scholarly journals Pattern of electrolytes in a cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients

2020 ◽  
pp. 46-50
Author(s):  
Rozina Sultana ◽  
ASM Areef Ahsan ◽  
Kaniz Fatema ◽  
Fatema Ahmed ◽  
Debasish Kumar Saha ◽  
...  

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a potentially fatal disease with multisystem involvement. Several studies have reported various electrolyte abnormalities at admission in patients who progress to the severe form of COVID-19. This study evaluated the electrolyte pattern in confirmed and critically ill COVID-19 patients. Methods: This cross sectional study was carried out in the department of critical care medicine of BIRDEM General Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh, from 1st July to 10th November, 2020. Total 70 RT-PCR positive, critically ill COVID-19 patients, were enrolled. Patients’ demographic profile, clinical features, admission electrolyte report, length of ICU stay and outcome were documented in case record forms. Results: In this cohort, total 70 RT-PCR positive COVID-19 cases (male 41, female 29, mean age 62.9 ± 13.3years) were enrolled. Fifty eight (82.85%) patients had different electrolytes abnormalities including hyponatraemia (54, 77.1%), hypokalaemia (35, 50%), hypocalcaemia (20, 28.6%) and hypomagnesaemia (11,15.7%). Regarding clinical symptoms, 98.6% (n=69) had respiratory distress, 97.1% (n=68) had cough, 94.3% (n= 66) had history of fever and 10.0 % (n=7) presented with unconsciousness. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was the most common co morbidity (94.3%).Mean length of ICU stay were 6.4 ± 3.4 days, where 48.57% (n=34) survived and 51.42% (n=36) died. Among 36 death cases, 33 patient (91.7%) had hyponatraemia (p value=0.003), which was statistically significant. Conclusion: In this study, we found that, hyponatraemia was the most predominant electrolyte abnormality. Among 36 death cases, around 92% had hyponatraemia. Like other studies, it showed that various electrolyte imbalances seem to have an impact on disease process. So, base line electrolyte assessment would be beneficial for evaluating the risk of severity of COVID-19. So, more study of electrolytes in COVID-19 cases with multi center approach is needed. Birdem Med J 2020; 10, COVID Supplement: 46-50

2020 ◽  
pp. 51-55
Author(s):  
ASM Areef Ahsan ◽  
Rozina Sultana ◽  
Kaniz Fatema ◽  
Fatema Ahmed ◽  
Debasish Kumar Saha ◽  
...  

Background: First outbreak of corona virus disease (COVID-19) started in Wuhan, China at December 2019 and since then, it spread globally but information about critically ill patients with COVID-19 is still limited. So, it is important to know the demographic profile and overall outcome of COVID-19 patients. We aimed to describe the clinic-demographic characteristics and outcome of critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted in our intensive care unit. Methods: This prospective observational study was carried out in the intensive care unit of department of Critical Care Medicine of BIRDEM General Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh from 11th June to 31st October, 2020. Out of 382 suspected cases, 86 patients were found to be RT-PCR for COVID-19 positive and were included in this study. After admission in ICU, all patients were resuscitated according to ICU protocol. Length of ICU stay were recorded and patient outcomes were mentioned as survival (transferred or discharged) or death. Results: A total of 86 patients (male 53, female 33, mean age 63.6 ± 12.8 years) with RT-PCR for COVID-19 positive were enrolled in this study. Regarding COVID related symptoms, Ninety six percent(83) had respiratory distress, 93.02 % (n=80) had cough, 84.9% (n=73) had history of fever,11.6 % (n=10) had loose motion and 7% (n=6), had anosmia. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was the most common co morbidity (91.9%).For improvement of oxygenation of COVID patient, we treated 7% of patients (n=6) by nasal Cannula, 24.4% (n=21) by Face Mask, 20.9% (n=18) by Non Rebreather Mask, 22.1% (n= 19) by High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) and 25.6% (n= 22) by Mechanical Ventilation. Mean length of ICU stay were 6.9 ± 3.6 days and range of icu stay were 1-20 days. Among 86 COVID patient, 51.16% (n=44) were transferred to the isolation ward or discharged at home and 48.8% (n=42) were died. Conclusion: This study showed the overall demographic and clinical features of critically ill COVID-19 patients, admitted in an icu of a tertiary care hospital. As it is a single centered study, we need more study with multi center approach to know the detail demographic profile and outcome of COVID-19 patients. Birdem Med J 2020; 10, COVID Supplement: 51-55


QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gihan Seif El Nasr Mohamed ◽  
Salwa Omar ElKhattab Amin ◽  
Mohamed Mohamed Kamal ◽  
Sherif Hany Adly Loka

Abstract Background A burn is a thermal injury caused by biological, chemical, electrical and physical agents with local and systemic repercussions. There are several ways of classifying burns: Classification by mechanism or cause, Classification by the degree and depth of a burn, Classification by extent of burn the extent of burn. Objectives The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of using recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in the treatment of pediatric burn victims and their ICU length of stay, mortality and morbidity. Patients and Methods This study was an Interventional randomized controlled Double Blind Study in which Patients subdivided randomly into 2 groups: Group A received somatotropine hormone after their 3 days of resuscitation besides their conventional treatment during their stay in the Burn ICU. Group B received the conventional treatment only in the Burn ICU. Results The comparison between the GH group and the control group showed that the mean ICU stay in days in GH group was 10.88 while in the control group 13.59 with P value 0.018 as a significant result as the GH group showed a less ICU stay time than the control group with approximately 20%. Mortality in the GH group was 6.2% from the total number of the group while in control group 18.8% from the total number of the group with P value 0.033 as a significant result yet the mortality may also depend on other factors as the degree of burn and the area of burn and the associated events like inhalational injury or delay post burn or any other co-morbidity. Morbidity results seen was 0% in control group and 4.7% in GH group with P value 0.080 as a non-significant result, morbidity was in the form of hyperglycemia. Conclusion The use of recombinant Growth hormone with a dose of 0.2 mg/Kg SQ 2 days per week with 3 days time interval in pediatric burn patients after their primary resuscitation from the burn injury, shows a marvelous improvement concerning the ICU stay time as the patient received the growth hormone showed an approximately 20% time less ICU stay than the control group this may be accounted for the faster wound healing and readiness for grafting and even faster graft healing, also a decreased mortality in a significant way, although mortality may depend on many factors in burn patients like degree of burn and the area of burn and the associated events like inhalational injury or any other co-morbidity.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gen Aikawa ◽  
Akira Ouchi ◽  
Hideaki Sakuramoto ◽  
Tetsuya Hoshino ◽  
Yuki Enomoto ◽  
...  

Abstract Constipation and diarrhea are both associated with poor outcomes in critically ill patients. Although constipation and diarrhea are closely related, few studies have examined them simultaneously. The purpose of this study was to describe patient defecation status after intensive care unit (ICU) admission and determine the association of early-onset constipation and diarrhea after ICU admission with outcomes for critically ill ventilated patients. Critically ill patients were retrospectively investigated and their defecation status was assessed during the first week after admission. The patients were divided into three groups: normal defecation, constipation, and diarrhea, and multiple comparison tests were performed. Additionally, multivariable analysis was performed for mortality and length of stay. Of the 85 critically ill ventilated patients, 47 (55%) experienced constipation, and 12 (14%) experienced diarrhea during the first week of ICU admission. Patients with normal defecation and diarrhea increased from the fourth and fifth day of ICU admission. Diarrhea was significantly associated with the length of ICU stay (B=7.534, 95% confidence interval: 0.116-14.951). Early-onset constipation and diarrhea were common in critically ill ventilated patients, and early-onset diarrhea was associated with the length of ICU stay. Prevention of constipation and diarrhea before the fifth day of ICU admission is essential.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyam Batra ◽  
Kapil Dev Soni ◽  
Purva Mathur

