scholarly journals Preferred Treatment with Curative Intent for Left Lateral Segment Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma under the Era of Minimal Invasive Surgery

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Tsung-Han Wu ◽  
Yu-Chao Wang ◽  
Hao-Chien Hung ◽  
Jin-Chiao Lee ◽  
Chia-Ying Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Curative Treatment ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Lateral Segment ◽  
Left Lateral Segment ◽  
Early Hcc ◽  
Hcc Recurrence

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurring at the left lateral segment (LLS) is relatively susceptible to treatment with curative intent in terms of tumor location. However, outcomes might vary depending on the selection of treatment modalities. This study aimed to analyze patients who had undergone curative treatment for early HCC at LLS. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 179 patients who underwent curative treatment for early HCC at LLS was performed. Patients were grouped based on treatment modalities, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and liver resection (LR). The long-term outcomes of the two groups were compared. Additionally, the impact of the LR approach on patient outcomes was analyzed. Results: Among these patients, 60 received RFA and 119 underwent LR as primary treatment with curative intent. During follow-up, a significantly higher incidence of HCC recurrence was observed in the RFA group (37/60, 61.7%) than in the LR group (45/119, 37.8%) (p = 0.0025). The median time of HCC recurrence was 10.8 (range: 1.1–60.9 months) and 17.6 (range: 2.4–94.8 months) months in the RFA and LR groups, respectively. In addition, multivariate analysis showed that liver cirrhosis, multiple tumors, and RFA treatment were significant risk factors for HCC recurrence. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year overall survival rates in the RFA and LR groups were 96.4%, 92.2%, and 71.5% versus 97.3%, 93.6%, and 87.7%, respectively. (p = 0.047). Moreover, outcomes related to LR were comparable between laparoscopic and conventional open methods. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year recurrence free survival rates in the laparoscopic (n = 37) and conventional open (n = 82) LR groups were 94.1%, 82.0%, and 66.9% versus 86.1%, 74.6%, and 53.1%, respectively. (p = 0.506) Conclusion: Early HCC at LLS had satisfactory outcomes after curative treatment, in which LR seems to have a superior outcome, as compared to RFA treatment. Moreover, laparoscopic LR could be considered a preferential option in the era of minimally invasive surgery.

Role of Sorafenib in Patients With Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 348-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola de’Angelis ◽  
Filippo Landi ◽  
Marco Nencioni ◽  
Anais Palen ◽  
Eylon Lahat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Early Recurrence ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Sorafenib Group ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Hcc Recurrence

Context: The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) is challenging, especially if it is not treatable by surgery or embolization. Objectives: The present study aims to compare the survival rates of liver transplanted patients receiving sorafenib or best supportive care (BSC) for HCC recurrence not amenable to curative intent treatments. Design: This is a retrospective comparative study on a prospectively maintained database. Participants: Liver transplanted patients with untreatable HCC recurrence receiving BSC (n = 18) until 2007 or sorafenib (n = 15) thereafter were compared. Results: No group difference was observed for demographic characteristics at the time of transplantation and at the time of HCC recurrence. On the explant pathology of the native liver, 81.2% patients were classified within the Milan criteria, and 53.1% presented with microvascular invasion. Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence was diagnosed 17.8 months (standard deviation: 14.5) after LT, with 17 (53.1%) patients presenting with early recurrence (≤12 months). The 1-year survival from untreatable progression of HCC recurrence was 23.9% for the BSC and 60% for the sorafenib group ( P = .002). The type of treatment (sorafenib vs BSC) was the sole independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio: 2.98; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-8.1; P = .033). In the sorafenib group, 8 (53.3%) patients required dose reduction, and 2 (13.3%) patients discontinued the treatment due to intolerable side effects. Conclusion: Sorafenib improves survival and is superior to the BSC in cases of untreatable posttransplant hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence.

scholarly journals Factors predicting long-term outcome of early stage hepatocellular carcinoma after primary curative treatment - the role of surgical or nonsurgical methods

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Jeng Kuo ◽  
Chi-Ling Chen ◽  
Lein-ray Mo
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Late Recurrence ◽  
Early Recurrence ◽  
Curative Treatment ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Early Hcc ◽  
Time Varying Covariates

