scholarly journals A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON EVALUATION OF CAESAREAN SECTION RATE USING THE ROBSON’S 10 GROUP CLASSIFICATION IN SARDAR PATEL MEDICAL COLLEGE, BIKANER

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudesh Agrawal ◽  
Virendar Singh Rawat
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
International Studies ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Pregnant Females

Introduction : Despite the lack of scientific evidence indicating any substantial maternal and perinatal benefits from increasing caesarean section rates, most of the studies are showing that higher rates could be linked to negative consequences in maternal and child health, still caesarean rates continues to increase worldwide, particularly in middle and high income countries, and have become a major and controversial public health concern. Therefore, we conducted this study to analyse the LSCS rate in the institute, to classify the indications of LSCS as per RTGCS and to find out strategy to decrease the prevalence of lower segment caesarean section. Material & Methods : This is a retrospective hospital based study at tertiary care centre. Data collection of one thousand pregnant females who delivered by caesarean section from the period of January 2018 onwards was assessed for the study. There are six parameters as per Robson’s classification to classify all pregnant females for caesarean section. Entire information was entered in Microsoft excel sheet and analysis were done to decrease caesarean section rate. Results : In the present study, a total of 1000 pregnant women delivered by caesarean section was taken from January 2018 onwards. The total number of deliveries during this study period was 2919 and the overall caesarean section rate was 34.25%. Most of the patients belonged to Robson’s group 1,2&5 which contributed to 65.6% to total. Conclusion :  The overall CSR in the study is 34.25% which is high as compared to international studies, contribution of repeat CS is high. It is important that efforts to reduce the overall CS rate should focus on reducing the primary CS rate. More analytical studies based on Robson’s 10-group classification system are needed locally, to evaluate the indications of CS within each group.  

scholarly journals Analysis of repeat LSCS in a tertiary care centre

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 1963
Author(s):  
M. Poovathi ◽  
Suilharsini T. S.
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Tamil Nadu ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Set Up

Background: Caesarean section (CS) rates continue to increase worldwide, particularly in middle and high-income countries without evidence indicating substantial maternal and perinatal benefits from the increase and some studies showing negative consequences for maternal and neonatal health. The objective of this study is to analyse the repeat caesarean section rates in a tertiary centre.Methods: This is a retrospective study carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pudhukottai Medical College, Tamil Nadu, India for a 12-month period from January 2017 to December 2017 with the aim to analyse the rate and indications for caesarean section and to identify the measures to decrease its incidence if possible. A total of 2654 cesarean deliveries were conducted in one year, out of which 1380 (51.99%) were primary cesarean sections and 1274(48%) were repeat cesarean sections.Results: Repeat LSCS is more common in age group of 21-30 years (80%) and in second gravida (90.42%). The incidence of caesarean section is 94.6%. Patients who had successful trial of scar were 73. In all these patients, measures were taken to shorten the 2nd stage of labour either by giving episiotomy alone or by application of outlet forceps or vacuum. Out of these 62 (84.9%) patients were delivered by episiotomy alone.Conclusions: Caesarean section has become one of the commonly performed surgeries in obstetric practice. Implementation of standard labour management strategies can reduce primary caesarean section rate without compromising maternal and fetal safety. One important strategy is ROBSON ‘S 10 GROUP classification system for caesarean section needs to be adopted. Targets of care needs to be set up which also depends on the available resources and expertise. With continuous critical review as described and frequent comparison with other delivery units, the caesarean section rate in each individual unit can be reduced to an appropriate level.

scholarly journals Classification of births according to Robson 10 group classification: an emerging concept to audit the increasing caesarean section rate

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 3915
Author(s):  
Priyanka Kolusu ◽  
Palutla Himabindu
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Health Care Facilities ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Group 5

