scholarly journals Oncology Pharmacists Can Reduce the Projected Shortfall in Cancer Patient Visits: Projections for Years 2020 to 2025

Pharmacy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Knapp ◽  
Robert Ignoffo
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Patient Education ◽  
Cancer Patient ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Oncology Care ◽  
Workforce Capacity

Based on the projected need for a larger oncology care workforce, we estimated the patient care visits and care activities that Board Certified oncology pharmacists (BCOPs) could contribute to oncology care from 2020–2025. Using projected counts for BCOPs through 2025, we estimated that 2.9–4.1 million 30-min BCOP patient visits were possible at 50% workforce capacity. BCOPs’ clinical activities overlapped strongly with those of nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) in patient education and treatment management. BCOPs could help reduce provider stress and burnout concerns by spreading these activities across a broader set of providers. BCOPs were more active than NPs and PAs in clinical trials research. Recent advances in immunotherapy, pharmacogenetics, pharmacogenomics, and oral oncolytic agents make the medication-focused training of OPs particularly useful to care teams. Comparison also showed that BCOPs were less active in providing follow-up visits and prescribing. Fulfilling the projected BCOP numbers through 2025 will require continued growth in Postgraduate Year 2 (PGY2) oncology pharmacy resident programs and on-the-job training programs. Our review of the trends in cancer incidence, mortality, and survivorship suggest a sustained need for the activities of BCOPs and other oncology care providers.

Demonstrating the value of the oncology pharmacist within the healthcare team

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 1945-1967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eve M Segal ◽  
Jill Bates ◽  
Sara L Fleszar ◽  
Lisa M Holle ◽  
Julie Kennerly-Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Education ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Healthcare Team ◽  
Oncology Care ◽  
Care Outcomes

IntroductionAlthough many oncology pharmacists are embedded members within the healthcare team, data documenting their contributions to optimal patient outcomes are growing. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the value of the oncology pharmacist within the healthcare team and describe the knowledge, skills, and functions of the oncology pharmacist.MethodsA systematic literature review of articles that were published on PubMed between January 1951 and October 2018 was completed. Identified abstracts were reviewed and included if they focused on measuring the value or impact of the oncology pharmacist on provider/patient satisfaction, improvement of medication safety, improvement of quality/clinical care outcomes, economics, and intervention acceptance. Review articles, meta-analysis, and studies not evaluating oncology pharmacist activities were excluded. Studies were thematically coded into four themes (clinical care, patient education, informatics, and cost savings) by 10 oncology pharmacists.ResultsFour-hundred twenty-two articles were identified, in which 66 articles met inclusion criteria for this review. The selected literature included 27 interventional and 38 descriptive studies. The value of the oncology pharmacist was demonstrated by published articles in four key themes: clinical care, patient education, informatics, and cost savings.ConclusionWith an expected shortage of oncology physicians and the ongoing development of complex oncology therapies, the board-certified oncology pharmacist is well suited to serve as a physician extender alongside nurse practitioners and/or physician assistants as the medication expert on the oncology care team. The demonstrated value of the oncology pharmacist supports their role as frontline providers of patient care.

scholarly journals Follow-up of ischemic cardiopathy, an essential moment in the communication between in-patient and out-patient setting: problems and opportunities

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 169-179
Author(s):  
Italo Paolini
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Patient Education ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Critical Time ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Pharmacological Therapy ◽  
Appropriate Treatment ◽  
Errors In Treatment

It is known that the transition from the inpatient to the outpatient setting is a critical time. Evidence suggests that contact between patients and providers (i.e., physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) during this interval may be crucial for appropriate treatment modifications and recognition of errors in treatment. Ambulatory follow-up provides opportunities for clinical assessment, patient education, and medication review, which may in turn improve outcomes. However, little is known about the appropriate timing and type of follow-up that is necessary following hospitalization for AMI. In Italian System of Heath contact between general pratictioner and specialists, after dicharge, is critical moment for management of chronic pharmacological and non pharmacological therapy. If professional approaches are not integrated can reduce patients compliance and effectiveness of therapies themselves. Good management of chronic cardiovascular disease requires attention to stenghtening the continuity of information and management of patients.

