Incidence and Clinical Impacts of COVID-19 Infection in Patients with Hemodialysis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 396,062 Hemodialysis Patients

Hemodialysis (HD) patients are highly susceptible to COVID-19 infection. However, comprehensive assessments of current evidence regarding COVID-19 in HD patients remain incomplete. We systematically searched PUBMED and EMBASE for articles published on incidence or mortality of COVID-19 infection in HD patients until September 2020. Two independent researchers extracted data and study-level risk of bias across studies. We conducted meta-analysis of proportions for incidence and mortality rate. Study heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. A total of 29 articles with 3261 confirmed COVID-19 cases from a pool of 396,062 HD patients were identified. Incidence of COVID-19 in these HD patients was 7.7% (95% CI: 5.0–10.9%; study heterogeneity: I2 = 99.7%, p < 0.001; risk of publication bias, Egger’s test, p < 0.001). Overall mortality rate was 22.4% (95% CI: 17.9–27.1%; study heterogeneity: I2 = 87.1%, p < 0.001; risk of publication bias, Egger’s test: p = 0.197) in HD patients with COVID-19. Reported estimates were higher in non-Asian than Asian countries. Quality of study may affect the reported incidence but not the mortality among studies. Both incidence and mortality of COVID-19 infection were higher in HD patients. Available data may underestimate the real incidence of infection. International collaboration and standardized reporting of epidemiological data should be needed for further studies.

Download Full-text

Incidence and Clinical Impacts of COVID-19 Infection in Patients with Hemodialysis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 396,062 Hemodialysis Patients

10.21203/rs.3.rs-113803/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Chun-Yu Chen ◽

Shih-Chieh Shao ◽

Yih-Ting Chen ◽

Cheng-Kai Hsu ◽

Heng-Jung Hsu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Mortality Rate ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Publication Bias ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Healthcare Providers ◽

Geographic Area ◽

Epidemiologic Studies ◽

Significant Heterogeneity ◽

Incidence And Mortality

Abstract Background: Better understanding of incidence and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 infection in hemodialysis (HD) patients could assist healthcare providers to develop proper preventive strategies and optimal management. However, no published systematic review summarizes current epidemiological evidence regarding COVID-19 infection in HD patients.Methods: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We systematically searched PUBMED and EMBASE for articles published on incidence or mortality of COVID-19 infection in maintenance HD patients until September 2020, and conducted meta-analysis of proportions for incidence and mortality rate. Heterogeneity was measured by Cochran’s Q and I2 statistic. Publication bias was evaluated by Egger’s test. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42020209134).Results: In total, 29 articles with 3,261 confirmed COVID-19 cases from pooled 396,062 HD patients were identified. Overall COVID-19 incidence in these HD patients was 7.7% (95% CI: 5.0-10.9%), with significant heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 99.7%, p<0.001) and risk of publication bias (Egger’s test, p<0.001). Overall mortality rate was 22.4% (95% CI: 17.9-27.1%) in HD patients with COVID-19, with significant heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 87.1%, p<0.001). Reported incidence and mortality varied by geographic area, being higher in non-Asian- than Asian countries.Conclusions: Both incidence and mortality of COVID-19 infection were higher in HD patients. Available data may underestimate the real incidence of infection because screening and diagnosis differ between countries. International collaboration and standardized reporting of future epidemiologic studies is encouraged to improve clinical outcomes of COVID-19 infection in HD patients.

Download Full-text

Accurate detection of atrial fibrillation using a smartphone remains uncertain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3505 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

S Gill ◽

C Sartini ◽

H.W Uh ◽

N Ghoreishi ◽

V Cardoso ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Publication Bias ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Small Range ◽