Abstract Background The effect of putative factors on the clinical course of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after primary surgical or nonsurgical curative treatment, which remains elusive, was quantified. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed early HCC who received surgical resection (SR) or percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) from January 2003 to December 2016 were enrolled. The cumulative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared. A polytomous logistic regression was used to estimate factors regarding early and late recurrence. Independent predictors of OS were identified using Cox proportional hazard regression. Results One hundred twenty-five patients underwent SR, and 176 patients underwent RFA, of whom 72 were treated with TACE followed by RFA. Either match analysis based on propensity score or multiple adjustment regression showed no significant difference in DFS and OS between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed high AFP (>= 20 ng/mL), and multinodularity significantly increased risk of early recurrence (<=1year). In contrast, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus and multinodularity were significantly associated with late recurrence (>1year). Multivariate Cox regression with recurrent events as time-varying covariates identified older age (HR=1.55, 95% CI:1.01-2.36), clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) (HR=1.97, 95% CI:1.26-3.08), early recurrence (HR=6.62, 95% CI:3.79-11.6) and late recurrence (HR=3.75, 95% CI:1.99-7.08) as independent risk factors of mortality. A simple risk score showed fair calibration and discrimination in early HCC patients after primary curative treatment. In the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A subgroup, SR significantly improved DFS comparing to those received RFA with or without TACE. Conclusion Host and tumor factors rather than the initial treatment modalities determine the outcomes of early HCC after primary curative treatment. Statistical models based on recurrence types can predict early HCC prognosis but further external validation is necessary.

scholarly journals Factors predicting long-term outcomes of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma after primary curative treatment: the role of surgical or nonsurgical methods

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Jeng Kuo ◽  
Lein-Ray Mo ◽  
Chi-Ling Chen
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Late Recurrence ◽  
Early Recurrence ◽  
Curative Treatment ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Early Hcc ◽  
Time Varying Covariates

Abstract Background We quantified the elusive effects of putative factors on the clinical course of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after primary surgical or nonsurgical curative treatment. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed early HCC who received surgical resection (SR) or percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) from January 2003 to December 2016 were enrolled. The cumulative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were compared. A polytomous logistic regression was used to estimate factors for early and late recurrence. Independent predictors of OS were identified using Cox proportional hazard regression. Results One hundred twenty-five patients underwent SR, and 176 patients underwent RFA, of whom 72 were treated with TACE followed by RFA. Neither match analysis based on propensity score nor multiple adjustment regression yielded a significant difference in DFS and OS between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed high AFP (> 20 ng/mL), and multinodularity significantly increased risk of early recurrence (< 1 year). In contrast, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus and multinodularity were significantly associated with late recurrence (> 1 year). Multivariate Cox regression with recurrent events as time-varying covariates identified older age (HR = 1.55, 95% CI:1.01–2.36), clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) (HR = 1.97, 95% CI:1.26–3.08), early recurrence (HR = 6.62, 95% CI:3.79–11.6) and late recurrence (HR = 3.75, 95% CI:1.99–7.08) as independent risk factors of mortality. A simple risk score showed fair calibration and discrimination in early HCC patients after primary curative treatment. In the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A subgroup, SR significantly improved DFS compared to RFA with or without TACE. Conclusion Host and tumor factors rather than the initial treatment modalities determine the outcomes of early HCC after primary curative treatment. Statistical models based on recurrence types can predict early HCC prognosis but further external validation is necessary.

Anatomical versus Nonanatomical Resection in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Located in the Left Lateral Segment

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
pp. 1163-1170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazunari Sasaki ◽  
Masamichi Matsuda ◽  
Yu Ohkura ◽  
Masaji Hashimoto ◽  
Goro Watanabe
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Liver Tumors ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Lateral Segment ◽  
Retrospective Comparison ◽  
Left Lateral Segment ◽  
Recurrence Patterns

