scholarly journals A New Score to Assess the Perioperative Period of the Cancer Patient Undergoing Non-Palliative Elective Surgery: A Retrospective Evaluation of a Case Report by PERIDIA Score

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Letizia Andresciani ◽  
Concetta Calabrò ◽  
Mariarita Laforgia ◽  
Maria Ronchi ◽  
Simona De Summa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Main Property ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Retrospective Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Complications ◽  
Hospitalization Period

The complexity of cancer patients and the use of advanced and demolitive surgical techniques frequently need post-operatory ICU hospitalization. To increase safety and to select the best medical strategies for the patient, a multidisciplinary team has performed a new peri-operatory assessment, arising from evidence-based literature data. Verifying that most of the cancer patients, admitted to the intensive care unit, undergo major surgery with localizations in the supramesocolic thoraco-abdominal area, the team focused the attention on supramesocolic peridiaphragmatic cancer surgery. Some scores already in use in clinical practice were selected for the peri-operatory evaluation process. None of them evaluate parameters relating to the entire peri-operative period. In detail, only a few study models were found that concern the assessment of the intra-operative period. Therefore, we wanted to see if using a mix of validated scores, it was possible to build a single evaluation score (named PERIDIAphragmatic surgery score or PERIDIA-score) for the entire peri-operative period that could be obtained at the end of the patient’s hospitalization period in post-operative ICU. The main property sought with the creation of the PERIDIA-score is the proportionality between the score and the incidence of injuries, deaths, and the length of stay in the ward. This property could organize a tailor-made therapeutic path for the patient based on pre-rehabilitation, physiotherapy, activation of social assistance services, targeted counseling, collaborations with the continuity of care network. Furthermore, if the pre-operative score is particularly high, it could suggest different or less invasive therapeutic options, and if the intra-operative score is particularly high, it could suggest a prolongation of hospitalization in ICU. The retrospective prospective study conducted on 83 patients is still ongoing. The first data would seem to prove an increase of clinical complications in patients who were assigned a one-third score with respect to the maximum (16/48) of PERIDIA-score. Moreover, patients with a 10/16 score within each phase of the evaluation (pre, peri, and post) more frequently develop injuries. In the light of these evidence, the 29-point score assigned to our patient can be considered as predictive for the subsequent critical and fatal complications the patient faced up.

Extrinsic Pathway Inhibitor in Elective Surgery: A Comparison with other Coagulation Inhibitors

1989 ◽  
Vol 62 (03) ◽  
pp. 856-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
P M Sandset ◽  
H E Høgevold ◽  
T Lyberg ◽  
T R Andersson ◽  
U Abildgaard
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Surgery ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Acute Phase Reactant ◽  
Hip Surgery ◽  
Albumin Concentration ◽  
Extrinsic Pathway ◽  
Heparin Cofactor Ii ◽  
Coagulation Inhibitors

SummaryExtrinsic coagulation pathway inhibitor may be an important regulator of haemostasis to prevent thrombosis after tissue damage. The functional activity of this inhibitor was determined using a chromogenic substrate assay, and compared to the activities of anti thrombin, heparin cofactor II and protein C during the perioperative period of elective hip replacement (n = 28), cholecystectomy (n = 11), and vascular surgery (n = 5). Peroperatively, all the inhibitors decreased rather similarly and to the same degree as the decrease in albumin concentration. The decreases during hip surgery were about 2-fold the decreases observed during cholecystectomy. A significant peroperative increase in extrinsic pathway inhibitor activity was observed in vascular surgery, probably due to a bolus injection of heparin. Antithrombin, heparin cofactor II and protein C levels normalized on days 3-5 postoperatively in all three patient groups. Sustained low levels of extrinsic pathway inhibitor were observed on postoperative days 1 to 7 in hip surgery patients. Apparently, extrinsic pathway inhibitor is not an acute phase reactant. In uncomplicated surgery, the decreases of the coagulation inhibitor levels are mainly due to hemodilution.

Preoperative preparation of alcohol and psychoactive substances-addicted patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-155
Author(s):  
Ivan Dimitrijevic ◽  
Zoran Zoricic ◽  
Miodrag Milenovic ◽  
Ivan Palibrk ◽  
Draga Dimitrijevic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Substance Abuse ◽  
Postoperative Care ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Psychoactive Substance ◽  
Preoperative Preparation ◽  
Psychoactive Substances ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Proper Diagnosis

Proper diagnosis of psychoactive substance abuse and addiction, as well as acute intoxication, withdrawal syndrome and overdosing are of great importance in patients who are preparing for surgical intervention. There are some specific details in their preoperative preparation whether they underwent emergency or elective surgery. Good knowledge of the characteristics of psychoactive substance abuse and addiction, interaction of psychoactive substances and anesthetics and any other drugs that could be used in the perioperative period is important especially for anastesiologist. In this work we present key issues for recognizing theese patients as well as some guidelines for adequate preoperative preparation and postoperative care.

