scholarly journals Comparative Risk of Incident Coronary Heart Disease Across Chronic Inflammatory Diseases

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arjun Sinha ◽  
Adovich S. Rivera ◽  
Simran A. Chadha ◽  
Sameer Prasada ◽  
Anna E. Pawlowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Chronic Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Adjusted Risk ◽  
Chd Risk

Background: Chronic inflammatory diseases (CIDs) are considered risk enhancing factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). However, sparse data exist regarding relative CHD risks across CIDs.Objective: Determine relative differences in CHD risk across multiple CIDs: psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).Methods: The cohort included patients with CIDs and controls without CID in an urban medical system from 2000 to 2019. Patients with CIDs were frequency-matched with non-CID controls on demographics, hypertension, and diabetes. CHD was defined as myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic heart disease, and/or coronary revascularization based on validated administrative codes. Multivariable-adjusted Cox models were used to determine the risk of incident CHD and MI for each CID relative to non-CID controls. In secondary analyses, we compared CHD risk by disease severity within each CID.Results: Of 17,049 patients included for analysis, 619 had incident CHD (202 MI) over an average of 4.4 years of follow-up. The multivariable-adjusted risk of CHD was significantly higher for SLE [hazard ratio (HR) 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2, 3.2] and SSc (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2, 3.9). Patients with SLE also had a significantly higher risk of MI (HR 3.6, 95% CI 1.9, 6.8). When CIDs were categorized by markers of disease severity (C-reactive protein for all CIDs except HIV, for which CD4 T cell count was used), greater disease severity was associated with higher CHD risk across CIDs.Conclusions: Patients with SLE and SSc have a higher risk of CHD. CHD risk with HIV, RA, psoriasis, and IBD may only be elevated in those with greater disease severity. Clinicians should personalize CHD risk and treatment based on type and severity of CID.

Abstract 16122: Comparative Risk of Incident Coronary Heart Disease Across Multiple Chronic Inflammatory Diseases

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arjun Sinha ◽  
Adovich Rivera ◽  
Simran Chadha ◽  
Sameer Prasada ◽  
Anna Pawlowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Immune Dysfunction ◽  
Chronic Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Chd Risk ◽  
Chd Risk Factors

Introduction: Inflammation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease (CHD). Chronic inflammatory diseases (CIDs) may serve as models to provide insights into the relationships between immune dysfunction, inflammation, and CHD. To investigate this further, we analyzed the risk of incident CHD across different CIDs. Methods: We created a cohort of individuals with CIDs and non-CID controls (frequency-matched on demographics and CHD risk factors), free of baseline CHD, receiving regular outpatient care in a large medical system from 2000 to 2019. CIDs included psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SSc), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). CHD was defined as myocardial infarction (MI), angina, or coronary revascularization. We used adjusted hazards models to determine incident CHD risk for each CID relative to controls. We also analyzed incident CHD risk by severity of inflammation (baseline C-reactive protein) or immune dysfunction (baseline CD4 T cell level in HIV). Results: Of 18,129 individuals with CIDs and 18,988 controls, there were 1,011 incident CHD events over a median of 3.5 years. After adjusting for demographics and CHD risk factors, CHD risk was significantly elevated in SLE [hazard ratio (HR) 2.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.19-3.71, p<0.01], SSc (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.54-2.99, p<0.01), HIV (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.12-1.69, p<0.01), and RA (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00-1.49, p=0.05). Findings were similar with MI as the lone outcome. When CIDs were categorized by inflammation or immune dysfunction, there was a pattern of higher CHD risk with higher levels of inflammation/immune dysfunction across CIDs (Figure). Conclusions: Our results show that SLE, SSc, HIV, and RA were associated with significantly elevated risks of incident CHD and MI. Higher levels of inflammation or immune dysfunction were associated with heightened CHD risk within CIDs.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Clinical Coronary Heart Disease in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: The Lupus and Atherosclerosis Evaluation of Risk (LASER) Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 322-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
SAHENA HAQUE ◽  
CAROLINE GORDON ◽  
DAVID ISENBERG ◽  
ANISUR RAHMAN ◽  
PETER LANYON ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Clinical Setting ◽  
Organ Involvement ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Chd Risk ◽  
Control Disease

