scholarly journals Analysis of m6A RNA Methylation-Related Genes in Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Their Correlation with Survival

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1474
Author(s):  
Yong Li ◽  
Dandan Qi ◽  
Baoli Zhu ◽  
Xin Ye
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Clustering Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Consensus Clustering ◽  
Rna Methylation ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
M6a Rna Methylation ◽  
Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
One Way Anova

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification on RNA plays an important role in tumorigenesis and metastasis, which could change gene expression and even function at multiple levels such as RNA splicing, stability, translocation, and translation. In this study, we aim to conduct a comprehensive analysis on m6A RNA methylation-related genes, including m6A RNA methylation regulators and m6A RNA methylation-modified genes, in liver hepatocellular carcinoma, and their relationship with survival and clinical features. Data, which consist of the expression of widely reported m6A RNA methylation-related genes in liver hepatocellular carcinoma from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Univariate Cox regression, a protein–protein interaction network, gene enrichment analysis, feature screening, a risk prognostic model, correlation analysis, and consensus clustering analysis. In total, 405 of the m6A RNA methylation-related genes were found based on one-way ANOVA. Among them, DNA topoisomerase 2-alpha (TOP2A), exodeoxyribonuclease 1 (EXO1), ser-ine/threonine-protein kinase Nek2 (NEK2), baculoviral IAP repeat-containing protein 5 (BIRC5), hyaluronan mediated motility receptor (HMMR), structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 4 (SMC4), bloom syndrome protein (BLM), ca-sein kinase I isoform epsilon (CSNK1E), cytoskeleton-associated protein 5 (CKAP5), and inner centromere protein (INCENP), which were m6A RNA methylation-modified genes, were recognized as the hub genes based on the protein–protein interaction analysis. The risk prognostic model showed that gender, AJCC stage, grade, T, and N were significantly different between the subgroup with the high and low risk groups. The AUC, the evaluation parameter of the prediction model which was built by RandomForest, was 0.7. Furthermore, two subgroups were divided by consensus clustering analysis, in which stage, grade, and T differed. We identified the important genes expressed significantly among two clusters, including uridine-cytidine kinase 2 (UCK2), filensin (BFSP1), tubulin-specific chaperone D (TBCD), histone-lysine N-methyltransferase PRDM16 (PRDM16), phosphorylase b ki-nase regulatory subunit alpha (PHKA2), serine/threonine-protein kinase BRSK2 (BRSK2), Arf-GAP with coiled-coil (ACAP3), general transcription factor 3C polypep-tide 2 (GTF3C2), and guanine nucleotide exchange factor MSS4 (RABIF). In our study, the m6A RNA methylation-related genes in liver hepatocellular carcinoma were analyzed systematically, including the expression, interaction, function, and prognostic values, which provided an important theoretical basis for m6A RNA methylation in liver cancer. The nine important m6A-related genes could be prognostic markers in the survival time of patients.

scholarly journals N6-Methyladenosine RNA modification in cerebrospinal fluid as a novel potential diagnostic biomarker for progressive multiple sclerosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Ye ◽  
Tianzhu Wang ◽  
Xiaoxin Wu ◽  
Jie Liang ◽  
Jiaoxing Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Clustering Analysis ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Rna Modification ◽  
Diagnostic Model ◽  
Consensus Clustering ◽  
Rna Methylation ◽  
M6a Rna Methylation

Abstract Background Progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) is an uncommon and severe subtype of MS that worsens gradually and leads to irreversible disabilities in young adults. Currently, there are no applicable or reliable biomarkers to distinguish PMS from relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Previous studies have demonstrated that dysfunction of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA modification is relevant to many neurological disorders. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the diagnostic biomarkers for PMS based on m6A regulatory genes in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Methods Gene expression matrices were downloaded from the ArrayExpress database. Then, we identified differentially expressed m6A regulatory genes between MS and non-MS patients. MS clusters were identified by consensus clustering analysis. Next, we analyzed the correlation between clusters and clinical characteristics. The random forest (RF) algorithm was applied to select key m6A-related genes. The support vector machine (SVM) was then used to construct a diagnostic gene signature. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the accuracy of the diagnostic model. In addition, CSF samples from MS and non-MS patients were collected and used for external validation, as evaluated by an m6A RNA Methylation Quantification Kit and by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results The 13 central m6A RNA methylation regulators were all upregulated in MS patients when compared with non-MS patients. Consensus clustering analysis identified two clusters, both of which were significantly associated with MS subtypes. Next, we divided 61 MS patients into a training set (n = 41) and a test set (n = 20). The RF algorithm identified eight feature genes, and the SVM method was successfully applied to construct a diagnostic model. ROC curves revealed good performance. Finally, the analysis of 11 CSF samples demonstrated that RRMS samples exhibited significantly higher levels of m6A RNA methylation and higher gene expression levels of m6A-related genes than PMS samples. Conclusions The dynamic modification of m6A RNA methylation is involved in the progression of MS and could potentially represent a novel CSF biomarker for diagnosing MS and distinguishing PMS from RRMS in the early stages of the disease.

