The Plant Circadian Clock and Chromatin Modifications

The circadian clock is an endogenous timekeeping network that integrates environmental signals with internal cues to coordinate diverse physiological processes. The circadian function depends on the precise regulation of rhythmic gene expression at the core of the oscillators. In addition to the well-characterized transcriptional feedback regulation of several clock components, additional regulatory mechanisms, such as alternative splicing, regulation of protein stability, and chromatin modifications are beginning to emerge. In this review, we discuss recent findings in the regulation of the circadian clock function in Arabidopsis thaliana. The involvement of chromatin modifications in the regulation of the core circadian clock genes is also discussed.

Download Full-text

Achilles-Mediated and Sex-Specific Regulation of Circadian mRNA Rhythms in Drosophila

Journal of Biological Rhythms ◽

10.1177/0748730419830845 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 34 (2) ◽

pp. 131-143 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Jiajia Li ◽

Renee Yin Yu ◽

Farida Emran ◽

Brian E. Chen ◽

Michael E. Hughes

Keyword(s):

Circadian Clock ◽

Molecular Mechanisms ◽

Rna Binding ◽

Clock Genes ◽

Peripheral Tissues ◽

Knock Down ◽

Rhythmic Expression ◽

The Core ◽

Physiological Processes ◽

Specific Regulation

The circadian clock is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism that generates the rhythmic expression of downstream genes. The core circadian clock drives the expression of clock-controlled genes, which in turn play critical roles in carrying out many rhythmic physiological processes. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms by which clock output genes orchestrate rhythmic signals from the brain to peripheral tissues are largely unknown. Here we explored the role of one rhythmic gene, Achilles, in regulating the rhythmic transcriptome in the fly head. Achilles is a clock-controlled gene in Drosophila that encodes a putative RNA-binding protein. Achilles expression is found in neurons throughout the fly brain using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and legacy data suggest it is not expressed in core clock neurons. Together, these observations argue against a role for Achilles in regulating the core clock. To assess its impact on circadian mRNA rhythms, we performed RNA sequencing (RNAseq) to compare the rhythmic transcriptomes of control flies and those with diminished Achilles expression in all neurons. Consistent with previous studies, we observe dramatic upregulation of immune response genes upon knock-down of Achilles. Furthermore, many circadian mRNAs lose their rhythmicity in Achilles knock-down flies, suggesting that a subset of the rhythmic transcriptome is regulated either directly or indirectly by Achilles. These Achilles-mediated rhythms are observed in genes involved in immune function and in neuronal signaling, including Prosap, Nemy and Jhl-21. A comparison of RNAseq data from control flies reveals that only 42.7% of clock-controlled genes in the fly brain are rhythmic in both males and females. As mRNA rhythms of core clock genes are largely invariant between the sexes, this observation suggests that sex-specific mechanisms are an important, and heretofore under-appreciated, regulator of the rhythmic transcriptome.

Download Full-text

Nyctinastic thallus movement in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha is regulated by a circadian clock

10.1101/2020.02.09.940403 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Ulf Lagercrantz ◽

Anja Billhardt ◽

Sabine N. Rousku ◽

D. Magnus Eklund

Keyword(s):

Circadian Clock ◽

Feedback Loop ◽

Clock Genes ◽

Marchantia Polymorpha ◽

Leaf Position ◽

Rhythmic Movements ◽

The Core ◽

Growth Development ◽

Rhythmic Growth ◽

Transcriptional Feedback

ABSTRACTThe circadian clock coordinates an organism’s growth, development and physiology with environmental factors. One illuminating example is the rhythmic growth of hypocotyls and cotyledons in Arabidopsis thaliana. Such daily oscillations in leaf position are often referred to as sleep movements or nyctinasty. Here, we report that plantlets of the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha show analogous rhythmic movements of thallus lobes, and that the circadian clock controls this rhythm, with auxin a likely meditator. The mechanisms of this circadian clock are partly conserved as compared to angiosperms, with homologs to the core clock genes PRR, RVE and TOC1 forming a core transcriptional feedback loop also in M. polymorpha.

Download Full-text

Prognostic values of the core components of the mammalian circadian clock in prostate cancer

PeerJ ◽

10.7717/peerj.12539 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 ◽

pp. e12539

Author(s):

Wenchang Yue ◽

Xiao Du ◽

Xuhong Wang ◽

Niu Gui ◽

Weijie Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Circadian Clock ◽

Risk Score ◽

Clock Genes ◽

Predictive Performance ◽

Lymph Node Status ◽

Free Survival ◽

The Core ◽

Circadian Clock Genes ◽

Core Components ◽

Score Model

Background Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most common malignancies in males. Extensive and complex connections between circadian rhythm and cancer were found. Nonetheless, in PC, the potential role of the core components of the mammalian circadian clock (CCMCCs) in prognosis prediction has not been fully clarified. Methods We firstly collected 605 patients with PC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Survival analysis was carried out for each CCMCC. Then, we investigated the prognostic ability of CCMCCs by Cox regression analysis. Independent prognostic signatures were extracted for the establishment of the circadian clock-based risk score model. We explored the predictive performance of the risk score model in the TCGA training cohort and the independent GEO dataset. Finally, the relationships between risk score and clinicopathological parameters, biological processes, and signaling pathways were evaluated. Results The expression levels of CCMCCs were widely correlated with age, tumor status, lymph node status, disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Nine circadian clock genes, including CSNK1D, BTRC, CLOCK, CSNK1E, FBXL3, PRKAA2, DBP, NR1D2, and RORB, were identified as vital prognostic factors in PC and were used to construct the circadian clock-based risk score model. For DFS, the area under the 3-year or 5-year receiver operating characteristic curves ranged from 0.728 to 0.821, suggesting better predictive performance. When compared with T3-4N1 stage, PC patients at T2N0 stage might be benefited more from the circadian clock-based risk score model. Furthermore, a high circadian clock-based risk score indicated shorter DFS (p < 0.0001), early progression (p < 0.0001), and higher 5-year death rate (p = 0.007) in PC. The risk score was related to tumor status (p < 0.001), lymph node status (p < 0.001), and ribosome-related biogenesis and pathways. Conclusions The vital roles of circadian clock genes in clinical outcomes were fully depicted. The circadian clock-based risk score model could reflect and predict the prognosis of patients with PC.

