scholarly journals Outcome of Sorafenib Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-18
Author(s):  
Md Niamul Gani Chowdhury ◽  
Md Azizul Islam
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Cancer ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Primary Liver Cancer ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
Oral Drug ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Hepatitis C Infection ◽  
Medical College

Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer. It occurs most often in people with chronic liver diseases, such as cirrhosis caused by hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection. It is the fifth most common liver cancer globally and also a common cancer in Bangladesh. Treatment is difficult; however newer oral drug Sorafenib is available in our country which is promising. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of TKI Sorafenib on advanced and non-resect able primary HCC in Bangladeshi patients. Materials and Methods: This clinical trial was conducted on 38 diagnosed patients of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (stage-3 and Child-Pugh Class-C) over a period of 3 years from May 2014 to July 2017 in the department of Oncology, CMH Dhaka. The patients receive Sorafenib 200-400 mg twice daily till disease progression ceases or increases and there are no unacceptable toxicities. Efficacy was observed in terms of overall survival, progressive free survival (PFS), drug compliance and common toxicities. Results: In 24 months of follow –up period from the date of Sorafenib taken, median overall survival was 7.73 months. The median overall survival was 8 months (range 8.13-27.43 months) in 42.4% patients. The median PFS is 3.5 months (range 1.2-5.8 months). Common toxicities found were anorexia, weakness, yellow colouration of skin and mucosa, HTN, rash and diarrhoea. Conclusion: In Sorafenib treated Bangladeshi advanced HCC patients, the median overall survival was found to be significant and compatible with some of the international publication. Journal of Armed Forces Medical College Bangladesh Vol.15 (1) 2019: 16-18

scholarly journals 452 Preliminary analysis of a real-world study (RWS) of camrelizumab treatment in primary liver cancer (PLC)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A479-A480
Author(s):  
Zhendong Chen ◽  
Nianfei Wang ◽  
Dayong Luo ◽  
Bo Jiang ◽  
Mu Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Cancer ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Primary Liver Cancer ◽  
Locoregional Therapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Patient Disposition ◽  
Ecog Ps

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the landscape of PLC management at all evolutionary stages.1 As an anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody, camrelizumab monotherapy and in combination with apatinib, an anti-angiogenetic tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2, chemotherapy or locoregional therapy, have demonstrated their efficacy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).2 3 4 5MethodsThis prospective, open-label, multi-center, observational RWS was conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of camrelizumab in treatment of PLC in clinical practice. Eligible patients were histopathologically or cytologically identified HCC or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, who were going to receive camrelizumab treatment, with age ≥18 ages, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score of 0–2 and Child-Pugh score ≤ 9. Patients were treated at clinician discretion. Three hundred patients were planned to enroll, including advanced or peri-operative PLC. The primary endpoint was progress-free survival for advanced PLC, whose efficacy was available to analysis. Efficacy was assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.ResultsFrom March 29, 2020 to June 10, 2021,a total of 147 eligible patients of advanced PLC were enrolled and included in this interim analysis, with 128 (87.1%) men, 130 (94.9%) ECOG PS of 0–1, 139 (94.6%) HCC, 74 (50.4%) Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C, 98 (66.7%) Child-Pugh B, and 72 (49.0%) with extrahepatic metastases, shown in table 1. Of the 147 patients, 45 (30.1%) patients were treated with camrelizumab monotherapy, 79 (53.8%) patients with combination with angiogenesis inhibitors, of which 55 (37.4%) in combination with apatinib, 21 (14.3%) patients with camrelizumab and chemotherapy. Patients, who had at least one efficacy assessment, were included in the efficacy analyses. Up to July 19, 2021, with a median follow time of 6.2 months, 132 patients were available for efficacy analyses. Patient disposition was shown in figure 1. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 10%/30.8%/35.3% and 75.0%/86.5%/70.6% in camrelizumab monotherapy/combined with apatinib/combined with chemotherapy, respectively. (table 2) The most common camrelizumab-treatment related adverse events (AEs) included reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) (12, 8.2%), ICI-induced pneumonia (2, 1.4%), enterocolitis (2, 1.4%), and nephritis (1, 0.7%), of which all these AEs recovered. Other AEs included increase of transaminase (5, 3.4%) and hypertension (4, 2.7%). All AEs were 1–2 grade and no treatment-related death occurred.Abstract 452 Table 1Baseline characteristicsAbstract 452 Figure 1Patient dispositionAbstract 452 Table 2Confirmed tumor response assessed by investigators per RECIST v1.1ConclusionsCamrelizumab, combined with anti-angiogenetic agents or chemotherapy, or monotherapy, demonstrated good efficacy and safety in treatment of PLC.Trial RegistrationChiCTR2000034264ReferencesLlovet JM, Kelley RK, Villanueva A, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021;7(1):6–28.Qin S, Ren Z, Meng Z, et al. Camrelizumab in patients with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2020;21(4):571–580.Xu J, Shen J, Gu S, et al. Camrelizumab in Combination with Apatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (RESCUE): A Nonrandomized, Open-label, Phase II Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(4):1003–1011.Mei K, Qin S, Chen Z, et al. Camrelizumab in combination with apatinib in second-line or above therapy for advanced primary liver cancer: cohort A report in a multicenter phase Ib/II trial. J Immunother Cancer 2021;9(3).Qin S, Bai Y, Lim HY, et al. Randomized, multicenter, open-label study of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin versus doxorubicin as palliative chemotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma from Asia. J Clin Oncol 2013;31(28):3501–3508.Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by China registered clinical trial ethics review committee with No.ChiECRCT20200042.

