The Clinical and Histopathological Features of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events and Their Outcomes

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) cause a variety of inflammatory eruptions. The understanding of ICI-induced inflammatory eruptions with detailed histopathological findings is not adequate, particularly in Asian populations. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed 51 patients who were histopathologically diagnosed with cutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs) following ICI therapy between 2014 and 2020 at the Department of Dermatology of Kyushu University Hospital. Of the 51 patients (30 men, 21 women), maculopapular rash (38/51, 74.5%), erythema multiforme (2/51, 3.9%), lichenoid reaction (3/51, 5.9%), psoriasiform reaction (3/51, 5.9%), bullous pemphigoid (3/51, 5.9%), scleroderma-like reaction (1/51, 2.0%), and Stevens–Johnson syndrome (1/51, 2.0%) were observed. The clinical and histopathological findings of these eruptions were equivalent to typical cases of common drug eruptions. The onset of maculopapular rash was relatively early (more than half of events occurred within 1 month), whereas lichenoid reactions and autoimmune diseases occurred relatively late (4–8 months). With appropriate treatment and/or interruption of ICIs, most rashes improved (50/51, 98.0%). The ICI-induced inflammatory eruptions shared similar clinical and histopathological features with classical inflammatory eruptions, but a variety of inflammatory eruptions may occur with different degrees of severity. Dermatologists play an important role in providing specialized care for cutaneous irAEs.

Download Full-text

Cutaneous Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Summarized Overview

Current Drug Safety ◽

10.2174/1574886313666180730114309 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

pp. 14-20 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Kerasia-Maria Plachouri ◽

Eleftheria Vryzaki ◽

Sophia Georgiou

Keyword(s):

Side Effects ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Skin Toxicity ◽

Maculopapular Rash ◽

Symptomatic Treatment ◽

Stevens Johnson Syndrome ◽

Life Threatening ◽

Skin Side Effects

Background:The introduction of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the recent years has resulted in high response rates and extended survival in patients with metastatic/advanced malignancies. Their mechanism of action is the indirect activation of cytotoxic T-cells through the blockade of inhibitory receptors of immunomodulatory pathways, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1). Despite their impressive therapeutic results, they can also induce immune-related toxicity, affecting various organs, including the skin.Objective:To provide an updated summarized overview of the most common immune-mediated cutaneous side effects and their management.Method:English articles derived from the databases PubMed and SCOPUS and published between 2009 and 2018, were analyzed for this narrative review.Results:The most common adverse cutaneous reactions include maculopapular rash, lichenoid reactions, vitiligo and pruritus, with severity Grade 1 or 2. Less frequent but eventually life-threatening skin side effects, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms and Toxic Epidermal necrolysis, have also been reported.Conclusion:Basic knowledge of the Immune-Checkpoint-Inhibitors-induced skin toxicity is necessary in order to recognize these treatment-related complications. The most frequent skin side effects, such as maculopapular rash, vitiligo and pruritus, tend to subside under symptomatic treatment so that permanent discontinuation of therapy is not commonly necessary. In the case of life-threatening side effects, apart from the necessary symptomatic treatment, the immunotherapy should be permanently stopped. Information concerning the management of ICIs-mediated skin toxicity can be obtained from the literature as well as from the Summary of Product Characteristics of each agent.

Download Full-text

Treatment Outcomes of Immune-Related Cutaneous Adverse Events

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.18.02141 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (30) ◽

pp. 2746-2758 ◽

Cited By ~ 25

Author(s):

Gregory S. Phillips ◽

Jennifer Wu ◽

Matthew D. Hellmann ◽

Michael A. Postow ◽

Naiyer A. Rizvi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Odds Ratio ◽

Immunoglobulin E ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Laboratory Data ◽

