scholarly journals Developing and Validating Novel Nomograms for Predicting the Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Survival of Patients With Primary Vulvar Squamous Cell Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weili Zhou ◽  
Yangyang Yue
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Squamous Cell Cancer ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Calibration Plot ◽  
Net Benefit ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Decision Curve Analysis ◽  
Best Fit

Background: To develop and validate novel nomograms for better predicting the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with vulvar squamous cell cancer (VSCC).Methods: A retrospective analysis using a population-based database between 2004 and 2016 was carried. A 10-fold cross-validation with 200 repetitions was used to choose the best fit multivariate Cox model based on the net-benefit of decision curve analysis. Net-benefit, Harrell's C concordance statistic (C-statistic) of calibration plot, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the model prediction accuracy. Nomograms of the OS and CSS were generated based on the best fit model.Results: Of the 6,792 patients with VSCC, 5,094 (75%) and 1,698 (25%) were allocated to the training and validation cohort, respectively. All the variables were balanced between the training and validation cohorts. Age, insurance, tumor size, pathological grade, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, invasion depth, lymphadenectomy, sentinel lymph nodes biopsy, surgery, N stage, and M stage were in the best fit model for generating nomograms. The decision curve analysis, calibration plot, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve show the better prediction performance of the model compared to previous studies. The C-statistics of our model for OS prediction are 0.80, 0.83, and 0.81 in the training, validation, and overall cohorts, respectively, while for CSS prediction are 0.83, 0.85, and 0.84. The AUCs for 3- and 5-year OS are the same and are 0.81, 0.83, and 0.81 in the training, validation, and overall cohorts, respectively. The AUCs for 3- and 5-year CSS are 0.78 and 0.80, 0.79 and 0.80, and 0.79 and 0.80 in those three cohorts.Conclusions: Our model shows the best prediction accuracy of the OS and CSS for patients with vulvar cancer (VC), which is of significant clinical practice value.

scholarly journals Establishment and Validation of a Clinically Predictive Nomogram Model for Thyroid Carcinoma Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruyi Zhang ◽  
Mei Xu ◽  
Xiangxiang Liu ◽  
Miao Wang ◽  
Qiang Jia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Cancer Staging ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Calibration Plot ◽  
Net Benefit ◽  
Training Set ◽  
Decision Curve Analysis ◽  
Validation Set ◽  
Good Calibration

Abstract Objectives To develop a clinically predictive nomogram model which can maximize patients’ net benefit in terms of predicting the prognosis of patients with thyroid carcinoma based on the 8th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging method. MethodsWe selected 134,962 thyroid carcinoma patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from SEER database with details of the 8th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and separated those patients into two datasets randomly. The first dataset, training set, was used to build the nomogram model accounting for 80% (94,474 cases) and the second dataset, validation set, was used for external validation accounting for 20% (40,488 cases). Then we evaluated its clinical availability by analyzing DCA (Decision Curve Analysis) performance and evaluated its accuracy by calculating AUC, C-index as well as calibration plot.ResultsDecision curve analysis showed the final prediction model could maximize patients’ net benefit. In training set and validation set, Harrell’s Concordance Indexes were 0.9450 and 0.9421 respectively. Both sensitivity and specificity of three predicted time points (12 Months,36 Months and 60 Months) of two datasets were all above 0.80 except sensitivity of 60-month time point of validation set was 0.7662. AUCs of three predicted timepoints were 0.9562, 0.9273 and 0.9009 respectively for training set. Similarly, those numbers were 0.9645, 0.9329, and 0.8894 respectively for validation set. Calibration plot also showed that the nomogram model had a good calibration.ConclusionThe final nomogram model provided with both excellent accuracy and clinical availability and should be able to predict patients’ survival probability visually and accurately.

scholarly journals Nomograms-based prediction of overall and cancer-specific survivals for patients with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

2020 ◽  
pp. 153537022097710
Author(s):  
Chunyang Chen ◽  
Xinyu Geng ◽  
Rui Liang ◽  
Dongze Zhang ◽  
Meiyun Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Decision Curve Analysis