Funding Source ◽

True Value

Abstract Introduction Early diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) is essential to reduce complications such as stroke, and improve patient quality of life. Novel screening techniques using smartphone camera photoplethysmography (PPG) can be used for AF detection, but their clinical applicability remains unclear. Purpose To assess the diagnostic accuracy of smartphone PPG compared to conventional ECG for AF detection. Methods We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and other databases (1980-October 2019), including any study or abstract where smartphone finger-tip PPG was compared with a reference ECG (1, 3 or 12-lead). Outcomes were sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive and negative predictive value (PPV; NPV) and overall accuracy. Bivariate hierarchical random effects meta-analysis was performed for studies with confidence intervals for SE and SP, and funnel plots were used to identify publication bias. Study quality was assessed using the established QUADAS-2 tool by two independent graders. Results 1350 publications were screened, of which 17 studies were included in the systematic review (7 full text publications and 10 abstracts), providing 21 comparisons of accuracy for AF detection. Most studies were based in secondary care and small (range n=33 to 1095), with a total of 5469 participants including 1384 with AF. Only 4 studies were multicentre. Smartphone applications used were Cardiio Rhythm, Fibricheck, Preventicus and Heartbeats, with 7 studies not specifying the tool used. Overall SE and SP for AF detection were high, ranging from 76 to 100%, and 85 to 100% respectively. PPV ranged from 54 to 100% and NPV from 77 to 100%, with overall accuracy between 61 and 99%. The meta-analysis included 12 comparisons from 10 studies (n=2714; 936 with AF). The pooled SE was 93% (95% CI 90–96%) and SP 97% (95% CI 95–99%); Figure 1A. QUADAS-2 assessment demonstrated poor quality of studies overall, with a high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain for all studies. There was clear evidence of publication bias; Figure 1B. Conclusions PPG offers the potential for large scale, non-invasive, patient-led screening of AF. However, current evidence is limited to biased, low quality studies often with unrealistic results for AF detection. These are insufficient to advise clinicians on the true value of current smartphone PPG technology. Figure 1. Meta-analysis & publication bias Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): BigData@Heart EU/EFPIA IMI 116074.

Download Full-text

The Prevalence of Sarcopenia and Its Impact on Clinical Outcomes in Lumbar Degenerative Spine Disease—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm10040773 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (4) ◽

pp. 773

Author(s):

Wei-Ting Wu ◽

Tsung-Min Lee ◽

Der-Sheng Han ◽

Ke-Vin Chang

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Clinical Manifestations ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Degenerative Spine ◽

Degenerative Spine Disease ◽

Spine Disease

The association of sarcopenia with poor clinical outcomes has been identified in various medical conditions, although there is a lack of quantitative analysis to validate the influence of sarcopenia on patients with lumbar degenerative spine disease (LDSD) from the available literature. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with LDSD and examine its impact on clinical outcomes. The electronic databases (PubMed and Embase) were systematically searched from inception through December 2020 for clinical studies investigating the association of sarcopenia with clinical outcomes in patients with LDSD. A random-effects model meta-analysis was carried out for data synthesis. This meta-analysis included 14 studies, comprising 1953 participants. The overall prevalence of sarcopenia among patients with LDSD was 24.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.3%–34.3%). The relative risk of sarcopenia was not significantly increased in patients with LDSD compared with controls (risk ratio, 1.605; 95% CI, 0.321–8.022). The patients with sarcopenia did not experience an increase in low back and leg pain. However, lower quality of life (SMD, −0.627; 95% CI, −0.844–−0.410) were identified postoperatively. Sarcopenia did not lead to an elevated rate of complications after lumbar surgeries. Sarcopenia accounts for approximately one-quarter of the population with LDSD. The clinical manifestations are less influenced by sarcopenia, whereas sarcopenia is associated with poorer quality of life after lumbar surgeries. The current evidence is still insufficient to support sarcopenia as a predictor of postoperative complications.

Download Full-text

Effectiveness of e-cigarettes in smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

European Journal of Public Health ◽

10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.1226 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽

Author(s):

M Oberndorfer ◽

I Grabovac ◽

S Haider ◽

T E Dorner

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Smoking Cessation ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Promising Alternative ◽

Quality Of Evidence ◽

Different Populations ◽

Meta Analyses

Abstract Background Reports of the effectiveness of e-cigarettes (ECs) for smoking cessation vary across different studies making implementation recommendations hard to attain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesise the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of ECs for smoking cessation. Methods PubMed, PsycInfo and Embase databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing nicotine ECs with non-nicotine ECs or with established smoking cessation interventions (nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and or counselling) published between 01/01/2014 and 01/05/2019. Data from eligible studies were extracted and used for random-effects meta-analyses. Results Our literature review yielded 13190 publications with 10 studies being identified as eligible for systematic review, covering 8362 participants, and 8 for meta-analyses (n = 30 - 6006). Using the last follow-up of eligible studies, the proportion of smokers achieving abstinence was 1.67 [95CI:0.99 - 2.81] times higher in nicotine EC users compared to non-nicotine EC users. The proportion of abstinent smokers was 1.69 [95CI:1.25 - 2.27] times higher in EC users compared to participants receiving NRT. EC users showed a 2.70 [95CI:1.15 - 6.30] times higher proportion of abstinent smokers in comparison to participants solely receiving counselling. Conclusions Our analysis showed modest effects of nicotine-ECs compared to non-nicotine ECs. When compared to NRT or counselling, results suggest that nicotine EC may be more effective for smoking cessation. As ECs also help maintaining routinized behaviour and social aspects of smoking, we hypothesise that this may explain their advantage as a tool for smoking cessation. However, given the small number of included studies, different populations, heterogeneous designs, and the overall moderate to low quality of evidence, it is not possible to offer clear recommendations. More comparable data is needed to strengthen confidence in the quality of evidence. Key messages The number of previous studies assessing the effectiveness of ECs for smoking cessation is limited. Further, comparability of these studies is restricted, weakening the quality of evidence. Although current evidence on the effectiveness of ECs for smoking cessation is inconclusive, our meta-analyses suggest that ECs could be a promising alternative tool in attempts to achieve abstinence.