Involvement and (Potential) Influence of Care Providers in the Enlistment Phase of the Informed Consent Process: the case of aids clinical trials

2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary-Rose Mueller
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Informed Consent Process ◽  
Consent Process ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Potential Influence ◽  
Aids Clinical Trials ◽  
Research Professionals

This article draws on ethnographic field data collected during an investigation of the informed consent process and AIDS clinical trials. It describes the involvement of care providers (physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants) during the enlistment, or recruitment, phase of the informed consent process. It shows that sometimes care providers are involved in the receipt, evaluation and distribution of information on clinical trials through their interactions with research professionals and patients. It suggests that the involvement of care providers has the potential to influence the informed consent process. Some of the ethical and practice considerations of this are discussed.

Role of oncology-advanced practitioners to enhance clinical research.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 95-95
Author(s):  
Christa Marie Braun-Inglis ◽  
Leigh Boehmer ◽  
Laura J Zitella ◽  
Brianna Hoffner ◽  
Jessica Rhee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
Care Providers

95 Background: Oncology Advanced Practitioners (APs), including Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistants, Clinical Nurse Specialists, and Pharmacists are highly trained health care providers that contribute significantly to quality cancer care. Given low clinical trial enrollment among adult oncology patients, understanding current research responsibilities of APs could lead to identification of opportunities to leverage this workforce to enhance accrual and conduct of clinical trials. Methods: A 65-item validated survey addressing attitudes, beliefs and responsibilities of oncology APs participating in clinical research was distributed from January 22 through March 6, 2020. Outreach via the Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) and Harborside was utilized to reach a sample set of 14,601 oncology APs’ emails. The survey was administered and data were analyzed using Survey Monkey. Results: 408 U.S. oncology APs completed the survey. Respondents were primarily white (83%), female (92%) and nurse practitioners (71%). Thirty-five percent practiced in an academic setting and 62% practiced in a community setting. Nearly all respondents believed that clinical trials are important to improve oncology care standards and more than 90% reported that clinical trials were available at their practice. Nearly 80% reported that they are comfortable discussing treatment options with patients, discussing clinical trials in general, and know where to find clinical trials. Furthermore, 80% participate in the care of patients enrolled on clinical trials. Only 60%, however, are comfortable discussing trials available at their practice and only 38% routinely explore whether a clinical trial is available for their patients. While 70% of APs approach eligible patients about clinical trials at their practice, only 20% reported doing so “a great deal” or “a lot”. Ninety percent of APs reported that they should play a role in clinical research and 75% would like to be more involved in the clinical trial process. Barriers to greater involvement in clinical trials include lack of time, inadequate awareness of clinical trial specifics, and under-representation on research committees. Conclusions: The majority of oncology APs are engaged and interested in clinical trials and believe that research is important to improve cancer care. However, they are not being utilized to their full scope. Multidisciplinary team integration, trials-related education, and policy change is needed to allow this group of skilled professionals to realize their full potential within cancer clinical trials.

scholarly journals The impact on patient flow after the integration of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in 6 Ontario emergency departments

CJEM ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (05) ◽  
pp. 455-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Ducharme ◽  
Robert J. Alder ◽  
Cindy Pelletier ◽  
Don Murray ◽  
Joshua Tepper
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Patient Flow ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Wait Times ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Left Without Being Seen ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT Objective: We sought to assess the impact of the integration of the new roles of primary health care nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) on patient flow, wait times and proportions of patients who left without being seen in 6 Ontario emergency departments (EDs). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of health records data on patient arrival time, time of initial assessment by a physician, time of discharge from the ED and discharge status. Results: Whether a PA or NP was directly involved in the care of patients or indirectly involved by being on duty, the wait times, lengths of stay and proportion of patients who left without being seen were significantly reduced. When a PA or NP were directly involved in patients' care, patients were 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3–2.1, p < 0.05) and 2.1 (95% CI 1.6–2.8, p < 0.05) times more likely to be seen within the wait time benchmarks, respectively. Lengths of stay were 30.3% (95% CI 21.6%–39.0%, p < 0.01) and 48.8% (95% CI 35.0%–62.7%, p < 0.01) lower when PAs and NPs, respectively, were involved. When PAs and NPs were not on duty, the proportion of patients who left without being seen were 44% (95% CI 31%–63%, p < 0.01) and 71% (95% CI 53%–96%, p < 0.05), respectively. Conclusion: The addition of PAs or NPs to the ED team can improve patient flow in medium-sized community hospital EDs. Given the ongoing shortage of physicians, use of alternative health care providers should be considered. These results require validation, as their generalizability to other locations or types of EDs is not known.

