van de Nederlands Nieuw Guenia Gouverneur Number 63 /1961, dated on February 22 ,however, it do not recognized by common law of Papuans because of having no transfer of right`s certificate`s on land and certificate of  right`s disengagement on customary land. Therefore, customary law communities want to replace the loss turn into money, also require compensation increasing their livelihoods, education,jobs, and many more. Hence, it will be wise, if provincial government of Papua, House of Regional Representatives (DPRD), and Indonesia Government c.q. the Ministry of Transportation of Indonesia agree and compromise after damages assesment of the Act No. 2/2012 provisions to pay compensation in order to improve the living standards of indigenous peoples, education, jobs, and providing airport manager of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Keywords: 13 airports land, conflict of customary law communities, the Ministry of Transportation ofIndonesia ABSTRAK Ada 13 Bandara yang terletak di provinsi Papua dan Provinsi Papua Barat tanah dimasukkan dalam Besluit van de Nederlands Nieuw Guenia Gouvernour nomor 63 tahun 1961 22 Februari 1961, tetapi itu tidak diakui oleh hukum masyarakat adat karena tidak ada transfer sertifikat hak atas tanah dan sertifikat pelepasan hak atas tanah adat. Jadi karena itu masyarakat hukum adat ingin mengganti kerugian dalam bentuk uang, juga memerlukan kompensasi yang meningkatkan mata pencaharian masyarakat adat,pendidikan, pekerjaan, dan banyak lagi. Oleh karena itu bijaksana jika pemerintah provinsi Papua, DPRP, dan pemerintah Republik Indonesia c. q Kementerian Perhubungan setuju dan dikompromikansetelah penilaian kerusakan dibawah ketentuan dari undang-undang 2/2012 – membayar ganti rugi,uang kompensasi untuk meningkatkan standar hidup masyarakat adat, pendidikan, pekerjaan, dan menyediakan manajer Bandara CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) Komunitas hukum di tanah divan Besluit Belanda Nieuw Guenia Gouvernour nomor 63 tahun 1961 22 Februari 1961. Kata kunci: 13 Tanah Bandar Udara, konflik, masyarakat hukum adat, Departemen Perhubungan.

IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN DAERAH KHUSUS (PERDASUS) PROVINSI PAPUA NOMOR 23 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG HAK ULAYAT MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT DAN HAK PERORANGAN WARGA MASYARAKAT ADAT ATAS TANAH (STUDI KASUS KOTA JAYAPURA DAN KABUPATEN BIAK NUMFOR)

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-59
Author(s):  
Ayu Kurnia Utami
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Land Conflict ◽  
Local Regulation ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government

This study discusses Perdasus 23 Year 2008 about individual and communal rights of customary law society over the land through a case study in Jayapura and Biak Numfor. The special local regulation (Perdasus) is a part of the efforts to secure the customary society or the indigenous people of Papua. The aim of this study is to identify how far Perdasus 23 Year 2008 has been implemented in Jayapura and Biak Numfor. The study applies qualitative approach which data is collected through observations, interviews, and content analysis of related documents. The result of this study shows that Perdasus 23 Year 2008 is not implemented thoroughly. Although the regulation is not normatively implemented, it has been practically implemented through the initiatives of Jayapura and Biak Numfor government to carry out conflict resolution program in each region. In doing so, the government of Jayapura has done the communal right mapping of Port Numbay people, while the government of Biak Numfor issues a local regulation (Perbup) about the strategy of land conflict resolution by encouraging of the involvement of customary role and legitimation in the region. Eventhough these activities are not conducted in accordance with Perdasus 23 Year 2008, Jayapura has performed four substances of the “Perdasus”: research, mapping, management and identification, and land conflict resolution. Meanwhile, Biak Numfor regency has performed two substances: communal land management and land conflict resolution though they only fulfill some aspects of these substances when performing research and mapping. There are three aspects affecting the implementation of Perdasus in Jayapura and Biak Numfor. First, ineffective communication both from the policy maker to the policy implementer and from policy implementer to the people that causes confusion to the society regarding the policy. Second, the existing paradigm of local people who still believe that customary law is more powerful than civil law. Last but not the least is Government’s initiative to do an activity to protect the communal right of indigenous people of Papua.

scholarly journals PENCEGAHAN PERUSAKAN HUTAN BERBASIS MASYARAKAT ADAT DALIHAN NA TOLU DI TAPANULI SELATAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Anwar Sadat Harahap ◽  
Ahmad Laut Hasibuan
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous People ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Forest Degradation ◽  
Customary Law