Objective. Accelerated atherosclerosis and premature coronary heart disease (CHD) are recognized complications of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but the exact etiology remains unclear and is likely to be multifactorial. We hypothesized that SLE patients with CHD have increased exposure to traditional risk factors as well as differing disease phenotype and therapy-related factors compared to SLE patients free of CHD. Our aim was to examine risk factors for development of clinical CHD in SLE in the clinical setting.Methods. In a UK-wide multicenter retrospective case-control study we recruited 53 SLE patients with verified clinical CHD (myocardial infarction or angina pectoris) and 96 SLE patients without clinical CHD. Controls were recruited from the same center as the case and matched by disease duration. Charts were reviewed up to time of event for cases, or the same “dummy-date” in controls.Results. SLE patients with clinical CHD were older at the time of event [mean (SD) 53 (10) vs 42 (10) yrs; p < 0.001], more likely to be male [11 (20%) vs 3 (7%); p < 0.001], and had more exposure to all classic CHD risk factors compared to SLE patients without clinical CHD. They were also more likely to have been treated with corticosteroids (OR 2.46; 95% CI 1.03, 5.88) and azathioprine (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.16, 4.67) and to have evidence of damage on the pre-event SLICC damage index (SDI) (OR 2.20; 95% CI 1.09, 4.44). There was no difference between groups with regard to clinical organ involvement or autoantibody profile.Conclusion. Our study highlights the need for clinical vigilance to identify modifiable risk factors in the clinical setting and in particular with male patients. The pattern of organ involvement did not differ in SLE patients with CHD events. However, the higher pre-event SDI, azathioprine exposure, and pattern of damage items (disease-related rather than therapy-related) in cases suggests that a persistent active lupus phenotype contributes to CHD risk. In this regard, corticosteroids and azathioprine may not control disease well enough to prevent CHD. Clinical trials are needed to determine whether classic risk factor modification will have a role in primary prevention of CHD in SLE patients and whether new therapies that control disease activity can better reduce CHD risk.

Longitudinal Evolution of Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 968-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
IGOR KARP ◽  
MICHAL ABRAHAMOWICZ ◽  
PAUL R. FORTIN ◽  
LOUISE PILOTE ◽  
CAROLYN NEVILLE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Chd Risk ◽  
Over Time

Objective.To produce evidence on the longitudinal evolution of risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Methods.Based on data for 115 patients from the Montreal General Hospital Lupus Clinic (1971–2003) and for 4367 control subjects from the Framingham Offspring Study (1971–1994), we investigated the temporal evolution of total serum cholesterol, systolic blood pressure (SBP), body mass index (BMI), blood glucose, and estimated risk for CHD (reflecting the balance of changes in different risk factors). In analyses limited to patients with SLE, we assessed the effect of SLE duration on each risk factor, adjusting for age, calendar time, sex, baseline level of the risk factor, and medication use. Next, we assessed how the adjusted difference in the values of the risk factors between SLE and controls changes over time.Results.Among patients with SLE, longer disease duration was independently associated with higher SBP and blood glucose levels. Compared with controls, these patients appeared to have accelerated rates of increase in total cholesterol, blood glucose, and overall estimated CHD risk. The rate of increase in BMI was lower in patients with SLE than in controls.Conclusion.Elevated CHD risk in patients with SLE appears to be at least partially mediated by accelerated increases in some CHD risk factors, longitudinal trajectories of which increasingly diverge over time from those of population controls.

Optimal Monitoring For Coronary Heart Disease Risk in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Tselios ◽  
Barry J. Sheane ◽  
Dafna D. Gladman ◽  
Murray B. Urowitz
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Carotid Ultrasonography ◽  
Chd Risk ◽  
Specific Factors ◽  
Disease Specific

Objective.Premature coronary heart disease (CHD) significantly affects morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Several studies have detected factors influencing the atherosclerotic process, as well as methods to quantify the atherosclerotic burden in subclinical stages. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the minimum investigations to optimally monitor CHD risk in SLE.Methods.English-restricted literature review was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines through Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases, from inception until May 2014 (Medline until October 2014). Specific search terms included, among others, “SLE,” “atherosclerosis,” “CHD,” “myocardial ischemia,” “acute coronary syndrome,” “myocardial infarction,” and “angina pectoris.” We identified 101 eligible articles, 23 with cardiovascular events (CVE) as endpoints and 78 with measures of subclinical atherosclerosis. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for quality assessment.Results.Certain traditional and disease-specific factors were identified as independent predictors for CHD. Among the former were age (particularly postmenopausal state), male sex, arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking. Disease activity and duration, cumulative damage, antiphospholipid antibodies, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and renal disease were the most consistent disease-related factors. Corticosteroids were linked to increased CHD risk whereas antimalarials were protective. Concerning imaging techniques, carotid ultrasonography (intima-media thickness and plaque) was shown to independently predict CVE.Conclusion.Premature CHD in SLE is multifactorial; modifiable variables should be monitored at frequent intervals to ensure prompt management. Disease-specific factors also affect the atherogenic process and should be evaluated regularly. Carotid ultrasonography may hold promise in predicting CVE in selected high-risk patients.

