scholarly journals Deuterium oxide enhances the SOS response of Escherichia coli induced by bactericidal agents

2020 ◽  
pp. 79-80
Author(s):  
С.В. Смирнова ◽  
Т.Н. Шапиро ◽  
Е.В. Игонина ◽  
С.К. Абилев
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Nalidixic Acid ◽  
Deuterium Oxide ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Genotoxic Effect ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Lux Biosensor ◽  
First Time

Изучали генотоксическое действие бактерицидных средств диоксидина, фурацилина и налидиксовой кислоты на клетки дейтерированной культуры lux-биосенсора E.coli MG1655 (pColD::lux), люминесцирующего в результате активации промотора гена колицина colD в ответ на повреждение ДНК. Впервые показано, что оксид дейтерия (D2O) в концентрации 9% усиливает SOS-ответ, индуцированный исследуемыми лекарственными препаратами, в 1,6-2,8 раза в клетках E. coli. We studied the genotoxic effect of bactericidal agents: dioxine, furaciline and nalidixic acid on cells of the deuterated culture lux-biosensor E. coli MG1655 (pColD::lux), which luminesces as a result of activation of the colicin gene promoter colD in response to DNA damage. For the first time, it was shown that deuterium oxide (D2O) at a concentration of 9% increases the SOS response by 1.6-2.8 times in E. coli cells induced by the studied drugs.

scholarly journals An SOS Response Induced by High Pressure in Escherichia coli

2004 ◽  
Vol 186 (18) ◽  
pp. 6133-6141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abram Aertsen ◽  
Rob Van Houdt ◽  
Kristof Vanoirbeek ◽  
Chris W. Michiels
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Fluorescence Induction ◽  
Food Preservation ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Mediated Effects ◽  
Bona Fide ◽  
First Time

ABSTRACT Although pressure is an important environmental parameter in microbial niches such as the deep sea and is furthermore used in food preservation to inactivate microorganisms, the fundamental understanding of its effects on bacteria remains fragmentary. Our group recently initiated differential fluorescence induction screening to search for pressure-induced Escherichia coli promoters and has already reported induction of the heat shock regulon. Here the screening was continued, and we report for the first time that pressure induces a bona fide SOS response in E. coli, characterized by the RecA and LexA-dependent expression of uvrA, recA, and sulA. Moreover, it was shown that pressure is capable of triggering lambda prophage induction in E. coli lysogens. The remnant lambdoid e14 element, however, could not be induced by pressure, as opposed to UV irradiation, indicating subtle differences between the pressure-induced and the classical SOS response. Furthermore, the pressure-induced SOS response seems not to be initiated by DNA damage, since ΔrecA and lexA1 (Ind−) mutants, which are intrinsically hypersensitive to DNA damage, were not sensitized or were only very slightly sensitized for pressure-mediated killing and since pressure treatment was not found to be mutagenic. In light of these findings, the current knowledge of pressure-mediated effects on bacteria is discussed.

Mutagenesis and More: umuDC and the Escherichia coli SOS Response

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 1599-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley T Smith ◽  
Graham C Walker
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Posttranslational Regulation ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Sos Mutagenesis ◽  
Induced Mutagenesis ◽  
Mechanistic Basis ◽  
Increase Cell Survival

Abstract The cellular response to DNA damage that has been most extensively studied is the SOS response of Escherichia coli. Analyses of the SOS response have led to new insights into the transcriptional and posttranslational regulation of processes that increase cell survival after DNA damage as well as insights into DNA-damage-induced mutagenesis, i.e., SOS mutagenesis. SOS mutagenesis requires the recA and umuDC gene products and has as its mechanistic basis the alteration of DNA polymerase III such that it becomes capable of replicating DNA containing miscoding and noncoding lesions. Ongoing investigations of the mechanisms underlying SOS mutagenesis, as well as recent observations suggesting that the umuDC operon may have a role in the regulation of the E. coli cell cycle after DNA damage has occurred, are discussed.

scholarly journals The Escherichia coli SOS Response: Much More than DNA Damage Repair

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zdravko Podlesek ◽  
Darja Žgur Bertok
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Genetic Adaptation ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Bacterial Pathogenicity ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Regulator Genes