To date, no reported studies comparing anatomical resection (AR) and nonanatomical resection (NAR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have restricted cases by tumor location. Thus, right hepatectomy and left lateral sectionectomy are both analyzed together as AR, whereas limited resection of both peripherally and centrally located liver tumors is categorized as NAR. This categorization may result in inaccurate conclusions in the analyses comparing AR and NAR. We conducted a retrospective comparison between AR (n = 30) and NAR (n = 57) for solitary and small (5 cm or less) HCC limited to the left lateral segment (LLS) to clarify whether AR is superior to NAR for HCC in LLS. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 83.3, 71.3, and 52.9 per cent for the AR group and 82.5, 51.0, and 40.7 per cent for the NAR group, respectively ( P = 0.10). The 3-, 5-, and 7-year overall survival rates were 96.0, 82.8, and 77.9 per cent for the AR group and 84.1, 77.0, and 54.2 per cent for the NAR group, respectively ( P = 0.07). The postoperative complication, recurrence patterns, and secondary treatment types after recurrence were not significantly different between the two groups. The multivariate analysis including the confounders related to background liver function indicated AR to be a significant protective factor against recurrence, although AR did not influence overall survival. AR was superior to NAR in preventing recurrence without increasing postoperative risks among patients with small solitary HCC limited to the LLS, although AR could not improve overall survival.

scholarly journals Expression of Cancer Testis Antigens in Tumor-Adjacent Normal Liver Is Associated with Post-Resection Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2499
Author(s):  
Lisanne Noordam ◽  
Zhouhong Ge ◽  
Hadiye Özturk ◽  
Michail Doukas ◽  
Shanta Mancham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Normal Liver ◽  
Occult Metastasis ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Cancer Testis Antigens ◽  
Negative Prognostic Factor ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Hcc Recurrence ◽  
Cancer Testis

High recurrence rates after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with curative intent impair clinical outcomes of HCC. Cancer/testis antigens (CTAs) are suitable targets for cancer immunotherapy if selectively expressed in tumor cells. The aims were to identify CTAs that are frequently and selectively expressed in HCC-tumors, and to investigate whether CTAs could serve as biomarkers for occult metastasis. Tumor and paired tumor-free liver (TFL) tissues of HCC-patients and healthy tissues were assessed for mRNA expression of 49 CTAs by RT-qPCR and protein expression of five CTAs by immunohistochemistry. Twelve CTA-mRNAs were expressed in ≥10% of HCC-tumors and not in healthy tissues except testis. In tumors, mRNA and protein of ≥ 1 CTA was expressed in 78% and 71% of HCC-patients, respectively. In TFL, CTA mRNA and protein was found in 45% and 30% of HCC-patients, respectively. Interestingly, CTA-expression in TFL was an independent negative prognostic factor for post-resection HCC-recurrence and survival. We established a panel of 12 testis-restricted CTAs expressed in tumors of most HCC-patients. The increased risk of HCC-recurrence in patients with CTA expression in TFL, suggests that CTA-expressing (pre-)malignant cells may be a source of HCC-recurrence, reflecting the relevance of targeting these to prevent HCC-recurrence.

scholarly journals Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance for Predicting the Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Curative Treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Imai ◽  
Koji Takai ◽  
Tatsunori Hanai ◽  
Atsushi Suetsugu ◽  
Makoto Shiraki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Insulin Resistance ◽  
Curative Treatment ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Model Assessment ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Hcc Recurrence

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the disorder of glucose metabolism on the recurrence of HCC after curative treatment. Two hundred and eleven patients with HCC who received curative treatment in our hospital from 2006 to 2017 were enrolled in this study. Recurrence-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the differences between the groups partitioned by the presence or absence of DM and the values of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting immunoreactive insulin (FIRI), and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were evaluated using the log-rank test. There were no significant differences in the recurrence-free survival rate between the patients with and without DM (p = 0.144), higher and lower levels of HbA1c (≥6.5 and <6.5%, respectively; p = 0.509), FPG (≥126 and <126 mg/dL, respectively; p = 0.143), and FIRI (≥10 and <10 μU/mL, respectively; p = 0.248). However, the higher HOMA-IR group (≥2.3) had HCC recurrence significantly earlier than the lower HOMA-IR group (<2.3, p = 0.013). Moreover, there was a significant difference between the higher and lower HOMA-IR groups without DM (p = 0.009), and there was no significant difference between those groups with DM (p = 0.759). A higher HOMA-IR level, particularly in non-diabetic patients, was a significant predictor for HCC recurrence after curative treatment.

