scholarly journals A comparative study of apical microleakage of different root canal sealers by apical dye penetration

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-224
Author(s):  
Ashok Ayer ◽  
TR Manandhar ◽  
Navin Agrawal ◽  
Mannu Vikram ◽  
Pramita Suwal
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Medical Science ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Blue Dye ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Root Canal Sealers

Objective: This study was designed to compare the level of apical microleakage of root canal sealers; Acroseal, AH Plus, Endoflas FS and Endomethasone N, with laterally condensed gutta percha by level of apical dye penetration.Materials and Methods: Freshly extracted sixty permanent maxillary anterior teeth were divided randomly into four groups. Shaping and cleaning of teeth was done followed by obturation with gutta percha and four different root canal sealers. Samples were immersed in 2% methylene blue dye solution in individual dappen dish and stored in the solution for 30 days. The roots were split longitudinally with a chisel in two halves and observed under stereomicroscope. Apical microleakage measured from the apex to the most coronal extent of dye penetration.Results: Minimum microleakage was observed with AH Plus with mean value 2.140 mm, standard deviation 0.817. The maximum microleakage was observed with Endomethasone N with mean value 3.858 mm, standard deviation 1.840. There was no statistically significant difference in microleakage between Acroseal, AH Plus, and Endoflas FS. Endomethasone N showed highest level of microleakage than other three groups under the test condition, which was statistically significant.Conclusion: The microleakage was the lowest for the AH Plus and increased in the following order, Endoflas FS, Acroseal, Endomethasone N.Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.16(2) 2017 p.219-224

scholarly journals Perbandingan sitotoksisitas Endomethasone, AH Plus, dan Apexit Plus terhadap sel fibroblas dengan teknik root dipping

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Christine A. Rovani ◽  
Kamizar Kamizar ◽  
Munyati Usman
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Chicken Fibroblast ◽  
Root Canal Sealers

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the lowest cytotoxicity of three endodonticsealers, Apexit Plus, AH Plus and Endomethasone that can be used safely. The crownof 30 intact lower premolars were removed at cementodentinal juntion and the teethwere prepared with crown down technique with # 20 initial file and # 30 masterapical file. After sterilization, the 30 teeth were randomly divided into three groupsand filled with gutta percha using laterally condensation technique and Apexit Plus,AH Plus, and Endomethasone as sealers. Apex of the roots was dipped 1.5 mm intoculture medium for 24 hours in incubator (root dipping technique). The mediumcontact was transformed into confluent chicken fibroblast. Cytotoxicity ofEndomethasone, AH Plus, and Apexit Plus were measured with hemocytometer assay.The results showed that percentage survived cells of Apexit Plus was 68%,Endomethasone 66.42%, and AH Plus 64%. The amount of exist cells were ApexitPlus>Endomethasone>AH Plus. There was no significant difference of cytotoxicityamong the sealers (P>0.05). The conclusion was the amount of exist cells were morethan 50% which means that the three root canal sealers were not toxic.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Effects of a Bioceramic and Conventional Resin-Based Sealers on Postoperative Pain after Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 2661
Author(s):  
Kiche Shim ◽  
Young-Eun Jang ◽  
Yemi Kim
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Continuous Wave ◽  
Root Canal Treatment ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group 2

Background: This clinical trial aimed to compare the effects of bioceramic sealer and resin-based sealer on the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain. Methods: Patients with anterior teeth or premolars requiring root canal treatment were assigned to group 1 (n = 51). Those with molars requiring treatment were assigned to group 2 (n = 57). In groups 1En and 2En, root canals were obturated with Endoseal MTA using the single-cone technique. In groups 1AH and 2AH, the sealer used was AH Plus with the continuous wave technique. On the day of canal filling, each patient was instructed to indicate their pain intensity over the 7 day postoperative period, at rest and, while biting, using a visual analog scale. Results: There was no significant difference in the incidence or intensity of postoperative pain between the Endoseal MTA and AH Plus groups during the 7 day postoperative period (p > 0.05). Less time was needed to seal the root canals with Endoseal MTA, especially in group 2 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Endoseal MTA and AH Plus had similar effects on the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain. The obturation time was shorter when using Endoseal MTA compared to AH Plus.

scholarly journals Re-establishing apical patency after obturation with Gutta-percha and two novel calcium silicate-based sealers