scholarly journals A Review of Marital Intimacy-Enhancing Interventions among Married Individuals

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Kardan-Souraki ◽  
Zeinab Hamzehgardeshi ◽  
Ismail Asadpour ◽  
Reza Ali Mohammadpour ◽  
Soghra Khani
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Main Concern ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Marital Intimacy ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Impact

<p><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong> Lack of intimacy is currently the main concern rather than main concern of the experts in psychology and counseling. It is considered as one of the most important causes for divorce and as such to improve marital intimacy a great number of interventions have been proposed in the literature. Intimacy training and counseling make the couples take effective and successful steps to increase marital intimacy. No study has reviewed the interventions promoting marital intimacy after marriage. Thus, this review study aimed to classify the articles investigating the impact of interventional programs on marital intimacy after marriage.</p><p><strong>SEARCH METHODS:</strong> In April 2015, we performed a general search in Google Scholar search engines, and then we did an advanced search the databases of Science Direct, ProQuest, SID, Magiran, Irandoc, Pubmed, Scopus, <a href="http://www.cochranelibrary.com/">Cochrane Library</a>, and Psych info; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). Also, lists of the references of the relevant articles were reviewed for additional citations. Using Medical Subject Headings (MESH) keywords: Intervention (Clinical Trials, Non-Randomized Controlled Trials, Randomized Controlled Trials, Education), intimacy, marital (Marriage) and selected related articles to the study objective were from 1995 to April 2015. Clinical trials that evaluated one or more behavioral interventions to improve marital intimacy were reviewed in the study.</p><p><strong>MAIN RESULTS:</strong> 39 trials met the inclusion criteria. Eleven interventions had follow-up, and 28 interventions lacked follow-up. The quality evidence for 22 interventions was low, for 15 interventions moderate, and for one intervention was considered high. Findings from studies were categorized in 11 categories as the intimacy promoting interventions in dimensions of emotional, psychological, physical, sexual, temporal, communicational, social and recreational, aesthetic, spiritual, intellectual intimacy, and total intimacy.</p><p><strong>AUTHORS’ CONCLUSIONS:</strong> Improving and promoting communication, problem solving, self-disclosure and empathic response skills and sexual education and counseling in the form of cognitive-behavioral techniques and based on religious and cultural context of each society, an effective step can be taken to enhance marital intimacy and strengthen family bonds and stability. Health care providers should consider which interventions are appropriate to the couple characteristics and their relationships.</p>

scholarly journals Quality of solo ambulance care by physician assistants versus ambulance nurses for non-conveyed patients in the Netherlands: An observational study

F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 357
Author(s):  
Lilian Vloet ◽  
Daniël Winterink ◽  
Aico Gerritsen ◽  
Wim Heutz ◽  
Thijs van Zonneveld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Experience ◽  
Emergency Care ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Care Process ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Follow Up Care ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
And Behavior ◽  
Ambulance Nurse

