scholarly journals Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Anak Menurut Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-138
Author(s):  
Mustakim Mahmud
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Research Issues ◽  
Community Factors ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
Alternative Solutions

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan sanksi berdasarkan Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dengan permasalahan penelitian, Pertama, Bagaimana penerapan Sanksi Pidana dan Tindakan Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak? Kedua, Bagaimanakah hambatan-hambatan apa yang ditemukan dalam penerapan Sanksi pidana dan Tindakan Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dan penelitian hukum empirik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, Pertama, Penerapan sanksi pidana menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradila Pidana Anak bahwa Penegak mencari alternatif penyelesaian terbaik bagi kepentingan anak. Kedua, Hambatannya yaitu belum adanya persamaan persfektif dalam penanganan terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum di antara para penegak hukum serta hambatan dari faktor masyarakat yaitu banyak masyarakat yang belum mengerti tentang peraturan undang-undang yang berhubungan dengan anak. This study aims to analyze the application of sanctions based on the Child Criminal Justice System Law with research issues, First, How is the application of Criminal Sanctions and Actions According to Law Number 11 of 2012 Concerning the Child Criminal Justice System? Second, what are the obstacles found in the application of criminal sanctions and actions according to Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children. The research method uses normative legal research and empirical legal research. The results showed, First, the application of criminal sanctions according to Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children that the Enforcement Seekers seek the best alternative solutions for the interests of children. Second, the obstacle is the lack of equality in the perspective of handling children in conflict with the law among law enforcers as well as obstacles from community factors, namely that many people do not understand the laws relating to children

scholarly journals INFRA PETITA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI YANG MENEROBOS KETENTUAN PEMIDANAAN MINIMUM

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Anshar Anshar ◽  
Suwito Suwito
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Corruption Case

ABSTRAKPenanganan perkara tindak pidana korupsi menganut sistem pemidanaan minimum bagi pelaku yang diputus bersalah oleh pengadilan. Istilah ketentuan pidana minimum khusus secara normatif diatur dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999, sebagaimana telah diubah menjadi Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Pada tataran praktiknya terdapat fenomena adanya putusan pengadilan yang menerobos sistem pemidanaan minimum yang dianut tersebut. Salah satu contoh putusan pengadilan yang ditelaah dalam tulisan ini adalah Putusan Nomor 2399 K/PID.SUS/2010. Permasalahan yang timbul adalah apa saja yang menjadi landasan infra petita hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan yang menerobos ketentuan pemidanaan minimum dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi tersebut. Metode dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang. Penulis berkesimpulan bahwa putusan pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi yang menerobos ketentuan pemidanaan minimum dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi pada dasarnya diperbolehkan. Sepanjang putusan hakim yang infra petita tersebut memiliki esensi ratio legis yang kuat dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan, atas dasar alasan pertimbangan nilai keadilan dan pertimbangan judex factie sebagaimana pada perkara a quo.Kata kunci: putusan, korupsi, pemidanaan minimum. ABSTRACT In the handling of a corruption case, mandatory minimum penalty is adopted in the criminal justice system for the offender who was found guilty by the court. The term ‘mandatory minimum penalty’ is normatively regulated in Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law Number 31 of 1999, as amended to Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption Eradication. In practice there is a phenomenon of a court decision breaching the adopted mandatory minimum penalty. One example of a court decision analyzed hereon is the Decision Number 2399 K/PID.SUS/2010. The arising problem is what the consideration of the judge is for infra petita in imposing decision which breached the mandatory minimum penalty provision in that corruption case. This research uses normative legal research method with legislation approach. It can be concluded that it is basically permissible in the corruption court’s decision to breach the minimum penalty provisions as stipulated in the Corruption Eradication Law. Provided that the judge’s decision of infra petita, is based on strong legislation ratio and can be accounted for, on the basis of justice value and judex factie considerations as in the a quo case. Keywords: court decision, corruption, minimum penalty.

scholarly journals CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDREN UNDER 12 YEARS OF AGE IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW IN THE CHILD CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 252-260
Author(s):  
Eko Iswahyudi ◽  
◽  
I. Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Nurini Aprilianda ◽  
Bambang Sugiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Community Service ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Obligations ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