Abstract Introduction Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is reported as the second most common nosocomial infection among critically ill patients with the incidence ranging from 2 to 16 episodes per 1000 ventilator days. The use of probiotics has been shown to have a promising effect in many RCTs. Our systematic review and meta-analysis were thus planned to determine the effect of probiotic use in critically ill ventilated adult patients on the incidence of VAP, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, the incidence of diarrhea, and the incidence of oropharyngeal colonization and in-hospital mortality. Methodology Systematic search of various databases (such as Embase, Cochrane, and Pubmed), published journals, clinical trials, and abstracts of the various major conferences were made to obtain the RCTs which compare probiotics with placebo for VAP prevention. The results were expressed as risk ratios or mean differences. Data synthesis was done using statistical software - Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020). Results Nine studies met our inclusion criterion and were included in the meta-analysis. The incidence of VAP (risk ratio: 0.70, CI 0.56, 0.88; P = 0.002; I2 = 37%), duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference −3.75, CI −6.93, −0.58; P 0.02; I2 = 96%), length of ICU stay (mean difference −4.20, CI −6.73, −1.66; P = 0.001; I2 = 84%) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.73, CI 0.54, 0.98; P = 0.04; I2 = 0%) in the probiotic group was significantly lower than that in the control group. Probiotic administration was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in length of hospital stay (MD −1.94, CI −7.17, 3.28; P = 0.47; I2 = 88%), incidence of oro-pharyngeal colonization (OR 0.59, CI 0.33, 1.04; P = 0.07; I2 = 69%), and incidence of diarrhea (OR 0.59, CI 0.34, 1.03; P = 0.06; I2 = 38%). Discussion Our meta-analysis shows that probiotic administration has a promising role in lowering the incidence of VAP, the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, and in-hospital mortality.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Al Harthi ◽  
Khalid Al Sulaiman ◽  
Ohoud Aljuhani ◽  
Ghazwa B. Korayem ◽  
Ali F. Altebainawi ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundMultiple medications with anti-inflammatory effects have been used to manage the hyper-inflammatory response associated with COVID-19. Aspirin is used widely as a cardioprotective agent due to its antiplatelet and anti-inflammatory properties. Its role in hospitalized COVID-19 patients has been assessed and evaluated in the literature. However, no data regards its role in COVID-19 critically ill patients. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the use of low-dose aspirin (81-100 mg) and its impact on outcomes in COVID-19 critically ill patients. MethodThis is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study for all adult critically ill patients with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICUs) between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. Eligible patients were classified into two groups based on aspirin use during ICU stay. The primary outcome is the in-hospital mortality; other outcomes were considered secondary. Propensity score-matched used based on patient’s age, SOFA score, MV status within 24 hours of ICU admission, prone position status, ischemic heart disease (IHD), and stroke as co-existing illness. We considered a P value of < 0.05 statistically significant.ResultsA total of 1033 patients were eligible; 352 patients were included after propensity score matching (1:1 ratio). The in-hospital mortality (HR (95%CI): 0.73 (0.56, 0.97), p-value=0.03) were lower in patients who received aspirin during hospital stay. On the other hand, patients who received aspirin have a higher risk of major bleeding compared to the control group (OR (95%CI): 2.92 (0.91, 9.36), p-value=0.07); but was not statistically significant.ConclusionAspirin use in COVID-19 critically ill patients may have a mortality benefit; nevertheless, it may be linked with an increased risk of significant bleeding. The benefit-risk evaluation for aspirin usage during an ICU stay should be tailored to each patient.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongping Fan ◽  
Xuemin Peng ◽  
Bo Yu ◽  
Jiaojiao Huang ◽  
Xuefeng Yu ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims: Although insulin treatment is widely used in critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the intensive care unit (ICU), the clinical outcomes of insulin treatment remain unclear. This retrospective study aimed to explore the impact of insulin treatment on mortality and ICU stay among patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: We consecutively recruited 578 ICU patients with type 2 diabetes, from 2011 to 2021. According to their medication history regarding insulin use before and after ICU admission, these patients were categorized into three groups: N-N (treated without insulin before and after ICU admission), N-I (treated without insulin before and with insulin after ICU admission) and I-I (treated with insulin before and after ICU admission). Clinical characteristics were analyzed, and clinical outcomes including mortality and the length of ICU stay were compared between the groups. Propensity score matching was performed to obtain comparable subpopulation and the Kaplan-Meier survival curves were graphed to describe the survival trend of different groups. Results: Compared with the N-N group, the N-I and I-I groups had significantly higher ICU mortality rates [20.0% (N-I) and 24.6% (I-I) vs. 0.0% (N-N); p < 0.001; respectively] and longer lengths of ICU stay [ 8.5 (N-I), 9 (I-I) vs. 6 (N-N), p < 0.05, respectively]. After propensity score matching, the N-I group had a significantly higher ICU mortality (15.4% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.025) and poorer survival rates (log-rank p = 0.040) than the N-N group. The length of ICU stay was significantly longer in the I-I group than in the N-N group (10 vs. 7, p = 0.026). Conclusions: Insulin treatment was associated with increased ICU mortality rate and longer length of ICU stay among critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes. Caution is warranted for the regular application of insulin in critical patients with type 2 diabetes.