scholarly journals Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Somatostatin Analogues: A Review of the Literature

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (19) ◽  
pp. 4811
Author(s):  
Hendrik Reynaert ◽  
Isabelle Colle
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Cancer ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Primary Liver Cancer ◽  
Somatostatin Receptor ◽  
Somatostatin Receptors ◽  
Somatostatin Analogues ◽  
Receptor Expression ◽  
Surrounding Tissue ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma, one of the most dreaded complications of cirrhosis, is a frequent cancer with high mortality. Early primary liver cancer can be treated by surgery or ablation techniques, but advanced hepatocellular carcinoma remains a challenge for clinicians. Most of these patients have underlying cirrhosis, which complicates or even precludes treatment. Therefore, efficacious treatments without major side effects are welcomed. Initial results of treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with somatostatin analogues were promising, but subsequent trials have resulted in conflicting outcomes. This might be explained by different patient populations, differences in dosage and type of treatment and differences in somatostatin receptor expression in the tumor or surrounding tissue. It has been shown that the expression of somatostatin receptors in the tumor might be of importance to select patients who could benefit from treatment with somatostatin analogues. Moreover, somatostatin receptor expression in hepatocellular carcinoma has been shown to correlate with recurrence, prognosis, and survival. In this review, we will summarize the available data on treatment of primary liver cancer with somatostatin analogues and analyze the current knowledge of somatostatin receptor expression in hepatocellular carcinoma and its possible clinical impact.

Assessment of radioembolization among patients who met the inclusion criteria for Sorafenib Hepatocellular Carcinoma Assessment Randomized Protocol (SHARP).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14654-e14654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Sangro ◽  
Livio Carpanese ◽  
Roberto Cianni ◽  
Daniele Gasparini ◽  
Rita Golfieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Function ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Good Liver Function

e14654 Background: SHARP was pivotal in determining the safety and efficacy of sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with predominately good liver function. In practice, many patients with advanced HCC receive radioembolization (RE). Investigators from the European Network on RE with yttrium-90 resin microspheres (ENRY) group conducted an analysis of safety and survival among consecutive patients who met the SHARP inclusion criteria. Methods: 58% of patients (189 of 325) who had received RE between 09/2003 and 12/2009 were considered SHARP-equivalents. Of these, 11.6% received sorafenib 4.7 months (median) after RE for a median duration of 2.8 months. Safety and tolerability analyses were conducted up to day 90 post RE; changes from baseline were recorded and transitions in CTCAE grades >3 tested. Statistical analyses used SAS (SAS, Cary NC) version 9.2 XP Pro. Results: Like the SHARP sorafenib cohort, most patients had advanced HCC (BCLC stage C: 72.5%), good liver function (Child–Pugh class A: 100%) and ECOG performance status (0–1: 90.5%). Macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI), extrahepatic spread (EHD) or both was present in 33.9%. 20.1% had received prior surgical procedures, 8.5% prior ablative procedures and 33.3% prior vascular [chemo]embolization. RE was predominantly a single whole-liver procedure (median activity 1.7 GBq). Median overall survival was 10.8 months (95% CI: 8.8–12.8) in the SHARP-equivalent cohort, 10.2 months (8.3–11.8) in patients with MVI/EHD, 9.7 months (7.6–10.9) in advanced HCC (BCLC stage C) and 16.6 months (11.2–22.8) in intermediate HCC (BCLC stage B). Treatment-related adverse events (all grades; grade >3) were: fatigue (50.3%; 2.1%), abdominal pain (25.9%; 2.1%), nausea/vomiting (31.2%; 0.5%) and GI ulcer (3.2%; 1.0%). At baseline, raised bilirubin (all grades) was present in 20.3%, increasing to 49.4% of patients evaluated up to day 90. Bilirubin grade was unchanged in 58.1% and increased in 37.8%; 4.0% had ≥grade 3 events. Conclusions: In patients matching the inclusion criteria for SHARP, RE was well tolerated with a median overall survival which compares favorably with sorafenib.