scholarly journals Expression pattern and prognostic value of N6-methyladenosine RNA methylation key regulators in hepatocellular carcinoma

Mutagenesis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 369-379
Author(s):  
Min Deng ◽  
Lin Fang ◽  
Shao-Hua Li ◽  
Rong-Ce Zhao ◽  
Jie Mei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Consensus Clustering ◽  
Rna Methylation ◽  
M6a Rna Methylation

Abstract Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still one of the most common malignancies worldwide. The accuracy of biomarkers for predicting the prognosis of HCC and the therapeutic effect is not satisfactory. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation regulators play a crucial role in various tumours. Our research aims further to determine the predictive value of m6A methylation regulators and establish a prognostic model for HCC. In this study, the data of HCC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was obtained, and the expression level of 15 genes and survival was examined. Then we identified two clusters of HCC with different clinical factors, constructed prognostic markers and analysed gene set enrichment, proteins’ interaction and gene co-expression. Three subgroups by consensus clustering according to the expression of the 13 genes were identified. The risk score generated by five genes divided HCC patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. In addition, we developed a prognostic marker that can identify high-risk HCC. Finally, a novel prognostic nomogram was developed to accurately predict HCC patients’ prognosis. The expression levels of 13 m6A RNA methylation regulators were significantly upregulated in HCC samples. The prognosis of cluster 1 and cluster 3 was worse. Patients in the high-risk group show a poor prognosis. Moreover, the risk score was an independent prognostic factor for HCC patients. In conclusion, we reveal the critical role of m6A RNA methylation modification in HCC and develop a predictive model based on the m6A RNA methylation regulators, which can accurately predict HCC patients’ prognosis and provide meaningful guidance for clinical treatment.

scholarly journals Identification of a m6A RNA methylation regulators-based signature for predicting the prognosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Zhou ◽  
Shuyan Li ◽  
Liqing Zou ◽  
Tiantian Guo ◽  
Xi Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Clustering Analysis ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Consensus Clustering ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Rna Methylation ◽  
M6a Rna Methylation

Abstract BackgroundN6-methyladenosine (m6A) is an abundant modification in RNAs that affects RNA metabolism, and it is reported to be closely related to cancer occurrence and metastasis. The aim of this study was to identify novel prognostic biomarkers by using m6A RNA methylation regulators capable of improving the risk-stratification criteria of survival for esophageal adenocarcinoma patients.MethodsThe gene expression data of 16 m6A methylation regulators and its relevant clinical information were extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The expression pattern of these m6A methylation regulators was evaluated. Consensus clustering analysis was conducted to identify clusters of esophageal adenocarcinoma patients with different prognosis. Univariate, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed to construct multiple-gene risk signature. A survival analysis was carried out to determine the prognosis significance.ResultsTen m6A methylation regulators (HNRNPA2B1, HNRNPC, YTHDF1, METTL3, YTHDF2, RBM15, YTHDC1, WTAP, KIAA1429 and YTHDF3) showed significant up-regulation in tumor tissue. Consensus clustering analysis identified three clusters of esophageal adenocarcinoma patients with different overall survival. A five-gene signature, HNRNPA2B1, KIAA1429, WTAP, METTL16 and ALKBH5, was constructed to serve as a prognostic indicator for distinguish esophageal adenocarcinoma patients with different prognosis. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve which indicated the area under the curve (AUC) were 0.803, demonstrated that the prognostic signature had preferable prediction efficiency.Conclusionsm6A methylation regulators exert as potential biomarkers for prognostic stratification of esophageal adenocarcinoma patients and might help clinicians make individualized therapy for this patient population.

