Abstract
BACKGROUND: L-asparaginase (L-asp) is one of the key drugs in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children. However, L-asp often produces severe adverse effects including anaphylaxis resulting in its discontinuation.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate retrospectively the outcome of discontinuation of L-asp in patients with ALL.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children newly diagnosed as ALL between 1999 and 2003 were consecutively enrolled on the TCCSG L99-15 study. Risk stratification was based on the age, initial white blood cell count, immunophenotype, cytogenetics and the response to prednisolone monotherapy. Totally, 267 (35%) out of 770 children were categorized into a standard-risk group (SR), 317 (41%) into a high-risk group (HR) and 186 (24%) into a very high-risk group (HEX). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation was indicated approximately in 50% of the HEX patients. L-asp was used 9 times in the induction phase in all the risk groups. The total number of L-asp administration all through the treatment was 19 in SR, 20 in HR and at least 10 in HEX. Patients were divided into two groups in the analysis: group A patients who received at least 50% of scheduled doses of L-asp and group B patients who received less than 50%.
RESULTS: Remission was obtained in 259 (97%) patients in SR, 311 (98%) in HR and 171(92%) in HEX. In the patients who achieved remission and were analyzed, 195 (83.7%) in SR, 223 (78.8%) in HR and 123 (83.7%) in HEX received all the scheduled doses of L-asp. Event-free survival (EFS) (SE) and overall survival (OS) (SE) at 5 years for all the risk groups are shown in the table. Notably, EFS in group A (92.9%) and in group B (74.1%) in SR was significantly different (p=0.025).
CONCLUSION: The outcome in patients who received less than 50% of scheduled dose of L-asp was inferior to that in the patients who received more than 50% of the scheduled dose. This suggests that modification or intensification of the treatment should be considered for the patients who discontinued L-asp in SR.
EFS and OS in each group Risk group EFS ± SE(%) OS ± SE(%) (No. in A /B) group A group B p value group A group B p value SR (223 /10) 92.9±2.4 74.1±16.1 0.025 97.8±1.1 88.9±10.5 0.066 HR (269 /14) 78.5±3.2 66.7±19.2 0.969 88.9±2.6 50.0±25.0 0.158 HEX (142 /5) 58.2±5.5 75.5±21.7 0.514 75.6±4.3 80.0±17.9 0.873
Does Hippocampal Volume Predict Transition to Psychosis in a High-Risk Group? A Meta-Analysis