In the Act No. 11 of 2012 about the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, it explains the age limit for juvenile criminal responsibility for those who commit criminal acts, as regulated in Article 1 point 3. The children between 12 (twelve) years old and 18 (eighteen) years old are suspected of committing a crime. The purpose of this study was to analyze the construction of the regulation of children under the age of 12 in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2021 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. This type of normative legal research uses a statute approach and a case approach through a literature study. The results of the research on the Construction of Regulations for Children under the Age of 12 in Act Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System as Children in Conflict with the Law. There is a need for additional rules or amendments to the provisions of criminal sanctions for children, where criminal sanctions will be given to children aged at least 10 years, where these rules consist of basic criminal sanctions, such as community service or supervision, job training, coaching in institutions. This sanction is carried out by considering the rights of children as perpetrators, children as victims and children as witnesses who are underage, without eliminating the implementation of applicable legal obligations.

scholarly journals PENGGANTIAN BIAYA KEPADA SAKSI ATAU AHLI DALAM RANGKA MEMBERIKAN KETERANGAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA (Studi Penelitian di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Takengon)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Lisa Purba Hajini Purba ◽  
Sumiadi S ◽  
Yusrizal Y
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
District Court ◽  
Compensation Mechanism ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Cost

Summons of witnesses at each level of criminal case examination has consequences for the cost of attending the summons. So far, the provisions regarding the cost of summoning witnaesses and experts have been regulated in Article 229 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims and Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning Procedures for Protection of Witnesses and Victims in Human rights violations, however, in reality the fees that have been regulated in the law are not fully provided to all witnesses and even if there are costs they are not up to standard and not optimal. These costs include accommodation costs, consumption costs, transportation costs and costs of reimbursing lost income due to having to attend calls. The purpose of this research is to find out and explain the compensation mechanism to witnesses or experts in order to differentiate information in the criminal justice system in the jurisdiction of the Takengon District Court and what are the obstacles in reimbursing costs to witnesses or experts in order to provide information in the criminal justice system in the region. the law of the Takengon District Court. This type of research is juridical empirical, that is, approaching the problem through legal research by looking at the prevailing legal norms and relating them to the facts that exist in society in connection with the problems encountered in the research.

scholarly journals PRIMUM REMEDIUM ACTION SANCTIONS AGAINST CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW

Cepalo ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-120
Author(s):  
Mashuril Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
State Budget ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law

Criminal sanctions are more popular than action sanctions at the application level. Action sanctions formulation is regulated in Articles 82 and 83 of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law, while criminal sanctions are the last resort. However, criminal sanctions are still the "prima donna" in law enforcement practices against children in conflict. This condition raises various problems such as the overcapacity of correctional institutions, burdens the state budget, and creates a stigma against children in conflict with the law. Because the purpose of implementing the juvenile criminal justice system is in the child's best interests, action sanctions should be prioritised, even though criminal sanctions are needed in law enforcement against children in conflict with the law. Therefore, an idea emerged to restore criminal sanctions as ultimum remedium and strengthen action sanctions as primum remedium. The problem discussed in this study is how to implement primum remedium action sanctions against children in conflict with the law? And how to strengthen primum remedium action sanctions against children in conflict with the law? This study uses a normative juridical, an empirical juridical, and a comparative methods. The data in this article are sourced from primary and secondary data processed through description, prescription, and system. The results indicate that criminal sanctions still dominate judges' decisions in children in conflict with the law, and action sanctions are complementary sanctions because it is rarely applied.

scholarly journals KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Made Wahyu Chandra Satriana
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Scientific Journals ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
Basic Ideas

The discussion on this journal raised regarding policy formulation RestorativeJustice in the Criminal Justice System Children . The objectives of this research thatin order to properly analyze the basic ideas contained in restorative justice , to dowith children in conflict with the law and to analyze policy formulation set forth in the Law. 112012 on the Criminal Justice System Kids for restorative justice to children inconflict with the law . While this type of research used in scientific journals this isthe kind of normative legal research , because it is based on the assessment thatthere is a conflict between the norms of Law. 11 of 2012 on the Criminal JusticeSystem Children with the norms contained in the draft - Criminal Code ( CriminalCode ) . In this case the unlawful act committed by the child who has not reached theage of 18 (eighteen years ) diversion efforts which have the purpose for the creationof a balance between the interests of focus and attention to the perpetrator and thevictim also impact the completion of the criminal case that happens in thecommunity to ensure and protecting children and their rights in order to live , grow,develop and participate optimally in accordance with the dignity of humanity , aswell as protection from violence and discrimination .