There are indigenous peoples who have their own traditional value in passing the prevention of forest destruction. Before the establishment of legislation on Preventing Forest Destruction in Indonesia, the indigenous people of Dalihan na Tolu have their own rules in preventing forest destruction. The customary law of Dalihan na Tolu has governed: the model of settlement of forest degradation disputes, the universal rules of indigenous peoples of Dalihan na Tolu on the prevention of forest destruction, the form of sanctions imposed on forest destruction parties, and the form of oversight in the implementation of the prevention of forest destruction.

scholarly journals EKSISTENSI MASYARAKAT ADAT TERGERUS OLEH KEBUTUHAN ZAMAN Studi Analisis Konflik Masyarakat Adat Sunda Wiwitan di Kuningan yang Terusir dari Tanah Adatnya Sendiri dengan Teori Identitas

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Rachel Farakhiyah ◽  
Maulana Irfan
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
District Court ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Customary Rights ◽  
The Government ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Privately Owned

Pengakuan pemerintah terhadap hukum adat masih setengah hati. Padahal, eksistensi hukum adat memiliki landasan konstitusional yang kuat dalam Pasal 18B ayat (2) UUD 1945. Tubrukan antara proyeksi pembangunan dari pemerintah, kepentingan masyarakat umum, beserta hak ulayat dari masyarakat adat, telah menimbulkan gesekan yang sangat rentan akan timbulnya konflik. Seperti halnya yang memicu terjadinya konflik yang memanas di dalam masyarakat sunda wiwitan atas sengketa lahan. Yang mana perlakuan Jaka yang mengklaim tanah adat menjadi tanah milik pribadi sebagai bentuk pelanggaran hukum adat dan kemudian ditambah dengan putusan PN Kuningan yang memanangkan permintaan Jaka atas hak milih tanah adat seluas 224 m2. Putusan PN tersebut dinilai cacat hukum dan tidak memperhatikan asal usul sejarah. Maka hal tersebut menimbulkan berbagai aksi perlawanan dari pihak kubu masyarakat adat Sunda Wiwitan untuk berusaha memperoleh kembali haknya atas tanah adat mereka. Tujuan penulisan artikel ini yaitu untuk menjelaskan latarbelakang terjadinya konflik dan pemicu terjadinya konflik dengan menggunakan teori identitas yang nantinya dapat dirumuskan resolusi konflik yang efektif. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan artikel ini yaitu menggunakan studi litelatur yang diperoleh dari jurnal,buku, dan berbagai macam berita. Hingga saat ini konflik yang bergulir belum menemukan kejelasan karena belum terdapat resolusi konflik yang jelas dan masih sampai kepada tahap digagalkannya proses eksekusi tanah adat seluas 224 m2oleh Pengadilan Negri Kuningan. Government recognition of customary law is still half-hearted. In fact, the existence of customary law has a strong constitutional foundation in Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. Collisions between projected development from the government, the interests of the general public, along with customary rights from indigenous peoples, have created a very vulnerable friction in the emergence of conflict. As is the case that triggered a heated conflict in Sunda Wiwitan society over land disputes. Which is the treatment of Jaka who claimed customary land to be privately owned as a form of violation of customary law and then added with the Kuningan District Court decision to adopt Jaka's request for customary land rights of 225 m2. The Kuningan District Court ruling was deemed legally flawed and did not pay attention to the origin of history. So this caused various acts of resistance from the sides of the Sunda Wiwitan indigenous people to try to regain their rights to their customary lands. The purpose of writing this article is to explain the background of the occurrence of the conflict and the trigger for the occurrence of conflict by using identity theory which can later be formulated effective conflict resolution. The method used in writing this article is to use litelatur studies obtained from journals, books, and various kinds of news. Until now the rolling conflict has not yet found clarity because there is no clear conflict resolution and is still up to the stage where the process of execution of customary land of 225 m2 was thwarted by the Kuningan District Court.

scholarly journals PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH SOKO PADA SUKU BENDANG KAMPAR RIAU DENGAN CORAK HUKUM ISLAM

2018 ◽  
pp. 289
Author(s):  
Hengki Firmanda
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous People ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Maternal Lineage ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
The Status ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Ownership Of Land

The purpose of this study was to describe the ownership status of Soko land in the Indigenous People of the Bendang Tribe, Kampar, Riau; and explain the settlement of the transfer dispute over the ownership of Soko Land to the Indigenous People of the Bendang Tribe, Kampar, Riau. The existence of indigenous peoples will not be separated from their customary lands. The existence of indigenous peoples will be determined by ownership of their customary land. Indigenous people will not be called indigenous peoples without owning their customary land. This type of research is sociological legal research, namely research in the form of empirical studies to find theories about the process of occurrence and the process of working the law in society. The results of this study are, the status of ownership of Soko land in the indigenous people of the kampar tribe of the kampar district is attached to the community that has a maternal lineage. The transfer of ownership of soko land to the indigenous people of the dam tribe of Kampar District is the transfer of ownership of land between generations according to lineage and the transfer of land ownership to the settlement of land disputes.

