History of thyroid surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (11) ◽  

The authors present an outline of the development of thyroid surgery from the ancient times to the beginning of the 20th century, when the definitive surgical technique have been developed and the physiologic and pathopfysiologic consequences of thyroid resections have been described. The key representatives, as well as the contribution of the most influential czech surgeons are mentioned.

2005 ◽  
pp. x-xi

Abstract This chapter briefly reviews the history of brazing from ancient times to the early 20th century.


2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  

The anatomical structures of the tubercle of Zuckerkandl (TZ) and the ligament of Berry (LB) have been known since the turn of the 20th century. The importance of the relationship between these structures and the thyroid gland was pointed out in the first half of the last century; nevertheless, it was neglected by most of the then surgeons. An increased interest of surgeons in detailed knowledge of these structures could only be observed from the 80´s of the last century in connection with guidelines for radical surgical treatments of the gland (both for benign and malignant diseases) and with the need to enhance the safety of these treatments. The knowledge of these two important structures and the skill of an exact surgical technique are necessary for the protection of the recurrent laryngeal nerve and the parathyroid glands, and also for the actual removal of the entire thyroid gland. Thyroid surgeons must keep in mind the existence of many anatomical and pathological variations in these regions, which makes the preparation of the gland so delicate.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 735-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry W. Mays

For millennia the search for ‘pure’ water has been pursued by humans. Criteria for purity have become more complex, more rigid, and more quantitative over time; however, the principles, methods, and material for purifying water have remained remarkably similar from the earliest recorded information of 2000 BC. The scope of this paper is to present a brief history of water filtration and sedimentation practices for potable water management extending from the ancient times to the 19th century. It is not an exhaustive presentation, but instead presents some of the most important advances in water supply since the beginning of human's quest for pure water. M. N. Baker and M. J. Taras in 1981 presented an excellent overview of this quest, especially during the 17th to the 20th century.


2021 ◽  
pp. 150-158
Author(s):  
Tamara S. Volkova ◽  
Alexandr V. Krushelnitskii

The review on the textbooks of the associate professor of the Ural State University S.I. Tsemenkova is devoted to moral and ethical problems: the textual coincidences in her textbooks with the works of her predecessors – scholars of the Moscow State Institute for History and Archives – Institute for History and Archives of the Russian State University for the Humanities (MGIAI – IAI RSUH). The proofs of Tsemenkova’s plagiarism are presented. There is a rhetorical question arising: can such a teacher be demanding with students if she herself is a plagiarist? It is noted that the behavior of the members of the Department of Records Management, Archival Science and the History of Public Administrationof the Ural State University is surprising in this situation. They have not carried out a scientific examination of S.I. Tsemenkova’s textbooks and recommended them for publication. In particular, the textbook “History of Russian Archives: the 20th – the beginning of the 21st centuries”, published in Yekaterinburg, at the Publishing House of the Ural University in 2019, is not only based on the monograph “History of the Fatherland and Archives” (M.: RSUH, 1994) by T.I. Khorkhordina, but entire pages were copied verbatim from her monograph.


2004 ◽  
pp. 142-157
Author(s):  
M. Voeikov ◽  
S. Dzarasov

The paper written in the light of 125th birth anniversary of L. Trotsky analyzes the life and ideas of one of the most prominent figures in the Russian history of the 20th century. He was one of the leaders of the Russian revolution in its Bolshevik period, worked with V. Lenin and played a significant role in the Civil War. Rejected by the party bureaucracy L. Trotsky led uncompromising struggle against Stalinism, defending his own understanding of the revolutionary ideals. The authors try to explain these events in historical perspective, avoiding biases of both Stalinism and anticommunism.


2007 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 407-420
Author(s):  
Magda Ritoókné Ádám ◽  
Olivér Nagybányai Nagy ◽  
Csaba Pléh ◽  
Attila Keresztes

VárinéSzilágyiIbolya: Építészprofilok, akik a 70-es, 80-as években indultak(Ritoókné Ádám Magda)      407RacsmányMihály(szerk.): Afejlődés zavarai és vizsgálómódszerei(Nagybányai Nagy Olivér)     409Új irányzatok és a bejárt út a pszichológiatörténet-írásban (Mandler, G.: Interesting times. An encounter with the 20th century; Hergenhahn, B. N.: An introduction to the history of psychology; Schultz, D. P.,Schultz, S. E.: A history of modern psychology; Greenwood, J. D.: The disappearance of the social in American social psychology;Bem, S.,LoorendeJong, H.: Theoretical issues in psychology. An introduction; Sternberg, R. J. (ed.)Unity in psychology: Possibility or pipedream?;Dalton, D. C.,Evans, R. B. (eds): __


2020 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 219-236
Author(s):  
Andrey Yu. Dvornichenko

The abundant Russian historiography of the medieval history of Grand Duchy of Lithuania (Lithuanian-Russian State) has become in the last decades the centre of the discussions and is often subject to groundless criticism. This historiography was not very lucky in the Soviet period of the 20th century either, as it was severely criticized from the Marxist-Leninist position. When discussing Russian historiography the author of this article is consciously committed to the Russian positions. There are no reasons to consider this historiography branch either Byelorussian or Ukrainian one, as that was really Russian historiography, - the phenomenon that formed under the favorable specific conditions of Russian Empire before the beginning of the 20th century. The said phenomenon can be studied in different ways: according to the existing then main trends and schools or according to their affiliation with specific universities of Russian Empire. But according to the author of this article the best way to study the issue is in accordance with the main concepts of history. And then the pre-revolutionary historiography appears as an integral scientific paradigm that turns out to be the most divaricate branch of the Lithuanian studies of the time. It created, in its turn, the most vivid and objective historical picture that can still serve as the basis for the studies of Lithuanian-Russian state.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document