scholarly journals PENENGGELAMAN KAPAL TERKAIT TINDAK PIDANA ILLEGAL FISHING SEBELUM ADANYA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN YANG BERKEKUATAN HUKUM TETAP

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-144
Author(s):  
Banan Prasetya

ABSTRACTThis research will be reviewed by the legal facts of the act of sinking illegal fishing vessels conducted by law enforcement officers or fisheries investigators in the Indonesian Fisheries Waters. The sinking of ships was carried out given the increasingly widespread theft of fish by foreign ships. An interesting legal issue to explore is about the sinking of illegal fishing vessels in a review of Indonesia's legal perspective. The purpose of this study is to analyse the sinking of ships related to the crime of illegal fishing before a court decision has permanent legal force, whether it is following applicable law. The next objective is to analyse the legal consequences of the ship sinking in the practice of enforcing illegal fishing criminal acts before a court decision has permanent legal force. This research is legal research with normative legal research type so that the analysis method used is a qualitative study that is built based on legal arguments to answer the problematic issues of this research law. The results showed that the act of sinking illegal fishing vessels in Indonesian fisheries waters by law enforcement officers or Indonesian fisheries investigators, normatively dogmatically, was following the provisions of Indonesian national law, which had been informed in Article 69 Paragraph 4 of Law Number 45 the Year 2009 regarding Fisheries, has also been by the provisions of international law, as regulated in Article 73 of UNCLOS 1982. Furthermore, the legal consequences of the sinking of illegal fishing vessels before the existence of a court decision have permanent legal force, normatively, has juridical implications on three things, namely: First, after the sinking of illegal fishing vessels became the basis for law enforcement officers or fisheries investigators to conduct further investigations within the formal criminal law enforcement framework; Second, the sinking of the ship has a legal effect on the status of the ship that sunk into status as evidence of the proceeds of crime or criminal acts that can be confiscated; Third, the sinking of the illegal fishing vessel has legal implications on the offender who can be subject to the status of a suspect and can even be raised to the status of a defendant of an illegal fishing crime. The author recommends that the Indonesian government through the foreign ministry should make diplomatic efforts to the international community to urge the United Nations to make illegal fishing a transnational crime. The procedure of permanent sinking of illegal fishing vessels, should not only be limited to the regulations of the Director-General of Fisheries but by the Indonesian government in the form of special legislation. Kata Kunci: Penenggelaman Kapal, Illegal Fishing, dan Penegakan Hukum 

Author(s):  
Guntur Dirga Saputra

Indonesia's natural resources in the form of very wide waters pose a threat to the crime of illegal fishing. The prevention of these crimes is carried out by giving the investigator authority to sink / burn ships with foreign flags directly without a court decision having permanent legal force as regulated in Law 45/2009. This research is a normative legal research. The results of this writing explain that the sinking / burning of foreign-flagged ships by investigators is contrary to Article 28D Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution which is hierarchically higher than Law 45/2009 and SPP regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code so that it does not provide justice and legal certainty because it has seized the rights of the suspect / defendant. The sinking / burning of the ship is the authority of the Public Prosecutor to carry out the execution after a court decision has permanent legal force which stipulates that evidence in the form of a ship is seized for destruction and is not under the authority of the investigator. The government and the DPR RI should revise Law 45/2009 to revoke the authority of investigators who can directly sink / burn ships and to the Prosecutor to coordinate and involve investigators to become witnesses in the execution. Kekayaan alam Indonesia berupa perairan yang sangat luas menimbulkan ancaman terjadinya tindak pidana illegal fishing. Penanggulangan kejahatan tersebut dilakukan dengan memberikan kewenangan kepada penyidik untuk melakukan penenggelaman/pembakaran kapal yang berbendera asing yang secara langsung tanpa putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap sebagaimana diatur dalam UU 45/2009. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penulisan ini menjelaskan bahwa Penenggelaman/pembakaran kapal berbendera asing oleh Penyidik bertentangan dengan Pasal 28D Ayat (1) UUDNRI 1945 yang secara hirarki lebih tinggi dari UU 45/2009 dan SPP yang diatur dalam KUHAP sehingga tidak memberikan keadilan dan kepastian hukum oleh karena telah merampas hak tersangka/terdakwa. Penenggelaman/pembakaran kapal merupakan kewenangan Jaksa Penuntut Umum untuk melakukan eksekusi setelah adanya putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap yang menetapkan barang bukti berupa kapal untuk dirampas untuk dimusnahkan dan bukan merupakan kewenangan penyidik. Pemerintah dengan DPR RI agar melakukan revisi UU 45/2009 untuk mencabut kewenangan penyidik yang secara langsung dapat melakukan penenggelaman/pembakaran kapal dan kepada Jaksa agar melakukan kordinasi dan melibatkan penyidik untuk menjadi saksi dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi.


