scholarly journals LECTURERS’ EXPERIENCES IN TEACHING SOFT SKILLS IN TEACHER PROFESSION EDUCATION PROGRAM (TPEP) IN INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-234
Author(s):  
Jefri Mailool ◽  
Heri Retnawati ◽  
Samsul Arifin ◽  
Ameliasari Tauresia Kesuma ◽  
Himawan Putranta

The Teacher Profession Education Program (hereafter abbreviated: TPEP) in Indonesia is a program designed to generate professional teachers. Every pre-service teacher must be equipped with adequate hard skills and soft skills before diving into a professional environment. This phenomenological research explored the lecturers' experiences in teaching soft skills to the students of TPEP. This research aims at getting a clear understanding of how soft skills teaching is implemented and what kinds of soft skills have been trained during TPEP. The data in this research were primarily collected through in-depth interviews conducted with 15 teaching lecturers from three universities that hold and organize the TPEP. Data analysis used analytic reduction which started from identifying important statements of the interview results, determining the core theme, and describing the essence of the entire experience. The results found that teaching soft skills with integrated/embedded models was used in the TPEP. Lecture, presentation, assignment, mentoring, and practice methods were used to train the TPEP students’ soft skills. While the soft skills that have been trained during the implementation of the TPEP consist of ethics, self-reliance, responsibility, patience, critical thinking skills, communication skills, teamwork, tolerance, and social skills. The future research is expected to develop a criteria-based on integrated soft skills assessment model that can be used to assess the achievement of the acquisition of teachers’ soft skills at the end of TPEP. Keywords: pre-service teacher, soft skills, teacher profession education program (TPEP).

Author(s):  
Kemi Elufiede ◽  
Beth Terrell

This chapter discusses the implementation of a literacy achievement program, the Carnegie Kids Club (CKC), developed by Carnegie Writers, Inc. (CW), a nonprofit organization that focuses on writing and literacy education. CKC is a community-based program designed to assist children with the improvement of literacy skills as they relate to reading, writing, and creativity. With this, the program seeks to approach literacy development skills based on addressing critical thinking skills, as these are soft skills that promote the development of hard skills. The chapter includes relevant literature about literacy development, programs, instruction, and evaluation. Lastly, it provides the CKC current structural model, assessment, and future research.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anisah Dickson ◽  
Laura B. Perry ◽  
Susan Ledger

International Baccalaureate (IB) programmes are growing rapidly worldwide, driven in part by their global reputation and concept-driven, inquiry-based approach to teaching and learning. This thematic review of a range of literature sources examines the impact of IB programmes on teaching and learning, highlighting trends, challenges, and benefits. Findings of the review revealed that most of the studies, both qualitative and quantitative, examined stakeholders’ perspectives or self-reported experiences of IB programmes; a very small number used research designs that control for confounding factors or allow causal inferences to be drawn. A wide range of stakeholders report that IB programmes develop research and critical thinking skills, intercultural appreciation and global awareness, as well as cultivate collaborative working cultures and creative pedagogical practices among teachers. Challenges include extra demands on teachers for lesson planning and assessment, additional stress for teachers and students, and competing demands and expectations with national requirements. Recommendations are provided which may guide future research endeavours.


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-73
Author(s):  
Alfiandra Alfiandra ◽  
Sani Safitri ◽  
Puspa Dianti