The Escherichia coli SOS response is an inducible DNA damage repair pathway controlled by two key regulators, LexA, a repressor and RecA, an inducer. Upon DNA damage RecA is activated and stimulates self cleavage of LexA, leading to, in E. coli, derepresion of approximately 50 SOS genes. The response is triggered by exogenous and endogenous signals that bacteria encounter at a number of sites within the host. Nevertheless, besides regulating DNA damage repair the SOS response plays a much broader role. Thus, SOS error prone polymerases promote elevated mutation rates significant for genetic adaptation and diversity, including antibiotic resistance. Here we review the E. coli SOS response in relation to recalcitrance to antimicrobials, including persister and biofilm formation, horizontal gene tranfer, gene mobility, bacterial pathogenicity, as well SOS induced bacteriocins that drive diversification. Phenotypic heterogeneity in expression of the SOS regulator genes, recA and lexA as well as colicin activity genes is also discussed.

scholarly journals Mechanistic insights into synergy between nalidixic acid and tetracycline against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Escherichia coli

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Gaurav ◽  
Varsha Gupta ◽  
Sandeep K. Shrivastava ◽  
Ranjana Pathania
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Nalidixic Acid ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Hospital Environment ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
E Coli

AbstractThe increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance has become a global health problem. Acinetobacter baumannii is an important nosocomial pathogen due to its capacity to persist in the hospital environment. It has a high mortality rate and few treatment options. Antibiotic combinations can help to fight multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial infections, but they are rarely used in the clinics and mostly unexplored. The interaction between bacteriostatic and bactericidal antibiotics are mostly reported as antagonism based on the results obtained in the susceptible model laboratory strain Escherichia coli. However, in the present study, we report a synergistic interaction between nalidixic acid and tetracycline against clinical multi-drug resistant A. baumannii and E. coli. Here we provide mechanistic insight into this dichotomy. The synergistic combination was studied by checkerboard assay and time-kill curve analysis. We also elucidate the mechanism behind this synergy using several techniques such as fluorescence spectroscopy, flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy, morphometric analysis, and real-time polymerase chain reaction. Nalidixic acid and tetracycline combination displayed synergy against most of the MDR clinical isolates of A. baumannii and E. coli but not against susceptible isolates. Finally, we demonstrate that this combination is also effective in vivo in an A. baumannii/Caenorhabditis elegans infection model (p < 0.001)

scholarly journals Quorum Sensing Is a Global Regulatory Mechanism in Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7

2001 ◽  
Vol 183 (17) ◽  
pp. 5187-5197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Sperandio ◽  
Alfredo G. Torres ◽  
Jorge A. Girón ◽  
James B. Kaper
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Quorum Sensing ◽  
Type Strain ◽  
Wild Type Strain ◽  
Regulatory Mechanism ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia Coli ◽  
Trna Genes ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
E Coli

ABSTRACT Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O157:H7 is responsible for outbreaks of bloody diarrhea and hemolytic-uremic syndrome in many countries. EHEC virulence mechanisms include the production of Shiga toxins (Stx) and formation of attaching and effacing (AE) lesions on intestinal epithelial cells. We recently reported that genes involved in the formation of the AE lesion were regulated by quorum sensing through autoinducer-2, which is synthesized by the product of the luxS gene. In this study we hybridized an E. coli gene array with cDNA synthesized from RNA that was extracted from EHEC strain 86-24 and its isogenicluxS mutant. We observed that 404 genes were regulated by luxS at least fivefold, which comprises approximately 10% of the array genes; 235 of these genes were up-regulated and 169 were down-regulated in the wild-type strain compared to in theluxS mutant. Down-regulated genes included several involved in cell division, as well as ribosomal and tRNA genes. Consistent with this pattern of gene expression, theluxS mutant grows faster than the wild-type strain (generation times of 37.5 and 60 min, respectively, in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium). Up-regulated genes included several involved in the expression and assembly of flagella, motility, and chemotaxis. Using operon::lacZ fusions to class I, II, and III flagellar genes, we were able to confirm this transcriptional regulation. We also observed fewer flagella by Western blotting and electron microscopy and decreased motility halos in semisolid agar in the luxS mutant. The average swimming speeds for the wild-type strain and the luxS mutant are 12.5 and 6.6 μm/s, respectively. We also observed an increase in the production of Stx due to quorum sensing. Genes encoding Stx, which are transcribed along with λ-like phage genes, are induced by an SOS response, and genes involved in the SOS response were also regulated by quorum sensing. These results indicate that quorum sensing is a global regulatory mechanism for basic physiological functions of E. coli as well as for virulence factors.