scholarly journals Experiences of a “COVID protected” robotic surgical centre for colorectal and urological cancer in the COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy R. Huddy ◽  
Matthew Crockett ◽  
A Shiyam Nizar ◽  
Ralph Smith ◽  
Manar Malki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Standard Operating Procedure ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Renal Surgery ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Acute Hospitals ◽  
Da Vinci Si

AbstractThe recent COVID-19 pandemic led to the cancellation of elective surgery across the United Kingdom. Re-establishing elective surgery in a manner that ensures patient and staff safety has been a priority. We report our experience and patient outcomes from setting up a “COVID protected” robotic unit for colorectal and renal surgery that housed both the da Vinci Si (Intuitive, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and the Versius (CMR Surgical, Cambridge, UK) robotic systems. “COVID protected” robotic surgery was undertaken in a day-surgical unit attached to the main hospital. A standard operating procedure was developed in collaboration with the trust COVID-19 leadership team and adapted to national recommendations. 60 patients underwent elective robotic surgery in the initial 10-weeks of the study. This included 10 colorectal procedures and 50 urology procedures. Median length of stay was 4 days for rectal cancer procedures, 2 days less than prior to the COVID period, and 1 day for renal procedures. There were no instances of in-patient coronavirus transmission. Six rectal cancer patients waited more than 62 days for their surgery because of the initial COVID peak but none had an increase T-stage between pre-operative staging and post-operative histology. Robotic surgery can be undertaken in “COVID protected” units within acute hospitals in a safe way that mitigates the increased risk of undergoing major surgery in the current pandemic. Some benefits were seen such as reduced length of stay for colorectal patients that may be associated with having a dedicated unit for elective robotic surgical services.

scholarly journals Surgical Techniques for Personalized Oncoplastic Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients with Small- to Moderate-Sized Breasts (Part 1): Volume Displacement

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Dug Yang ◽  
Jeong Woo Lee ◽  
Young Kyoo Cho ◽  
Wan Wook Kim ◽  
Seung Ook Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Oncoplastic Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Ethical considerations and patient safety concerns for cancelling non-urgent surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nolan J. Brown ◽  
Bayard Wilson ◽  
Stephen Szabadi ◽  
Cameron Quon ◽  
Vera Ong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Ethics ◽  
Health Care Access ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
Surgical Safety ◽  
Care Access ◽  
Urgent Surgery ◽  
Starting Point

AbstractAt the time of writing of this article, there have been over 110 million cases and 2.4 million deaths worldwide since the start of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, postponing millions of non-urgent surgeries. Existing literature explores the complexities of rationing medical care. However, implications of non-urgent surgery postponement during the COVID-19 pandemic have not yet been analyzed within the context of the four pillars of medical ethics. The objective of this review is to discuss the ethics of elective surgery cancellation during the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and autonomy. This review hypothesizes that a more equitable decision-making algorithm can be formulated by analyzing the ethical dilemmas of elective surgical care during the pandemic through the lens of these four pillars. This paper’s analysis shows that non-urgent surgeries treat conditions that can become urgent if left untreated. Postponement of these surgeries can cause cumulative harm downstream. An improved algorithm can address these issues of beneficence by weighing local pandemic stressors within predictive algorithms to appropriately increase surgeries. Additionally, the potential harms of performing non-urgent surgeries extend beyond the patient. Non-maleficence is maintained through using enhanced screening protocols and modifying surgical techniques to reduce risks to patients and clinicians. This model proposes a system to transfer patients from areas of high to low burden, addressing the challenge of justice by considering facility burden rather than value judgments concerning the nature of a particular surgery, such as cosmetic surgeries. Autonomy can be respected by giving patients the option to cancel or postpone non-urgent surgeries. However, in the context of limited resources in a global pandemic, autonomy is not absolute. Non-urgent surgeries can ethically be postponed in opposition to the patient’s preference. The proposed algorithm attempts to uphold the four principles of medical ethics in rationing non-urgent surgical care by building upon existing decision models, using additional measures of resource burden and surgical safety to increase health care access and decrease long-term harm as much as possible. The next global health crisis will undoubtedly present its own unique challenges. This model may serve as a comprehensive starting point in determining future guidelines for non-urgent surgical care.