2015 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 457-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasia Agrafioti ◽  
Anastasios D. Koursoumis ◽  
Evangelos G. Kontakiotis
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
Continuous Wave ◽  
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate ◽  
Optical Microscope ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Working Length ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Time Required

ABSTRACT Objective: Aim of the present study was to evaluate the retreatability and reestablishment of apical patency of two calcium silicate-based sealers, TotalFill BC Sealer (BCS) and mineral trioxide aggregate Fillapex (MTA F), versus AH Plus, when used in combination with Gutta-percha (GP). Materials and Methods: The canals of 54 single-rooted anterior teeth were instrumented and filled with GP/AH Plus (Group A), GP/MTA F (Group B), or GP/BCS (Group C) using continuous wave obturation technique. The groups were subdivided into subgroups with the master-GP cone placed to the working length (WL) or intentionally 2 mm short. The retreatment procedures were performed using ultrasonics, chloroform, rotary, and hand files. The ability to establish the patency and reach WL was determined as well as the time taken to reach WL was calculated in minutes. Furthermore, the samples were observed under a dental, optical microscope, after vertically splitting them. Results: The WL and patency were reestablished in 100% of specimens in all groups. The Mann–Whitney U-test indicated that there was a significant difference in the amount of time required to reach WL between the groups (P < 0.05) with group GP/BCS short of the WL showing the most amount of time to be retreated. Conclusion: The novel calcium silicate-based sealers are negotiable under simple root canal anatomy. However, the conventional retreatment techniques are not able to fully remove them.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Apical Filling after Warm Vertical Compaction using Two Different Endodontic Materials: Resilon® and Gutta-Percha

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-170
Author(s):  
Carla Zogheib ◽  
Etienne Medioni
Keyword(s):  
Group 4 ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Warm Vertical Compaction ◽  
Group 1

ABSTRACT Forty-eight extracted maxillary anterior teeth instrumented with ProTaper system to apical preparations 0.25, 0.40 and 0.60 mm (n = 16 each) were divided into six groups for filling as following: Group 1: Apical preparation 25/100 + gutta-percha/AH Plus sealer, group 2: Apical preparation 25/100 + Resilon/Real Seal, group 3: Apical preparation 40/100 + gutta-percha/AH plus sealer, group 4: Apical preparation 40/100 + Resilon/Real Seal, group 5: Apical preparation 60/100 + gutta-percha/AH plus, group 6: Apical preparation 60/100 + Resilon/Real Seal. All teeth were filled using the warm vertical technique. Horizontal sections at 1, 2 and 3 mm from the apex were observed by SEM under 200 × magnification. Sections were digitally photographed under a stereomicroscope and the images were transferred to a compatible PC for image analysis. The surface area of voids were calculated and compared at all levels; using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Sidak correction and Mann-Whitney U test (p > 0.05). Comparisons within each group (gutta-percha/AH plus and Resilon/Real Seal) showed the presence of voids but there was no significant difference between any level of sectioning for apical preparations of 25 and 40 (p > 0.05). The only difference was in the groups prepared to size 60 and filled with Resilon/ Real Seal which showed significantly more voids than the group filled with gutta-percha/AH plus and especially at the 3 mm level. Conclusion The system Resilon/Real Seal did not achieve better results in terms of sealing ability in the apical third when compared to the conventional gutta-percha/AH plus sealing system. How to cite this article Zogheib C, Naaman A, Medioni E. Evaluation of Apical Filling after Warm Vertical Compaction using Two Different Endodontic Materials: Resilon® and Gutta-Percha. World J Dent 2012;3(2):166-170.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Manual and Two-Rotary Niti Retreatment Systems in Removing Gutta-Percha Obturated with Two Root Canal Sealers

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athikesavan Jayasenthil ◽  
Emmanuel Solomon Sathish ◽  
Prashanth Prakash
Keyword(s):  
Zinc Oxide ◽  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Canal Wall ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Root Canal Sealers ◽  
One Way Anova

Objective. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two retreatment NiTi systems (protaper universal retreatment files, R-Endo), when compared to manual technique in removing Gutta-percha obturated with two sealers. Study Design. Sixty extracted single-rooted premolars were instrumented with Protaper rotary files till F3. The specimens were divided into six groups. Groups 1, 2, 3 were obturated with Gutta-percha and zinc oxide eugenol and Groups 4, 5, 6 were obturated with Gutta-percha and AH-plus. The retreatment was carried out in groups 1 and 4 with H-files and GGdrills, groups 2 and 5 with R-endo retreatment files and groups 3 and 6 with Protaper retreatment files. The roots were sectioned and evaluated under optical stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA and Newman-Keul's test at . Results. The manual technique resulted in cleaner canal walls when compared with both rotary retreatment systems. Conclusion. NiTi rotary retreatment files can be used to remove the filling material quickly, but it should be followed by hand instruments to obtain better canal wall cleanliness.