This study built and tested two effective nomograms for the purpose of predicting cancer-specific survival and overall survival of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was employed to filter independent prognostic factors predictive of cancer-specific survival and overall survival, and the nomograms were built based on a training set incorporating 2901 chRCC patients in a retrospective study (from 2004 to 2015) downloaded from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database. The nomograms were verified on a validation cohort of 1934 patients, subsequently the performances of the nomograms were examined according to the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curves, the concordance (C-index), and decision curve analysis. The results showed that tumor grade, AJCC and N stages, race, marital status, age, histories of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery were the individual prognostic factors for overall survival, and that AJCC, N and SEER stages, histories of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, age, tumor grade were individual prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival. According to C-indexes, receiver operating characteristic curves, and decision curve analysis outcomes, the nomograms showed a higher accuracy in predicting overall survival and OSS when compared with TNM stage and SEER stage. All the calibration curves were significantly consistent between predictive and validation sets. In this study, the nomograms, which were validated to be highly accurate and applicable, were built to facilitate individualized predictions of the cancer-specific survival and overall survival to patients diagnosed with chRCC between 2004 and 2015.

scholarly journals Dynamic nomograms combining N classification with ratio-based nodal classifications to predict long-term survival for patients with lung adenocarcinoma after surgery: a SEER population-based study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suyu Wang ◽  
Yue Yu ◽  
Wenting Xu ◽  
Xin Lv ◽  
Yufeng Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Information Criterion ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Tnm Stage ◽  
Concordance Index ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Decision Curve Analysis

Abstract Background The prognostic roles of three lymph node classifications, number of positive lymph nodes (NPLN), log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), and lymph node ratio (LNR) in lung adenocarcinoma are unclear. We aim to find the classification with the strongest predictive power and combine it with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th TNM stage to establish an optimal prognostic nomogram. Methods 25,005 patients with T1-4N0–2M0 lung adenocarcinoma after surgery between 2004 to 2016 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were included. The study cohort was divided into training cohort (13,551 patients) and external validation cohort (11,454 patients) according to different geographic region. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed on the training cohort to evaluate the predictive performance of NPLN (Model 1), LODDS (Model 2), LNR (Model 3) or LODDS+LNR (Model 4) respectively for cancer-specific survival and overall survival. Likelihood-ratio χ2 test, Akaike Information Criterion, Harrell concordance index, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the models. Nomograms were established according to the optimal models. They’re put into internal validation using bootstrapping technique and external validation using calibration curves. Nomograms were compared with AJCC 8th TNM stage using decision curve analysis. Results NPLN, LODDS and LNR were independent prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival and overall survival. LODDS+LNR (Model 4) demonstrated the highest Likelihood-ratio χ2 test, highest Harrell concordance index, and lowest Akaike Information Criterion, and IDI and NRI values suggested Model 4 had better prediction accuracy than other models. Internal and external validations showed that the nomograms combining TNM stage with LODDS+LNR were convincingly precise. Decision curve analysis suggested the nomograms performed better than AJCC 8th TNM stage in clinical practicability. Conclusions We constructed online nomograms for cancer-specific survival and overall survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients after surgery, which may facilitate doctors to provide highly individualized therapy.

P0560POST-DISCHARGE FOLLOW UP AFTER AKI. AN EXTERNAL VALIDATION AND DECISION CURVE ANALYSIS OF TWO RISK MODELS

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Sawhney ◽  
Zhi Tan ◽  
Corri Black ◽  
Brenda Hemmelgarn ◽  
Angharad Marks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Model ◽  
Discharge Planning ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Net Benefit ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Decision Curve Analysis ◽  
One Year ◽  
Unplanned Admissions