These studies indicate that homologous blood transfusion affects the outcome of clinical diseases in both beneficial and adverse ways. Experimental situations are not suitable for randomized clinical trials - transfusions cannot be given to prevent the onset of diabetes or wound strength measured in man following receipt of homologous or autologous blood. These experimental observations indicate that the outcomes of numerous clinical diseases which have not been studied may be manipulated by the use of homologous blood or that transfusion should be avoided. Several studies indicate that changes in immune function following transfusion are permanent. The number of clinical phenomena associated with immune suppression and attributable to blood transfusion is unknown. SUMMARY Given the evidence presented here it would be foolish to suggest that transfusion of homologous blood has no immunologic consequences for the recipient. Blood transfusion is the oldest form of transplant - no one would argue that transplantation between unrelated individuals has no influience on the immune system. In organ transplantation the immunologic sequelae are permanent and there is evidence that the same is true following homologous blood transfusion. Lymphocytopenia is present one year following surgery for Crohn's disease if patients receive perioperative blood transfusion (43). Colorectal cancer patients transfused more than seven years prior to diagnosis have significantly reduced numbers of lymphocytes and lower natural killer cytotoxicity than colorectal cancer patients who have never been transfused (44). Transfusion of neonates causes suppression of lymphocyte reactivity which is still demonstrable 25 to 30 years later (45). There is evidence that transfusion at any time prior to elective surgery increases susceptibility to infectious complications (14) and otherwise healthy transfused individuals may be at increased risk of developing malignancies (46). All the longterm consequences of blood transfusion are not negative: Survival of transplants is prolonged by pretransplant transfusion and some women suffering from recurrent spontaneous abortion can deliver at term if previously transfused with their spouse's leukocytes. In the future we will be able to transfuse blood without causing immune perterbations and the consequent clinical phenomena. Studies presented here suggest that removal of donor leukocytes reduces the risk of infection and cancer recurrence. The technology has not reached the point of reducing the leukocyte number in transfused blood below 10^/unit. An alternative which is increasingly being utilized is autologous blood programs. Physicians are discovering that patients tolerate hemoglobin levels which were previously unacceptably low and many patients prefer being anemic over the risks of receiving homologous blood. Since transfusion is an identifier of high cost hospitalized patients, alternatives to routine blood use are being studied in hopes of safely reducing the costs of transfusion. REFERENCES 1. Jubert AV, Lee ET, Hersh EM, McBride CM. J Surg Res 15:399-403, 1973. 2. M 19 u4n ( s3t ) e3r4A6-M 35 , 2 W , i1n9c8h1u . rch RA, Keane RM, Shatney CH, Ernst CB, Nuidema GD. Ann Surg

1995 ◽  
pp. 300-300
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Autologous Blood ◽  
Homologous Blood ◽  
Homologous Blood Transfusion ◽  
One Year ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Perioperative Cumulative Fluid Balance and Its Association with an Increase in Costs after Major Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 227
Author(s):  
Tak Oh ◽  
Jung-Won Hwang ◽  
Young-Tae Jeon ◽  
Sang-Hwan Do
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Total Hospital Cost ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Total Input ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Cumulative Fluid Balance

Positive fluid balance (FB) during the perioperative period may increase the incidence of postoperative complications, which may lead to longer hospitalization and higher hospital costs. However, a definitive association between positive FB and hospital costs has not yet been established. This retrospective observational study examined the association between perioperative FB and hospital costs of patients who underwent major surgical procedures. Medical records of patients who underwent major surgery (surgery time >2 h, estimated blood loss >500 mL) from January 2010 to December 2017 were analyzed to determine the associations between calculated FB (%, total input fluid—output fluid in liter/weight (kg) at admission) and total hospital cost ($). The analysis included medical data of 7010 patients. Multivariable linear regression analyses showed that a 1% increase in FB in postoperative day (POD) 0 (24 h), 0–1 (48 h), 0–2 (72 h), and 0–3 (96 h) significantly increased the total cost by $967.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 803.4–1132.1), $688.8 (95% CI: 566.3–811.2), $591 (95% CI: 485.7–696.4), and $434.2 (95% CI: 349.4–519.1), respectively (all p < 0.001). Perioperative cumulative FB was positively associated with hospital costs of patients who underwent major surgery.

scholarly journals Exploring Hyperoxia Effects in Cancer—From Perioperative Clinical Data to Potential Molecular Mechanisms

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1213
Author(s):  
Anca Irina Ristescu ◽  
Crina Elena Tiron ◽  
Adrian Tiron ◽  
Ioana Grigoras
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Cancer Biology ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Oncological Treatment

Increased inspiratory oxygen concentration is constantly used during the perioperative period of cancer patients to prevent the potential development of hypoxemia and to provide an adequate oxygen transport to the organs, tissues and cells. Although the primary tumours are surgically removed, the effects of perioperative hyperoxia exposure on distal micro-metastases and on circulating cancer cells can potentially play a role in cancer progression or recurrence. In clinical trials, hyperoxia seems to increase the rate of postoperative complications and, by delaying postoperative recovery, it can alter the return to intended oncological treatment. The effects of supplemental oxygen on the long-term mortality of surgical cancer patients offer, at this point, conflicting results. In experimental studies, hyperoxia effects on cancer biology were explored following multiple pathways. In cancer cell cultures and animal models, hyperoxia increases the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and increases the oxidative stress. These can be followed by the induction of the expression of Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and other molecules involved in angiogenesis and by the promotion of various degrees of epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document