scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran ARCS dan Active Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yudhi Hanggara ◽  
Irwan Juniman Zendato
Keyword(s):  
Active Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Normality Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Low Motivation

Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diberikan perlakuan model pembelajaran ARCS dengan model pembelajaran Active Learning. (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi, sedang dan rendah. (3) Interaksi antara model pembelajaran (ARCS dan Active Learning) dengan motivasi belajar siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian quasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 3. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X SMKN 2 Batam tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Sampel diperoleh kelas X Akutansi-2 sebagai kelas eksperimen-1 dan kelas X Akutansi-4 sebagai kelas eksperimen-2. Instrumen pada penelitian ini adalah tes dan angket Uji prasyarat meliputi uji normalitas dengan metode Lilliefors dan uji Homogenitas dengan metode Bartlett. Pengujian hipotesis pada penelitian ini menggunakan analisis variansi dua jalan dengan sel tak sama. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa: (1) tidak terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar matematika antara siswa yang diberikan perlakuan model pembelajaran ARCS dengan model pembelajaran Active Learning. (2) terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar metematika antara siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi dan rendah. (3) tidak terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan motivasi belajar siswa.Kata Kunci: ARCS, Active Learning, motivasi belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract. This study aims to determine: (1) The difference in learning outcomes of student who study mathematics using ARCS learning model with Active learning model. (2) The difference in mathematics learning outcomes in student who have hight, medium and low motivation. (3) Interaction between learning model (ARCS and Active Learning) with student learning motivation. This research is quasi-experimental study with factorial design 2 x 3. The population in this research is all of students class X SMKN 2 Batam with academic year 2016/2017. The Sample in this research from class X accountant-2 is used as sampling for 1st experiment and class X accountant-4 for 2nd experiment. Instrument of research are mathematics achievement test and questionnaire student motivation. The test requirement is normality test using Lilliefors method and homogeneity test using Bartlett method. Hypothesis testing in this study uses two-way analisis of variance with defferent cells. Conclusion in this study: (1) there is no difference between student math result between ARCS learning model with Active learning model. (2) there is difference between result of student math between learning high motivation with low motivation. (3) there is no interaction between the learning model with student motivation.Keywords: ARCS, Active Learning, Motivation learning, Study of Math

scholarly journals The Influence of Jigsaw-type Cooperative Learning Model on Students' Mathematics Learning Outcomes and Motivation

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-246
Author(s):  
M Amin ◽  
Fitriani Nur ◽  
Mardhiah Diah ◽  
Eka Damayanti ◽  
Suharti Harti
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Motivation And Learning

The learning process is inseparable from the learning model. The application of a learning model is an attempt to improve learning outcomes and learning motivation. This research aimed to determine the effect of the Jigsaw-type cooperative learning model on students’ motivation and learning outcomes. This research was a quasi-experimental research with a non-equivalent control group design. The research instruments used were learning motivation questionnaires and tests. Data analysis techniques used were descriptive analysis and inferential analysis using the MANOVA test. The results showed that there was an influence of the Jigsaw-type cooperative learning model on students’ motivation and learning outcomes.

scholarly journals PENGARUH SOFTWARE GEOGEBRA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK PADA MATERI FUNGSI KUADRAT KELAS X MA SARJI AR-RASYID SITUBONDO

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-112
Author(s):  
Ika Irmawati ◽  
Lisma Dian Kartika Sari ◽  
Tri Astindari
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Quadratic Function ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
T Test ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Test Analysis ◽  
Normality Test ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Quasi Experimental

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of using Geogebra software on student learning outcomes on the quadratic function material in Class X MA Sarji Ar-Rasyid Situbondo. The research method used a quasi-experimental research design with data collection techniques used, namely pretest and posttest. The data analysis technique used the normality test, homogeneity test, and t-test. From the t-test analysis, results obtained sig 0.263> ɑ 0.05. So it can be concluded that there is no significant effect between students taught by learning GeoGebra software with conventional learning. This result is due to students' low ability and experience in using Geogebra software for mathematics learning.

scholarly journals Comparison of Mathematical Representation Skill and Science Learning Result in Classes with Problem-Based and Discovery Learning Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ertikanto ◽  
U. Rosidin ◽  
I. W. Distrik ◽  
Yuberti Yuberti ◽  
T. Rahayu
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Science Learning ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Mathematical Representation ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Normality Test ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Test Correlation

The purpose of this research is to know the difference of mathematical representation skill, the result of science learning and its influence on problem-based learning and discovery learning model. The population of this study was 16 students of PGSD FKIP University of Lampung. Among 534 students, there were two experimental classes consisting of 35 students and each was determined through cluster random sampling.  The data on mathematical representation skills and learning outcomes of science were obtained through a description test, five questions for assessing mathematical representation skills, and ten questions for assessing science learning outcomes. From the instruments that had been tested to 30 respondents, it was obtained a valid and reliable instrument with a score of 0.505 for mathematical representation skills, and 0.832 for learning outcomes. Furthermore, the data were analyzed by using normality test, homogeneity test, independent sample t-test, correlation test, and simple linear regression test. The results showed that there was no difference in the result of mathematical representation skill and science learning outcomes, between the problem-based learning model and real discovery. But there is a positive and significant linear influence between the mathematical representation skill and the learning outcomes of science, through a problem-based learning model of discovery.

