scholarly journals Cell Lysis Directed by SulA in Response to DNA Damage in Escherichia coli

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 4535
Author(s):  
Masayuki Murata ◽  
Keiko Nakamura ◽  
Tomoyuki Kosaka ◽  
Natsuko Ota ◽  
Ayumi Osawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Cell Lysis ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cell Populations ◽  
Cell Death Pathways ◽  
Z Ring ◽  
Dependent Cell ◽  
Damaged Dna

The SOS response is induced upon DNA damage and the inhibition of Z ring formation by the product of the sulA gene, which is one of the LexA-regulated genes, allows time for repair of damaged DNA. On the other hand, severely DNA-damaged cells are eliminated from cell populations. Overexpression of sulA leads to cell lysis, suggesting SulA eliminates cells with unrepaired damaged DNA. Transcriptome analysis revealed that overexpression of sulA leads to up-regulation of numerous genes, including soxS. Deletion of soxS markedly reduced the extent of cell lysis by sulA overexpression and soxS overexpression alone led to cell lysis. Further experiments on the SoxS regulon suggested that LpxC is a main player downstream from SoxS. These findings suggested the SulA-dependent cell lysis (SDCL) cascade as follows: SulA→SoxS→LpxC. Other tests showed that the SDCL cascade pathway does not overlap with the apoptosis-like and mazEF cell death pathways.

Mutagenesis and More: umuDC and the Escherichia coli SOS Response

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 1599-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley T Smith ◽  
Graham C Walker
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Posttranslational Regulation ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Sos Mutagenesis ◽  
Induced Mutagenesis ◽  
Mechanistic Basis ◽  
Increase Cell Survival

Abstract The cellular response to DNA damage that has been most extensively studied is the SOS response of Escherichia coli. Analyses of the SOS response have led to new insights into the transcriptional and posttranslational regulation of processes that increase cell survival after DNA damage as well as insights into DNA-damage-induced mutagenesis, i.e., SOS mutagenesis. SOS mutagenesis requires the recA and umuDC gene products and has as its mechanistic basis the alteration of DNA polymerase III such that it becomes capable of replicating DNA containing miscoding and noncoding lesions. Ongoing investigations of the mechanisms underlying SOS mutagenesis, as well as recent observations suggesting that the umuDC operon may have a role in the regulation of the E. coli cell cycle after DNA damage has occurred, are discussed.

scholarly journals Characterization of the Two Mycobacterium tuberculosis recA Promoters

2003 ◽  
Vol 185 (20) ◽  
pp. 6005-6015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna K. Gopaul ◽  
Patricia C. Brooks ◽  
Jean-François Prost ◽  
Elaine O. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Promoter Activity ◽  
The Other ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
Promoter Elements ◽  
Kinetics Of

ABSTRACT The recA gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is unusual in that it is expressed from two promoters, one of which, P1, is DNA damage inducible independently of LexA and RecA, while the other, P2, is regulated by LexA in the classical way (E. O. Davis, B. Springer, K. K. Gopaul, K. G. Papavinasasundaram, P. Sander, and E. C. Böttger, Mol. Microbiol. 46:791-800, 2002). In this study we characterized these two promoters in more detail. Firstly, we localized the promoter elements for each of the promoters, and in so doing we identified a mutation in each promoter which eliminates promoter activity. Interestingly, a motif with similarity to Escherichia coli σ70 −35 elements but located much closer to the −10 element is important for optimal expression of P1, whereas the sequence at the −35 location is not. Secondly, we found that the sequences flanking the promoters can have a profound effect on the expression level directed by each of the promoters. Finally, we examined the contribution of each of the promoters to recA expression and compared their kinetics of induction following DNA damage.

scholarly journals A newly identified prophage-encoded gene, ymfM, causes SOS-inducible filamentation in Escherichia coli

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirin Ansari ◽  
James C. Walsh ◽  
Amy L. Bottomley ◽  
Iain G. Duggin ◽  
Catherine Burke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Pathogenic Bacteria ◽  
Bacterial Resistance ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Ring Assembly ◽  
Multiple Alternative ◽  
Z Ring ◽  
Cell Division Inhibitor

Rod-shaped bacteria such as Escherichia coli can regulate cell division in response to stress, leading to filamentation, a process where cell growth and DNA replication continues in the absence of division, resulting in elongated cells. The classic example of stress is DNA damage which results in the activation of the SOS response. While the inhibition of cell division during SOS has traditionally been attributed to SulA in E. coli, a previous report suggests that the e14 prophage may also encode an SOS-inducible cell division inhibitor, previously named SfiC. However, the exact gene responsible for this division inhibition has remained unknown for over 35 years. A recent high-throughput over-expression screen in E. coli identified the e14 prophage gene, ymfM, as a potential cell division inhibitor. In this study, we show that the inducible expression of ymfM from a plasmid causes filamentation. We show that this expression of ymfM results in the inhibition of Z ring formation and is independent of the well characterised inhibitors of FtsZ ring assembly in E. coli, SulA, SlmA and MinC. We confirm that ymfM is the gene responsible for the SfiC phenotype as it contributes to the filamentation observed during the SOS response. This function is independent of SulA, highlighting that multiple alternative division inhibition pathways exist during the SOS response. Our data also highlight that our current understanding of cell division regulation during the SOS response is incomplete and raises many questions regarding how many inhibitors there actually are and their purpose for the survival of the organism. Importance: Filamentation is an important biological mechanism which aids in the survival, pathogenesis and antibiotic resistance of bacteria within different environments, including pathogenic bacteria such as uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Here we have identified a bacteriophage-encoded cell division inhibitor which contributes to the filamentation that occurs during the SOS response. Our work highlights that there are multiple pathways that inhibit cell division during stress. Identifying and characterising these pathways is a critical step in understanding survival tactics of bacteria which become important when combating the development of bacterial resistance to antibiotics and their pathogenicity.