Maculopapular Rash ◽

Clinicopathologic Characteristics ◽

Systemic Treatments ◽

Grade 3

PURPOSE The aim of the current study was to report the efficacy of topical and systemic treatments for immune-related cutaneous adverse events (ircAEs) attributed to checkpoint inhibitors in an uncontrolled cohort of patients referred to oncodermatology clinics. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients with ircAEs evaluated by dermatologists from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2017, at three tertiary care hospitals and cancer centers were identified through electronic medical records. Clinicopathologic characteristics, dermatologic therapy outcome, and laboratory data were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 285 patients (median age, 65 years [range, 17 to 89 years]) with 427 ircAEs were included: pruritus (n = 138; 32%), maculopapular rash (n = 120; 28%), psoriasiform rash (n = 22; 5%), and others (n = 147; 34%). Immune checkpoint inhibitor class was associated with ircAE phenotype ( P = .007), where maculopapular rash was predominant in patients who received combination therapy. Severity of ircAEs was significantly reduced (mean Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade: 1.74 v 0.71; P < .001) with dermatologic interventions, including topical corticosteroids, oral antipruritics, and systemic immunomodulators. A total of 88 ircAEs (20%) were managed with systemic immunomodulators. Of these, 22 (25%) of 88 persisted or worsened. In seven patients with corticosteroid-refractory ircAEs, improvement resulted from targeted biologic immunomodulatory therapies that included rituximab and dupilumab. Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) was elevated in 34 (52%) of 65 patients; grade 3 or greater ircAEs were associated with increased absolute eosinophils (odds ratio, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 13.4) and IL-10 (odds ratio, 23.8; 95% CI, 2.1 to 262.5); mean immunoglobulin E serum levels were greater in higher-grade ircAEs: 1,093 kU/L (grade 3), 245 kU/L (grade 2), and 112 kU/L (grade 1; P = .043). CONCLUSION Most ircAEs responded to symptom- and phenotype-directed dermatologic therapies, whereas biologic therapies were effective in patients with corticosteroid-refractory disease. Increased eosinophils, IL-6, IL-10, and immunoglobulin E were associated with ircAEs, and they may represent actionable therapeutic targets for immune-related skin toxicities.

Download Full-text

Immune-related adverse events are associated with improved outcomes in ICI-treated renal cell carcinoma patients.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.7_suppl.645 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽

pp. 645-645 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Roy Elias ◽

Flora Yan ◽

Nirmish Singla ◽

Nicholas Levonyack ◽

Joseph Formella ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽

Multivariate Analysis ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Cell Carcinoma ◽

Renal Cell ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Prognostic Score ◽

University Hospital ◽

Therapeutic Decisions ◽

Endocrine Organs

645 Background: With the approval of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as first and second line agents for treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), immune-related adverse events (irAE) are a growing concern. In this study, we present the safety profile and outcomes of 90 patients with RCC treated at two centers, including a university (UT Southwestern/Clements University Hospital) and a county hospital (UT Southwestern/Parkland). Methods: All patients with RCC treated with ICI were identified from 2013 to January 31, 2018. We examined the incidence of any treatment-related adverse events and “select” irAEs and evaluated their impact on patient outcomes and therapeutic decisions. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare overall survival (OS) and time to next therapy (TTNT) by the presence of irAEs. Results: Of 90 patients treated with ICI, 65 (72.2%) patients experienced adverse events, most commonly fatigue (37.8%), nausea (14%), and decreased appetite (12.2%). Select irAEs were seen in 38 (42.2%) with the most common irAEs involving the skin (15.6%), gastrointestinal tract (14%), endocrine organs (11%), and lungs (7.8%). There were 15 (16.7%) grade III/IV irAEs resulting in cessation of therapy for 12 (13.3%) patients. The median OS was 35.9 (95% CI: 24.3-not reached) and 26.5 months (95% CI: 10.2-28.8; p = 0.002) for patients with and without irAEs, respectively. The median TTNT was 17.8 (95% CI: 11.3-29.3) and 6.6 months (95% CI: 4.5-9.6; p = 0.002) for patients with and without irAEs, respectively. In multivariate analysis of irAE status and Heng prognostic score, irAEs were associated with improved OS, HR 0.376 (95% CI 0.179–0.792; p = 0.010) and TTNT, HR 0.482 (95% CI 0.280–0.829; p = 0.008). Conclusions: ICI in RCC is well tolerated with only 16.7% of patients experiencing an adverse event resulting in cessation of therapy. The development of an irAE correlated with both an improved median OS as well as median TTNT, a benefit that persisted after multivariate analysis including Heng prognostic scoring. These findings suggest that the development of irAEs may be an independent positive prognostic factor in patients with RCC treated with ICI.