2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1137-1143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryosuke Tsuruta ◽  
Hidekazu Mizuno ◽  
Tadashi Kaneko ◽  
Yasutaka Oda ◽  
Kotaro Kaneda ◽  
...  

Background: The Japanese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Deep-Seated Mycosis were established in 2003. Proven Candida infection (CI) is defined as at least one positive blood culture yielding a Candida species. Clinically documented CI requires documentation of more than 2 sites of colonization and a positive plasma β-O-glucan test. Possible CI is diagnosed by one of the above criteria in febrile, nonneutropenic critically ill patients. Objective: To assess the use of definitions of clinically documented and possible CI for guiding preemptive antifungal therapy in critically ill patients. Methods: The patients treated in our intensive care unit (ICU) for at least 48 hours between 2000 and 2004 were investigated. The administration of antifungal agents and ICU mortality were compared among proven, clinically documented, and possible CI groups for age, sex, APACHE II score, diagnosis, length of ICU stay, treatment, number of colonization sites, and plasma β-D-glucan level. Results: Six patients were diagnosed with proven CI, 25 were diagnosed with clinically documented CI, and 104 with possible CI. The patients with clinically documented CI were compared with those with possible CI, and statistically significant differences were found in the following variables: APACHE II score (p = 0.018), length of ICU stay (p < 0.01), use of ventilator (p = 0.027), tracheotomy (p = 0.027), number of colonization sites (p < 0.001), plasma β-D-glucan level (p < 0.001), and administration of antifungal agents (p < 0.001); incidence of mortality was not statistically significant (p = 0.33). The shorter length of ICU stay, use of ventilator, and continuous hemodiafiltration were risk factors for death after adjusting for APACHE II score, admission before/after 2003, antifungal therapy, and other factors. Although the frequency of the administration of preemptive antifungal therapy was higher after 2003 than before, the mortality rate did not differ significantly, Conclusions: The use of the definitions of clinically documented and possible CI may be beneficial for determining when it is appropriate to initiate preemptive antifungal therapy. However, use of the guidelines did not lead to prevention of possible CI proceeding to clinically documented CI or to improved mortality.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Frenkel ◽  
Ran Abuhasira ◽  
Yoav Bichovsky ◽  
Anton Bukhin ◽  
Victor Novack ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Glucocorticoids (GCS) are commonly administered to critically ill patients. Due to their mineralocorticoid effect, GCS might have a substantial influence on a positive fluid balance. We assessed the association between glucocorticoids (GCS) therapy and fluid balance in critically ill patients with sepsis.Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients with sepsis hospitalized during 2006-2018 in a general intensive care unit (ICU) at a 1100-bed tertiary medical center.Results – We considered two definitions of exposure: daily exposure to GCS and GCS treatment at any time in the ICU. Of 945 patients with a diagnosis of sepsis, 375 were treated with GCS at any time and 570 were not. We applied four regression models to assess the association between GCS treatment and fluid balance; in our first model, fluid balance did not differ during days with GCS treatment, between patients who were and were not treated with GCS in the ICU (coefficient estimate 79.5 (-55.4 to 214.4), p=0.25). In our second model, daily fluid balance was increased by 139.8 ml (10.8 to 268.9; p=0.03) in patients who were ever treated with GCS during their ICU stay compared to untreated patients. In the third model, which included only patients treated with GCS during their ICU stay, GCS treatment days were not associated with daily fluid balance (coefficient estimate -190.6 (-485.1 to 103.9), p-value=0.21). In the last model, on "steroid free days", patients who received GCS treatment during their ICU stay had a positive fluid balance compared to those who were never treated with steroids (coefficient estimate 157.7 (-24.6 to 340.1), p-value=0.09).Conclusions – Despite their known mineralocorticoid activity, GCS themselves appear not to contribute substantially to fluid retention. The findings highlight the importance of a clear definition of exposure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document