scholarly journals Comparative study of coronal sealing ability using root cross sections method

2007 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 224-230
Author(s):  
Dejan Markovic ◽  
Vesna Zivojinovic ◽  
Slavoljub Zivkovic
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sections ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Smear Layer ◽  
Blue Dye ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Dye Penetration ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective: An in vitro comparison of coronal microleakage of three root canal sealers was performed using the dye leakage method. Methodology: Ninety-eight single-rooted human teeth were instrumented and randomly allocated to two groups. In the first group, root canals were treated with EDTA to remove the smear layer. The roots in both groups were obturated using laterally condensed gutta-percha and Sealapex, AH-26 or Ketac-Endo as the sealer. The teeth were suspended in 1% methylene blue dye for 6 days. The teeth were then rinsed, sectioned perpendicular to the long axis and evaluated for coronal dye penetration. Results: In general, Ketac-Endo root canal sealer showed greater dye penetration than Sealapex and AH-26. A statistically significant difference in the coronal penetration of the dye was found in the group with intact smear layer. Conclusion: Highly significant differences between AH-26 and Ketac-Endo (p < 0.001) and Sealapex and Ketac Endo (p < 0.001) were found.

scholarly journals Physicochemical Properties and Interfacial Adaptation of Root Canal Sealers

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 435-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piedad S. Cañadas ◽  
Ester Berástegui ◽  
Patrícia Gaton-Hernández ◽  
Léa A. B. Silva ◽  
Giselle A. Leite ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Physicochemical Properties ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Chemical Nature ◽  
Ph Variation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Root Canal Sealers ◽  
Adaptation Data ◽  
Scanning Electron

This study compared the physicochemical properties and interfacial adaptation to canal walls of Endo-CPM-Sealer, Sealapex and Activ GP with the well-established AH Plus sealer. The following analyses were performed: radiopacity, pH variation and solubility using samples of each material and scanning electron microscopy of root-filled bovine incisors to evaluate the interfacial adaptation. Data were analyzed by the parametric and no-parametric tests (α=0.05). All materials were in accordance with the ANSI/ADA requirements for radiopacity. Endo-CPM-Sealer presented the lowest radiopacity values and AH Plus was the most radiopaque sealer (p=0.0001). Except for ActiV GP, which was acidic, all other sealers had basic chemical nature and released hydroxyl ions. Regarding solubility, all materials met the ANSI/ADA recommendations, with no statistically significant difference between the sealers (p=0.0834). AH Plus presented the best adaptation to canal walls in the middle (p=0.0023) and apical (p=0.0012) thirds, while the sealers Activ GP and Endo-CPM-Sealer had poor adaptation to the canal walls. All sealers, except for ActiV GP, were alkaline and all of them fulfilled the ANSI/ADA requirements for radiopacity and solubility. Regarding the interfacial adaptation, AH Plus was superior to the others considering the adaptation to the bovine root canal walls.

scholarly journals An in vitro study on the effects of serum proteins on Enterococcus faecalis adhesion to three types of root sealers and gutta-percha

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinwei Lin ◽  
Danlu Chi ◽  
Qimei Gong ◽  
Zhongchun Tong
Keyword(s):  
Epoxy Resin ◽  
Calcium Hydroxide ◽  
Enterococcus Faecalis ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Serum Proteins ◽  
Laser Scanning Microscopy ◽  
Root Canal Sealer ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Root Canal Sealers