The effect of m6A RNA methylation regulators on tumor microenvironment in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuaishuai Huang ◽  
Xiaodong Qing ◽  
Qiuzi Lin ◽  
Qiaoling Wu ◽  
Xue Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
Consensus Clustering ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Rna Methylation ◽  
M6a Rna Methylation

Abstract Background: m6A RNA methylation and tumor microenvironment (TME) have been reported to play important roles in the progression and prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). However, whether m6A RNA methylation regulators affect TME in ccRCC remains unknown. Thus, the current study is designed to comprehensively evaluate the effect of m6A RNA methylation regulators on TME in ccRCC.Methods: Transcriptome data of ccRCC was obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Consensus clustering analysis was conducted based on the expressions of m6A RNA methylation regulators. Survival differences were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis between the clusters. DESeq2 package was used to analyze the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the clusters. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were analyzed by ClusterProfiler R package. Immune, stromal and ESTIMATE scores were assessed by ESTIMATE algorithm. CIBERSORT algorithm was applied to evaluate immune infiltration. The expressions of human leukocyte antigen (HLA), immune checkpoint molecules, and Th1/IFNγ gene signature associated with TME were also compared between the clusters. TIDE algorithm and subclass mapping were used to analyze the clinical response of different clusters to PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade. Results: The expressions of fifteen m6A regulators were significantly different between ccRCC and normal kidney tissues. Based on the expressions of those fifteen m6A regulators, two clusters were identified by consensus clustering, in which cluster 1 had better overall survival (OS). A total of 4,429 DEGs were found between the two clusters, and were enriched into immune-related biological processes. Further analysis of the two clusters’ TME showed that cluster 1 had lower immune and ESTIMATE scores, higher expressions of HLA and lower expressions of immune checkpoint molecules. Besides, immune infiltration and the expressions of Th1/IFNγ gene signature also have significant differences between two clusters. Conclusions: Our study revealed that m6A regulators were important participants in the development of ccRCC, with a close relationship with TME.

scholarly journals Significance of N6-Methyladenosine RNA Methylation Regulators in Immune Infiltrates of Ovarian Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Gu ◽  
Fangfang Bi
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Clustering Algorithm ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Regulation Mechanism ◽  
Consensus Clustering ◽  
Differential Analysis ◽  
Rna Methylation ◽  
M6a Rna Methylation

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation regulators play an important role in the occurrence and development of tumors. Here, we aimed to identify the potential roles of m6A RNA methylation regulators in immune infiltrates of ovarian cancer. We obtained two distinct m6A patterns (m6Acluster.A and m6Acluster.B) based on the expression levels of all 21 m6A RNA methylation regulators from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database using a consensus clustering algorithm. Differential analysis of m6Acluster.A and m6Acluster.B identified 196 m6A-related genes. We further validated the m6A regulation mechanism based on the 196 m6A-related genes using another consensus clustering algorithm. Considering individual differences, principal component analysis algorithms were used to calculate an m6A score for each sample in order to quantify the m6A patterns. A low m6A score was associated with immune activation and enhanced response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, whereas a high m6A score was associated with tumor progression. Finally, we successfully verified the correlation between m6A regulators and immune microenvironment in OC using our microarray analysis data. In summary, m6A regulators play non-negligible roles in immune infiltrates of ovarian cancer. Our investigation of m6A patterns may help to guide future immunotherapy strategies for advanced ovarian cancer.

scholarly journals Multiple m6A RNA methylation modulators promote the malignant progression of hepatocellular carcinoma and affect its clinical prognosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanfang Qu ◽  
Sanyu Qin ◽  
Xuemei Zhang ◽  
Xiaotong Bo ◽  
Zhengchun Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Cancer Genome ◽  
Malignant Progression ◽  
World Health ◽  
Pathological Grade ◽  
Clinical Prognosis ◽  
Rna Methylation ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
Normal Tissues ◽  
M6a Rna Methylation

Abstract Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in the world. N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A) RNA methylation is dynamically regulated by m 6 A RNA methylation modulators (“writer,” “eraser,” and “reader” proteins), which are associated with cancer occurrence and development. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between m 6 A RNA methylation modulators and HCC. Methods: First, using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) databases, we compared the expression levels of 13 major m6A RNA methylation modulators between HCC and normal tissues. Second, we applied consensus clustering to the expression data on the m 6 A RNA methylation modulators to divide the HCC tissues into two subgroups (clusters 1 and 2), and we compared the clusters in terms of overall survival (OS), World Health Organization (WHO) stage, and pathological grade. Third, using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, we constructed a risk signature involving the m 6 A RNA methylation modulators that affected OS in TCGA and ICGC analyses. Results: We found that the expression levels of 12 major m6A RNA methylation modulators were significantly different between HCC and normal tissues. After dividing the HCC tissues into clusters 1 and 2, we found that cluster 2 had poorer OS, higher WHO stage, and higher pathological grade. Four m 6 A RNA methylation modulators (YTHDF1, YTHDF2, METTL3, and KIAA1429) affecting OS in the TCGA and ICGC analyses were selected to construct a risk signature, which was significantly associated with WHO stage and was also an independent prognostic marker of OS. Conclusions: In summary, m 6 A RNA methylation modulators are key participants in the malignant progression of HCC and have potential value in prognostication and treatment decisions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document