Differences in clinical characteristics and treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma between Asians and non-Asians.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 289-289
Author(s):  
Kit Man Wong ◽  
Jonghun John Lee ◽  
Amy Wong ◽  
Geoffrey Liu ◽  
Morris Sherman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Liver Transplant ◽  
Meld Score ◽  
Public Health Care ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Multifocal Disease

289 Background: Studies have demonstrated clinical differences in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between Asians (AS) and non-Asians (NAS). In the US, AS are less likely to undergo liver transplant compared to Caucasians. Despite the large immigrant population in Canada, there has been no prior comparison of HCC in AS and NAS in the context of the Canadian universal health care system. We retrospectively evaluated the ethnic differences in HCC at the largest cancer centre in Canada. Methods: We analyzed 268 patients who enrolled in a Genetic Epidemiology Study of HCC (April 2010 to February 2013), where patients were asked to complete a questionnaire and give a blood sample at their first visit. Relevant clinical data were extracted and analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test or Chi-square test. Results: The study population had a mean age of 61 years and 83% males. There were 45% AS, 49% Caucasians, and 6% other ethnicities. Etiologies of HCC included: Hepatitis B (HBV) 34%, Hepatitis C (HCV) 32%, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis 15%, alcohol 18%. Compared to NAS, HCC patients of Asian ancestry had significantly higher rates of HBV (60% vs. 12%, p<0.001). At diagnosis, 83% of patients were Child-Pugh A (mean MELD score 9.2). Ethnicity had no impact on Child-Pugh class, multifocal disease or macrovascular invasion. However, MELD scores were lower in AS (p=0.02). Overall, 71% of cases were initially treated with curative intent. Patients underwent various treatment modalities: liver transplant 13%, resection 31%, radiofrequency ablation 39%, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) 21%, radiation 17%, systemic therapy 27%. AS had higher resection rates (41% vs. 22%, p<0.001), while no differences were observed for other treatments. Duration of response was 11.7 months for TACE (AS 14.2, NAS 10.5), 7.5 months for sorafenib (AS 6.8, NAS 8.1). Rate of intolerance to sorafenib was 24% (AS 27%, NAS 22%, p=0.63). This analysis was limited by inherent bias in the selection of study patients. Conclusions: AS with HCC tend to have HBV and lower MELD scores, and to undergo resection in a public health care setting with no differences in the uptake of other therapies. An analysis of survival based on ethnicity will be reported.

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcomes and Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence after Hepatitis C Virus Eradication by Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment: All Kagawa Liver Disease Group (AKLDG) Study

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2257
Author(s):  
Joji Tani ◽  
Tomonori Senoh ◽  
Akio Moriya ◽  
Chikara Ogawa ◽  
Akihiro Deguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Antiviral Treatment ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Virus Eradication ◽  
Direct Acting Antiviral ◽  
Direct Acting ◽  
Hcc Recurrence

There are limited studies that have evaluated the long-term outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the recurrence rates, recurrence factors, and prognosis of 130 patients who were treated with IFN-free DAA treatment after treatment for HCC. The median observation time was 41 ± 13.9 months after DAA treatment. The recurrence rates of HCC were 23.2%, 32.5%, 46.3%, and 59.4% at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. A multivariate analysis showed that palliative treatment prior to DAA treatment (HR = 3.974, 95% CI 1.924–8.207, p = 0.0006) and alpha-fetoprotein at sustained virological response 12 (HR = 1.048, 95% CI 1.016–1.077, p = 0.0046) were associated with independent factors for HCC recurrence (HCC-R). The 12-, 24-, and 36-month overall survival rates were 97.6%, 94.0%, and 89.8%, respectively. The 12-, 24-, and 36-month survival rates of the non-recurrence and recurrence groups were 97.7%, 97.7%, and 94.1% and 97.6%, 92.3%, and 87.9%, respectively (p = 0.3404). The size of the main tumor lesion and the serological data were significantly improved at the time of HCC-R after DAA treatment. This study showed an improved prognosis regardless of recurrence rate, which suggests that DAA treatment in HCV patients should be considered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document