scholarly journals DIVERSI TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
I Made Wiharsa
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Criminal Punishment ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Research Type

Diversion of narcotic crime in the criminal justice system for the children. Children in conflict with the law, especially in narcotic cases not specifically regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 on the Narcotics. During this time the children in conflict with the law that is drafted in the Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Criminal Justice System for The Children. Criminal punishment against with a certain person started because that person has committed a crime. Children in the case of a criminal act of narcotics criminal sanctions will have a negative impact on a child's future. Referring to the criminal justice system for the children are known to attempt a diversion to divert the child's completion of the criminal case of the trial into a non-judicial process. This research with the normative methods research type, which aims to determine the impact of the imposition of criminal sanctions and diversion efforts for children in narcotic crime. Diversi tindak pidana narkotika dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak. Anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum khususnya dalam tindak pidana narkotika belum diatur secara khusus dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. Selama ini terhadap anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum mengacu pada Undang-Undang Nomor. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.  Penjatuhan pidana terhadap seseorang bermula karena seseorang tersebut telah melakukan suatu tindak pidana. Anak dalam hal melakukan tindak pidana narkotika yang dijatuhi sanksi pidana akan berdampak buruk pada masa depan anak. Mengacu pada sistem peradilan pidana anak yang dikenal upaya diversi untuk mengalihkan penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana anak dari proses peradilan ke proses non peradilan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metoda penelitian hukum normatif, yang bertujuan untuk dapat mengetahui dampak penjatuhan sanksi pidana dan upaya diversi bagi anak dalam tindak pidana narkotika.

scholarly journals RECONSTRUCTION OF CHILD CRIMINAL SANCTIONS IN PERSPECTIVE OF LAW NUMBER 11 THE YEAR 2012 CONCERNING JUSTICE CHILD CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM BASED ON JUSTICE VALUES

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (18) ◽  
pp. 68-81
Author(s):  
Akhmad Munawar ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto ◽  
Anis Mashdurohatun ◽  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Law

Children who are in conflict with the law are seen to need to be given physical and spiritual protection. Bearing in mind, the Court's decision is more likely to impose imprisonment sanctions. The United Nations in several Congresses has criticized imprisonment sanctions, besides having the potential to cause stigmatization in children, it is also ineffective and does not create a deterrent effect. This study aims to examine and to analyze the implementation of Child Criminal sanctions in the perspective of Law Number 11-year 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System, to analyze the factors that influence child criminal sanctions that are not yet fair. The research question is how the reconstruction of child-based criminal sanctions based on justice is. This research is included in non-doctrinal research (empirical). It used three theories, namely the theory of criminal purpose to analyze the first problem, the dignified justice theory to analyze the second problem and progressive legal theory to analyze the third problem. The results found that the implementation of sanctions Crime against a child in conflict with a law imposed by a prison sentence, the Judge in his consideration emphasizes juridical considerations so that the criminal sanctions imposed on the child are not in accordance with teleological theory as the purpose of punishment. Criminal sanctions against children have not brought justice, among others, because several articles in Law Number 11-year 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System still have weaknesses. Reconstruction of Articles that hinder the realization of fair criminal sanctions, namely Article 7 paragraph (2) Article 32 paragraph (2), Article 71 paragraph (1) letter e, Article 79 paragraph (1) and Article 81 paragraph (1) of the Law Number 11 the year 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of the implementation of diversion on children who conflict with the law at the level of the state court in gorontalo province

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-69
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rizal Lampatta ◽  
Herlina Sulaiman
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
District Court ◽  
State Court ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Psychological Condition ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Remedy ◽  
The Law

