scholarly journals PENDEKATAN RESTORATIF DALAM PENJATUHAN SANKSI TINDAKAN BAGI ANAK YANG BERKONFLIK DENGAN HUKUM

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-143
Author(s):  
Citra

Children are the next generation of the nation, the existence of children is very important because the child is a potential fate of the nation as well as a mirror attitude of life of the nation in the future. A child who is a superior seed and has the widest hope to prepare for his future as a milestone of success of a nation in the future should not fall in the world of evil. It is unfortunate that children at an early age have been involved in criminal offenses and past their youth behind bars, increasingly contaminated with other inmates. This research was empirical legal research, that is the research on the provisions of the legislation in the national law concerning restorative approach in the imposition of action sanctions against children in conflict with law in order to keep children away from imprisonment and negative stigma in society . Addressing the issue of a child in conflict with the law should be done in a familial approach and avoiding children from prison as much as possible. The sanction of action for the child contained in Article 82 of Law Number 11 of 2012 on Criminal Justice System for Children expected to prevent the child from the negative stigma in society and keep the children from bad effects of prison. Thus the current restorative model of punishment is more applicable in handling child offenders. It is expected that law enforcement officers to pay attention to the provisions of the rules that apply to children in conflict with the law in terms of imposition of more sanctions toward education and character development of children so that the threat of imprisonment becomes the last alternative in imposing sanctions for children

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-101
Author(s):  
Christian A Caesar

Diversion is the settlement of juvenile cases that have been transferred from the criminal justice process to the non-criminal justice process. This is because the child is the party who has not been able to legally account for his dressing. The purpose of the research was to analyse in depth the background execution of the diversion of the dealing with the law and the obstacles affecting the implementation of diversion. This research uses a type of normative empirical legal research by finding the empirical in the field that concerns the problems of primary that is obtained directly from the results of the interviews with respondents and interviewees as well as data secondary data is obtained through literature-literature which deals directly with the issue discussed in this study. The research results give a hint that execution is a form of diversion pemidanaan the more education against children as well as the factors that influence the implementation of restorative justice in the diversion on the criminal justice system, child is a factor the substance of the law, human resource law enforcement officers who have yet to grasp the versioned, support and cooperation among related agencies not optimal, and are also victims/families of the victims have not been able to receive them well on diversion.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Haryanto Ginting ◽  
Muazzul Muazzul

<p class="1judul"><em><span>The Role of the Police in the Application of Restorative Justice to Perpetrators of Criminal Offenses Conducted by Children and Adults</span></em></p><p class="1judul"> </p><h1><span lang="EN-US">The rise of cases of brawl between high school students and even not only between high school students, but also has hit up to campuses, this often happens in big cities such as Jakarta, Surabaya, and Medan. This study aims to determine the role of the Police in implementing Restorative Justice against perpetrators of criminal acts of beating carried out by children and adults that occurred in the District of Namo Rambe District of Deli Serdang. The research method is done by using descriptive qualitative method that is normative. Based on the data obtained in the results of this study, the authors draw conclusions as follows: The criminal justice system must always promote the importance of law and justice. But there is a false view that the measure of the success of law enforcement is only marked by the success of bringing a suspect to court and then being sentenced. The measure of success of law enforcement by law enforcement officers should be characterized by the achievement of values of justice in the community. The police as a state tool that plays a role in enforcing the law is expected to be able to respond to this by implementing a Restorative Justice mechanism.<strong></strong></span></h1>


Rechtidee ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 219
Author(s):  
Atika Anggraini