Abstract Background and Aims There is limited evidence to inform which people should receive follow up after AKI and for what reasons. Here we report the external validation (geographical and temporal) and potential clinical utility of two complementary models for predicting different post-discharge outcomes after AKI. We used decision curve analysis, a technique that enables visualisation of the trade-off (net benefit) between identifying true positives and avoiding false positives across a range of potential risk thresholds for a risk model. Based on decision curve analysis we compared model guided approaches to follow up after AKI with alternative strategies of standardised follow up – e.g. follow up of all people with AKI, severe AKI, or a discharge eGFR<30. Method The Alberta AKI risk model predicts the risk of stage G4 CKD at one year after AKI among those with a baseline GFR>=45 and at least 90 days survival (2004-2014, n=9973). A trial is now underway using this tool at a 10% threshold to identify high risk people who may benefit from specialist nephrology follow up. The Aberdeen AKI risk model provides complementary predictions of early mortality or unplanned readmissions within 90 days of discharge (2003, n=16453), aimed at supporting non-specialists in discharge planning, with a threshold of 20-40% considered clinically appropriate in the study. For the Alberta model we externally validated using Grampian residents with hospital AKI in 2011-2013 (n=9382). For the Aberdeen model we externally validated using all people admitted to hospital in Grampian in 2012 (n=26575). Analysis code was shared between the sites to maximise reproducibility. Results Both models discriminated well in the external validation cohorts (AUC 0.855 for CKD G4, and AUC 0.774 for death and readmissions model), but as both models overpredicted risks, recalibration was performed. For both models, decision curve analysis showed that prioritisation of patients based on the presence or severity of AKI would be inferior to a model guided approach. For predicting CKD G4 progression at one year, a strategy guided by discharge eGFR<30 was similar to a model guided approach at the prespecified 10% threshold (figure 1). In contrast for early unplanned admissions and mortality, model guided approaches were superior at the prespecified 20-40% threshold (figure 2). Conclusion In conclusion, prioritising AKI follow up is complex and standardised recommendations for all people may be an inefficient and inadequate way of guiding clinical follow-up. Guidelines for AKI follow up should consider suggesting an individualised approach both with respect to purpose and prioritisation.

Utility of PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG urinary biomarkers in African American men undergoing prostate biopsy.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 126-126
Author(s):  
Allison H. Feibus ◽  
A. Oliver Sartor ◽  
Krishnarao Moparty ◽  
Michael W. Kattan ◽  
Kevin M. Chagin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
African American Men ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Net Benefit ◽  
Racially Diverse ◽  
Decision Curve Analysis ◽  
History Of

126 Background: To determine the performance characteristics of urinary PCA3 andTMPRSS2:ERG (T2:ERG) in a racially diverse group of men. Methods: Following IRB approval, from 2013-2015, post digital rectal exam (DRE) urine was prospectively collected in patients without known prostate cancer (PCa), prior to biopsy. PCA3 and T2:ERG RNA copies were quantified and normalized to PSA mRNA copies using Progensa assay (Hologic, San Diego, CA). Prediction models for PCa and high-grade PCa were created using standard of care (SOC) variables (age, race, family history of PCa, prior prostate biopsy and abnormal DRE) plus PSA. Decision Curve Analysis was performed to compare the net benefit of using SOC, plus PSA, with the addition of PCA3 and T2:ERG. Results: Of 304 patients, 182 (60%) were AA; 139(46%) were diagnosed with PCa (69% AA). PCA3 and T2:ERG scores were greater in men with PCa, ≥ 3 cores, ≥ 33.3% cores, > 50% involvement of greatest biopsy core and Epstein significant PCa (p-values < 0.04). PCA3 added to the SOC plus PSA model for the detection of any PCa in the overall cohort (0.747 vs 0.677; p < 0.0001), in AA only (0.711 vs 0.638; p = 0.0002) and non-AA (0.781 vs 0.732; p = 0.0016). PCA3 added to the model for the prediction of high-grade PCa for the overall cohort (0.804 vs 0.78; p = 0.0002) and AA only (0.759 vs 0.717; p = 0.0003) but not non-AA. Decision curve analysis demonstrated significant net benefit with the addition of PCA3 compared with SOC plus PSA. For AA, T2:ERG did not improve concordance statistics for the detection any or high-grade PCa. Conclusions: For AA, urinary PCA3 improves the ability to predict the presence of any and high-grade PCa. However for this population, T2:ERG urinary assay does not add significantly to standard detection and risk stratification tools.

