scholarly journals Characterization of Ginkgo biloba Leaf Flavonoids as Neuroexocytosis Regulators

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 1829
Author(s):  
Choongjin Ban ◽  
Joon-Bum Park ◽  
Sora Cho ◽  
Hye Rin Kim ◽  
Yong Joon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ginkgo Biloba ◽  
Neurotransmitter Release ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Potential Source ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Physicochemical Stability ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Low Toxicity ◽  
Ginkgo Biloba Leaf

Ginkgo biloba leaf (GBL) is known as a potential source of bioactive flavonoids, such as quercetin, arresting the neuronal soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE)-zippering. Here, the GBL flavonoids were isolated in two different manners and then examined for their bioactivity, physicochemical stability, and biocompatibility. The majority of flavonoids in the non-hydrolyzed and acidolyzed isolates, termed non-hydrolyzed isolate (NI) and acidolyzed isolate (AI) hereafter, were rich in flavonol glycosides and aglycones, respectively. Glycosidic/aglyconic quercetin and kaempferol were abundant in both NI and AI, whereas a little of apigenin, luteolin, and isorhamnetin were found in AI. NI was more thermostable in all pH ranges than quercetin, kaempferol, and AI. NI and AI both inhibited neurotransmitter release from differentiated neuronal PC-12 cells. NI and AI showed 1/2–1/3 lower EC50/CC50 values than quercetin and kaempferol. The NI and AI exhibited no toxicity assessed by the tests on chorioallantoic membranes of hen’s eggs, removing toxicological concerns of irritation potential. Moreover, GBL isolates, particularly AI, showed antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities in the use below the CC50 levels. Taken together, these results suggest that GBL isolates that are rich in antioxidant flavonoids are effective anti-neuroexocytotic agents with high stability and low toxicity.

scholarly journals Complexin splits the membrane-proximal region of a single SNAREpin

2016 ◽  
Vol 473 (14) ◽  
pp. 2219-2224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linxiang Yin ◽  
Jaewook Kim ◽  
Yeon-Kyun Shin
Keyword(s):  
Neurotransmitter Release ◽  
Proximal Part ◽  
Proximal Region ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Spontaneous Release ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Membrane Proximal Region ◽  
Factor Attachment Protein Receptor

Tight regulation of neurotransmitter release by Ca2+ is critical in neurons, which requires suppression of spontaneous release. In the present study, we find that the complexin (Cpx) protein binds to the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complex to split the membrane-proximal part, whereby it inhibits spontaneous release.

scholarly journals Characterization of VAMP isoforms in 3T3-L1 adipocytes: implications for GLUT4 trafficking

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 530-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica B. A. Sadler ◽  
Nia J. Bryant ◽  
Gwyn W. Gould
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Factor Attachment Protein Receptor

The fusion of GLUT4-containing vesicles with the plasma membrane of adipocytes is a key facet of insulin action. This process is mediated by the formation of functional soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complexes between the plasma membrane t-SNARE complex and the vesicle v-SNARE or VAMP. The t-SNARE complex consists of Syntaxin4 and SNAP23, and whereas many studies identify VAMP2 as the v-SNARE, others suggest that either VAMP3 or VAMP8 may also fulfil this role. Here we characterized the levels of expression, distribution, and association of all the VAMPs expressed in 3T3-L1 adipocytes to provide the first systematic analysis of all members of this protein family for any cell type. Despite our finding that all VAMP isoforms form SDS-resistant SNARE complexes with Syntaxin4/SNAP23 in vitro, a combination of levels of expression (which vary by >30-fold), subcellular distribution, and coimmunoprecipitation analyses lead us to propose that VAMP2 is the major v-SNARE involved in GLUT4 trafficking to the surface of 3T3-L1 adipocytes.

scholarly journals A Role for Soluble N-Ethylmaleimide-sensitive Factor Attachment Protein Receptor Complex Dimerization during Neurosecretion

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 3379-3389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Fdez ◽  
Thomas A. Jowitt ◽  
Ming-Chuan Wang ◽  
Manisha Rajebhosale ◽  
Keith Foster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Neuroendocrine Cells ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Membrane Interface ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Factor Attachment Protein Receptor

The interactions underlying the cooperativity of soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complexes during neurotransmission are not known. Here, we provide a molecular characterization of a dimer formed between the cytoplasmic portions of neuronal SNARE complexes. Dimerization generates a two-winged structure in which the C termini of cytosolic SNARE complexes are in apposition, and it involves residues from the vesicle-associated SNARE synaptobrevin 2 that lie close to the cytosol–membrane interface within the full-length protein. Mutation of these residues reduces stability of dimers formed between SNARE complexes, without affecting the stability of each individual SNARE complex. These mutations also cause a corresponding decrease in the ability of botulinum toxin-resistant synaptobrevin 2 to rescue regulated exocytosis in toxin-treated neuroendocrine cells. Moreover, such synaptobrevin 2 mutants give rise to a dominant-negative inhibition of exocytosis. These data are consistent with an important role for SNARE complex dimers in neurosecretion.