<p align="center"><strong>ABSTRAK</strong></p><p>Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis Implementasi Konsep <em>Restorative Justice</em>Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Di Wilayah Bangkalan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Tulisan ini di buat berdasarkan penelitian menggunakan pendekatan utama yaitu yuridis normative (legal Research) dan yuridis Empiris sebagai penunjang pendekatan Normatif. Hasil penelitian ini bahwa konsep Restorative Justice dibangkalan telah efektif dilaksanakan oleh para penegak hukum meskipun banyak kekurangan tetapi tidak mengurangi pelaksanaan demi kepentingan Anak berhadapan hukum. Pendampingan Kasus ABH wajib didampingi oleh Keluarga, Pengacara, Bapas, LSM dan tokoh masyarakat. Pendamping terhadap ABH tidak hanya kasus yang dapat dilaksanakan Restorative Justice tetapi semua kasus yang melibatkan anak sebagai anak pelaku. Pendampingan ABH dimulai sejak tahap penyidikan hingga telah selesainya pidana yang harus ABH pertanggung jawabkan dan dikembalikannya ABH kepada masyrakat untuk bersosialisasi. Oleh karena itu, diharapkan putusan para penegak hukum yang menyangkut masa depan ABH lebih untuk diperhatikan masa depannya agar menjadi pribadi yang lebih baik.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Kata Kunci: Anak Berhadapan Hukum, <em>Restorative Justice, </em>Pendampingan</strong></p><p align="center"><strong> </strong></p><p align="center"><strong> </strong></p><p align="center"><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p><p align="center"><strong> </strong></p><p>This reseach aims to analyze the Implementation of Restorative Justice Concept on Children Against the Law in Bangkalan Territory Based on Act No. 11 Year 2012 on the Criminal Justice System of Children. This paper is based on research using the main approach of normative juridical (Legal Research) and juridical Empirical as supporting Normative approach. The result of research is the concept of Restorative Justice has been effectively implemented by law enforcers despite many shortcomings but does not reduce the implementation in the interest of the Child in the against of law. Assistance of ABH Cases must be accompanied by Family, Lawyers, BAPAS (Balai Permasyarakatan), NGOs and community leaders. Companions to ABH are not the only cases that Restorative Justice can implement but all cases involving children as child offenders. ABH mentoring started from the investigation stage until the completion of the crime that should be ABH accountable and returned ABH to the community to socialize. Therefore, it is hoped that the decision of law enforcers concerning the future of ABH is more to be considered for the future to become a better person.</p><p> </p><strong>Keywords :</strong>Children Against the Law, Restorative Justice, Assistance


Yustitia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-200
Author(s):  
Nabella Rona Sahati ◽  
Kodrat Alam

Extradition Agreeament (treaty) provides facilities for countries that have an agreement, where the agreement is to act against, arrest and prosecute criminals in a country who have fled to another country outside national jurisdiction. The presence of the perpetrator in another country is to avoid attempts to arrest him in connection with the crime he has committed in the country of origin. So by running out of the country, this means that there are other countries whose interests are harmed because they cannot arrest the perpetrator, in which the perpetrator has committed a violation of the law based on the location where the crime was committed (locus delicti). One of them is that the criminal case of corruption is considered a threat of extraordinary crime that harms all people in the world, in upholding the law of corruption in which the perpetrator has fled abroad so that he feels safe and free from a crime he has committed. So extradition is very necessary for the perpetrators of corruption who have fled to other countries. From the background that has been explained, the following problems can be made inventory, namely 1) what is the position of the extradition agreement in international law related to criminal acts of corruption and 2) how is the implementation of extradition agreements against perpetrators of corruption in Indonesia. This study uses a normative juridical research method, namely legal research that refers to legal norms contained in statutory regulations with descriptive analytical research specifications with the aim of obtaining an overview of the application of extradition agreements to perpetrators of corruption in Indonesia based on Law Number 1 of 1979 of Extradition. The results in this research have shown that indeed there have been regulations regarding extradition treaties but it has been long enough and it is necessary to have regulatory reforms according to existing needs, furthermore it is necessary to improve diplomatic relations because law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption which involves cooperation between two countries is not only achieved through extradition treaties, but also good diplomatic relations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 283
Author(s):  
Oscar Stefanus Setjo ◽  
Umar Ma'ruf

The purpose of this study to know and analyze the mechanisms used in the investigation of children in conflict with the law against narcotic crime, the provision of diversion for children who are in conflict with the law in narcotic crime, obstacles and solutions in the process of diversion for children who are in conflict with the law in narcotics. This research uses the approach method of normative juridical and sociology juridical methods, the specifications in the study are analytical descriptive, population and sampling methods are all objects or all symptoms or all events or all units to be studied, data collection techniques using literature studies and interviews, analysis the data used are qualitative, using the theory of law enforcement, the theory of expediency and the theory of justice. Research result: Act No. 11 of 2012 on the Child Criminal Justice System. Giving diversion for criminal acts without victims also must be diversified. Crimes without victims such as narcotics abuse, children who become narcotics abusers are categorized as victims. Internal barriers, agreement between the victim and the child in conflict with the law; Human Resources (HR). External barriers, limited facilities and infrastructure; Different understandings; Lack of coordination; Community understanding of diversion; Regulation regarding supervision of the implementation of the agreed version of the agreement. Efforts to overcome internal barriers: Develop a work plan, include training investigators and educate. Efforts to overcome external barriers: Optimize facilities and infrastructure; Using social welfare personnel in the diversion process; Establish intensive communication with other law enforcement officers; Improve coordination with community mentors; Hold socialization.Keywords: Investigation; Children; Legal Conflict; Criminal Acts; Narcotics.