Background: High caesarean birth rates are an issue of international public health concern. Worries over such increases have led the WHO to advice that caesarean section rate should not be more than 15%. WHO proposes that the health care facilities to use the Robson’s 10 group classification system to audit their CS rates. Our aim was to investigate the CS rates in a period of 6 months using Robso’s 10 group classification.Methods: This was a cross sectional study conducted for a period of 6 months from July 2018 to December 2018 in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siddhartha medical college which is a tertiary care center .All women delivered during this period in labour ward were included. All relevant obstetric information (parity, mode of previous deliveries, previous CS and indications, gestational age, onset of labor) was entered on a questionnaire and classified into Robson’s 10 classes and percentages were calculated.Results: Total number of deliveries in 6 months is 4719 out of which C-sections are 1816 which accounts for 38.48%. Highest contribution was by group 5 and group 2. Together these two groups contribute to 62.4% of the total caesarean sections. Group 6 and group 9 by themselves did not contribute much but within their groups had 100% C-section rates.Conclusions: Robson’s 10 group classification provides easy way in collecting information about caesarean section rate which obtains good insight into certain birth groups. Number of women who attempt VBAC has declined over recent years due to fear of uterine rupture. Reducing primary C-section rates, adequate counseling and changing norms for non-reassuring fetal status could reduce contribution of Robson’s groups towards absolute C-section rates.

scholarly journals Analysis of caesarean sections at a tertiary care centre according to Robson’s criteria

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 3445
Author(s):  
Ipsita Mohapatra ◽  
Subha Ranjan Samantaray ◽  
Achanta Vivekanand ◽  
Anandala Manjula ◽  
Buyyani Priyanka
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Civil Hospital ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Still Births ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Uterine Scar

Background: There has been a considerable increase in the rate of caesarean sections in the past few decades. Some demographers have argued that this increase is largely affected by the uprising trend of new medically indicated caesarean sections. M. S. Robson proposed a ten-group classification of caesarean sections in year 2001 which was appreciated by WHO in 2014 and FIGO in 2016. This classification is known as Robson’s classification which has ten groups.Methods: This is a retrospective study which was carried out at Civil Hospital, Karimnagar. The study group included all live births and still births of at least 500 gm birth weight or at least 28 weeks of gestation at Civil Hospital, Karimnagar during the period from October 2019 to December 2019. The data collected was analysed using simple statistical methods like percentage and proportion. The data was grouped according to the Robson’s 10 group classification system. The overall caesarean section rate, size of each group and the relative contribution of each group to the overall CS rate were calculated.Results: The total number of deliveries during the study period was 2493. Out of these, the number of caesarean deliveries was 1345. The caesarean section rate was calculated to be 53.95%. The group 5 (multiparous with at least one previous uterine scar with single cephalic pregnancy ≥37 weeks of gestation) contributed to 38.07% of the total caesarean section rate which is the highest.Conclusions: A regular audit into the number and indications of caesarean sections will definitely help in decreasing the primary and repeat caesarean sections.

scholarly journals A study of cesarean section rate by using modified Robson's ten group classification system

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 2610
Author(s):  
Meha K. Patel ◽  
Saloni M. Prajapati
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Maternal Characteristics ◽  
Spontaneous Labour ◽  
Group 5

Background: High caesarean section rate worldwide including India is matter of concern. The Robson’s Ten-group classification system allows critical analysis of caesarean deliveries according to characteristics of pregnancy. The objective was to analyze caesarean section rates in a tertiary care centre according to Modified Robson’s ten groups classification.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at GMERS Gotri Medical College, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. All patients who delivered between August 2018 and March 2019, were included in the study. Women were classified in 10 groups according to modified Robson’s classification using their maternal characteristics and obstetric history. For each group, authors calculated the caesarean section rate within the group and its absolute and relative contribution to the overall caesarean rate.Results: Total number of delivery in my study institute in 8 months was 1531 out of them 456 was cesarean section, so the overall caesarean section rate was 29.78%. The main contributions to overall caesarean rate was 40.78% by group 5 (previous CS, singleton, cephalic, >37weeks) followed by 14.25% by group 1 (nullipara, singleton, cephalic, >37 weeks, spontaneous labour), 11.40% by group 2 (nullipara, singleton, cephalic,>37 weeks, induced or CS before labour). CS rates among various group ranges from 100% among women with abnormal lie (group 9) to 98.4% in previous CS (group 5), 84% in nulliparous breech (group 6), 58% in multiparous breech (group 7) and least 8.2% in multipara spontaneous labour (group 3).Conclusions: The Robson’s classification is easy to use. It is time to implement obstetric audit to lower the overall CS rates.