Download Full-text

The Effectiveness of Acupuncture in Management of Functional Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine ◽

10.1155/2020/6137450 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2020 ◽

pp. 1-17

Author(s):

Lu Wang ◽

Mingmin Xu ◽

Qianhua Zheng ◽

Wei Zhang ◽

Ying Li

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Safety Evaluation ◽

Functional Constipation ◽

Responder Rate ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽

Increased Risk

Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for functional constipation (FC). Methods. A rigorous literature search was performed in English (PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) and Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biological Medical (CBM), Wanfang database, and China Science and Technology Journal (VIP)) electronic databases from their inception to October 2019. Included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared acupuncture therapy with sham acupuncture or pharmacological therapies. The outcome measures were evaluated, including the primary outcome of complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) and secondary outcomes of Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), constipation symptoms scores (CSS), responder rate, the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) questionnaire, and safety evaluation. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan5.3. Results. The merged data of 28 RCTs with 3525 participants indicated that acupuncture may be efficient for FC by increasing CSBMs (p<0.00001; MD = 0.84 [95% CI, 0.65 to 1.03]; I2 = 0%) and improving constipation symptoms (p=0.03; SMD = −0.4 [95% CI, −0.78 to −0.03]; I2 = 74%), stool formation (p<0.00001; MD = 0.24 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.34]; I2 = 0%), quality of life (p<0.00001; N = 1, MD = −0.33 [95% CI, −0.45 to −0.21]), and responder rates (p=0.02; RR = 2.16; [95% CI, 1.1 to 4.24]; I2 = 69%) compared with the effects of sham treatment. No increased risk of adverse events was observed (p=0.44; RR = 1.18; [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.81]; I2 = 0%). With regard to medication comparisons, the pooled data indicated that acupuncture was more effective in increasing CSBMs (p=0.004; MD = 0.53 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.88]; I2 = 88%) and improving patients’ quality of life (p<0.00001; SMD = −0.73 [95% CI, −1.02 to −0.44]; I2 = 64%), with high heterogeneity. However, there were no significant differences in responder rate (p=0.12; RR = 1.31; [95% CI, 0.94 to 1.82]; I2 = 53%), BSFS (p=0.5; MD = 0.17 [95% CI, −0.33 to 0.68]; I2 = 93%), or CSS (p=0.05; SMD = −0.62 [95% CI, −1.23 to −0.01]; I2 = 89%). Regarding safety evaluation, acupuncture was safer than medications (p<0.0001; RR = 0.3; [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.52]; I2 = 30%). Conclusions. Current evidence suggests that acupuncture is an efficient and safe treatment for FC. Acupuncture increased stool frequency, improved stool formation, alleviated constipation symptoms, and improved quality of life. However, the evidence quality was relatively low and the relationship between acupuncture and drugs is not clear. More high-quality trials are recommended in the future. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019143347.

Download Full-text

Association Between Prediabetes and Retinopathy: A Meta-Analysis

Hormone and Metabolic Research ◽

10.1055/a-1678-7092 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 53 (12) ◽

pp. 801-809

Author(s):

Ji Jin ◽

Peirong Lu

Keyword(s):

Meta Analysis ◽

Microvascular Complications ◽

Random Effect ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Community Dwelling ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Study Heterogeneity ◽