Diversion is a step or legal remedy aimed specifically at children who are in conflict with the law. As perpetrators of criminal acts, children need to be treated differently from adults. This is due to the psychological condition of children who are considered unable to accept criminal sanctions. Even children who have committed criminal acts, Act No. 11 of 2012 on the Criminal Justice System Children continue to provide collateral in the form of diversion efforts so that children avoid criminal prosecution. Diversion is carried out at the police, attorney and court levels. Not all cases of child offenders who enter the PN level can be diversified because there are already rules in the SPPA Law, Perma No. 4 of 2014 and PP. 65 of 2015. Likewise in the implementation of diversion at the District Court level in Gorontalo Province, some were successful and some were not. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the implementation of diversion to child offenders at court level in Gorontalo Province. As well as to find out the obstacles in the implementation of diversion against child offenders at the District Court level in Gorontalo Province.

scholarly journals PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK DAN PEDOMAN PERILAKU HAKIM

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Imran Imran
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research

ABSTRAKDalam sistem peradilan pidana penanganan suatu kasus dimulai sejak kasus itu muncul, kemudian ditangani oleh polisi, hingga proses akhir dari penegakan hukum terletak pada putusan hakim. Putusan hakim dapat berupa menjatuhkan hukuman ataupun membebaskan seorang terdakwa. Dalam putusan hakim akan terlihat kemampuan hakim dalam mengonstruksi kasus sejak dakwaan dibacakan hingga pledoi diucapkan. Semua konstruksi hakim tersebut akan tergambar dalam pertimbangan-pertimbangan. Dalam pertimbangan tersebut akan terlihat apakah suatu putusan tersebut melanggar kode etik atau tidak. Apa yang terlihat dalam dua putusan hakim yang dikeluarkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Tobelo, mencerminkan adanya persoalan ketika seorang terdakwa dua kali dihukum oleh majelis hakim yang sama untuk perbuatan yang sama pula. Hal inilah yang kemudian menjadi rumusan masalah, apakah putusan tersebut melanggar Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim atau tidak? Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang memfokuskan kajian pada data sekunder, maka akan terlihat bagaimana sesungguhnya dua putusan tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan telah terjadi pelanggaran Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim yang dilakukan oleh majelis hakim.Kata kunci: kode etik dan pedoman perilaku hakim; sistem peradilan pidana; profesionalisme.  ABSTRACT In the criminal justice system, the handling of a case starts since the claim arises, then is handled by the police, until the final process of law enforcement, which lies in the judge's decision. Judges' decisions can be in the form of sentencing or acquitting a defendant. The ability of a judge to construct a case will appear in the decision from the time the indictment is read until the plea is pronounced. In these considerations, it will be seen whether the judge's decision violates the code of ethics or not. Two judges' decisions issued by the Tobelo District Court reflect the problem in which a defendant was twice sentenced by the same panel of judges for violating the same law. This is what then becomes the formula of the problem, whether the decision violates the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges or not. By using normative legal research method focusing on secondary data construing, it will expose the fact of these two decisions. The results of this analysis indicate that there are violations of the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges been committed by the panel of judges examining the case. Keywords: code of ethics and code of conduct of judges; criminal justice system; professionalism. 

scholarly journals Diversion In Children Criminal Justice System Through Restorative Justice

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 331
Author(s):  
Yudi Hendarto ◽  
Umar Ma'ruf
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Psychological Burden ◽  
Criminal Matters

The formulation of the problem and the purpose of this study is to describe and analyze the diversion urgency in handling juvenile criminal cases, and to describe and analyze Perma No. 4 of 2014 on Diversion in criminal matters menyelesaian children through restorative justice approach. This research method using normative legal research methods dengn type of research is descriptive analytical.� Based on the analysis result No. 4 of 2014 can be presented the following results, that Perma No. 4 of 2014 is needed in handling juvenile criminal cases. This is because during this time the condition of children who are in the coaching institutions, detention and permayarakatan far worse than a face appeared positive aspects of child development. Mixing children with adults in penitentiary have negative effects and its own psychological burden for the child, because he considered himself the same as adults with Perma No. 4 of 2014.Keywords: Diversion, Child Criminal Justice System, Restorative Justice

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document