scholarly journals STUDI KOMPARASI ANTARA MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR KIMIA SISWA

Alotrop ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julita Sari ◽  
Amrul Bahar ◽  
Dewi Handayani
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Outcome ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Normality Test ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental

The average students' chemical learning outcomes are still low, the low learning outcome is influenced by several factors, including students still consider that chemistry as one of the scary, difficult to understand and less interesting lessons. Therefore, the research wants to vary the learning process in the classroom by applying the learning model of Discovery Learning with Group Investigation model. This research was aimed to find out the students’ achievement differences of chemical subject by using Discovery learning and  Group Investigation model. The research is quasi experimental research. The population of this research were class X MIPA in SMAN 9 Bengkulu City, and the sample were X MIPA 2 and MIPA 3. This research using two experimental classes, that is class X MIPA 2 applying Group Investigation model and X MIPA 3 applying Discovery Learning model. Analysis of the data used is mean values, normality test, homogeneity test, and t-test. Post-test mean values for first experiment class is 78,12, but for second experiment class is 81,3. To determine whether the differences of student’s learning outcomes between both of experiment classes or not, we use t-test by using the differences between student’s pretest and posttest values, tcount > ttable (2,17 > 1,67). The result of this research showed that Ha accepted, in other words is a significant differences in learning outcomes of student’s applying Discovery Learning and Group Investigation model.

The Effect of Jigsaw Methode and Motivation on Students’ of Learning Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-30
Author(s):  
Yunita Yunita ◽  
Hidayat Hidayat ◽  
Harun Sitompul
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Average Value ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Low Motivation

This study aims to: (1) investigate the effect of Jigsaw cooperative learning on students learning outcomes; (2) find the difference in learning outcomes between high and low learning motivation and (3) find the interaction between learning approaches and learning motivation towards learning outcomes. The population of the study is students of grade IVa, IVb, IVc at SD Kasih Ibu Patumbak and the sample in this study is grade IVa with 35 students and grade IVb with 35 students. The results show that: (1) the average student learning outcomes of jigsaw cooperative learning is 28.40 while conventional is 24.14. Thus, students learning outcomes that get cooperative learning of jigsaw type are higher than conventional learning, (2) Students who have high motivation get an average value = 30.74, while low motivation is 22.72. Thus, it can be concluded that there are differences in student learning outcomes having high learning motivation and low learning motivation, and (3) students learning outcomes  taught by jigsaw cooperative learning are high learning motivation groups (32.94), and low learning motivation groups (24.58), while students taught with conventional learning are high learning motivation groups (28.40 ), and low motivation groups (20,95). Thus, there is no interaction between learning approaches and learning motivation towards learning outcomes.

ENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN AKTIF COURSE REVIEW HORAY TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR BIOLOGI SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 10 BATAM

SIMBIOSA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramses Ramses ◽  
Nurhaty Purnama Sari ◽  
Harni Lainy Br.Bakkara
Keyword(s):  
Active Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Eighth Grade ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Eighth Grade Students ◽  
Biology Learning

This study aims to know the influence of active learning model Course Review Horay to biology learning outcomes at eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 10 Batam academic year 2013/2014. This research design is  randomized experiment using posttest only control-group design. The study population is all the eighth grade students of  SMP Negeri 10 Batam with reached population consist of 7 classes. The sampling technique using a simple random sampling. Samples were selected class VIII5 as control class and VIII8 as experiment class. The instrument  that use in this research is the form of the test. Requirement have been in the form of normality and homogeneity test, which showed that normal and homogeneous data. Technique of data analysis conducted by the t test. The result analysis of data using the t test showed the tvalue 3.01 and ttable is 2.00 (tvalue > ttable). The results showed that the active learning result model Course Review Horay give effect to increase student learning outcomes from the average of the experimental class 82,57 and control class 76,04. Thus, the hypothesis put forward acceptable significance level (α = 0.05). Thus, it can be concluded that the using of active learning model Course Review Horay influential on learning outcomes of biology at eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 10 Batam. Keywords: Course Review Horay, Biology Learning Outcomes.

PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DENGAN PENDEKATAN RME UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS IX SMP MUHAMMADIYAH PADANG LUAS KECAMATAN TAMBANG KABUPATEN KAMPAR

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 744
Author(s):  
Zainur Zainur
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Research Instrument ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Better Than

This research was motivated by the low learning outcomes of grade IX SMP Muhammadiyah Padang LuasKecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar. This study aims to improve learning outcomes in mathematicslearning through STAD type cooperative learning with the RME approach in class IX SMP MuhammadiyahPadang Luas Kecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar. The subjects of this study were all classes IX in SMPMuhammadiyah Padang Luas Kecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar totaling 26 people. The form ofresearch is classroom action research. This research instrument consists of performance instruments and datacollection instruments in the form of teacher activity observation sheets and activities. The results of the studystated that there were significant differences between students' mathematics learning outcomes before applyingthe STAD type cooperative learning model with the RME approach with after applying the STAD typecooperative learning model with the RME approach. The difference shows student learning outcomes after theaction is better than before the action with completeness reaching 80.77% or 21 completed. Based on the resultsof the study and discussion it can be concluded that the application of STAD type learning model with RealisticMathematic Education (RME) approach can improve the learning outcomes of grade IX students of SMPMuhammadiyah Padang Luas Kecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar on statistical material.

scholarly journals PEMBELAJARAN DARING MATEMATIKA BERBANTUAN GOOGLE CLASSROOM DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR PADA MASA PANDEMI

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-342
Author(s):  
Yunti fahrulia Subekti
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Normality Test

The purpose of the study was to determine the differences in mathematics learning outcomes and the effectiveness of google classroom-assisted learning in terms of learning styles on students' mathematics learning outcomes. This research used an experimental research method with a randomized pretest-posttest control group design. Sampling using a simple random sampling technique. The population of this research is the seventhgrade students of one of the public junior high schools in Sleman. The sample of this study amounted to 54 students consisting of class VII C and VII D. The data collection techniques used in this study were tests and questionnaires. The data analysis techniques used in this study were normality test, homogeneity test, similarity test, and hypothesis testing. The results of the study show that: (1) there are differences in learning outcomes in bold learning assisted by google classroom; (2) bold learning assisted by google classroom is more effective in terms of visual learning styles; (3) bold learning assisted by google classroom is not more effective in terms of auditory and kinesthetic learning styles.

scholarly journals The Influence of Scramble Learning Models and Motivation Learning on the Results of Citizension Education Class V SD Students State 101766 Bandar Setia

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 288-304
Author(s):  
Dewi Lestari ◽  
Reh Bungana ◽  
Siman Siman
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Development ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Teachers have a duty to encourage, guide and provide learning facilities to achieve goals. Teachers have a responsibility to see everything that happens in the classroom to help student development. Teachers must be able to carry out their duties properly by first having to understand carefully the matters relating to the teaching and learning process, because the success of the learning process is supported by the ability of the teacher to develop and generate activeness and students in the learning process. The research method used is the Quasi Experiment (Quasi Experimental Method) with the research design as the basis for the implementation of the research is to distinguish the influence of the Inquiry method and the effect of conventional methods on learning outcomes of Citizenship Education in terms of high learning motivation and low learning motivation where the treatment class is class Va student and Vb class. The following is presented sequentially descriptive data regarding: (1) Civics learning outcomes students are taught using scramble learning model, (2) Civics student learning outcomes are taught using the expository model, (3) Civics student learning outcomes have high learning motivation, (4) Civics student learning outcomes have motivation to learn low, (5)Civics learning outcomes of students who have high learning motivation are taught with the Scramble learning model, (6) Civics learning outcomes of students who have low learning motivation are taught with the Scramble learning model, (7) Civics learning outcomes of students who have high learning motivation are taught using the expository learning model, (8) Civics learning outcomes of students who have low learning motivation are taught using the expository learning model.

scholarly journals Hubungan antara Kedalaman Permukaan Air Tanah dengan Salinitas di Pesisir Pantai Kungkai Baru serta Penggunaan Model Discovery Learning

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-182
Author(s):  
Sutijo Joko Sudiro ◽  
Muchammad Farid ◽  
Eko Swistoro
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
High Ability ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Average Value ◽  
A Value ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Relationship

ABSTRACT [Relationship between Groundwater Surface Depth with Salinity at the Coast of New Kungkai Beach and its Implementation on Discovery Learning Model]. The aims of this study were 1) to describe the relationship between groundwater surface depth with salinity in the coastal areas of new kungkai beach of Seluma, and 2) to determine the improvement of learning outcomes (cognitive) of high ability students, moderate and low by using discovery learning model on the concept of static fluid in class X computer and network engineering at SMK Negeri 3 Seluma. This research was a quasi experimental research with one groups pretest-posttest design. The results showed: 1) The relationship between depth with salinity has a value of 0.6478 with a significance level of 0.001 (<0.05); 2) Learning with discovery learning model can improve student learning outcomes on cognitive aspects (knowledge). Increased cognitive results can be seen from the average value of the initial test, the final test and the average value of gain in the class x Tkj is high-ability groups are at high criteria with a value of 0.75 gain in the group is in the criteria medium with the value of gain 0,52 and in the low group were in moderate criteria with a gain value of 0.44. There is a difference in learning outcomes between the high, medium and low groups. The difference is shown by Fcount > Ftable (4.04 > 3.35) with a significance level of 5%. Keywords: Groundwater surface depth; salinity; discovery learning model; SMKN 3 Seluma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document