Author(s):  
Yunan Hilmy

Sistem peradilan pidana harus selalu mempromosikan kepentingan hukum dan keadilan. Tetapi terdapat pandangan salah bahwa ukuran keberhasilan penegakan hukum hanya ditandai dengan keberhasilan mengajukan tersangka ke pengadilan dan kemudian dijatuhi hukuman. Seharusnya ukuran keberhasilan penegakan hukum oleh aparat penegak hukum ditandai dengan tercapainya nilai-nilai keadilan di dalam masyarakat. Kepolisian sebagai alat negara yang berperan dalam menegakkan hukum diharapkan dapat merespon hal ini dengan menggunakan mekanisme restorative justice . Tulisan ini akan membahas mengapa mekanisme restorative justice bisa dijadikan alternatif penegakan hukum oleh polisi; bagaimana prospek penerapan mekanisme restorative justice yang dilakukan oleh Polisi; serta bagaimana mekanisme restorative justice yang dilakukan oleh polisi dalam sistem hukum nasional. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dapat disimpulkan bahwa dengan menjadikan restorative justice sebagai pendekatan maka ada beberapa keuntungan yang bisa didapatkan. Pertama , masyarakat diberikan ruang untuk menangani sendiri permasalahan hukumnya yang dirasakan lebih adil. Kedua , beban negara dalam beberapa hal menjadi berkurang. Polisi dapat melaksanakan mekanisme restorative justice melalui diskresi yang dimilikinya karena hal merupakan kelengkapan dari sistem pengaturan oleh hukum itu sendiri. Pelaksanaan restorative justice oleh Polri dalam perspektif sistem hukum nasional dapat diterima apabila dilaksanakan berdasar falsafah negara Pancasila, menjamin keadilan serta perlindungan hukum terhadap HAM. Untuk menjamin adanya keseragaman dalam implementasinya, diperlukan suatu norma atau kaidah untuk memberikan legitimasi agar segala tindakan yang dilakukan dalam implementasi restorative justice tidak dianggap ilegal.<p>The Criminal Justice System should be promoting interest of law and justice. However, there is a mistake of view that measuring success on law enforcement simply characterized with success filed a suspect to court and sentenced. Supposed to be success measure of law enforcement by law enforcement officers marked by the achievement of value of justice in society. The police as a state of tool who role in enforcing the law are expected respond by using restorative justice mechanism. Therefore, this paper focus on why restorative justice mechanism could be an alternative on law enforcement by the police; and how the mechanisms of restorative justice by the police in the national legal system. By using normative juridical methode, it can be conclude that by making restorative justice as an approach of, there are several advantages which can be found. First, public givenits own space to handles with his legal issues which preceived fairly. Second, burden on th estate in some way be reduced. The police could be implementing restorative justice mechanism through discretionbecause it is the completeness of regulation by the law itself. Implementation of restorative justice by the police in perspective of national legal system is acceptable if carried out based on the state ohilosophy of Pancasila, ensures of justice and legal protection of human rights.To ensure uniformity in implementation, needs a norm or rule to gave legitimacy that all actions which taken in implementation of restorative justice ha snot considered illegal.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 254
Author(s):  
Priyo Utomo ◽  
Dona Budi Kharisma