scholarly journals Characterization of Escherichia coli DNA Lesions Generated within J774 Macrophages

2000 ◽  
Vol 182 (18) ◽  
pp. 5225-5230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliana Schlosser-Silverman ◽  
Maya Elgrably-Weiss ◽  
Ilan Rosenshine ◽  
Ron Kohen ◽  
Shoshy Altuvia
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Respiratory Burst ◽  
Defense Mechanism ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Intracellular Bacteria ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Dna Strand

ABSTRACT Macrophages are armed with multiple oxygen-dependent and -independent bactericidal properties. However, the respiratory burst, generating reactive oxygen species, is believed to be a major cause of bacterial killing. We exploited the susceptibility of Escherichia coli in macrophages to characterize the effects of the respiratory burst on intracellular bacteria. We show that E. coli strains recovered from J774 macrophages exhibit high rates of mutations. We report that the DNA damage generated inside macrophages includes DNA strand breaks and the modification 8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine, which are typical oxidative lesions. Interestingly, we found that under these conditions, early in the infection the majority of E. coli cells are viable but gene expression is inhibited. Our findings demonstrate that macrophages can cause severe DNA damage to intracellular bacteria. Our results also suggest that protection against the macrophage-induced DNA damage is an important component of the bacterial defense mechanism within macrophages.

scholarly journals In Vitro Antimicrobial Sensitivity of Escherichia coli Isolated from Clinical Sources

1970 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-101
Author(s):  
Mohammad Shahriar ◽  
Mahboob Hossain ◽  
Shaila Kabir
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Nalidixic Acid ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Antimicrobial Sensitivity ◽  
Sensitivity Pattern ◽  
Low Sensitivity ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Higher Sensitivity

A study of antimicrobial sensitivity of Escherichia coli (E. coli) isolated from clinical sourcesof different diagnostic centers of Dhaka, Bangladesh was carried out to facilitate the choice of drugin the management of E. coli induced symptoms. Very low sensitivity of E. coli towards ampicillin(4%), aztreonam (4%), cloxacillin (5%), nalidixic acid (5%), ciprofloxacin (7.5%), ceftriaxone(12.5%), doxycycline (12.5%), ceftazidime (16.25%), co-trimoxazole (20%), chloramphenicol(22.51%), tetracycline (25%), and netilmicin (35%) was observed. Higher sensitivity pattern wasobserved for gentamicin (56%) and only imipenem (95%) showed sensitivity pattern possiblysusceptible enough to consider for the management of E. coli induced cases in the area under study.The low sensitivity to different antimicrobial could be attributed to their prevailing usage and abusein the area under study.Key words: E. coli; Antimicrobial sensitivity; Clinical isolatesDOI: 10.3329/jbas.v34i1.5497Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences, Vol.34, No.1, 99-101, 2010

scholarly journals Induction and control of the autolytic system of Escherichia coli

1982 ◽  
Vol 152 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-34
Author(s):  
M Leduc ◽  
R Kasra ◽  
J van Heijenoort
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Fatty Acid ◽  
Acid Synthesis ◽  
Induction Method ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Escherichia Coli Cells ◽  
Carbonyl Cyanide ◽  
And Control ◽  
First Time ◽  
Induced Autolysis

Various methods of inducing autolysis of Escherichia coli cells were investigated, some being described here for the first time. For the autolysis of growing cells only induction methods interfering with the biosynthesis of peptidoglycan were taken into consideration, whereas with harvested cells autolysis was induced by rapid osmotic or EDTA shock treatments. The highest rates of autolysis were observed after induction by moenomycin, EDTA, or cephaloridine. The different autolyses examined shared certain common properties. In particular, regardless of the induction method used, more or less extensive peptidoglycan degradation was observed, and 10(-2) M Mg2+ efficiently inhibited the autolytic process. However, for other properties a distinction was made between methods used for growing cells and those used for harvested cells. Autolysis of growing cells required RNA, protein, and fatty acid synthesis. No such requirements were observed with shock-induced autolysis performed with harvested cells. Thus, the effects of Mg2+, rifampicin, chloramphenicol, and cerulenin clearly suggest that distinct factors are involved in the control of the autolytic system of E. Coli. Uncoupling agents such as sodium azide, 2,4-dinitrophenol, and carbonyl-cyanide-m-chlorophenyl hydrazone used at their usual inhibiting concentration had no effect on the cephaloridine or shock-induced autolysis.