Abstract P080: The Combined Effect of Low Income and Low Education on Coronary Heart Disease Outcomes in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 131 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marquita W Lewis ◽  
Yulia Khodneva ◽  
Monika M Safford
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Racial Differences ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Annual Household Income ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Education Group ◽  
Chd Risk ◽  
Low Education ◽  
Regards Study

Background: Low income (LoINC) and low education (LoED) have both been associated with higher coronary heart disease (CHD) risk, but few studies have examined the combined effects of both LoINC and LoED. Hypothesis: The combination of LoINC and LoED is more strongly associated with incident CHD than either LoINC and LoED, or neither. Methods: REGARDS recruited 30,239 black and white participants aged > 45 years residing in the 48 contiguous US between 2003-2007. Baseline data included telephone interviews and in-home visits, and follow-up was conducted every 6 months to detect potential events with expert adjudication of endpoints based on medical record review. Low income (LoInc) was defined as annual household income <$35,000, and low education (LoEd) was defined as less than a high school education. Income and education were combined into four mutually exclusive exposure groups (noLoInc+noLoEd, noLoInc+LoEd, LoInc+noLoEd ,LoInc+LoEd, ). CHD outcomes were definite or probable myocardial infarction or acute CHD death. We constructed Cox models estimating the hazard ratios (HR) for CHD, sequentially adjusting for sociodemographics, health behaviors, physiologic parameters, access to healthcare, and stress and depression. Because of significant interaction by age (p<0.001), analyses were stratified at age 65. Results: We analyzed 24,461 participants without baseline CHD, with numbers in each income/education group as shown in the Table. LoInc+LoEd was associated with the highest risk of CHD among those aged < 65 years, but not among those >65 years of age. LoEd was associated with higher CHD risk in those age >65 years and LoInc was not, but LoInc was associated with higher CHD risk in those age < 65 years, but LoEd was not. Conclusion: LoInc+LoEd was associated with the highest CHD risk at younger ages, but not at higher ages. Income was more important than education for CHD risk at younger ages, but education was more important than income at older ages.

Exploring the interplay between job strain and different domains of physical activity on the incidence of coronary heart disease in adult men

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (17) ◽  
pp. 1877-1885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco M Ferrario ◽  
Giovanni Veronesi ◽  
Mattia Roncaioli ◽  
Andreas Holtermann ◽  
Niklas Krause ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Protective Effect ◽  
Job Strain ◽  
Joint Effect ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Chd Risk

Aims The aim of this study was to investigate the independent associations of occupational (OPA) and sport physical activity (SpPA) and job strain on the incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) events, and to explore their interplay. Methods The study sample included 3310 25–64-year-old employed men, free of CHD at baseline, recruited in three population-based and one factory-based cohorts. OPA and SpPA, and job strain were assessed by the Baecke and the Job Content Questionnaires, respectively. We estimated the associations between different domains of physical activity and job strain with CHD, adjusting for major risk factors using Cox models. Results During follow-up (median=14 years), 120 CHD events, fatal and non-fatal, occurred. In the entire sample, a higher CHD risk was found for high job strain (hazard ratio=1.55, 95% confidence interval: 1.05–2.31). The joint effect of low OPA and high job strain was estimated as a hazard ratio of 2.53 (1.29–4.97; reference intermediate OPA with non-high strain). With respect to intermediate OPA workers, in stratified analysis when SpPA is none, low OPA workers had a hazard ratio of 2.13 (95% confidence interval: 1.19–3.81), increased to 3.95 (1.79–8.78) by the presence of high job strain. Low OPA–high job strain workers take great advantage from SpPA, reducing their risk up to 90%. In contrast, the protective effect of SpPA on CHD in other OPA–job strain categories was modest or even absent, in particular when OPA is high. Conclusions Our study shows a protective effect of recommended and intermediate SpPA levels on CHD risk among sedentary male workers. When workers are jointly exposed to high job strain and sedentary work their risk further increases, but this group benefits most from regular sport physical activity.

scholarly journals Risk of coronary heart disease among cancer survivors with different prediagnosis body mass index

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahryoung Ko ◽  
Kyuwoong Kim ◽  
Joung Sik Son ◽  
Yu Jin Cho ◽  
Sang Min Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Cancer Site ◽  
Chd Risk

AbstractAssociation between body mass index (BMI) and coronary heart disease (CHD) in cancer survivors is not clearly established. This study analyzed the prediagnosis BMI-CHD association by examining 13,500 cancer survivors identified from the National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2009 including the patients who were free of cardiovascular disease at enrollment. The Cox proportional hazards model (adjusted for socioeconomic, health behavior, health status, and medical characteristics) was used for calculating hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for CHD in each prediagnosis BMI category among cancer survivors. Compared to cancer survivors with a prediagnosis BMI between 18.5 and 22.9 kg/m2, those with a prediagnosis BMI of 23.0–24.9 kg/m2 and ≥ 25.0 kg/m2 had significantly higher CHD risk (HR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.13–2.01 and HR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.04–1.84, respectively). Cancer survivors with a low prediagnosis BMI (< 18.5 kg/m2) also had significantly higher CHD risk (HR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.20–3.24) compared to those with a BMI of 18.5–22.9 kg/m2. Similar associations were found after stratifying analyses based on first cancer site and sociodemographic and medical characteristic subgroups. Our study suggests that prediagnosis underweight among patients with cancer is a predictor of CHD risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document