SASI ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Sherly Adam

His study aims to determine to examine, analyze coordination between institutions in the framework of sinking vessels resulting from criminal acts in the field of fisheries. This research is a normative legal research (legal research). The research began with an inventory of legal regulations or laws and regulations relating to coordination between institutions in the framework of sinking vessels resulting from criminal acts in the field of fisheries. According to the Law, there are two methods of sinking ships carried out by the Government of the Republic of Indonesia, namely sinking ships through a court decision and being caught red-handed. For this reason, there is coordination between institutions in the framework of sinking fishing vessels by the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (government) of the Republic of Indonesia, but the coordination of these institutions has not yet been implemented or carried out properly. This is due to unclear regulations regarding operational standards or guidelines for the destruction or sinking of fishing vessels which regulate the implementation, mechanism, and procedure for the destruction of ships to be used as a basis for the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Prosecutors' Office and the Courts in sinking fishing vessels conducting Illegal Fishing in Indonesian waters.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-55
Author(s):  
Irman Widi Kurniawan ◽  
Etty Mulyati ◽  
Betty Rubiati

ABSTRAKDi dalam bagian kedua UUPA mengatur tentang pelaksanaan konversi hak atas tanah menjadi wujud kepastian hukum sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 33 ayat (3) UUD 1945. Namun kepastian hukum terhadap konversi Hak atas tanah barat terutama sertifikat Hak Eigendom Verponding masih menjadi problematika tersendiri bagi masyarakat yang memiliki bukti kepemilikan hak atas tanah barat tersebut apabila dijadikan sebuah jaminan guna memperoleh fasilitas kredit. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah yuridis normatif dengan kajian bahan hukum primer, sekunder serta tersier. Berdasarkan pembahasan tersebut bahwa Kepastian Hukum terkait konversi hak Eigendom Verponding telah memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat dengan ketentuan diperlukan konversi sehingga dapat dijadikan objek jaminan namun dalam prakteknya masih terdapat objek jaminan dengan tidak memperhatikan asal mula objek jaminan tersebut serta akibat hukum terhadap konversi hak atas tanah tersebut adalah pemberlakuan UUPA menjadi dasar bahwasanya prinsip status quo hak atas tanah terdahulu memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dengan ketentuan hak-hak lama menjadi tidak diakui keberadaannya. Kata Kunci: hak atas tanah; hak barat; kepastian hukum jaminan; konversi ABSTRACTIn the second section of the UUPA regulates the conversion of land rights into a form of legal certainty as stipulated in Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution. But the legal certainty of the conversion of the Right to western land, especially the Eigendom Verponding Rights certificate, remains a problem for people who have proof of ownership of the western land if it is used as a guarantee to obtain credit facilities. The research method used is normative juridical with the study of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the discussion that legal certainty related to the conversion of rights Eigendom Verponding has had a binding legal force with the necessary provisions of conversion so that it can be used as an object of guarantee but in practice there is still an object of guarantee by not taking into account the origin of the object of the guarantee and the legal consequences of the conversion of the right to land is the enactment of the UUPA being the basis that the principle of the status quo of the former land rights provides a guarantee of legal certainty with the provisions of old rights to be unclaimed civility. Keywords: conversion; guarantee legal certainty; land rights; western rights