Abstract Background The extrusion of overfilled materials that extend beyond the apical foramina into the periradicular tissue may serve as a reservoir for bacterial adhesion and further affect recovery from periapical diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of serum proteins on Enterococcus faecalis adhesion and survival on the surface of a calcium hydroxide-based root canal sealer (Apexit Plus), an epoxy resin sealer (AH-Plus) and a bioceramic sealer (iRoot SP). Methods Apexit Plus, AH-Plus and iRoot SP were evenly coated on gutta-percha, using gutta-percha alone as the control. After root canal sealer setting, the number of E. faecalis adhering to the root canal sealers and gutta-percha was counted in fetal bovine serum (FBS) or tryptic soy broth supplemented with 1% glucose (TSBG) by viable cell plate counts. The morphology of 7-day-old E. faecalis biofilms in FSB and TSBG was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Furthermore, E. faecalis biofilms on the three root canal sealers were labeled with a LIVE/DEAD BacLight™ Bacterial Viability Kit, and the ratios of viable to dead cells were analyzed using laser scanning microscopy operative software (Zen software). Results In the assays, after 1 and 7 days, the number of E. faecalis adhering to the root canal sealers or gutta-percha in FBS were significantly lower than those in TSBG (P < 0.05). In FBS, E. faecalis adhesion to iRoot SP and gutta-percha was reduced to a greater extent than that adhered to Apexit Plus and AH-Plus. Few E. faecalis accumulated on iRoot SP in FBS, whereas many bacteria assembled on iRoot SP and formed biofilms in TSBG. The ratio of viable cells in the E. faecalis biofilm on iRoot SP was the lowest. Conclusions Calcium hydroxide-based root canal sealers, epoxy resin sealers and bioceramic sealers may provide a substrate for E. faecalis adhesion, and the bioceramic sealer in this study showed the least E. faecalis adhesion in the presence of serum proteins compared to the other two sealers.

An Analysis of the Antimicrobial Activity of Ten Root Canal Sealers - A Duration Based in vitro Evaluation

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasanna Neelakantan ◽  
Subbarao CV
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Activity ◽  
Candida Albicans ◽  
Enterococcus Faecalis ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Antimicrobial Action ◽  
Agar Diffusion Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Root Canal Sealers

Aim and Design: Sealers with prolonged antimicrobial activity are needed by the fact that microorganisms are commonly recovered from teeth with failed endodontic therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the duration of antimicrobial activity of ten root canal sealers (Apexit plus, Tubli Seal Xpress, Endoflas FS,Endomethasone, Endomethasone N, AH Plus, Epiphany, EndoRez, Ketac Endo, Roeko Seal) against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans by the agar diffusion test. The zones of inhibition were examined immediately and after 24, 48, 72 hours, 5 and 7 days. Statistical analysis was done using Kruskal - Wallis test and Mann Whitney U test. Results and conclusions: Against Enterococcus faecalis, Endoflas FS showed the largest inhibitory zones immediately and 24 hours after manipulation, whereas, there was no significant difference between Endoflas FS and Endomethasone after 48 hours. Against Candida albicans, Endoflas FS performed better than the other sealers. All the sealers (except AH Plus, Epiphany and Roeko Seal) demonstrated higher antimicrobial action in the first 24 hours after manipulation The antimicrobial action of all the sealers (except AH Plus and Roeko Seal which showed no antimicrobial activity in any studied time and Epiphany which ceased to show any antimicrobial action after 24 hours) decreased significantly with time.

scholarly journals Evaluation of apical microleakage of teeth sealed with four different root canal sealers

2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 341-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fábio Dultra ◽  
Juliana Machado Barroso ◽  
Laise Daniela Carrasco ◽  
Alexandre Capelli ◽  
Danilo M. Zanello Guerisoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Methyl Salicylate ◽  
The Other ◽  
Root Canal Sealer ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Dye Penetration ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
India Ink ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Root Canal Sealers

OBJECTIVES: to compare the apical sealing ability of four root canal sealers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: forty extracted human maxillary canines were instrumented 1 mm short of the anatomical apex and randomly assigned to four groups (n=10), according to the root canal sealer used for obturation: Endofill, AH Plus, EndoREZ and Epiphany. Root canals were obturated with gutta-percha points, except for the Epiphany group, in which resin points (Resilon) were used. The teeth were immersed in India ink for seven days and clarified using methyl salicylate. The extent of apical dye penetration was measured with a measuroscope in all aspects of the canal. RESULTS: AH Plus (0.02 mm ± 0.07), Epiphany (0.00 mm ± 0.00) and EndoREZ (0.32 mm ± 0.62) did not differ statistically to each other (p>0.01). EndoFill presented the highest dye penetration mean (0.83 mm ± 0.73) and was statistically different from the other sealers (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: the resin-based root canal sealers presented lesser apical microleakage than the zinc oxide and eugenol based sealer. No statistical differences were observed among resin based sealers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document