Download Full-text

PTBP1 Positively Regulates the Translation of Circadian Clock Gene, Period1

International Journal of Molecular Sciences ◽

10.3390/ijms21186921 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 21 (18) ◽

pp. 6921

Author(s):

Wanil Kim ◽

Jae-Cheon Shin ◽

Kyung-Ha Lee ◽

Kyong-Tai Kim

Keyword(s):

Circadian Clock ◽

Translational Regulation ◽

Clock Gene ◽

Clock Genes ◽

Internal Ribosomal Entry Site ◽

Feedback Regulation ◽

Entry Site ◽

Negative Feedback Regulation ◽

Polypyrimidine Tract Binding Protein ◽

Circadian Clock Genes

Circadian oscillations of mRNAs and proteins are the main features of circadian clock genes. Among them, Period1 (Per1) is a key component in negative-feedback regulation, which shows a robust diurnal oscillation and the importance of circadian rhythm and translational regulation of circadian clock genes has been recognized. In the present study, we investigated the 5′-untranslated region (5′-UTR) of the mouse core clock gene, Per1, at the posttranscriptional level, particularly its translational regulation. The 5′-UTR of Per1 was found to promote its translation via an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES). We found that polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1 (PTBP1) binds to the 5′-UTR of Per1 and positively regulates the IRES-mediated translation of Per1 without affecting the levels of Per1 mRNA. The reduction of PTBP1 level also decreased the endogenous levels of the PER1 protein but not of its mRNA. As for the oscillation of PER1 expression, the disruption of PTBP1 levels lowered the PER1 expression but not the phase of the oscillation. PTBP1 also changed the amplitudes of the mRNAs of other circadian clock genes, such as Cryptochrome 1 (Cry1) and Per3. Our results suggest that the PTBP1 is important for rhythmic translation of Per1 and it fine-tunes the overall circadian system.

Download Full-text

Circadian Clock Genes and the Transcriptional Architecture of the Clock Mechanism

Endocrine Abstracts ◽

10.1530/endoabs.59.pl4 ◽

2018 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Joseph Takahashi

Keyword(s):

Circadian Clock ◽

Clock Genes ◽

Circadian Clock Genes ◽

Clock Mechanism

Download Full-text

Transcriptomal dissection of soybean circadian rhythmicity in two geographically, phenotypically and genetically distinct cultivars

BMC Genomics ◽

10.1186/s12864-021-07869-8 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Yanlei Yue ◽

Ze Jiang ◽

Enoch Sapey ◽

Tingting Wu ◽

Shi Sun ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Circadian Clock ◽

Chromosome Structure ◽

Clock Genes ◽

Expression Profiles ◽

Circadian Rhythmicity ◽

Rna Seq ◽

Night Time ◽

Time Points ◽

Circadian Clock Genes

Abstract Background In soybean, some circadian clock genes have been identified as loci for maturity traits. However, the effects of these genes on soybean circadian rhythmicity and their impacts on maturity are unclear. Results We used two geographically, phenotypically and genetically distinct cultivars, conventional juvenile Zhonghuang 24 (with functional J/GmELF3a, a homolog of the circadian clock indispensable component EARLY FLOWERING 3) and long juvenile Huaxia 3 (with dysfunctional j/Gmelf3a) to dissect the soybean circadian clock with time-series transcriptomal RNA-Seq analysis of unifoliate leaves on a day scale. The results showed that several known circadian clock components, including RVE1, GI, LUX and TOC1, phase differently in soybean than in Arabidopsis, demonstrating that the soybean circadian clock is obviously different from the canonical model in Arabidopsis. In contrast to the observation that ELF3 dysfunction results in clock arrhythmia in Arabidopsis, the circadian clock is conserved in soybean regardless of the functional status of J/GmELF3a. Soybean exhibits a circadian rhythmicity in both gene expression and alternative splicing. Genes can be grouped into six clusters, C1-C6, with different expression profiles. Many more genes are grouped into the night clusters (C4-C6) than in the day cluster (C2), showing that night is essential for gene expression and regulation. Moreover, soybean chromosomes are activated with a circadian rhythmicity, indicating that high-order chromosome structure might impact circadian rhythmicity. Interestingly, night time points were clustered in one group, while day time points were separated into two groups, morning and afternoon, demonstrating that morning and afternoon are representative of different environments for soybean growth and development. However, no genes were consistently differentially expressed over different time-points, indicating that it is necessary to perform a circadian rhythmicity analysis to more thoroughly dissect the function of a gene. Moreover, the analysis of the circadian rhythmicity of the GmFT family showed that GmELF3a might phase- and amplitude-modulate the GmFT family to regulate the juvenility and maturity traits of soybean. Conclusions These results and the resultant RNA-seq data should be helpful in understanding the soybean circadian clock and elucidating the connection between the circadian clock and soybean maturity.

Download Full-text