Author(s):  
Volodymyr Ivantsov

It is emphasized that the current legislation uses the terms "law enforcement agency", "law enforcement officer", which is directly correlated with law enforcement activities, which in turn indicates the unconditional relevance of the current study. This article analyzes the current legislation in order to separate law enforcement agencies from other government agencies, in order to assign certain positions of government agencies to law enforcement officers. As a result, the imperfections of the definitions of Ukrainian legislation for unambiguous identification of both law enforcement activities and the list of law enforcement agencies have been established. Theoretical and legal bases for establishing the affiliation of a state body to the list of law enforcement agencies in terms of practical implementation of current regulations are obtained by assessing the status of the Civil Service of Ukraine for Emergencies, namely: the assignment of a body to law enforcement should be carried out separately , taking into account the legal position (status) of such body defined in normative legal acts; if the endowment of a certain entity with the status of a law enforcement body has not occurred normatively, it is necessary to proceed from the analysis of the purpose (tasks) and basic functions assigned to a particular body and, accordingly, the powers vested in such a body It has been proved that SES bodies do not belong to law enforcement bodies, as they belong to the unified state system of civil protection (SES bodies are not assigned law enforcement tasks and / or functions; they are not endowed with law enforcement powers), and their officials cannot be recognized as law enforcement officers. body. It is emphasized that the legal approach proposed by the author to establish the affiliation of a state body to the list of "law enforcement agencies" may be fully applicable to other subjects of power, which in the future will provide an opportunity to outline the comprehensive range of law enforcement agencies in Ukraine.


Author(s):  
Andrey Koblenkov

The article is devoted to the analysis of the legal consequences of incompetent actions of police officers in the use of firearms. The author assesses the circumstances and consequences of the use of firearms by law enforcement officers against offenders.


Lentera Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Ayu Izza Elvany

This paper analyzes how formulation policy of lobster seeds smuggling regulated in Indonesian law to optimize the effectiveness of illegal fishing enforcement, considering penal policy is the basis of criminal law operationalization. This research uses both statute approach and conceptual approach as legal research methods to analyze the issued legal problem. Fishery law in Indonesia regulated in Law No. 45 of 2009 amending Law No. 31 of 2004 concerning Fishery, especially Articles 88 and 16 paragraph (1) which cover the formulation policy of lobster seeds smuggling enforcement. This study will be analyzed into three aspects which are the conduct (the criminal offense), criminal liability, and sentencing system. The result shows that law enforcement regarding the smuggling of lobster seeds in Indonesia is ineffective due to the nonexistence of corporate criminal liability in the fishery law and its sentencing system is lack of both the specific minimum penalty regulation and the penal measures as criminal punishment. However, the draft of the fishery law has already set corporate criminal liability; hence it also regulates the penal measures, in the form of secondary sanctions. Nevertheless, instead of enacting the specific minimum penalty, the draft only determined the maximum penalty as well. Keywords: Formulation Policy, Fishery Law, Lobster Seeds Smuggling.


Author(s):  
Tajuddin Noor

Analysis of settlement of debt receivables disputes between PT. Bank Perkreditan Rakyat NBP 5 and Lisbon Manurung, defendant I, and Tetty Herawati, the defendant II. The settlement is carried out based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Completion of Simple Lawsuits because the value of the material claim does not exceed 200,000,000.00 Rupiahs (two hundred million rupiahs). The dispute ended with the ruling of the peace deed because of the good intentions of the parties who ended the dispute by means of peace. In the study of the decision, the author applied legal research in a normative juridical manner. The result of this study indicates that the legal analysis of debt settlement through agreements / deeds of peace has legal consequences for the parties, namely closed appeal and cassation legal efforts, which have permanent legal force, and executive power. Keywords: Debt and Receivables, Peace, Settlement. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-212
Author(s):  
Pande Putu Gede Parwata ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽  
I Wayan Artanaya

