scholarly journals Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Patients Undergoing Heart Transplantation: A 7-Year Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-yi Hou ◽  
Xin Li ◽  
Shou-guo Yang ◽  
Ji-li Zheng ◽  
Jie-fei Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Heart Transplantation ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Ecmo Support ◽  
Circulatory Support ◽  
Orthotopic Heart Transplantation ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Va Ecmo

Objective: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the leading cause of early death after heart transplantation. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) can provide temporary mechanical circulatory support and time for functional recovery of the transplanted heart. The purpose of this study was to analyze the timing and prognoses of VA-ECMO in patients with severe PGD after heart transplantation.Methods: A total of 130 patients underwent heart transplantation at the Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated with Fudan University between January 2014 and December 2020. All patients received basiliximab immunoinduction and a classic double vena cava anastomosis orthotopic heart transplantation. Among them, 29 patients (22.3%) developed severe PGD in the early postoperative period. VA-ECMO was performed in patients with difficulty weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) or postoperative refractory cardiogenic shock. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not they were successfully weaned from VA-ECMO (patients who survived for 48 h after weaning and did not need VA-ECMO assistance again). The perioperative clinical data were recorded, and all patients were followed up until discharge. Early outcomes were compared between groups.Results: A total of 29 patients with VA-ECMO support after heart transplantation were included in this study. The proportion of patients receiving VA-ECMO was 22.3% (29/130). Nineteen patients (65.5%) needed VA-ECMO due to difficulty with weaning from CPB, and 10 patients required VA-ECMO for postoperative cardiogenic shock. Nineteen patients (65.5%) were successfully weaned from VA-ECMO. Overall, in-hospital mortality of VA-ECMO support patients was 55.2%. The main causes of death were ventricular fibrillation (four cases), major bleeding (three cases), infection (four cases), and graft failure (five cases).Conclusion: Despite advances in heart transplantation, severe PGD remains a lethal complication after heart transplantation. At present, the treatment for severe PGD after heart transplantation is a challenge. VA-ECMO provides an effective treatment for severe PGD after heart transplantation, which can promote graft function recovery.

scholarly journals Overview of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) Support for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adamantios Tsangaris ◽  
Tamas Alexy ◽  
Rajat Kalra ◽  
Marinos Kosmopoulos ◽  
Andrea Elliott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
The United States ◽  
Ecmo Support ◽  
Circulatory Support ◽  
Hemodynamic Support ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Va Ecmo

Cardiogenic shock accounts for ~100,000 annual hospital admissions in the United States. Despite improvements in medical management strategies, in-hospital mortality remains unacceptably high. Multiple mechanical circulatory support devices have been developed with the aim to provide hemodynamic support and to improve outcomes in this population. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is the most advanced temporary life support system that is unique in that it provides immediate and complete hemodynamic support as well as concomitant gas exchange. In this review, we discuss the fundamental concepts and hemodynamic aspects of VA-ECMO support in patients with cardiogenic shock of various etiologies. In addition, we review the common indications, contraindications and complications associated with VA-ECMO use.

scholarly journals Biventricular Unloading with Impella and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Implications from the Combined Use of the Devices and Prognostic Risk Factors of Survival

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 747
Author(s):  
Georgios Chatzis ◽  
Styliani Syntila ◽  
Birgit Markus ◽  
Holger Ahrens ◽  
Nikolaos Patsalis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Circulatory Support ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Refractory Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Lactate Levels ◽  
Va Ecmo

Since mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have become integral component in the therapy of refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS), we identified 67 patients in biventricular support with Impella and venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for RCS between February 2013 and December 2019 and evaluated the risk factors of mortality in this setting. Mean age was 61.07 ± 10.7 and 54 (80.6%) patients were male. Main cause of RCS was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (74.6%), while 44 (65.7%) were resuscitated prior to admission. The mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA) score on admission was 73.54 ± 16.03 and 12.25 ± 2.71, respectively, corresponding to an expected mortality of higher than 80%. Vasopressor doses and lactate levels were significantly decreased within 72 h on biventricular support (p < 0.05 for both). Overall, 17 (25.4%) patients were discharged to cardiac rehabilitation and 5 patients (7.5%) were bridged successfully to ventricular assist device implantation, leading to a total of 32.8% survival on hospital discharge. The 6-month survival was 31.3%. Lactate > 6 mmol/L, vasoactive score > 100 and pH < 7.26 on initiation of biventricular support, as well as Charlson comorbity index > 3 and prior resuscitation were independent predictors of survival. In conclusion, biventricular support with Impella and VA-ECMO in patients with RCS is feasible and efficient leading to a better survival than predicted through traditional risk scores, mainly via significant hemodynamic improvement and reduction in lactate levels.