Download Full-text

Atypical Stevens-Johnson syndrome-like reaction in the setting of immune checkpoint inhibition.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.5_suppl.102 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (5_suppl) ◽

pp. 102-102

Author(s):

Gabriel E. Molina ◽

Zizi Yu ◽

Ruth K. Foreman ◽

Kerry Lynn Reynolds ◽

Steven T. Chen

Keyword(s):

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Clinical Course ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Clinical Manifestations ◽

Stevens Johnson Syndrome ◽

Ocular Involvement ◽

Drug Eruptions ◽

Johnson Syndrome ◽

Life Threatening ◽

Epidermal Necrosis

102 Background: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) is a rare, life-threatening mucocutaneous toxicity that can occur in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). ICI-induced SJS is scarcely reported in the literature and thus remains poorly understood, particularly regarding features that may distinguish it from classic SJS. Methods: To describe the timing, clinical manifestations, and treatment course of ICI-induced SJS, this multicenter, retrospective study identified seven patients with SJS in the setting of ICI use from January 2011 through May 2019. Results: All seven patients presented initially as benign, limited drug eruptions after a median of 4 ICI cycles (range, 1-7) and 63 days (range, 13-253 days) from ICI initiation. While none of the patients had prior drug allergies, all 7 were receiving new, recently initiated – i.e., within two months – medications at the time of rash onset. Cases demonstrated characteristic histologic findings of SJS, such as epidermal necrosis, and occasional unusual features, including interface dermatitis. All patients responded favorably and rapidly to systemic therapy, primarily intravenous corticosteroids, with near immediate symptomatic resolution and cessation of progressive skin blistering or detachment. Median length of stay was 11 days and no patients died from SJS. Conclusions: Our cohort defines an atypical SJS-like reaction secondary to ICI use, which is distinct from classic SJS in its delayed onset, mild initial presentation, and rare ocular involvement. The association with concomitant medication use suggests a potential mechanism whereby ICIs reduce patient immune tolerance to subsequent drug exposures. Reassuringly, this atypical SJS-like phenomenon exhibits a benign clinical course and favorable response to standard treatments.

Download Full-text

Multiple immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy: real-world data on various solid tumors

10.21203/rs.2.21095/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Keitaro Shimozaki ◽

Yasutaka Sukawa ◽

Noriko Beppu ◽

Isao Kurihara ◽

Shigeaki Suzuki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Study ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Real World ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Proportional Hazards Model ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽

University Hospital ◽

Real World Data

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for various types of cancer; however, they cause a broad spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The association between the development of irAEs and the clinical benefit remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the association of irAEs and the treatment efficacy in the real-world practice. Methods We conducted a retrospective study on patients with recurrent or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, or gastric cancer who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab) at the Keio University Hospital between September 2014 and January 2019. We recorded treatment-related AEs from medical records and graded them using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. We performed an overall survival (OS) analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results Among 212 patients eligible for this study, 108 experienced irAEs and 42 developed multiple irAEs. OS in patients with multiple irAEs was significantly longer than that in patients with single irAE (42.3 months vs. 18.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25–0.93; P = 0.03). Moreover, OS from the development of a second irAE in those with multiple irAEs was longer than that from the development of the first irAE in patients with single irAEs (median OS, 26.9 months vs. 17.7 months, respectively; HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.30–1.14; P = 0.11). Conclusions Our single-center retrospective study revealed a remarkable tendency associating the development of multiple irAEs with favorable prognoses.

