scholarly journals Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Salvage Radiation for Postoperative Lymph Node Recurrence of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi Zhang ◽  
Xiao-Lin Ge ◽  
Chen-Jun Huang ◽  
Shu Zhang ◽  
Xin-Chen Sun
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Combined Chemotherapy ◽  
Regional Lymph Nodes ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Salvage Resection

Purpose: Recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in regional lymph nodes (LNs) after surgical section can be treated with salvage resection, radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). RT or CRT is more widely used in clinic. This paper investigates the effects, toxicities and prognostic risk factors of salvage RT or CRT on patients with LN recurrence.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of 103 patients receiving salvage RT or CRT for LN recurrence after ESCC resection. In total, 39 patients received RT alone and 64 received concurrent CRT. All the patients received intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), administered with a median dose of 62 Gy (range, 50–70 Gy).Results: The median follow-up time was 44.5 months, and median survival was 22.5 months (5.5–99.5 months). One-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 80.6, 37.0, and 25.8%, respectively. One- and 2-year progression free survival (PFS) were 57.3 and 34.0%, respectively. Grade 3 or above toxicity was low (16.5%) and no treatment-related deaths occurred. In univariate analysis of OS, pN0 (p = 0.039), smaller LN volume (≤25 cm3, p = 0.019), combined chemotherapy (p = 0.041) and single LN recurrence (p = 0.001) were associated with prolonged OS. And pT1-2 (p = 0.044), pN0 (p = 0.042), irradiation dose (>60 Gy, p = 0.044), combined chemotherapy (p = 0.019) and single LN recurrence (p = 0.002) were associated with prolonged PFS. In multivariate analysis, the patients with only one recurrent node had a significant better OS (HR = 0.556, 95% CI 0.324–0.956, p = 0.034) and PFS (HR = 0.528, 95% CI 0.339–0.847, p = 0.008).Conclusions: Salvage RT or CRT for regional LN recurrence is effective and acceptable. Fewer recurrent nodes may indicate a better long-term survival.

scholarly journals Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis along the left gastric artery in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuan Liu ◽  
Leilei Wu ◽  
Dongkun Zhang ◽  
Peng Lin ◽  
Hao Long ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Left Gastric Artery ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Gastric Artery ◽  
Term Survival

Abstract Background Although the incidence of lymph node (LN) metastasis (LNM) along the left gastric artery is high, its relationship with the prognosis in postoperative patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is rarely reported. This study clarified the prognostic impact of LNM along the left gastric artery in postoperative patients with ESCC. Methods This study assessed data of 1521 patients with ESCC who underwent esophagectomy at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between March 1992 and March 2012. A chi-squared test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to explore the preliminary correlation between clinical factors and LNM along the left gastric artery. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess whether LNM along the left gastric artery was an independent predictor of overall survival. Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to present a classifying effect based on LN status. Results LNM was observed in 598 patients (39.3%) and was found along the branches of the left gastric artery in 256 patients (16.8%). The patients were classified into two groups based on the presence of LNM along the left gastric artery. Patients without LNM along the left gastric artery had better cancer-specific survival than those with positive LNs (P <  0.001). Conclusions This study indicated that LNM along the left gastric artery was an important independent prognostic factor for long-term survival among ESCC patients (P = 0.011).

Three-field versus two-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A long-term survival meta-analysis

Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Bona ◽  
Francesca Lombardo ◽  
Kazuhide Matsushima ◽  
Marta Cavalli ◽  
Caterina Lastraioli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Field Versus

Real-world clinical effectiveness and safety of camrelizumab in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16023-e16023
Author(s):  
Qiwei Yao ◽  
Zhichao Fu ◽  
Qisong Chen ◽  
Jianli Huang ◽  
Jintong Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Real World ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