scholarly journals Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in staged combined heart–kidney transplant

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tareq Al Saadi ◽  
Christopher Sciamanna ◽  
Ambar Andrade ◽  
Sunil Pauwaa ◽  
Gregory Macaluso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplantation ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Heart Transplantation ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ Transplantation ◽  
Orthotopic Heart Transplantation ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Va Ecmo

Abstract Outside of heart and lung transplantation, only few cases have been reported describing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) use in solid organ transplantation. We present a case of a staged combined heart–kidney transplant in which VA-ECMO was utilized after a complicated orthotopic heart transplantation to successfully complete the subsequent renal transplantation.

scholarly journals Ten thousand kilometre transfer of cardiogenic shock patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for emergency heart transplantation: Cooperation between Reunion Island and Metropolitan France

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clément Charon ◽  
Jérôme Allyn ◽  
Bruno Bouchet ◽  
Fréderic Nativel ◽  
Eric Braunberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Heart Transplantation ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Reunion Island ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Réunion Island ◽  
Va Ecmo

Background: There is no heart transplantation centre on the French overseas territory of Reunion Island (distance of 10,000 km). The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of cardiogenic shock adult patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) who were transferred from Reunion Island to mainland France for emergency heart transplantation. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted between 2005 and 2015. The characteristics and outcome of cardiogenic shock patients on VA-ECMO were compared with those of cardiogenic shock patients not on VA-ECMO. Results: Thirty-three cardiogenic shock adult patients were transferred from Reunion Island to Paris for emergency heart transplantation. Among them, 19 (57.6%) needed mechanical circulatory support in the form of VA-ECMO. Median age was 51 (33–57) years and 46% of the patients had ischaemic heart disease. Patients on VA-ECMO presented higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score ( p = 0.03). No death occurred during the medical transfer by long flight, while severe complications occurred in 10 patients (30.3%). Incidence of thromboembolic events, severe infectious complications and major haemorrhages was higher in the group of patients on VA-ECMO than in the group of patients not on VA-ECMO ( p <0.01). Seven patients from the VA-ECMO group (36.8%) and six patients from the non-VA-ECMO group (42.9%, p=0.7) underwent heart transplantation after a median delay of 10 (4–29) days on the emergency waiting list. After heart transplantation, one-year survival rates were 85.7% for patients on VA-ECMO and 83.3% for patients not on VA-ECMO ( p=0.91). Conclusions: This study suggests the feasibility of very long-distance medical evacuation of cardiogenic shock patients on VA-ECMO for emergency heart transplantation, with acceptable long-term results.

A retrospective cohort analysis of percutaneous versus side-graft perfusion techniques for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock

Perfusion ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 363-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Cakici ◽  
Evren Ozcinar ◽  
Cagdas Baran ◽  
Ahmet Onat Bermede ◽  
Mehmet Cahit Sarıcaoglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Femoral Artery ◽  
Vascular Complications ◽  
Ecmo Support ◽  
Acute Limb Ischemia ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Refractory Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Cannulation Site ◽  
Va Ecmo

Objectives: This study was designed to compare vascular complications and the outcomes of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous cannulation with distal perfusion catheter (PC-DP) and arterial side-graft perfusion (SGP) techniques in patients who require veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support for refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study of consequtive patients with RCS treated with VA-ECMO at a single transplant center from March 2010 until August 2015. Overall, 148 patients underwent VA-ECMO for RCS (99 men, aged 56.6 ± 12.0 years; BSA, 1.85 ± 0.19). Patients were categorized based on VA-ECMO perfusion technique into PC-DP via femoral artery and SGP via axillary/femoral artery groups. Results: The median duration of VA-ECMO support was 5 days (range, 8 hours–80 days). Hospital mortality (PC-DP group, 54.7%; SGP group, 64.4%; p=0.23) and overall ECMO survival (PC-DP group, 36.9%; SGP group, 32.2%; p=0.47) was similar between the groups. There were no significant between-group differences in the rate of acute limb ischemia (PC-DP group, 4/75, 5.3%; SGP group, 2/73, 2.7%; p=0.68). However, the rate of surgical/cannulation site bleeding (PC-DP, 9/75 (12%) vs SGP, 18/73 (24.7%), p=0.05) and hyperperfusion syndrome (PC-DP, 2/75 (2.7%) vs SGP, 22/73 (30.1%),p=0.001) were higher in the SGP group than in the PC-DP group. Conclusions: We observed no significant difference in major vascular complications or survival between patients who underwent the PC-DP technique and those who underwent arterial SGP.

Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiogenic Shock: Lifeline of Modern Day CICU

2019 ◽  
pp. 088506661989454
Author(s):  
Aniket S. Rali ◽  
Jonathan Chandler ◽  
Andrew Sauer ◽  
Michael A. Solomon ◽  
Zubair Shah
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Mechanical Circulatory Support ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Circulatory Support ◽  
Steady Increase ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Support ◽  
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Va Ecmo

Cardiogenic shock (CS) portends an extremely high mortality of nearly 50% during index hospitalization. Prompt diagnoses of CS, its underlying etiology, and efficient implementation of treatment modalities, including mechanical circulatory support (MCS), are critical especially in light of such high predicted mortality. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides the most comprehensive cardiopulmonary support in critically ill patients and hence has seen a steady increase in its utilization over the past decade. Hence, a good understanding of VA-ECMO, its role in treatment of CS, especially when compared with other temporary MCS devices, and its complications are vital for any critical care cardiologist. Our review of VA-ECMO aims to provide the same.

scholarly journals Massive aspiration syndrome: a possible indication for “emergent” veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation?: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emiliano Gamberini ◽  
Venerino Poletti ◽  
Emanuele Russo ◽  
Alessandro Circelli ◽  
Marco Benni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
White Male ◽  
Ecmo Support ◽  
Circulatory Support ◽  
Lung Protective Ventilation ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Va Ecmo ◽  
Vv Ecmo

Abstract Background Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is usually performed in cases of severe respiratory failure in which conventional and advanced mechanical ventilation strategies are ineffective in achieving true lung-protective ventilation, thus triggering ventilatory-induced lung injury. If circulatory failure coexists, veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) may be preferred over VV-ECMO because of its potential for circulatory support. In VA-ECMO, the respiratory contribution is less effective and the complication rate is higher than in the VV configuration. Case presentation The authors present a case in which VV-ECMO was performed in an emergency setting to treat a 68-year-old White male patient who experienced acute respiratory failure after massive aspiration. Despite intubation and intensive care unit admission, multiple organ failure occurred suddenly, thus prompting referral to a level-1 trauma center with an ECMO facility. The patient’s condition slowly improved with VV-ECMO support along with standard treatment for hemodynamic impairment. VV-ECMO was discontinued on day 8. The patient was extubated on day 14 and discharged home fully recovered 34 days after the event. Conclusions Attention was focused on the decision to initiate VV-ECMO support even in the presence of severe hemodynamic derangement, although VA-ECMO could have provided better hemodynamic support but less effective respiratory support.

Perioperative, protective use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in complex thoracic surgery

Perfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 026765912110110
Author(s):  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Ming Luo ◽  
Bo Wang ◽  
Zhen Qin ◽  
Ronghua Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Circulatory Support ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Thoracic Surgical Procedures ◽  
One Year ◽  
Va Ecmo

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used in patients undergoing complex thoracic surgical procedures. However, studies reporting the clinical outcomes of these patients are limited to case reports, without real consensus. Our aim was to evaluate the perioperative use of ECMO as respiratory and/or circulatory support in thoracic surgery: indications, benefits, and perioperative management. Methods: Between May 2013 and December 2018, we reviewed the clinical data of 15 patients (11 males and 4 females; mean age: 47 years old; range, 25–73 years) undergoing ECMO-assisted thoracic surgery in our hospital. Results: Of the 15 patients, 10 cases received peripheral veno-arterial (VA) ECMO and five cases received veno-venous (VV) ECMO. Indications for ECMO were pulmonary transplantation with hard-to-maintain oxygenation (n = 5), traumatic main bronchial rupture (n = 2), traumatic lung injury (n = 1), airway tumor leading to severe airway stenosis (n = 2), huge thoracic mass infiltrated vena cava (n = 5). The ECMO duration was 1–51 hours. All patients were successfully extubated and weaned from ECMO postoperatively. The main complications were hemorrhage (26.7%), infection (33.3%), acute hepatic dysfunction (33.3%), and venous thrombosis (26.7%). There was only one hospital death and postoperative one-year survival rate was 86%. Conclusion: Our experience indicates that ECMO is a feasible method for complex trachea-bronchial surgery, huge thoracic mass excision and lung transplantation, and the ECMO-related risks may be justified. With further accumulation of experience with ECMO, a more sophisticated protocol for management of critical airway or heart failure problems in thoracic surgeries can be derived.