Efficacy and safety of localized concurrent chemoradiation therapy and sorafenib sequential therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective phase II trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15678-e15678
Author(s):  
Beom Kyung Kim ◽  
Do Young Kim ◽  
Hye Jin Choi ◽  
Seung-Hoon Beom ◽  
Hye Won Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment

e15678 Background: Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have a particularly poor prognosis of the median overall survival of less than 12 months. Even though sorafenib has been approved for treating advanced stage HCC, the unsatisfactory objective response rate still remain unresolved. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of localized concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by sequential sorafenib treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: This study is an ongoing, phase II trial. Patients with advanced HCC not amenable for curative treatments were eligible. In the course of radiotherapy for 5 weeks, hepatic arterial infusion of 5-fluorouracil (500mg/day) via implanted port was applied during the first 5 days and the last 5 days of radiotherapy. Four weeks after localized CCRT, sorafenib (400mg bid) was maintained. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results: A total of 47 patients were enrolled. After the completion of localized CCRT, the objective response rate was 31.9%. During the overall treatment course, the objective response rate was 46.8% respectively. Overall, 7 patients (14.9%) underwent curative resection or transplantation after down-staging. The median overall survival was 18.4 months and the progression-free survival was 6.8 months. Adverse events were predictable and manageable with conservative care. Conclusions: Localized CCRT followed by sequential sorafenib treatment in patients with advanced HCC showed significant activity and good tolerability. Furthermore, such a treatment modality, when compared to the use of sorafenib alone, might provide the additional therapeutic benefit through initial tumor reduction, allowing curative treatment after down-staging in 14.9% of patients, Further randomized trial should be required to make the more robust evidence. Clinical trial information: NCT02425605.

Systemic targeted and immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J Cersosimo
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Sorafenib Therapy

Abstract Purpose The activity of targeted agents and immunotherapy in the management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is reviewed. Summary The first drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration for advanced HCC, sorafenib, was approved in 2007. Regorafenib, the second drug, was approved 10 years later. Six additional drugs have been approved since. Targeted agents and checkpoint inhibitors are the only agents approved for systemic therapy of advanced HCC. Sorafenib and lenvatinib are approved as first-line agents, with regorafenib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab, nivolumab (used alone or with ipilimumab), and pembrolizumab approved for patients who have received prior sorafenib therapy. Most patients in phase 3 studies had Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis, and data on the use of these agents in patients with more advanced hepatic dysfunction are limited. All of the targeted agents improve survival in patients with advanced disease. Median overall survival durations of up to 12.3 and 13.6 months were reported with use of sorafenib and lenvatinib, respectively, in phase 3 trials. Overall survival durations of 10.6, 10.2, and 9.2 months have been achieved with use of regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab as second-line therapy after sorafenib. A median overall survival of 13.2 months was reported in 1 cohort of a dose-expansion study of nivolumab in which all patients received prior sorafenib therapy. Median survival durations of 12.9 months and 13.9 months were reported with use of pembrolizumab in patients with a history of sorafenib therapy. The most common adverse effects associated with targeted agents are dermatological effects, diarrhea, fatigue, and hypertension. Immune-mediated adverse effects are associated with checkpoint inhibitors. Conclusion Targeted agents and checkpoint inhibitors are the standard of therapy for patients who need systemic therapy for advanced HCC.

scholarly journals Clinico-Epidemiological Analysis of Characteristics and Outcome in Patient with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Retrospective Study