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menunjukkan efektifitas model pembelajaran controversial issue dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berfikir kritis mahasiswa pada mata kuliah Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan di Unit Pelaksana Teknis Mata Kuliah Pengembangan Kepribadian Universitas Sriwijaya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian tindakan kelas (classroom action research) sebanyak tiga siklus dimana setiap siklus melalui tahapan perencanaan, pelaksanaan, observasi, evaluasi dan refleksi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi model pembelajaran controversial issue dapat meningkatkan kemampuan berfikir kritis mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran mata kuliah Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Peningkatan kemampuan berfikir kritis tersebut terlihat pada keterampilan mahasiswa dalam mengidentifikasi masalah, mendefinisikan masalah, mengeksplorasi masalah, mengevaluasi dan mengintegrasikan berbagai macam solusi menjadi suatu jawaban yang komprehensif terhadap suatu permasalahan.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------This article tries to reveal the effectiveness of controversial issue based teaching model to increase students’ critical thinking skills at Unit Pelaksana Teknis Mata Kuliah Pengembangan Kepribadian Universitas Sriwijaya. It was a classroom action research with three cycles, each of which consists of planing, observation, evaluation and reflection. The results reveal that the implementation of controversial issue based teaching model can increase students’ critical thinking skills in Citizenship Education Program. This increasing of critical thinking skills was indicated by the skills to identify problem, to define problem, to explore problem, to evaluate, and to integrate any kinds of solutions in order to comprehend the problem.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaikha Bint Jabor Al-Thani ◽  
Ali Abdelmoneim ◽  
Adel Cherif ◽  
Dalal Moukarzel ◽  
Khaled Daoud

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to assess the effectiveness of a new general education program at Qatar University (QU) in achieving English writing and critical thinking outcomes. Design/methodology/approach – Collegiate Assessment of Academic Proficiency (CAAP) test was used as direct assessment tool to identify the extent to which QU students are making progress with respect to general education outcomes, and how well QU students perform compared to US students on general education outcomes that are measured by the CAAP test. Findings – Findings show evidence that students make progress in English and critical thinking during their QU educational careers. However, QU students lag well behind their US counterparts in writing skills, but they performed relatively better in critical thinking and essay writing. Research limitations/implications – The sample of students tested was limited to students who met certain criteria. Therefore, the sample was neither representative nor random and does not reflect the performance of the entire student body. English is a second language for most QU students, and cultural differences as well as students’ high school preparation and quality of faculty at QU add to the complexity of the study. Practical implications – Research finding may have implication on the general education program curriculum plan, assessment process, assessment plan and tools. It may also trigger comprehensive review of courses addressing writing and critical thinking skills. Moreover, the findings will have impact on institutional total approach and support to retain and enhance some of the cornerstone skills that general education program promise to achieve. The pilot study, results and findings can have implications on similar GCC general educations programs that focus on English writing and critical thinking skills. Originality/value – This original pilot study indicates a need for improvement of internal assessment processes and reconsideration of general education program courses contributing to skills examined. It also provides evidence on students’ performance on two important generic skills, both are important for QU and its stakeholders. The study’s findings are of broad interest to assess the efficacy of internal assessment at international institutions using an internationally available standardized test.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-16
Author(s):  
Frances Hamilton ◽  
Kimberly Hile ◽  
Dana Skelley ◽  
Sarah Roller ◽  
Sandra Lampley ◽  
...  

Collaboration and critical thinking are 21st century skills employers value. Campus programming offers a space where, through intentional design, post-secondary students may develop critical thinking and collaboration skills. This study investigates survey data collected after a campus program that engaged participants in an escape room experience. Descriptive statistics were utilized to investigate students’ perceptions of collaboration and critical thinking skills use and improvement during the experience. Comparison analysis was employed to explore if the structure of the escape room produced any difference in results. Findings indicate the majority of participants reported being able to practice and improve collaboration and critical thinking skills in the escape room experience. Patterns suggest that the escape room structure may impact participants’ perceptions of collaboration and critical thinking skills. Limitations and recommendations for areas of future research are discussed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Citra Windani Mambang Sari ◽  
Siti Yuyun Rahayu Fitri ◽  
Efri Widianti