Screening for aggressive prostate cancer: A single-center experience using the 4Kscore and multiparametric MRI for the detection of Gleason 7 or higher prostate cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 84-84
Author(s):  
Vivek Venkatramani ◽  
Bruno Nahar ◽  
Tulay Koru-Sengul ◽  
Nachiketh Soodana-Prakash ◽  
Mark L. Gonzalgo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Net Benefit ◽  
Decision Curve Analysis ◽  
Aggressive Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer Detection

84 Background: While non-invasive biomarkers and multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) are routinely used for prostate cancer detection, few studies have assessed their performance together. We evaluated the performance of mpMRI and the 4Kscore for the detection of significant prostate cancer. Methods: We identified a consecutive series of men who underwent an mpMRI and 4Kscore for evaluation of prostate cancer at the University of Miami. We selected those who underwent a biopsy of the prostate. The primary outcome was the presence of Gleason 7 or higher cancer on biopsy. The 4Kscore was modeled as a continuous variable, but also categorized into low ( < 7.5%), intermediate (7.5-20%), and high ( > 20) risk scores. The mpMRI was categorized as being either negative or positive for a suspicion of cancer. We used logistic regression and Decision Curve Analysis to report the discrimination and clinical utility of using mpMRI and the 4Kscore for prostate cancer detection. Finally, we modeled the probability of harboring a Gleason 7 or higher prostate cancer based on various categories of the 4Kscore and mpMRI. Results: Among 235 men who underwent a 4Kscore and mpMRI, only 112 (52%) were referred for a biopsy, allowing a significant proportion of men to avoid a biopsy. Among those who had a biopsy, the AUC for using the 4Kscore and mpMRI together [0.81(0.72-0.90)] was superior to using the 4Kscore [0.71(0.61-0.81);p = 0.004] and mpMRI [0.74(0.65-0.83);p = 0.02] alone. Similarly, decision curve analysis revealed the highest net benefit for using both tests together, compared to either test alone. Finally, we found that having a positive mpMRI was a predictor of aggressive cancer in the higher two 4Kscores, but not in the lowest category, suggesting that men with a low 4Kscore may not benefit from getting an mpMRI, most likely due to the low likelihood of cancer and having a positive mpMRI. Conclusions: The 4Kscore and mpMRI provides independent, but complementary, information to enhance the prediction of aggressive prostate cancer. Prospective trials are required to confirm these findings.

Development of a composite biomarker-based calculator to predict the probability of pathologic complete response (pT0) after neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (pembro) in muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 539-539
Author(s):  
Andrea Necchi ◽  
Joshua J. Meeks ◽  
Marco Bandini ◽  
Leigh Ann Fall ◽  
Daniele Raggi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Risk Calculator ◽  
Net Benefit ◽  
Decision Curve Analysis ◽  
Post Therapy

539 Background: The PURE01 study (NCT02736266) evaluates the use of pembro before radical cystectomy (RC) in MIBC. We assessed selected individual and combined biomarkers for predicting pT0 response after pembro, and developed a tool that may be used as an aid for clinical decision-making. Methods: Patients (pts) enrolled in the PURE01 were clinical (c) stage T≤4aN0M0 MIBC. Analysis to date included a comprehensive genomic profiling (FoundationONE assay), programmed cell-death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score assessment (CPS, Dako 22C3 antibody) and whole transcriptome (Decipher assay) and RNA-seq profiling of pre/post therapy samples. Multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVA) evaluated baseline cT-stage and biomarkers in association with pT0 response. Corresponding coefficients were used to develop a risk calculator based on the tumor mutational burden (TMB), CPS, Immune190 signature score, and cT-stage. Decision-curve analysis was performed. Results: Complete biomarker data was available for 84 pts. Increasing TMB, CPS, and Immune190 scores showed a linear positive correlation with the pT0 probability in logistic regression (p=0.02, p=0.004, p=0.02). The c-index of the risk calculator was 0.79. Decision-curve analysis found the net-benefit of the model was higher than the “treat-all” option within the clinically-meaningful threshold probabilities of achieving a pT0 of 40-60%. Within this range, adding the Immune190 score improved the model over TMB and CPS. A significant decrease in median TMB values was observed (p=0.005) in 24 matched RC, versus a non-significant change in median CPS in 38 matched RC. Molecular subtyping switching was observed in 20/31 matched cases (64.5%), most frequently to the luminal-infiltrated subtype (80%). Conclusions: The study presents the first composite biomarker-based pT0 probability calculator for optimal pt selection. Pending validation, the model may be used to recommend neoadjuvant pembro to very selected MIBC pts. The observed changes in biomarker features in post-therapy samples may have an impact on future adjuvant strategies. Clinical trial information: NCT02736266.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document