scholarly journals SNARE phosphorylation: a control mechanism for insulin-stimulated glucose transport and other regulated exocytic events

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1271-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamilla M.E. Laidlaw ◽  
Rachel Livingstone ◽  
Mohammed Al-Tobi ◽  
Nia J. Bryant ◽  
Gwyn W. Gould
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Membrane Receptors ◽  
Multivesicular Bodies ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Plasma Membrane Receptors ◽  
Regulated Trafficking ◽  
Receptor Family

Trafficking within eukaryotic cells is a complex and highly regulated process; events such as recycling of plasma membrane receptors, formation of multivesicular bodies, regulated release of hormones and delivery of proteins to membranes all require directionality and specificity. The underpinning processes, including cargo selection, membrane fusion, trafficking flow and timing, are controlled by a variety of molecular mechanisms and engage multiple families of lipids and proteins. Here, we will focus on control of trafficking processes via the action of the SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) family of proteins, in particular their regulation by phosphorylation. We will describe how these proteins are controlled in a range of regulated trafficking events, with particular emphasis on the insulin-stimulated delivery of glucose transporters to the surface of adipose and muscle cells. Here, we focus on a few examples of SNARE phosphorylation which exemplify distinct ways in which SNARE machinery phosphorylation may regulate membrane fusion.

scholarly journals Multiple ER–Golgi SNARE transmembrane domains are dispensable for trafficking but required for SNARE recycling

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (17) ◽  
pp. 2633-2641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Chen ◽  
Martin S. Y. Lau ◽  
David K. Banfield
Keyword(s):  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Retrograde Transport ◽  
Steady State Distribution ◽  
State Distribution ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Strict Requirement ◽  
Membrane Tether ◽  
Essential Prerequisite

The formation of soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complexes between opposing membranes is an essential prerequisite for fusion between vesicles and their target compartments. The composition and length of a SNARE’s transmembrane domain (TMD) is also an indicator for their steady-state distribution in cells. The evolutionary conservation of the SNARE TMD, together with the strict requirement of this feature for membrane fusion in biochemical studies, implies that the TMD represents an essential protein module. Paradoxically, we find that for several essential ER- and Golgi-localized SNAREs, a TMD is unnecessary. Moreover, in the absence of a covalent membrane tether, such SNAREs can still support ER–Golgi vesicle transport and recapitulate established genetic interactions. Transport anomalies appear to be restricted to retrograde trafficking, but these defects are overcome by the attachment of a C-terminal lipid anchor to the SNARE. We conclude that the TMD functions principally to support the recycling of Qb-, Qc-, and R-SNAREs and, in so doing, retrograde transport.

Distinct Initial SNARE Configurations Underlying the Diversity of Exocytosis

2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 1915-1964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruo Kasai ◽  
Noriko Takahashi ◽  
Hiroshi Tokumaru
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Trafficking ◽  
Synaptic Vesicles ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Snare Proteins ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Large Dense Core Vesicles ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
The Common ◽  
Kinetics Of

The dynamics of exocytosis are diverse and have been optimized for the functions of synapses and a wide variety of cell types. For example, the kinetics of exocytosis varies by more than five orders of magnitude between ultrafast exocytosis in synaptic vesicles and slow exocytosis in large dense-core vesicles. However, in all cases, exocytosis is mediated by the same fundamental mechanism, i.e., the assembly of soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins. It is often assumed that vesicles need to be docked at the plasma membrane and SNARE proteins must be preassembled before exocytosis is triggered. However, this model cannot account for the dynamics of exocytosis recently reported in synapses and other cells. For example, vesicles undergo exocytosis without prestimulus docking during tonic exocytosis of synaptic vesicles in the active zone. In addition, epithelial and hematopoietic cells utilize cAMP and kinases to trigger slow exocytosis of nondocked vesicles. In this review, we summarize the manner in which the diversity of exocytosis reflects the initial configurations of SNARE assembly, including trans-SNARE, binary-SNARE, unitary-SNARE, and cis-SNARE configurations. The initial SNARE configurations depend on the particular SNARE subtype (syntaxin, SNAP25, or VAMP), priming proteins (Munc18, Munc13, CAPS, complexin, or snapin), triggering proteins (synaptotagmins, Doc2, and various protein kinases), and the submembraneous cytomatrix, and they are the key to determining the kinetics of subsequent exocytosis. These distinct initial configurations will help us clarify the common SNARE assembly processes underlying exocytosis and membrane trafficking in eukaryotic cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document