scholarly journals Deuterium oxide enhances the SOS response of Escherichia coli induced by bactericidal agents

2020 ◽  
pp. 79-80
Author(s):  
С.В. Смирнова ◽  
Т.Н. Шапиро ◽  
Е.В. Игонина ◽  
С.К. Абилев
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Nalidixic Acid ◽  
Deuterium Oxide ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Genotoxic Effect ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Lux Biosensor ◽  
First Time

Изучали генотоксическое действие бактерицидных средств диоксидина, фурацилина и налидиксовой кислоты на клетки дейтерированной культуры lux-биосенсора E.coli MG1655 (pColD::lux), люминесцирующего в результате активации промотора гена колицина colD в ответ на повреждение ДНК. Впервые показано, что оксид дейтерия (D2O) в концентрации 9% усиливает SOS-ответ, индуцированный исследуемыми лекарственными препаратами, в 1,6-2,8 раза в клетках E. coli. We studied the genotoxic effect of bactericidal agents: dioxine, furaciline and nalidixic acid on cells of the deuterated culture lux-biosensor E. coli MG1655 (pColD::lux), which luminesces as a result of activation of the colicin gene promoter colD in response to DNA damage. For the first time, it was shown that deuterium oxide (D2O) at a concentration of 9% increases the SOS response by 1.6-2.8 times in E. coli cells induced by the studied drugs.

scholarly journals A newly identified prophage-encoded gene, ymfM, causes SOS-inducible filamentation in Escherichia coli

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirin Ansari ◽  
James C. Walsh ◽  
Amy L. Bottomley ◽  
Iain G. Duggin ◽  
Catherine Burke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Pathogenic Bacteria ◽  
Bacterial Resistance ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Ring Assembly ◽  
Z Ring ◽  
Response To Stress ◽  
Cell Division Inhibitor

AbstractRod-shaped bacteria such as Escherichia coli can regulate cell division in response to stress, leading to filamentation, a process where cell growth and DNA replication continues in the absence of division, resulting in elongated cells. The classic example of stress is DNA damage which results in the activation of the SOS response. While the inhibition of cell division during SOS has traditionally been attributed to SulA in E. coli, a previous report suggests that the e14 prophage may also encode an SOS-inducible cell division inhibitor, previously named SfiC. However, the exact gene responsible for this division inhibition has remained unknown for over 35 years. A recent high-throughput over-expression screen in E. coli identified the e14 prophage gene, ymfM, as a potential cell division inhibitor. In this study, we show that the inducible expression of ymfM from a plasmid causes filamentation. We show that this expression of ymfM results in the inhibition of Z ring formation and is independent of the well characterised inhibitors of FtsZ ring assembly in E. coli, SulA, SlmA and MinC. We confirm that ymfM is the gene responsible for the SfiC+ phenotype as it contributes to the filamentation observed during the SOS response. This function is independent of SulA, highlighting that multiple division inhibition pathways exist during the stress-induced SOS response. Our data also highlight that our current understanding of cell division regulation during the SOS response is incomplete and raises many questions regarding how many inhibitors there actually are and their purpose for the survival of the organism.ImportanceFilamentation is an important biological mechanism which aids in the survival, pathogenesis and antibiotic resistance of bacteria within different environments, including pathogenic bacteria such as uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Here we have identified a bacteriophage-encoded cell division inhibitor which contributes to the filamentation that occurs during the SOS response. Our work highlights that there are multiple pathways that inhibit cell division during stress. Identifying and characterising these pathways is a critical step in understanding survival tactics of bacteria which become important when combating the development of bacterial resistance to antibiotics and their pathogenicity.

scholarly journals Intracellular d-Serine Accumulation Promotes Genetic Diversity via Modulated Induction of RecA in Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli

2016 ◽  
Vol 198 (24) ◽  
pp. 3318-3328 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. R. Connolly ◽  
Andrew J. Roe
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Genetic Diversity ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Mutation Frequency ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia Coli ◽  
Lytic Bacteriophage ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Lexa Repressor ◽  
Physiological Relevance