scholarly journals A newly identified prophage-encoded gene, ymfM, causes SOS-inducible filamentation in Escherichia coli

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirin Ansari ◽  
James C. Walsh ◽  
Amy L. Bottomley ◽  
Iain G. Duggin ◽  
Catherine Burke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Pathogenic Bacteria ◽  
Bacterial Resistance ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Ring Assembly ◽  
Multiple Alternative ◽  
Z Ring ◽  
Cell Division Inhibitor

Rod-shaped bacteria such as Escherichia coli can regulate cell division in response to stress, leading to filamentation, a process where cell growth and DNA replication continues in the absence of division, resulting in elongated cells. The classic example of stress is DNA damage which results in the activation of the SOS response. While the inhibition of cell division during SOS has traditionally been attributed to SulA in E. coli, a previous report suggests that the e14 prophage may also encode an SOS-inducible cell division inhibitor, previously named SfiC. However, the exact gene responsible for this division inhibition has remained unknown for over 35 years. A recent high-throughput over-expression screen in E. coli identified the e14 prophage gene, ymfM, as a potential cell division inhibitor. In this study, we show that the inducible expression of ymfM from a plasmid causes filamentation. We show that this expression of ymfM results in the inhibition of Z ring formation and is independent of the well characterised inhibitors of FtsZ ring assembly in E. coli, SulA, SlmA and MinC. We confirm that ymfM is the gene responsible for the SfiC phenotype as it contributes to the filamentation observed during the SOS response. This function is independent of SulA, highlighting that multiple alternative division inhibition pathways exist during the SOS response. Our data also highlight that our current understanding of cell division regulation during the SOS response is incomplete and raises many questions regarding how many inhibitors there actually are and their purpose for the survival of the organism. Importance: Filamentation is an important biological mechanism which aids in the survival, pathogenesis and antibiotic resistance of bacteria within different environments, including pathogenic bacteria such as uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Here we have identified a bacteriophage-encoded cell division inhibitor which contributes to the filamentation that occurs during the SOS response. Our work highlights that there are multiple pathways that inhibit cell division during stress. Identifying and characterising these pathways is a critical step in understanding survival tactics of bacteria which become important when combating the development of bacterial resistance to antibiotics and their pathogenicity.

Contribution of SOS Genes to H2O2-induced Apoptosis-like Death in Escherichia Coli

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heesu Kim ◽  
Dong Gun Lee
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Bacterial Dna ◽  
E Coli ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
Induced Apoptosis ◽  
And Function ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a debriding agent that damages the microbial structure and function by generating various reactive oxygen species (ROS). H2O2-produced hydroxyl radical (OH∙) also exert oxidative stress on microorganisms. The spread of antibiotic resistance in bacteria is a serious issue worldwide, and greater efforts are needed to identify and characterize novel antibacterial mechanisms to develop new treatment strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the relationship between H2O2 and Escherichia coli and to elucidate a novel antibacterial mechanism(s) of H2O2. Following H2O2 exposure, increased levels of 8-hydroxyldeoxyguanosine and malondialdehyde indicated that H2O2 accelerates oxidation of bacterial DNA and lipids in E. coli. As oxidative damage worsened, the SOS response was triggered. Cell division arrest and resulting filamentation were identified in cells, indicating that LexA was involved in DNA replication. It was also verified that RecA, a representative SOS gene, helps self-cleavage of LexA and acts as a bacterial caspase-like protein. Our findings also showed that dinF is essential to preserve E. coli from H2O2-induced ROS, and furthermore, demonstrated that H2O2-induced SOS response and SOS genes participate differently in guarding E. coli from oxidative stress. As an extreme SOS response is considered apoptosis-like death (ALD) in bacteria, additional experiments were performed to examine the characteristics of ALD. DNA fragmentation and membrane depolarization appeared in H2O2-treated cells, suggesting that H2O2 causes ALD in E. coli. In conclusion, our investigations revealed that ALD is a novel antibacterial mode of action(s) of H2O2 with important contributions from SOS genes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document