scholarly journals Analysis of caesarean section rate in tertiary care hospital according to Robson`s 10 groups classification

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1380
Author(s):  
Varija T. ◽  
Veerendra Kumar C. M. ◽  
Chandrasekhar Tarihalli
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Case Series Study ◽  
Group 5

Background: The caesarean section (CS) delivery rate is steadily increasing worldwide, including India. Identifying the proportion of women in various categories as per Robson's ten group classification system and CS rate among them is important to bring down the increasing CS rate.Methods: This case series study was conducted at Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences (VIMS), a tertiary care teaching hospital in Ballari, Karnataka, India. All pregnant women who have been admitted for delivery were enrolled and the data was collected for the women delivered by CS during January 2016 to December 2016 and proportions in various groups as per Robson’s ten-group classification system were calculated.Results: Among a total of 6980 women delivered during study period, 2992 (42.8%) delivered by CS. The CS rates among various groups varied from 100% among women with abnormal lies and group 6-95% (all nulliparous breeches) group 5-94% (Previous CS, single cephalic, >37 weeks) to 10 to 15% among multiparous women with spontaneous labour having single cephalic pregnancy (group 3). Among women with previous section, CS rate was very high (89.6%). Women with previous CS (group 5) contributed maximum (40.24%) to the total number of CS.Conclusions: In the present study, all women with breech presentation and abnormal lies delivered by CS and repeat CS was the highest contributor to all CS deliveries.

scholarly journals The ten group Robson classification: a retrospective study to identify strategies to optimise caesarean section rates

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 5082
Author(s):  
Spandana S. ◽  
Amarpali K. Shivanna
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Robson Classification ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Ongoing Surveillance

Background: Caesarean section rates have been increasing worldwide. For proper assessment, the ten group Robson classification is recommended by WHO for assessing CS rates. We are analyzing the caesarean section rates by classifying the caesarean sections using modified Robson’s ten group classification. Objective of the current study was to estimate caesarean section rates in our hospital and to classify caesarean section using modified Robson’s ten group classification system.Methods: Current retrospective study was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynaecology in a tertiary care hospital. The medical records were reviewed for a period of 12 months.Results: Total number of deliveries during the study period was 315. The total numbers of caesarean section were 159 and total vaginal deliveries were 156. The caesarean section rate was 50.47%. The main contributors to overall caesarean section rate were group 5 (18.10%), group 2 (13.96%) and group 1 (5.71%). Women with one previous LSCS contributed majorly to the caesarean section rate. Higher CS rate was also seen in both group 2A (69.40%) and group 4A (47.30%) which had underwent induction of labour. More inclination towards trial of labour following CS for women with previous one LSCS can lower CS rates.Conclusions: Modified Robson’s classification is easily implementable and an effective tool for ongoing surveillance. The results can be compared between Institutions, states and countries. Having implemented the Robson classification and identified groups which contributed the most to the overall CS rate, interventions to reduce the same has to be our prime objective.

scholarly journals Analysis of caesarean section rate according to modified Robson’s classification at tertiary care centre in Uttarakhand, India

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1288
Author(s):  
Kusum Dogra ◽  
Neetu Arora ◽  
Bhawna Sharma ◽  
Meenakshi Tanwar
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Centre ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Maternal Characteristics ◽  
Robson Classification ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Spontaneous Labour ◽  
Group 5