ABSTRACTWe recently discovered that exposure of enterohemorrhagicEscherichia coli(EHEC) tod-serine resulted in accumulation of this unusual amino acid, induction of the SOS regulon, and downregulation of the type III secretion system that is essential for efficient colonization of the host. Here, we have investigated the physiological relevance of this elevated SOS response, which is of particular interest given the presence of Stx toxin-carrying lysogenic prophages on the EHEC chromosome that are activated during the SOS response. We found that RecA elevation in response tod-serine, while being significant, was heterogeneous and not capable of activatingstxexpression orstxphage transduction to a nonlysogenic recipient. This “SOS-like response” was, however, capable of increasing the mutation frequency associated with low-level RecA activity, thus promoting genetic diversity. Furthermore, this response was entirely dependent on RecA and enhanced in the presence of a DNA-damaging agent, indicating a functional SOS response, but did not result in observable cleavage of the LexA repressor alone, indicating a controlled mechanism of induction. This work demonstrates that environmental factors not usually associated with DNA damage are capable of promoting an SOS-like response. We propose that this modulated induction of RecA allows EHEC to adapt to environmental insults such asd-serine while avoiding unwanted phage-induced lysis.IMPORTANCEThe SOS response is a global stress network that is triggered by the presence of DNA damage due to breakage or stalled replication forks. Activation of the SOS response can trigger the replication of lytic bacteriophages and promote genetic diversification through error-prone polymerases. We have demonstrated that the host-associated metabolited-serine contributes toEscherichia coliniche specification and accumulates inside cells that cannot catabolize it. This results in a modulated activation of the SOS antirepressor RecA that is insufficient to trigger lytic bacteriophage but capable of increasing the SOS-associated mutation frequency. These findings describe how relevant signals not normally associated with DNA damage can hijack the SOS response, promoting diversity asE. colistrains adapt while avoiding unwanted phage lysis.

scholarly journals An SOS Response Induced by High Pressure in Escherichia coli

2004 ◽  
Vol 186 (18) ◽  
pp. 6133-6141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abram Aertsen ◽  
Rob Van Houdt ◽  
Kristof Vanoirbeek ◽  
Chris W. Michiels
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Fluorescence Induction ◽  
Food Preservation ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Mediated Effects ◽  
Bona Fide ◽  
First Time

ABSTRACT Although pressure is an important environmental parameter in microbial niches such as the deep sea and is furthermore used in food preservation to inactivate microorganisms, the fundamental understanding of its effects on bacteria remains fragmentary. Our group recently initiated differential fluorescence induction screening to search for pressure-induced Escherichia coli promoters and has already reported induction of the heat shock regulon. Here the screening was continued, and we report for the first time that pressure induces a bona fide SOS response in E. coli, characterized by the RecA and LexA-dependent expression of uvrA, recA, and sulA. Moreover, it was shown that pressure is capable of triggering lambda prophage induction in E. coli lysogens. The remnant lambdoid e14 element, however, could not be induced by pressure, as opposed to UV irradiation, indicating subtle differences between the pressure-induced and the classical SOS response. Furthermore, the pressure-induced SOS response seems not to be initiated by DNA damage, since ΔrecA and lexA1 (Ind−) mutants, which are intrinsically hypersensitive to DNA damage, were not sensitized or were only very slightly sensitized for pressure-mediated killing and since pressure treatment was not found to be mutagenic. In light of these findings, the current knowledge of pressure-mediated effects on bacteria is discussed.

scholarly journals RecA4142 Causes SOS Constitutive Expression by Loading onto Reversed Replication Forks in Escherichia coli K-12

2010 ◽  
Vol 192 (10) ◽  
pp. 2575-2582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarukit Edward Long ◽  
Shawn C. Massoni ◽  
Steven J. Sandler
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Constitutive Expression ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Specific Mechanism ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Single Stranded Dna ◽  
K 12

ABSTRACT Escherichia coli initiates the SOS response when single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) produced by DNA damage is bound by RecA and forms a RecA-DNA filament. recA SOS constitutive [recA(Con)] mutants induce the SOS response in the absence of DNA damage. It has been proposed that recA(Con) mutants bind to ssDNA at replication forks, although the specific mechanism is unknown. Previously, it had been shown that recA4142(F217Y), a novel recA(Con) mutant, was dependent on RecBCD for its high SOS constitutive [SOS(Con)] expression. This was presumably because RecA4142 was loaded at a double-strand end (DSE) of DNA. Herein, it is shown that recA4142 SOS(Con) expression is additionally dependent on ruvAB (replication fork reversal [RFR] activity only) and recJ (5′→3′ exonuclease), xonA (3′→5′ exonuclease) and partially dependent on recQ (helicase). Lastly, sbcCD mutations (Mre11/Rad50 homolog) in recA4142 strains caused full SOS(Con) expression in an ruvAB-, recBCD-, recJ-, and xonA-independent manner. It is hypothesized that RuvAB catalyzes RFR, RecJ and XonA blunt the DSE (created by the RFR), and then RecBCD loads RecA4142 onto this end to produce SOS(Con) expression. In sbcCD mutants, RecA4142 can bind other DNA substrates by itself that are normally degraded by the SbcCD nuclease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document