The problem of illegal parking that occurs in the tourist area of ​​Ubud has prompted the Gianyar Regency Government to issue a Gianyar Regent Regulation Number 57 of 2018 concerning the Management and Engineering of Traffic and Road Transportation and Parking in the Ubud Tourism Area. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the Gianyar Regent Regulation Number 57 of 2018 concerning the Management and Engineering of Traffic and Road Transportation and Parking in the Ubud Tourism Area and to determine the application of sanctions against illegal parking prohibitions in the Ubud Tourism Object area. This research is an empirical legal research. The approach to the problem used is the sociology of law approach. Based on the results of the study, the parked vehicles are not properly organized due to the lack of parking arrangements that occur in the tourist area of ​​Ubud. The application of sanctions against the prohibition of illegal parking in the tourist area of ​​Ubud is carried out, starting from giving warnings for breaking tires, towing the transportation of violating vehicles to tickets. Thus, law enforcement officers should be more assertive in effectively implementing the prohibition on illegal parking on the shoulder of the Ubud road area. The road user community should be pro-active towards the applicable regulations. People who obey the rules should not only be there when there are traffic officers, but also obey the rules when there is no guard.


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 502
Author(s):  
Vidya Prahassacitta

Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini, pertama: makna Pasal 2 ayat (1) dan Pasal 3 UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 pra dan pasca dikeluarkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Kedua, penerapan Pasal 2 ayat (1) dan Pasal 3 UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 pra Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Ketiga, efek dikeluarkannya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut dalam meminimalisir kriminalisasi perbuatan pegawai negeri sipil atau pejabat publik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Sebagai penelitian kualitatif maka data yang dipergunakan merupakan data sekunder yang terdiri dari data hukum primer, sekunder dan tertier yang diperoleh dari studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan mahkamah konstitusi tersebut telah mengubah rumusan delik dari formil menjadi materiil yang menjadikan makna pasal tersebut semakin menjauh dari makna awalnya. Pada akhirnya, keluarnya putusan mahkamah konstitusi tersebut tidak dapat memecahkan permasalahan hukum yang telah ada sebelumnya bahkan putusan tersebut berpotensi menimbulkan permasalahan baru yang dapat menghambat proses penegakan hukum dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia.The problems on this research are, first: the meaning of Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 UU No. 31 Year 1999 before and after Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Second, the application of Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 UU No. 31 Year 1999 before Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/ PUU-XIV/2016. Third, the effects of Constitutional Court Decision in minimizing criminal actions conducted by civil servants and public officials. This research is a legal research using normative legal approach. As qualitative research, this research uses secondary data consist of primary, secondary, tertiary legal data collected from literature study. The results show that the constitutional court decision has changed the formulation of the offense from formal to material which makes the meaning of the article different from its original meaning. At last, the constitutional court deciasion could not solve the existing legal problem, but contrary it potentially creates a new problem which obstructs law enforcement process in combating corruption in Indonesia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-143
Author(s):  
Citra

Children are the next generation of the nation, the existence of children is very important because the child is a potential fate of the nation as well as a mirror attitude of life of the nation in the future. A child who is a superior seed and has the widest hope to prepare for his future as a milestone of success of a nation in the future should not fall in the world of evil. It is unfortunate that children at an early age have been involved in criminal offenses and past their youth behind bars, increasingly contaminated with other inmates. This research was empirical legal research, that is the research on the provisions of the legislation in the national law concerning restorative approach in the imposition of action sanctions against children in conflict with law in order to keep children away from imprisonment and negative stigma in society . Addressing the issue of a child in conflict with the law should be done in a familial approach and avoiding children from prison as much as possible. The sanction of action for the child contained in Article 82 of Law Number 11 of 2012 on Criminal Justice System for Children expected to prevent the child from the negative stigma in society and keep the children from bad effects of prison. Thus the current restorative model of punishment is more applicable in handling child offenders. It is expected that law enforcement officers to pay attention to the provisions of the rules that apply to children in conflict with the law in terms of imposition of more sanctions toward education and character development of children so that the threat of imprisonment becomes the last alternative in imposing sanctions for children


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document