Background The aim of this study was to compare the ambulance care process, follow-up care and patient experience between physician assistants and ambulance nurses operating as solo ambulance care providers, for a non-conveyed patient population. Methods An observational design was used. Characteristics of patients and events and the care process were retrieved from the ambulance registration database. Data on follow-up care and patient experience were collected through questionnaires. Results Of the included solo ambulance events, 49/379 (12.9%) were performed by physician assistants, 330/379 (87.1%) were performed by ambulance nurses. For initial complaints and the on-scene diagnoses there were no significant differences between the physician assistants and ambulance nurses. 90/165 (54.5%) of the patients requested follow-up care after being non-conveyed with no significant association between the PA and ambulance nurse group (p=.293). For type of follow-up care, 91.9% of the follow-up emergency care requests in this study came from patients treated by an ambulance nurse. There were no significant differences in patients’ experience for clinician attitude and behavior, treatment, and communication between physician assistants and ambulance nurses, although pain management and explanation about the non-conveyance decision could be improved Conclusions Besides small statistical but not clinically significant differences, this study indicated comparable solo ambulance care provided by a physician assistant or an ambulance nurse concerning the care process, follow-up care and patient experience. Patients treated by physician assistants seek less follow-up emergency care after non-conveyance, compared to ambulance nurses. Overall, patients experienced good attitude and behavior, treatment, and communication of the solo ambulance professional. Future well powered studies to gain insight in effects of PAs in ambulance care are needed, as well as studies in which PAs apply all additional skills they are licensed to.

Healthcare Providers Face Numerous Challenges in Treating Patients with Psoriasis: Results from a Mixed-Methods Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 247553032110628
Author(s):  
Suzanne Murray ◽  
Jeffrey Crowley ◽  
Melinda J. Gooderham ◽  
Alan Kivitz ◽  
Vinod Chandran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Paradigm Shift ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Continuing Professional Development ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Practice Gaps

Background The paradigm shift toward biologic medications in psoriasis care requires healthcare providers (HCPs) to become acquainted with mechanisms of action and safety profiles of these new treatments to confidently use them in practice. A better understanding of this paradigm shift is necessary to provide adequate education for HCPs in psoriasis care. Objectives This study assessed clinical practice gaps and challenges experienced by HCPs caring for patients with psoriasis. Methods A mixed-methods approach was used to identify practice gaps and clinical challenges of dermatologists, rheumatologists, primary care physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners with various levels of clinical experience in academic and community-based settings. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected sequentially. Interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed. Results A total of 380 psoriasis care providers in Canada and the US participated in this study. Analysis revealed challenges in establishing an accurate diagnosis of psoriasis (including screening for sub-type and distinguishing psoriasis from other skin conditions), selecting treatment (particularly regarding recently approved treatments), monitoring side effects, and collaborating with other HCPs involved in psoriasis care. Conclusion These findings highlight educational needs of HCPs involved in psoriasis care that could have repercussions on accurate and timely diagnosis of the condition, treatment initiation, side effect monitoring, and continuity of care. Findings provide a starting point for clinicians to reflect on their practice and for the improvement of continuing professional development interventions that would bridge these gaps.

Students’ lack of knowledge regarding healthcare providers’ duties, and their preferences for information when selecting new providers

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Perrault
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Personal Information ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Midwestern Usa

Rationale, aims and objectives: When USA college students need medical care, their first destinations are usually campus health centers. Normally, staffed by a variety of care providers (e.g., nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physicians), students may be confused about who they may need to see and possibly hesitant to receive care. The present study sought to determine students’ knowledge about primary care providers and the qualities they would like to know about them prior to consultations. The goal of this paper is to improve the information campus health centers in terms of their ability to provide students health solutions when and where they need them. Methods: 534 USA college students from a large Midwestern USA university completed a web-based survey about their knowledge, attitudes and information preferences regarding their various care providers. They also viewed 3 experimentally manipulated biographies of providers and chose the provider they would want to visit. Results: The majority of students did not know the differences between physicians, physician assistants and nurse practitioners and the types of care that they could provide. About 9% stated they would not seek care and 16% would delay seeking care if unable to see a physician immediately. The most important pieces of information desired were providers’ philosophies of care, certifications, areas of specialization and length of time practising medicine. As students perceived greater similarities due to more personal information provided in the biographies, they viewed, uncertainty was reduced leading to higher levels of anticipated patient satisfaction and quality of care. Conclusions: USA college students need greater levels of education regarding the care that can be received from a variety of healthcare professionals. Information provided should also include more personal information about the providers to help reduce students’ uncertainty and to enable students to access services that are person-centered in their nature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document