ABSTRAK Metode pembelajaran yang diberikan sangat berpengaruh dalam kemampuan berpikir kritis dan keterampilan mahasiswa perawat dalam mengambil keputusan. Kemampuan berfikir kritis dan keterampilan mengambil keputusan ini merupakan dua hal yang dapat dijadikan dasar untuk melihat kompetensi lulusan perawat. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengidentifikasi kemampuan berpikir kritis dan keterampilan mengambil keputusan pada mahasiswa Fakultas Keperawatan. Metode penelitian adalah deskriptif kuantitatif dengan jumlah sampel 151 mahasiswa. Analisis data menggunakan distribusi frekuensi. Hasil penelitian adalah Lebih dari setengah responden (66,2 %) memiliki kemampuan berpikir kritis diatas rata-rata kelompok (M=186,19, SD=33,92). Lebih dari setengah responden memiliki keterampilan mengambil keputusan di atas rata-rata kelompok (M=94.92, SD=9.52). Sebagian kecil responden dengan IPK 3.01-3.25 memiliki kemampuan berpikir kritis dan keterampilan mengambil keputusan diatas rata-rata kelompok. Sebagian kecil responden latar belakang jurusan IPA memiliki kemampuan berpikir kritis dan keterampilan mengambil keputusan diatas rata-rata kelompok. Kemampuan berpikir kritis dan keterampilan mengambil keputusan sebaiknya dimasukkan ke dalam kurikulum akademik sehingga terwujud perawat profesional.  ABSTRACT Methods of learning in nursing students affect the ability of critical thinking skills and student nurses in making decisions. The ability of critical thinking and decision making skills are the two things that can be used as a basis to see competence of nurse graduates. The aim of this study is to identify the critical thinking skills and decision making skills in student Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran. The research method is quantitative descriptive with a sample of 151 students. Data analysis using frequency distribution. Results of the study were more than half of the respondents (66.2%) have the ability to think critically above the group average (M = 186.19, SD = 33.92). More than half of respondents have a decision-making skills in the above average group (M = 94.92, SD = 9.52). A small portion of respondents with a GPA of 3.01 to 3.25 to have critical thinking skills and decision making skills above the group average. A small portion of respondent background science majors have the critical thinking skills and decision making skills above the group average. The ability of critical thinking and decision making skills should be incorporated into the academic curriculum as soft skills to realize a professional nurse. 


Author(s):  
Kerri Pilling Burchill ◽  
David Anderson

The contemporary demands of the education environment today require that teachers refine their reflective thinking skills and shift towards the deeper critical thinking skills inherent in reflexive thinking. Reflexivity is a deeper level of critical thinking that assumes a degree of metacognition and “knowing-in-action” (Schon, 1983, p. 50). Metacognition is a critical tool in helping individuals become more aware of their deeply seeded biases and tacit assumptions about the way the world works. Through a phenomenological analysis of four individual case studies, this study found that student feedback was a key catalyst for building reflexivity skills. Specifically, the study details the key ways by which feedback prompted novice teachers to metacognitively think through their knowing-in-action and ultimately improve their teaching practice. The research details important implications in three areas: 1) practice, 2) theory, and 3) future research.


2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Kersting ◽  
Ann Marie Mumm

The Council on Social Work Education (CSWE) requires social work programs to integrate critical thinking into their curriculum (CSWE, 1992). This article reports results from a pilot study designed to assess how well students integrate critical thinking skills after a one-semester generalist practice course. Forty-six students completed a pre- and posttest assessing critical-thinking skills and their attitudes about critical thinking. The results show some minimal changes in critical thinking. It is concluded that critical thinking is a difficult set of skills to develop and it requires more than a single, one-semester course to develop those skills. We suggest changes in teaching methodology. The article concludes with a discussion of issues regarding measurement of critical thinking for future research.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-131
Author(s):  
Farah Mohamad Zain ◽  
Siti Nazuar Sailin

E-Portfolio is an innovative platform that can be integrated in the teaching and learning process to develop graduates’ soft skills. E-Portfolio is a dynamic collection that incude reflective practice that enable students to showcase their learning outcome, achievements, skills and experience. E-portfolio is a medium that store a collection of learners’ works / artefacts which include products, demonstrations, self-assessments, resources, and accomplishments in digital. E-portfolio is a powerful tool to develop students’ soft skill such as creativity, digital literacy as well as critical thinking skills as it allows students to produce their own reflective writing and showcase their learning outcome / products. Through the E-portfolio, students’ can showcase their best learning practices or learning outcome such as the product that they have created during undergraduate or postgraduate studies to be showcased with the wider audience. The development of E-Portfolio also encourage students to set their career or professional goal and plan, which consequently enable them to showcase their knowledge and skills (including soft skills) to their future employers (Lorenzo & Ittelson, 2005; Reese & Levy, 2009).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document