scholarly journals Protecting expressions of Folklore within the Right to Culture in Africa

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Enyinna Sodienye Nwauche
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Cultural Rights ◽  
Substantive Content ◽  
Human Rights Regime ◽  
United Nations Declaration ◽  
The Right

This paper explores the protection of expressions of folklore within the right to culture in Africa by considering three issues, which are the increased understanding of the right to culture in national constitutions and the recognition that customary law is a manifestation of the right to culture; an expanded understanding of the substantive content of the article 15(1) of the International Covenant for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as part of the right to culture; and the recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples marked significantly by the 2007 United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous People. The paper demonstrates how a human rights regime may assist in overcoming some of the deficiencies in the national protection of expressions of folklore in Africa.

scholarly journals Moronene Indigenous Recognition and Protection Regulation Hukaea Laea in Bombana County

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-166
Author(s):  
Bakri Sulaiman
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
National Park ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law ◽  
Park Area ◽  
Customary Land

Regulations on the Recognition and Protection of Customary Law Communities are not always effective. This study was to determine the concept of recognition and protection of the Customary Law Community in Rawa Aopa Watumohai National Park. This research is a normative legal research. The results of the research are First, the law still provides conditional recognition of indigenous peoples, which limits their space. second, that the recognition and protection of the customary MHA of Moronene Hukaea Laea in Bombana Regency has not been maximized. They have received recognition and protection through a recognition of perda, but their customary territory still has the status of designating a National Park Area, so they cannot use it as customary land.

Keragaman Sistem Hukum Pertanahan Lokal Terhadap Pendaftaran Tanah Studi Pelaksanaan PTSL di Ohoi Ngabub dan Ohoi Sathean, Provinsi Maluku

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Priska Irvine Loupatty ◽  
Julius Sembiring ◽  
Ahmad Nashih Luthfi
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous People ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Land Law ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Law System ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Almost All

Abstract: Land registration through PTSL activities is conducted for all parcels of land throughout Indonesia. However, there are some ohoi in Southeast Maluku regency that refuse the registration of land which has been implemented through PTSL in recent years, whereas almost all of ohoi in Southeast Maluku Regency has already done land registration. This study aims to determine the implementation of PTSL in Ohoi Ngabub and Ohoi Sathean, the reason the Ohoi Sathean indigenous people accepted PTSL activities and the Ohoi Ngabub indigenous people rejected PTSL activities, and the land law system that applies in both ohoi. The research method used is qualitative with a sociolegal approach. The results showed that PTSL-UKM activities carried out in 2017 at Ohoi Sathean received good responses from the Ohoi Government and indigenous people of Ohoi Sathean, while the Ohoi Ngabub government refused to do PTSL activities. This is due to the local land law system that applies in both ohois. The local land law system that applies in Ohoi Sathean is individual land ownership, whereas the local land law system that applies in Ohoi Ngabub is joint land ownership. Keywords: customary land, communal rights, PTSL, indigenous peoples of Kei Intisari: Pendaftaran tanah melalui kegiatan PTSL dilakukan untuk seluruh bidang tanah di seluruh wilayah Indonesia. Akan tetapi terdapat beberapa ohoi (desa) di Kabupaten Maluku Tenggara yang menolak dilaksanakannya pendaftaran tanah melalui PTSL, sedangkan hampir seluruh ohoi sudah dilakukan pendaftaran tanah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pelaksanaan PTSL di Ohoi Ngabub dan Ohoi Sathean, alasan masyarakat adat Ohoi Sathean menerima kegiatan PTSL dan masyarakat adat Ohoi Ngabub menolak kegiatan PTSL, dan sistem hukum pertanahan lokal yang berlaku di kedua ohoi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu kualitatif dengan pendekatan sosiolegal. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa kegiatan PTSLUKM yang dilaksanakan pada tahun 2017 lalu di Ohoi Sathean mendapatkan tanggapan yang baik dari perangkat ohoi dan masyarakat adat Ohoi Sathean sedangkan perangkat Ohoi Ngabub menolak untuk dilakukan kegiatan PTSL. Hal ini disebabkan oleh sistem hukum pertanahan lokal yang berlaku di kedua ohoi. Sistem hukum pertanahan lokal yang berlaku di Ohoi Sathean yaitu kepemilikan tanah secara individual, sedangkan sistem hukum pertanahan lokal yang berlaku di Ohoi Ngabub yaitu kepemilikan tanah secara bersama. Kata kunci: tanah adat, hak komunal, PTSL, masyarakat adat kei

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document