Study Characteristics

AbstractDiabetes confers an increased risk of microvascular complications, including retinopathy. However, whether prediabetes is also related to retinopathy has not been comprehensively examined. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between prediabetes and retinopathy. This meta-analysis included relevant observational studies from Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. A random-effect model after incorporation of the intra-study heterogeneity was selected to pool the results. Subgroup analyses were applied to evaluate the influences of study characteristics on relationship. Nine cross-sectional studies including 14 751 community dwelling adult participants were included; 3847 (26.1%) of them were prediabetic. Results showed that prediabetes was associated with a higher prevalence of retinopathy compared to normoglycemia [odds ratio (OR): 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10–2.20, p=0.01, I2=34%]. Sensitivity analysis by excluding one study at a time showed consistent result (OR: 1.35 to 1.73, p all<0.05). Subgroup analysis showed study characteristics such as definition of prediabetes, country of study, sample size, mean age of participants, or univariate or multivariate analyses may not significantly affect the association (p for subgroup difference all>0.05). Current evidence suggests that patients with prediabetes may be associated with higher prevalence of retinopathy as compared to those with normoglycemia. Although prospective cohort studies are needed to validate these findings, results of our meta-analysis highlighted the importance of early prevention of retinopathy in patients with prediabetes.

Download Full-text

Swimming as Treatment for Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2020/6210201 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2020 ◽

pp. 1-8

Author(s):

Yanlin Su ◽

Zhe Chen ◽

Wei Xie

Keyword(s):

Meta Analysis ◽

Relevant Literature ◽

Premenopausal Women ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Spine Density ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Premenopausal Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease that seriously affects human health and quality of life. This study is aimed at determining whether swimming had an effect on the bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and femoral neck in postmenopausal and premenopausal osteoporosis patients. We retrieved relevant literature and analyzed data from randomized controlled trials to assess the effect of swimming on BMD in postmenopausal and premenopausal women. Relevant studies, with no language restrictions, from inception to September 2019, were retrieved from the PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and EBSCO databases independently by two investigators. The keywords used for the literature search were “osteoporosis” and “swimming.” The main results included BMD and T-score. We searched 256 relevant articles and finally screened five articles, including 263 participants. Lumbar spine density was mentioned in three articles. Although the heterogeneity of lumbar vertebral density is moderate, the analysis of swimmers to nonswimmers shows that the lumbar vertebral density in swimmers is improved [heterogeneity: chi2=5.16, df=2 (P=0.08); I2=61%]. We analyzed the following heterogeneous subgroups: subgroup 1 (3–6 hours) and subgroup 2 (<3 hours). The BMD in subgroup 1 was significantly higher than that in the placebo, while no effect on BMD was found in subgroup 2 [heterogeneity: chi2=0.15, df=3 (P=0.70); I2=0%]. According to the current evidence, swimming may improve the BMD of postmenopausal women participants, if the swimming time is between 3 and 6 hours, especially in long-term swimmers. However, the effectiveness of swimming does require further investigation.

Download Full-text

Effectiveness of Electronic Cigarettes in Smoking Cessation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Nicotine & Tobacco Research ◽

10.1093/ntr/ntaa181 ◽

2020 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Igor Grabovac ◽

Moritz Oberndorfer ◽

Jismy Fischer ◽

Winfried Wiesinger ◽

Sandra Haider ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Smoking Cessation ◽

Random Effects ◽

Electronic Cigarettes ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Quality Of Evidence ◽

Registration Number ◽

Meta Analyses

Abstract Introduction Reports of the effectiveness of e-cigarettes (ECs) for smoking cessation vary across different studies making implementation recommendations hard to attain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the current evidence regarding effectiveness of ECs for smoking cessation. Methods PubMed, PsycInfo, and Embase databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing nicotine ECs with non-nicotine ECs or with established smoking cessation interventions (nicotine replacement therapy [NRT] and or counseling) published between 1 January 2014 and 27 June 2020. Data from eligible studies were extracted and used for random-effects meta-analyses (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019141414). Results The search yielded 13 950 publications with 12 studies being identified as eligible for systematic review (N = 8362) and 9 studies for random-effects meta-analyses (range: 30–6006 participants). The proportion of smokers achieving abstinence was 1.71 (95 CI: 1.02–2.84) times higher in nicotine EC users compared with non-nicotine EC users. The proportion of abstinent smokers was 1.69 (95 CI: 1.25–2.27) times higher in EC users compared with participants receiving NRT. EC users showed a 2.04 (95 CI: 0.90–4.64) times higher proportion of abstinent smokers in comparison with participants solely receiving counseling. Conclusions Our results suggest that nicotine ECs may be more effective in smoking cessation when compared with placebo ECs or NRT. When compared with counseling alone, nicotine ECs are more effective short term, but its effectiveness appears to diminish with later follow-ups. Given the small number of studies, heterogeneous design, and the overall moderate to low quality of evidence, it is not possible to offer clear recommendations. Implications The results of this study do not allow for a conclusive argument. However, pooling current evidence points toward a potential for ECs as a smoking cessation tool. Though, given the overall quality of evidence, future studies should aim for more clarity in terms of interventions and larger study populations.