Download Full-text

Detect it so you can treat it: a case series and proposed checklist to detect neurotoxicity in checkpoint therapy

10.21203/rs.3.rs-19760/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Saskia Bolz ◽

Thivyah Ramakrishnan ◽

Michael Fleischer ◽

Elisabeth Livingstone ◽

Benjamin Stolte ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Case Series ◽

Transverse Myelitis ◽

University Hospital ◽

Life Threatening ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy ◽

Cancer Types ◽

Brachial Plexus Neuritis

Abstract Background: Checkpoint inhibitors show impressive and durable responses in various cancer types and provide new avenues for cancer immunotherapy. However, these drugs have a variety of adverse events. Common autoimmune-related adverse effects include fatigue, hepatitis, skin rash, endocrine deficiencies, and colitis. Neurotoxicity has been reported, but its incidence and course remain unclear.Methods: To illustrate the broad spectrum of neurotoxicity, we exemplarily report the neurological adverse events of five patients with melanoma and one patient with differentiated thyroid cancer who received checkpoint inhibitors at Essen University Hospital (Essen, Germany).Results: After treatment with ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab, neurotoxic effects included hypophysitis-associated neck pain and headache, Guillain-Barré syndrome, transverse myelitis, acute brachial plexus neuritis, and ocular myasthenia gravis.Conclusions: Checkpoint inhibitor therapy remains a success story; however, neurological immune-related adverse events may cause severe life-threatening conditions. We propose a checklist for the early detection of neurological adverse events during routine clinical treatment to prevent more severe courses of checkpoint inhibitor-induced neurotoxicity.

Download Full-text

Prevalence, therapy and tumour response in patients with rheumatic immune-related adverse events following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a single-centre analysis

Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease ◽

10.1177/1759720x211006963 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 ◽

pp. 1759720X2110069

Author(s):

Sophia H. Verspohl ◽

Tobias Holderried ◽

Charlotte Behning ◽

Peter Brossart ◽

Valentin S. Schäfer

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Tumour Response ◽

University Hospital ◽

Neck Tumour ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy ◽

The University ◽

Additional Therapy

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improved cancer therapy by inducing a higher immune system activity. This effect can cause rheumatic immune-related adverse events (rh-irAEs), which have not yet been extensively studied. Methods: We analysed 437 patients between 2014 and 2019, treated with ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) and/or nivolumab (anti-PD-1) or pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) at the Clinic for Internal Medicine III, Oncology, Haematology and Rheumatology at the University Hospital Bonn, Germany. Results: Of the 437 patients 60% were males. Patients were mainly treated for melanoma, lung cancer, head and neck tumour and urothelial carcinoma. At least one immune-related adverse event (irAE) was observed in 163 patients (37.3%), including rh-irAE. Most common side effects were rash, colitis and hepatitis. We identified 19 patients (4.3%) with a minimum of one rh-irAE due to ICI therapy; three of those had a pre-existing rheumatic disease. Arthralgia developed most frequently in eight patients (42.1%). Other rh-irAEs were: arthritis ( n = 7; distinguished in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis and undifferentiated arthritis), myalgia ( n = 2) and myositis ( n = 3). Most rh-irAEs were classified as moderately severe (Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events grade 2: 68.4%). Median time between starting ICI therapy and the occurrence of rh-irAE was 109 days (interquartile range 40–420 days). Fifteen patients (78.9%) were treated with glucocorticosteroids. In four cases additional therapy with methotrexate or tocilizumab was required. Even though patients benefited from ICI treatment, therapy had to be discontinued in six of the participants due to rh-irAE. Interestingly, patients with rh-irAE had a significantly higher tumour response compared with patients without rh-irAE (94.4% versus 43.5%; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Rh-irAEs occur under ICI therapy, especially in patients with higher tumour response. However, they are not the most frequent irAE after ICI exposure: 9.3% of all irAEs were rheumatic (20 rh-irAE cases in 19 patients of a total of 215 irAE cases in 163 patients).

Download Full-text