scholarly journals IMPELLA® or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Left Ventricular Dominant Refractory Cardiogenic Shock

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 759
Author(s):  
Guillaume Schurtz ◽  
Natacha Rousse ◽  
Ouriel Saura ◽  
Vincent Balmette ◽  
Flavien Vincent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Mechanical Circulatory Support ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Circulatory Support ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Refractory Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Va Ecmo ◽  
Unadjusted Analysis

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are effective tools in managing refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Data comparing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and IMPELLA® are however scarce. We aimed to assess outcomes of patients implanted with these two devices and eligible to both systems. From 2004 to 2020, we retrospectively analyzed 128 patients who underwent VA-ECMO or IMPELLA® in our institution for refractory left ventricle (LV) dominant CS. All patients were eligible to both systems: 97 patients were first implanted with VA-ECMO and 31 with IMPELLA®. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause death. VA-ECMO patients were younger (52 vs. 59.4, p = 0.006) and had a higher lactate level at baseline than those in the IMPELLA® group (6.84 vs. 3.03 mmol/L, p < 0.001). Duration of MCS was similar between groups (9.4 days vs. 6 days in the VA-ECMO and IMPELLA® groups respectively, p = 0.077). In unadjusted analysis, no significant difference was observed between groups in 30-day mortality: 43.3% vs. 58.1% in the VA-ECMO and IMPELLA® groups, respectively (p = 0.152). After adjustment, VA-ECMO was associated with a significant reduction in 30-day mortality (HR = 0.25, p = 0.004). A higher rate of MCS escalation was observed in the IMPELLA® group: 32.3% vs. 10.3% (p = 0.003). In patients eligible to either VA-ECMO or IMPELLA® for LV dominant refractory CS, VA-ECMO was associated with improved survival rate and a lower need for escalation.

scholarly journals Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with or without simultaneous intra-aortic balloon pump support as a direct bridge to heart transplantation: results from a nationwide Spanish registry

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 670-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gonzalo Barge-Caballero ◽  
María A Castel-Lavilla ◽  
Luis Almenar-Bonet ◽  
Iris P Garrido-Bravo ◽  
Juan F Delgado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Heart Transplantation ◽  
Ecmo Support ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Intra Aortic Balloon Pump ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Iabp Support ◽  
Va Ecmo

Abstract OBJECTIVES To investigate the potential clinical benefit of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a bridge to heart transplantation (HT). METHODS We studied 169 patients who were listed for urgent HT under VA-ECMO support at 16 Spanish institutions from 2010 to 2015. The clinical outcomes of patients under simultaneous IABP support (n = 73) were compared to a control group of patients without IABP support (n = 96). RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences between the IABP and control groups with regard to the cumulative rates of transplantation (71.2% vs 81.2%, P = 0.17), death during VA-ECMO support (20.6% vs 14.6%, P = 0.31), transition to a different mechanical circulatory support device (5.5% vs 5.2%, P = 0.94) or weaning from VA-ECMO support due to recovery (2.7% vs 0%, P = 0.10). There was a higher incidence of bleeding events in the IABP group (45.2% vs 25%, P = 0.006; adjusted odds ratio 2.18, 95% confidence interval 1.02–4.67). In-hospital postoperative mortality after HT was 34.6% in the IABP group and 32.5% in the control group (P = 0.80). One-year survival after listing for urgent HT was 53.3% in the IABP group and 52.2% in the control group (log rank P = 0.75). Multivariate adjustment for potential confounders did not change this result (adjusted hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.56–1.58). CONCLUSIONS In our study, simultaneous IABP therapy in transplant candidates under VA-ECMO support did not significantly reduce morbidity or mortality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document