scholarly journals Goal Missed, Self Hit: Goal-Setting, Goal-Failure, and Their Affective, Motivational, and Behavioral Consequences

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Höpfner ◽  
Nina Keith

Setting high and specific goals is one of the best-established management tools to increase performance and motivation. However, in recent years, potential downsides of goal-setting are being discussed. One possible downside is the high risk of failing the goal. In an approach to integrate research on the consequences of goal-failure and the basic assumptions of goal-setting theory, we investigated whether failure of a high and specific goal has detrimental effects on a person’s affect, self-esteem, and motivation. In Experiment 1, 185 participants received fictitious feedback about attaining or failing an assigned high and specific goal. In Experiment 2 with 86 participants, we manipulated goal-failure through task-difficulty and we included task choice as a behavioral measure of motivation. In both experiments, participants who failed the high and specific goal showed a decrease in affect, self-esteem, and motivation compared to participants who attained that goal. Results indicate that failing a high and specific goal can be damaging for self-related factors that may be crucial for organizational long-term outcomes. We advise organizations to consider potential undesirable effects when using goal-setting interventions.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Kyle Robison ◽  
Nash Unsworth ◽  
Gene Arnold Brewer

Across four experiments we examined the effects of goal-setting, feedback, and incentivizing manipulations on sustained attention. In addition to measuring task performance, we measured subjective attentional states and momentary feelings of motivation and alertness. Experiment 1 compared two specific goal conditions - one difficult and one easy - to a standard set of instructions. The specific goal conditions both reduced RTs and attenuated the vigilance decrement but did not impact task engagement (motivation or task-unrelated thoughts). Experiment 2 manipulated both goal-setting and feedback across conditions. The combination of a specific goal and feedback had strong effects on both task performance and task engagement. Additionally, feedback increased task engagement (higher motivation and fewer task-unrelated thoughts) regardless of whether or not it was paired with a specific goal. Experiment 3 examined the effect of pairing goals with a reward. Participants in one reward condition (time-based incentive) reported higher motivation, but did not show better task performance. Offering a cash incentive to meet a goal did not have an effect on any dependent variables. Finally, in an effort to examine whether more moderately-difficult goals might lead to optimal performance, Experiment 4 examined a broader range of goals. However we did not see an effect of a moderately-difficult goal on any of the dependent variables. None of the experimental manipulations were effective in mitigating or eliminating the vigilance decrement. We discuss the theoretical implications of the results with regard to goal-setting theory and theories of vigilance.


1988 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Weinberg ◽  
Lawrence Bruya ◽  
Janice Longino ◽  
Allen Jackson

The purpose of this investigation was to test the effects of goal proximity and goal specificity on endurance performance of young children. Subjects were 130 boys and 125 girls from the fourth, fifth, and sixth grades. Children were matched on baseline performance of the 2-min sit-up test and then randomly assigned to one of the following goal setting conditions: (a) short-term goal improvement of 4% each test trial, (b) long-term goal of 20% improvement over the course of the 10-week study, (c) short-term plus long-term goal, and (d) do your best. Subjects practiced sit-ups in class every day with practice tests once a week and actual scored tests once every other week. No significant differences between goal-setting conditions were found on baseline performance and thus a 4 × 3 × 2 × 5 (Goal × Grade × Gender × Trials) ANOVA was conducted. Results produced significant gender and grade main effects, with boys and sixth graders exhibiting the best performance. More important, a significant goal-condition-by-trials interaction revealed there were no differences on Trials 1 and 2, but on Trials 3, 4, and 5 the specific goal groups performed significantly better than the do-your-best group. A postexperimental questionnaire revealed that children were highly committed to their goals and tried extremely hard to reach their goals. Results are discussed in terms of Locke's goal-setting theory as well as recent empirical goal-setting studies conducted in physical activity settings.


1996 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 711-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamao Matsui ◽  
Yukie Tsuzuki ◽  
Takashi Kakuyama ◽  
Mary-Lou Onglatco

For Japanese male university students ( N = 134) as subjects, self-reported victimization by peers during junior high school was correlated with current scores on self-esteem and depression only for subjects who reported low self-esteem and high depression prior to victimization.


2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1001-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
PENELOPE K. TRICKETT ◽  
JENNIE G. NOLL ◽  
ALLAN REIFFMAN ◽  
FRANK W. PUTNAM

This study examines short- and long-term maladaptive outcomes in a sample of sexually abused females and a comparison group. The sample consists of intrafamilial sexual abuse victims ages 6–16 years at entry into the study and a demographically similar comparison group. The outcomes examined included measures of behavior and psychological problems such as aggressive behavior, depression, dissociation, and low self-esteem; and measures at two time points, first at entry into the study (median age 11 years) and approximately 7 years later (median age 18 years). The specific questions being addressed were (a) whether subgroups or profiles, based on the specific characteristics of the sexual abuse experienced, can be identified in this sample of abused females; and (b) whether these profile groups predict different patterns of adverse short- or long-term outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-57
Author(s):  
Aurelija Zonienė ◽  
Violeta Valiulė

Shifting societal understanding of sustainability can be tied to the potential of long-term growth of a company. This is reflected in the organization’s approach to sustainable investment and its management. Mostly, sustainable investment is based on the theories of economics and there is no clear consensus regarding the justification of sustainable investment by the theories of management.The purpose of this paper is to justify the benefits of sustainable investment for organizations by the two theories of management (modern and classic): Sustainable goal setting and Stakeholder theory. Those two theories have been chosen because they are believed to better correspond with the principles of sustainable investment.The question of the research is how to justify sustainable investment by Sustainable goal setting and Stakeholder theories. The aim of the research is to justify sustainable investment by Sustainable goal setting and Stakeholder theories.It has been found out that Sustainable goal setting theory and Stakeholder theory are related, overlapping and equally important in sustainable investment.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin L. Snider ◽  
James R. Farmer

Scholars have well documented the impact on youth of attending a residential summer camp. Quantitative studies, generally consisting of pre/post assessments, have found positive outcomes related to self-esteem, self-efficacy, hard skills, and social skills. We explored the long-term outcomes of the camp experience through adult recollections of the camp experience. Participants’ interviews provided four primary, emergent themes: self growth, affinity for nature, life skills, and relationship. Outcomes appear to stem from camper-counselor relationships and unstructured free time. This study highlights the lifelong benefits of the camp experience and suggests there is utility in collecting adult long-term recollections of childhood memories.


1992 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Ann Boyce

This study investigated the effect of goal proximity on skill acquisition and retention of a selected shooting task. Twelve classes (n=181) were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: (a) short-term goals, (b) a long-term goal, (c) short-term plus long-term goals, and (d) do-your-best goals. The pretest and six skill acquisition/retention trials were analyzed in a 4×2×6 (Goal Groups × Gender × Trials) MANCOVA design with repeated measures on the last factor and with the pretest as the covariate. Results of a multivariate F test revealed significant main effects for goal groups, gender, and trials. Post hoc tests indicated that the three specific goal-setting groups were superior to the do-your-best group. Males were statistically superior to females in the shooting task. The follow-up tests on trials revealed that as trials progressed, shooting performance improved significantly.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document