e16023 Background: Camrelizumab, a programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, has recently demonstrated efficacy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients in a phase III trial. We report real-world clinical outcomes of camrelizumab therapy for ESCC patients in a multicenter prospective cohort. Methods: Eligible patientswereadvanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with stage II-IV confirmed by pathology (including histology or cytology). All patients had received at most one systematic treatment and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Camrelizumab monotherapy(200mg) or combined with chemo-radiotherapy, chemotherapy, chemotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy as a first or second line of therapy were included. Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS) and safety data were evaluated. This abstract summarizes the findings of an exploratory interim analysis (cut-off Dec 2020). Results: From Oct 2019-Dec 2020, 63 patients were enrolled (19 centers in China; mean age 62.26 years; 97% ECOG PS 1; 54% first line therapy). Patients received camrelizumab monotherapy (8; 13%), camrelizumab/chemo-radiotherapy combination therapy (22, 35%), camrelizumab/chemotherapy combination therapy (26, 41%), camrelizumab/chemotherapy/antiangiogenic therapy combination therapy (7, 11%). One patient achieved a complete response and 27 patients achieved a partial response, leading to an ORR of 41.26%. The DCR was 95.24%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.33 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.73-NA). Among patients with adequate samples test for LBH level and (lung immune prognostic index) LIPI score, 15.7% (8/51) patients had a high LBH level;63% (29/46), 32.6% (15/46) and 4.3% (2/46) patients had a good, middle and poor LIPI score, respectively. A significantly longer PFS was observed in patients with a normal LBH level (NA vs. 6.33 months, P = 0.049), and also in patients treated with first-line therapy (6.33 months vs. NA, P = 0.0338). Among adverse events, 4 patients (6.35%) reported grade 3-4 AEs, including pneumonia (n=2 [3.17%]), and bone marrow suppression (n=2 [3.17%]). 10 of 63 patients (15.87%) experienced any grade pneumonia, and 21 of 63 patients (33.33%) experienced grade 1-2 RCCEP. Conclusions: This real-world population showed that camrelizumab as the first- or second-line therapy was an effective and safe treatment for patients with ESCC. Clinical trial information: CHICTR2000039499.

Evaluation of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radical Esophagectomy in Clinical T1bN0M0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryoma Haneda ◽  
Eisuke Booka ◽  
Kenjiro Ishii ◽  
Hirotoshi Kikuchi ◽  
Yoshihiro Hiramatsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Definitive Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Radical Esophagectomy ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: The standard treatment for patients with clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is radical esophagectomy. Definitive chemoradiotherapy is regarded as a treatment option, and good clinical outcome of this treatment has been reported. This study compared the efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy with radical esophagectomy.Methods: From January 2011 to December 2019, this study enrolled 68 consecutive patients. Patients were classified into two groups whether treated by surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy. Survival outcome were compared and subsequent therapies after recurrence were also investigated.Results: Surgery was performed to 39 patients, and 29 patients received definitive chemoradiotherapy. No significant difference was noted in overall survival between two groups. However, the rate of 5-year recurrence free survival was significantly lower in definitive chemoradiotherapy group than that of surgery group (91.1% vs. 62.7%, Hazard ratio 3.976, 95% Confidence interval 1.076-14.696, p = 0.039). Patients who had local recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy received endoscopic submucosal dissection or photodynamic therapy as salvage therapies, and resulted in no disease progression and a good prognosis.Conclusions: Definitive chemoradiotherapy may become a promising alternative therapy comparable with radical esophagectomy in patients with clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Early detection of recurrence by frequent follow-up after definitive chemoradiotherapy is important to control disease within local recurrence, and salvage therapy for local lesions could contribute to long-term survival.

scholarly journals Comparison of Outcomes Between McKeown and Sweet Esophagectomy in the Elderly Patients for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 107327482090470
Author(s):  
Dongni Chen ◽  
Yihuai Hu ◽  
Youfang Chen ◽  
Jia Hu ◽  
Zhesheng Wen
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Term Survival

The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; P = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; P = .211 and log rank = 0.668; P = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; P = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, P = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group.

PS02.085: ASSESSMENT OF TUMOR REGRESSION OF ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY: COMPARISON OF 3 COMMONLY USED SCORING APPROACHES

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 144-145
Author(s):  
Yin-Kai Chao ◽  
Hsin-Yueh Fang
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Interobserver Agreement ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Margin Status ◽  
Tier System

Abstract Background Tumor regression grade (TRG) is a measure of histopathological response of cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(nCRT) and is associated with outcomes. Several TRG system are used in esophageal cancer: Schneider 4 tier(0%,1∼10%,10∼50%, > 50% vital residual tumor cell[VRTC]), Chirieac 3 tier(0%,1∼50%, > 50% VRTC) and Japanese 4 tier(0%,1∼33%,33∼66%, > 66% VRTC). Although these methods are generally accepted, currently there is no common standard. Methods We compared the application of three major systems for assessment of tumor regression. Hematoxylin and eosin–stained slides from 370 resection specimens of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma following nCRT were independently reviewed by two pathologists. Primary endpoints included (1) interobserver agreement (2) prognostic discrimination Results Interobserver agreement was excellent for all three sutem while the Chirieac 3 tier system showed the best kappa value(0.93). All models had similar discriminatory and stratification power, and they predicted survival (P < 0.0001) on univariate analysis. While Chirieac system remained a significant predictor for overall survival independent of yp-stage and margin status in multivariate analysis. Conclusion A simple 3-tiered system with the estimation of VRTC(0%,1∼50%, > 50%) is most reproducible for the evaluation of histological response and together with yp-stage and margin status as independent predictors for survival. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document