Download Full-text

The Effect of Mode of Delivery On Health-Related Quality-of-Life In Mothers: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

10.21203/rs.3.rs-839758/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Kate Evans ◽

Hannah Fraser ◽

Olalekan Uthman ◽

Osemeke Osokogu ◽

Samantha Johnson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Vaginal Delivery ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Mode Of Delivery ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Health Related Quality ◽

Related Quality ◽

Health Related

Abstract Background: Previous research is inconclusive on the effects of mode of delivery on maternal health-related quality-of-life. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the current evidence for associations between mode of delivery and postpartum health-related quality-of-life. Methods: Electronic databases MEDLINE ALL (OVID), Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL and EMBASE (OVID) were searched for English written articles investigating the relationship between mode of delivery and quality-of-life published form inception to 15th October 2020. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, assessed full texts, and extracted data. Meta-analysis was conducted where possible.Results: Twenty-one studies, including 19,879 women, met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of 18 studies found HRQoL scores were significantly higher for women after vaginal delivery in comparison to caesarean (emergency and elective combined) (Effect Size (ES) 0.17, 95% CI 0.01-0.25, n=7665) with highest scores after assisted vaginal delivery (ES 0.21, 95% CI 0.13-0.30, n=2547). Physical functioning (ES 11.18, 95% CI=2.29-20.06, n=1746), physical role (ES 13.10, 95% CI=1.16-25.05, n=1471), vitality (ES 6.31, 95% CI=1.14-10.29, n=1746) and social functioning (ES 5.69, 95% CI=1.26-10.11, n=1746) were significantly higher after vaginal delivery compared to caesarean. There was no significant difference in bodily pain, emotion role, mental health and general health scores were higher after vaginal delivery compared to caesarean.Conclusions: Health-related quality-of-life scores were higher for women after vaginal delivery in comparison to caesarean section. Consequently, women should be encouraged to deliver vaginally where possible. The findings of this research should be available to the relevant population to help support informed choice

Download Full-text

Does cardiac arrhythmia surgery improve a patient"s quality of life? a systematic review and meta-analysis

EP Europace ◽

10.1093/europace/euab116.262 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽

Author(s):

CAJ Van Der Heijden ◽

E Bidar ◽

R Vos ◽

J Maessen ◽

T Athanasiou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Physical Functioning ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Sf 36 ◽

Meta Regression ◽

One Year ◽

Arrhythmia Surgery

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Although one-year success of arrhythmia surgery for atrial fibrillation (AF) has long been defined as freedom from supraventricular tachyarrhythmia, patient-reported quality of life (QOL) has become increasingly important. Purpose We aimed to analyze current evidence of QOL following both concomitant and stand-alone arrhythmia surgery for AF. Methods Studies reporting on QOL of patients undergoing arrhythmia surgery for AF, stand-alone or concomitant, who provided essential data for the analysis, were included in this systematic review. A meta-analysis was performed on inter-study heterogeneity of changes in QOL in 9 of 12 included studies who used the Short-Form (SF) 36 tool. The metric standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to compare one year outcomes with baseline scores per variable of the SF-36 QOL questionnaire (total patients n = 545). Finally, meta-regression based on rhythm outcome after one year and add-on arrhythmia surgery as covariate were performed. Results QOL scores improved one year after surgical ablation for AF, evaluated by several questionnaires. In standalone arrhythmia procedures, meta-regression showed a significant improvement between the QOL and the procedural effectiveness after one year (Physical Functioning p = 0.015, Role Physical p = 0.006, General Health p = 0.002, Social Functioning p = 0.043. Forest plot Physical Functioning: SMD = 1.105; heterogeneity: I²=90.6%, p < 0.001). While this association was also suggested in concomitant procedures, only the variable Physical Role demonstrated a significant improvement when comparing QOL of cardiac surgery with and without add-on surgical AF ablation (p = 0.037). Conclusion Arrhythmia surgery for AF improves QOL. Both in standalone and concomitant procedures, the improvement in QOL seems to be related to the procedural effectiveness to maintain sinus rhythm after 12 months. Abstract Figure. SF-36 variable Physical Functioning

Download Full-text