<p>Abstract<br />This article describes how to apply standardization on batik in Yogyakarta. This is based on the globalization of trade which requires all products to meet standards that have been applied internationally to be accepted in the international market. The methodology and research used are empirical legal research methods that are sociological juridical, namely understanding the conditions and social situations in which the law is applied. The results of the study show that law enforcement officers in this case are the Yogyakarta City Industri and Trade Department and the Yogyakarta Center for Crafts and Batik has not made maximum effort. The legal rules that apply are not relevant to current conditions because the application of standardization of batik which is a benchmark to be accepted in the international market cannot be enforced. In addition, there are still many legal cultures in the batik industri that ignore the law, especially batik standardization. This has an impact on batik entrepreneurs who apply standardization on batik in the city of Yogyakarta are still very few due to various obstacles.<br />Keywords: Standardization; Batik; International Trade; Application of Rules; Problems</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini mendeskripsikan bagaimana penerapan standarisasi pada batik di Kota Yogyakarta. Hal tersebut didasari oleh globalisasi perdagangan yang menuntut semua produk harus memenuhi standar yang telah<br />diterapkan secara internasional agar dapat diterima di pasar internasional. Metodologi dan penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum empiris yang bersifat yuridis sosiologis, yaitu memahami kondisi dan situasi sosial kemasyarakatan di mana hukum itu diterapkan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa aparat penegak hukum dalam hal ini adalah Dinas Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Kota Yogyakarta serta Balai Besar Kerajinan dan Batik Yogyakarta belum melakukan usaha yang maksimal. Aturan hukum yang berlaku tidak relevan dengan kondisi sekarang ini dikarenakan penerapan standarisasi batik yang menjadi tolok ukur untuk dapat diterima di pasar internasional tidak dapat dipaksakan penerapannya. Selain itu budaya hukum dalam pelaku industri batik masih banyak yang mengabaikan hukum, khususnya standarisasi batik. Hal demikian berdampak pada pelaku usaha batik yang menerapan standarisasi pada batik di Kota Yogyakarta masih sangat sedikit yang dikarenakan berbagai kendala yang ada. <br />Kata Kunci: Standarisasi; Batik; Perdagangan Internasional; Penerapan Aturan; Problematika.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-281
Author(s):  
Azwad Rachmat Hambali

Tujuan penelitian menganalisis efektivitas penegakan hukum tindak pidana kekerasan terhadap anak di Kota Makassar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dan hukum empiris. Sifat penelitian ini adalah deskriptif analitis. Populasi dalam penelitian ini Penyidik Kepolisian di Polres Makassar, Advokat, Aktivis Lembaga Perlindungan Anak Sulawesi Selatan, dan Korban/Keluarganya. Sampel peneltian adalah Penyidik Kepolisian 10 orang, Advokat 10 orang, Masyarakat 15 orang, dan Korban/Keluarganya 5 orang. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kasus kekerasan terhadap anak yang dilaporkan ke Polresta Makassar setiap tahun mengalami penurunan akan tetapi penyelesaiannya juga mengalami kecenderungan penurunan. Oleh karena itu, penegakan hukum tindak pidana kekerasan terhadap anak di Kepolisian Resor Kota Makassar kurang efektif. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi efektivitas penegakan hukum tindak pidana kekerasan terhadap anak di Kepolisian Resor Kota Makassar adalah faktor substansi hukum, faktor aparat penegak hukum, faktor sarana dan prasarana, serta faktor kesadaran hukum masyarakat. The research objective is to analyze the effectiveness of law enforcement on violence against children in Makassar City and the factors that influence it. This research is a normative legal research and empirical law. The nature of this research is descriptive analytical. The population in this study were Police Investigators at the Makassar Police, Advocates, South Sulawesi Child Protection Institution activists, and victims / their families. The sample of the study was 10 Police Investigators, 10 Advocates, 15 People, and 5 Victims / Their Families. The results of this study indicate that cases of violence against children reported to the Makassar Police have decreased every year, but the resolution has also decreased. Therefore, the law enforcement of violence against children in the Makassar City Police is less effective. Factors that affect the effectiveness of law enforcement on crimes against children at the Makassar City Police are legal substance factors, law enforcement officers, facilities and infrastructure factors, and community legal awareness factors.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
ELMA YANTI

The settlement of criminal offenses with mild motives can be carried out by reasoning penal mediation called the restorative justice approach, which focuses on the direct participation of perpetrators, victims and the community. The research that use in this study is sociological legal research (social legal research). The concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of a mildly criminal case for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak, was carried out with the intermediary of the headman. Headman as customary village heads and as government administrators have an important role in creating peace efforts in resolving disputes that occur in the community, one of which is through the settlement of criminal cases by reasoning penal mediation with the concept of restorative justice. The constraints of the concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of mildly criminal cases for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak are: a) The absence of a special law mediation of regulation, b) Lack of facilities and infrastructure in mediating, c) Lack of mediator skills for village head to reconcile the parties to the dispute, d) There are differences of opinion among law enforcement officials about the concept of restorative justice through penal mediation


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document