Background: High caesarean section rate worldwide including India is matter of concern. The aim of this study is to analyse caesarean section rate at tertiary care centre according to Modified Robson’s classification.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Sciences (SGRRIMHS) and Shri Mahant Indiresh Hospital at Dehradun from April 2018 to September 2018. All women delivered during this period were classified according to modified Robson’s classification using their maternal characteristics and obstetric history. For each group, authors calculated the caesarean section rate within the group and its contribution to overall caesarean section rate.Results: Out of total 1302 women delivered, 395 underwent CS (30.3%).The major contribution to overall caesarean section rate was 33.4% by group 5 (Previous CS, singleton, cephalic, >37weeks) followed by 16.7% by group 1 (nullipara, singleton, cephalic, >37 weeks, spontaneous labour), 12.4% by group 3 ( multipara, singleton, cephalic, >37 weeks, spontaneous labour ).CS rates among various group ranges from 100% among women with abnormal lie (group 9) to 77.5% in nulliparous breech (group 6), 73.7% in previous CS (group 5) and least 11.2%  in multipara induced or pre labour CS (group 4).Conclusions: Modified Robson classification is simple, systematic, reproducible and can be effectively utilized in analyzing delivering women. Major contribution to overall caesarean section is made by previous CS.

scholarly journals A clinical study of effect of standard labour protocols on rates of primary caesarean section at a tertiary care centre, Madurai, India

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 3766
Author(s):  
Shanthi C. ◽  
Mahalakshmi N. K.
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Centre ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
The World ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Failed Induction

Background: Caesarean section rates are on the rise all over the world. Primary caesarean section usually determines the future obstetric course of any woman and therefore should be avoided whenever possible. WHO recommended that caesarean rates should not be more than 15 %. In this view we started our study on how to reduce the rate of Primary caesarean section in Tertiary Care Centre, Madurai, India. The objective of the present study was to evaluate how the implementation of universally acceptable standards affects rates of primary caesarean section rates without compromising maternal and foetal safetyMethods: This a comparative study on the effect of standard labour protocols and guidelines devised after audit of cases from January 2017 to June 2017, on the rate of primary caesarean section rates, induction of labour, failed induction, maternal and fetal outcomes before and after the implementation of the guidelines.Results: Primary caesarean section rates from 52.85% to 45.02% noted in the induced cases. There were no significant adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes.Conclusions: Implementation of standard labour protocols can reduce primary caesarean section rate without compromising maternal or foetal safety.

scholarly journals Caesarean Section Audit: The Use of the Robson’s Criteria in a Teaching Hospital with Limited Advanced Fetal Surveillance

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (07) ◽  
pp. 217-221
Author(s):  
Babatunde Ajayi Olofinbiyi ◽  
Jacob Olumuyiwa Awoleke ◽  
Oluwole Dominic Olaogun ◽  
Adeyemi Sunday Adefisan ◽  
Oluwafunke Rebecca Olofinbiyi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
University Teaching ◽  
Active Management ◽  
External Cephalic Version ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Continuous Training ◽  
Fetal Surveillance

Background: Rising caesarean section rates have become a global health concern. The need for a contemporary objective tool for comparison of rates, optimizing and standardizing the use of caesarean section has been met by the Robson’s Ten-Group classification. However, there are no available studies auditing caesarean section rates in southern Nigeria using these criteria. Methods: All mothers delivered by caesarean section over a 12-month period at Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado – Ekiti, were prospectively captured and classified according to Robson’s 10-group classification with a view to detecting which clinically relevant groups contributed most to the caesarean section rate. Data collected were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 20. Results: The total deliveries recorded over the study period was 2,139, out of which 760 underwent caesarean section, thus giving a Caesarean Section Rate of 35.5%. Group 1 had the highest contribution to Caesarean section rate, followed by Group 5. There was a statistically significant relationship between booking status of the patients and the various groups in the Robson’s classes (p < 0.001). Conclusion: There should be continuous training and drills on active management of labour, supportive companionship in labour, and improved fetal surveillance techniques to reduce the rates of primary caesarean section. Developing locally-adapted eligibility criteria to increase successful trials of labour after caesarean section, revisiting external cephalic version, and addressing potentially modifiable risks for preterm birth are advocated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document