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M M Elbassiouny ◽  
M Y Mustafa ◽  
M E Saleh ◽  
N G A Gebril
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Liver Cancer ◽  
Clinical Oncology ◽  
Primary Liver Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer. Globally, liver cancer is the 5th and 7th most common cancer in men and women, respectively. Most of HCC burden lies in developing countries. The regions of high incidence include Eastern and South-Eastern Asia, Middle and Western Africa. Worldwide, it is the third most common cause of cancer deaths Aim of the Work A retrospective study of Hepatocellular carcinoma patients presented to Ain Shams University Hospital clinical oncology department between the period of 1/2013 till the end of 12/2016 aiming to review of epidemiological and clinical risk factors, response to the therapy used, progression free survival and overall survival. Patients and Methods The current study is a retrospective analysis carried out in Ain-Shams clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine department, Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University between the period of 1st January 2013 till the end of 2016, where 136 medical records were planned to be analyzed, from which 18 records were not included in analysis (8 records weren’t available in the archive, 10 contained inadequate data) and 118 were analyzed aiming at detection of the prognostic factors, response, progression free survival and overall survival of patients with HCC. Results Regarding age, the median age at diagnosis was 58 years (SD = 8.29), where the average median age was 57.5 years. In our study most of patients were presented with good PS, where 100 (84.7%) of them had performance status less than or equals 2 and only 18 patients (11.8%) were more than or equals 3 performance status < 2 in 84 % of all cases and >2 in 16 %. Conclusion To conclude, age as a prognostic factor significantly affects survival in favor of patients < =58 years. RFA affects survival. Performance status significantly affects survival. The quality of data reported was to some extent impaired due unavailability of complete clinical, analytical and radiological information in the charts.

scholarly journals Profiling of tumour-associated microbiota in human hepatocellular carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiga Komiyama ◽  
Takahiro Yamada ◽  
Nobuyuki Takemura ◽  
Norihiro Kokudo ◽  
Koji Hase ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Cancer ◽  
Fatty Liver Disease ◽  
Primary Liver Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Barrier ◽  
Sequence Variants ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver ◽  
Uncultured Bacterium ◽  
Hepatitis C Viruses ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

AbstractLiver cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a primary liver cancer that results from chronic hepatitis caused by multiple predisposing factors such as viral infection, alcohol consumption, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Accumulating studies have indicated that dysfunction of the gut epithelial barrier and hepatic translocation of gut microbes may be implicated in the pathogenesis of HCC. However, the translocated bacteria in HCC patients remains unclear. Here, we characterised tumour-associated microbiota in patients with liver cancer and focused on HCC. We observed that the number of amplicon sequence variants in tumour-associated microbiota was significantly higher compared with that in non-tumour regions of the liver. The tumour-associated microbiota consisted of Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria as the dominant phyla. We identified an unclassified genus that belonged to the Bacteroides, Romboutsia, uncultured bacterium of Lachnospiraceae as a signature taxon for primary liver cancer. Additionally, we identified Ruminococcus gnavus as a signature taxon for HCC patients infected with hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C viruses. This study suggests that tumour microbiota may contribute to the pathology of HCC.

scholarly journals The Association between Diet and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 172
Author(s):  
Elena S. George ◽  
Surbhi Sood ◽  
Anna Broughton ◽  
Georgia Cogan ◽  
Megan Hickey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Liver Cancer ◽  
Dietary Pattern ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Primary Liver Cancer ◽  
Healthy Eating Index ◽  
Vitamin B9 ◽  
Related Risk ◽  
Monounsaturated Fats

Globally, liver cancer is the sixth most common cause of cancer mortality, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) being the most common type of primary liver cancer. Emerging evidence states that diet is recognised as a potential lifestyle-related risk factor for the development of HCC. The aim of this systematic review is to determine whether there is an association between diet and the development of HCC. Using the PRISMA guidelines, three databases (MEDLINE Complete, CINAHL and Embase) were systematically searched, and studies published until July 2020 were included. Thirty observational studies were selected. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019135240). Higher adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern, Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010, the Urban Prudent Dietary Pattern, the Traditional Cantonese Dietary Pattern, intake of vegetables, wholegrains, fish, poultry, coffee, macronutrients such as monounsaturated fats and micronutrients such as vitamin E, vitamin B9, β-carotene, manganese and potassium were associated with a reduced risk of HCC. The results suggest a potential role of diet in the development of HCC. Further quantitative research needs to be undertaken within a range of populations to investigate diet and the relationship with HCC risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document